This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
We need to make up our minds with regard to the boat's fate. While it is obvious that the boat "sank", to say that "she was sunk" implies that an outside agent, namely Allied ships and/or aircraft, were responsible for her loss, when, in fact, no Allied attack can be linked to her disappearance. The info box and introduction both clearly state that she was lost under unknown circumstances, but the paragraph on her last patrol states the above, that "she was sunk" with a source attribution to the (unfortunately) ubiquitous uboat.net site. It would be nice if all of these U-boat-related articles had real, reliable sources instead of uboat.net, but I fear that people connected to that site have made it their business to make sure that any and all U-boat pages lead one way or another to them, if for no other reason than to claim an authority over the subject that they really don't deserve.--172.190.125.225 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
