Talk:Hot Air

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contesting speedy

Not sure why I'm bothering about this, since I've never heard of the woman or the website, but...

...the Hot Air article was previously deleted, but given that there was a section within Michelle Malkin discussing the subject, I thought the most beneficial thing for readers would be a redirect (I can never figure out this obsession some editors at AfD have, to delete instead of redirecting when relevant content exists elsewhere on WP). The original version of this page was just that, and I'd support reverting to that.

The text which breaks the redirect serves no encyclopedic purpose and would otherwise merit an A5 speedy. Also, if the section at MM's page is ever removed so there's no anchor point for this page to target, then I think deletion would be appropriate. Regards, --DeLarge (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now have Hot Air (news site)

We now have an article about HotAir.com, at Hot Air (news site). I've changed this redirect to point there. (Should we consider moving that article to "Hot Air", over this redirect?) Cheers, CWC 10:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hot Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070923004552/http://truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php to http://truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sourced/quoted article strangely changed

This ref seems to be bogus:

^[1]

It doesn't say any more what it apparently once said. Wefa (talk) 18:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Carrie Budoff (June 13, 2007). "GOP issues rules to avoid Macaca moments". The Politico. five of the best-read national conservative bloggers [...]: Instapundit, Michelle Malkin, Captain's Quarters, Power Line and Hugh Hewitt. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

[1] Carrie Budoff (June 13, 2007). "GOP issues rules to avoid Macaca moments". The Politico. five of the best-read national conservative bloggers [...]: Instapundit, Michelle Malkin, Captain's Quarters, Power Line and Hugh Hewitt. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

[1]