Talk:Follicle-stimulating hormone

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Follicle-stimulating hormone article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

High FSH was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 31 August 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Follicle-stimulating hormone. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Medicine: Reproductive Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as High-importance).

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Follicle-stimulating hormone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 June 2020 and 21 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wrroth97, RShah33, Nnobahar, J.Orta UCSF.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

info on FSH receptor

How about we get a little info about the FSH receptor, the molecular biology behind it, etc? This page is seriously lacking at this point in time. Ill be back (In an Arnold like manner) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.190.42 (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content merged from another article

- Richard Cavell (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Follicle-stimulating hormone/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Please excuse the intrusion of an amateur.

This article contains the statement, "FSH regulates the development, growth, pubertol maturation, and reproductive processes of the human body."

This would seem to imply the FSH is a distinguishing feature of humans, and that therefore, other Hominidae must be using other hormones to achieve analogous tasks. Would someone care to verify or clarify?

Thank you. ImagawaMark (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Measurement

The measurement section describes taking the measurements during the menstrual cycle. Obviously, this only applies to people who menstruate. Does anyone have a source they can use to add information on measuring it in everyone else? 68.142.180.84 (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Edits for FSH Article

Foundations II 2020 Group 9 proposed edits

As a group, we are planning to complete the following edits within the next two weeks: 1. Reword the Structures section emphasizing less technical language, as well as change lay-out to that similar to the Luteinizing Hormone Wikipedia article emphasizing reader clarity. 2. Add current sources to the Disease States section. 3. Add current sources to the Use as Therapy section. 4. Add normal levels to the Measurements section. 5. Reformat the final four sections together for simplicity. 6. Expand the final section to include other future roles in therapy (if any). 7. Add to the "effects in males" subheading. Wrroth97 (talk) 21:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These edits were not completed due to the reduction in articles assigned to be completed. As a group, we chose not to focus on Follicle-stimulating hormone. Wrroth97 (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XY/XX individual change

I notice recent edits by 151.42.39.179 on Jul 26, 2021 replaced the words male and female with XY/XX individual. I'm frankly ignorant of the scientific or wikipedia-policy basis for this change. But it seems to me like this article about a hormone uses a medical definition of gender that is not necessarily based in the XX/XY distinction. I don't honestly know if "XX individual" even has a clear meaning in a medical / scientific context. Anyways I think the change is mostly bad (though not all bad, noting the organ involved seems like an improvement!) but I'm not going to impose my belief on the article because of my afore-mentioned ignorance. Hopefully this will draw the attention of someone who knows more about medicine and/or wikipedia... cheers! 69.151.178.164 (talk) 01:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "male", "female", "XX", and "XY" are all wrong, see, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonadal_dysgenesis. "A person who has some ovarial tissue (not necessary an ovar)" and "a person who has some testicular tissue (not necessarily an testicle)" would be better, but on the other hand readability would be reduced. Anybody any idea how to fix that? 2A01:C23:71C2:2400:849C:37D9:F813:86AD (talk) 11:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Males and females in italics?

Why are "males" and "females" in italics in the Activity and functions section, but not the rest of the article? Is that a convention used in other Wikipedia articles? Generally speaking, when should those words be in italics? Pmokeefe (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]