Talk:Johnny Borrell
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Height
[edit]- is this bellend really 5"5?
- Heh. Um, well hes not very big, i would believe that. But im not sure its particularly relevant for a music biog anyway, so i wouldnt worry about it.. Jdcooper 17:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
you will neva know but i do
- apparently he's 5"8, he looks quite tall anyway. celebheights.com then search johnny borrell.
"Borrell also said that he believed Razorlight were better than the Arctic Monkeys. Which is true because Razorlight are a fucking sick band, and the artic monkeys are over-rated!"
someone's funny. personally if you ask my opinion they are both overrated! people only like them because corporate media whores like NME and Radio 1 say it's cool to listen to them. Simple chord progressions, with a singer lazily drooling out lyrics about how boring everyday life is. Where's the musical value in that?!
- Precisely. Stuff like Muse trounces either of them --MartinUK 00:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
The Dear Eskiimo
[edit]The Dear Eskiimo section was deleted. Why? WHY?????87.36.25.39 (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Copyrighted text
[edit]I'm sure bits are lifted from a newspaper, such as "the UP ALL NIGHT STAR, 25," etc.
213.254.90.177 11:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Personal attack
[edit]Why is someone called JD Copper a Borrell fan?
- I am not a Borrell fan. I hate him. But he has the human right to a proper wikipedia page. And its Jd Cooper. Jdcooper 05:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
You keep removing stuff that is actually true though! Besides which, HUMAN RIGHTS are not the right to a wiki page - human rights are the right to life and stuff. Can't you be doing some charity work in the time it takes to alter this page?
- If its true then please provide a link to somewhere, preferably on the internet, where other people can find out for themselves that its true. That's called Verifiability, and is a basic principle of wikipedia. We are quite happy to let any information stay on the page that is backed up by a source. The human rights comment was a (bad) joke. And plus, since wikipedia is a charity, i am technically already doing charity work by maintaining this page. Please provide sources next time you add information about Borrell, then we will have no quarrel. Jdcooper 18:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Why are you deleting factual additions about Borrell that are verified with links and references?
- Like what? Jdcooper 03:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Like the bit about your mamma having no boobs and a penis.
- If you can find a source for that, by all means add it to my user page. Jdcooper 18:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
picture
[edit]and can someone include a decent pic of him, i would but i dont know how (ive tried to master it alas to no avail)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johnny Borrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223122230/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0466235/ to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0466235/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johnny Borrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080109112316/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/10/134301.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/10/134301.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)