Talk:Julia Neuberger
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Confused views on euthenasia?
[edit]In an Independent article from 2005 about her book 'The Moral State We're In' (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/rabbi-julia-neuberger-highly-unorthodox-6150953.html), Rabbi Neuberger states she is in favour of voluntary euthenasia, yet in 2011, at the annual Tyburn lecture, she is quoted as saying "“Just so everyone knows, let’s be very clear, I am not in favour of euthanasia, I am not in favour of physician-assisted suicide. I don’t think it is a good idea for our health professionals to kill their patients any more than they do accidentally, I just don’t think it is a good idea." (http://www.lifenews.com/2013/01/16/julia-neuberger-heading-liverpool-care-pathway-inquiry-is-worrying/). In 2005 she voted against an anti-euthanasia amendment to the pro-euthanasia Mental Capacity Bill (now law). The amendment would have removed the ability of attorneys to deny life-sustaining treatment to mentally-incapacitated patients. As the chief criticisms of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) relate to it being euthanasia by omission (AKA euthanasia by neglect– the withdrawal of life-sustaining care,i.e. food and/or fluids,and/or reasonable medical treatment), some feel her vote against the MCA amendment should disqualify her from the chairmanship of any inquiry into the LCP. Do you know if she has debated this subject since 2005 - she seems rather confused?79.67.253.58 (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)twl79.67.253.58 (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Charity involvement
[edit]The first paragraph of the section Charity involvement has nothing to do with charity but constitutes about half of the section. 109.154.58.234 (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Julia Neuberger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701194808/http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page12225.asp to http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page12225.asp
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/third_sector/assets/neuberger.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903111333/http://www.blythe.org/nytransfer-subs/97ire/The_IE_Professional__120b_9-23-97 to http://www.blythe.org/nytransfer-subs/97ire/The_IE_Professional__120b_9-23-97
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Julia Neuberger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928024717/http://www.wls.org.uk/content/view/117/150/ to http://www.wls.org.uk/content/view/117/150/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003122810/http://www.wbs.ac.uk/faculty/members/anthony/neuberger to http://www.wbs.ac.uk/faculty/members/anthony/neuberger
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Nationality Is 'English' OK as a nationality? Or is 'nationality' different from 'citizenship'?
Nationality
[edit]Is 'English' OK as a nationality? Or is 'nationality' different from 'citizenship'?Snugglepuss (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (peerage) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (peerage) articles
- Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Low-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Jewish Women articles
- Low-importance Jewish Women articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- C-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles