Talk:Expungement in Texas

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Expungement in Texas article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Convictions involving family violence

I spoke with a lawyer acquaintance of mine who practices criminal law in Allen, Texas. Apparently, convictions that include findings of family violence cannot be expunged. This law was passed a few years ago.

I'm not an expert on the topic and, regrettably, I've been unable to find an online source for this. I'm hoping an expert can jump in and add this content.

71.170.183.170 (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bush "controversies" section

I've removed this section because (a) the referenced article has been deleted, and (b) because of the misleading way it used the reference. The newspaper article in question in fact talked about the controversy surrounding Hatfield's book, not one about then-candidate Bush. Mangoe (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like an unsourced conspiracy theory. Afronig (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be a stand-alone article

Is there a reason this article shouldn't be merged into Expungement in the United States? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arllaw (talk • contribs) 15:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Expungement in Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]