Talk:LED art

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LED art article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Reorganizing LED-related pages

There are 23 different LED-related pages, and I think there should be less than half that many. I've started a discussion on this at Talk:Light-emitting_diode#An_absurd_number_of_articles_involving_light-emitting_diodes; please come and join in. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-inserted the piece of metal with LED's that was taken out without comment here in the talk page. I consider this as an example of LED art. Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.134.139.72 (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Artist list

I believe the artist list should be replaced somehow (I do not yet know by what). The current form seems to open the door for artists to add themselves. The artists descriptions are not written in neutral language (eg. "mind bending", "plays on our memories"). However, my knowledge of wikipedia internals is too limited to set this right. 77.177.192.73 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, are we missing something?

There's this led artist on youtube who does strobe art in which the drawings appear to move or spin round, that could be considered another example. I'm also new here does anyone know how to link youtube references on an article, you know to back up those statements? --FlashingDazzalion (talk) 15:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that Youtube is not considered to be a reliable source Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not even if it has visual evidence? --FlashingDazzalion (talk) 16:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He's got a point if its a visual demonstration of art rather than just facts on politics its arguably reliable right? --193.61.240.43 (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I second that --151.227.11.3 (talk) 23:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I third that --2A02:C7F:906B:200:214E:9689:EF9F:E36C (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are over 4 years late, and we still need WP:reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The person who said "I second that", was 3 years late and you didn't complain then. How am I any different? --2A02:C7F:906B:200:214E:9689:EF9F:E36C (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm 7 years late, whaddduuup — Preceding unsigned comment added by AreYouARightPerson (talk • contribs) 08:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LED art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental Impact

I think there should be a discussion on the environmental impact blinkies have. They are basically single-use devices that will probably end up as toxic waste in our environment. So users should be at least aware of this when buying/using them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.254.26.95 (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]