Talk:FWD.us

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pedrogaytan12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keystone XL pipeline

Nothing on the controversy over the group's support of the Keystone XL pipeline? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.136.32 (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned in the "Political lobbying and ads" section and also in the "Viability of the approach" section. The Keystone XL Pipeline isn't mentioned by name, but the general thrust is there. You could add a reference to it; I didn't want to include too much specific detailed information since the particular controversy changes from day to day. Vipul (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to add this as its own subject under reception, as it was a major controversy that caused two big name -- Elon Musk and David Sacks -- to leave the group. Fortibus (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?

What is the correct way to pronounce the name of this organization? Is it "forward dot U.S.", "forward us", "F.W.D. dot U.S." or something else? --JHP (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Political Leaning

It seems this section is an individual's political analysis of the group's actions. All information in this section is also covered under the "Criticisms" section, so it is a bit redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.42.157.91 (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FWD.us. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130416045611/http://www.fwd.us/our_supporters to http://fwd.us/our_supporters

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated information

This article doesn't have any information from after 2014. Their website doesn't seem to have much of the stuff that made them controversial back in 2013 and 2014, so I assume they've moved closer to the views of other pro-immigration organizations. In particular, the article is missing information on their response to Trump's immigration policies. Qzekrom (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serious WP:SOAPBOX concerns with the lede

In its current form, the lede is full of weasel words and uses the organization's own defintions to define its policy goals. "Immigration reform" is incredibly vague (do they want more immigration? less? A path to citizenship? E-Verify? That could mean anything). "The facilitation of scientific breakthroughs with broad public benefits" is blatant WP:SOAP, and so weasel-y I'm not even sure what it means in any concrete terms. This is an organization that supports higher levels of visas and amnesty for undocumented immigrants, which has a liberal bias, according to RS. The lede ought to reflect that. ModerateMike729 (talk) 17:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Struck comment from confirmed sockpuppet ModerateMikayla555/ModerateMike729. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darryl.jensen/Archive § 07 July 2019. — Newslinger talk 13:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosing conflict of interest

Disclosing that I am affiliated with FWD.us; I currently serve as the Manager of Planning and Development. Due to the fact that this article is tagged to be updated to reflect newly available information and that it has been over five years since it has been substantively reviewed and updated by the community, I am here to provide some neutral, reliable, and verifiable sources in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines for input, feedback, and discussion with the community and its active editors. Emilylevett (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]