Talk:Eversince

Eversince has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 7, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Skyshiftertalk 21:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eversince/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 00:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this soon. Skyshiftertalk 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this one! Locust member (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image has a valid fair use rationale.
No copyvio.

Lead

It was released by Year0001 on 25 May 2016. → released on 25 May 2016 through Year0001.
- Y
It was produced → The album was produced
- Y
The album received → Eversince received
- Y

Background and composition

They ended up meeting → They later met (as you just used "ended up")
- Y
made a name for himself can be made more formal i.e. "established a reputation for himself"
- Y
When Eversince was released, publications simply described him as a "Yung Lean collaborator". The word "simply" is editorializing. Additionally, I don't think this sentence is particularly important to include unless sources specifically note that "when Eversince was released, publications simply described Bladee as a Yung Lean collaborator".
- Y just removed it altogether, sorry for the unintentional WP:OR on my part, I just noticed pretty much every article on the album said "Yung Lean collaborator Bladee..." lol

Release and reception

by Year0001 on 25 May 2016 → on 25 May 2016 through Year0001
- Y
"briljant debut [brilliant debut]" either paraphrase or add the original quote to a footnote, same for the next one. Also note that there are some quotes from Eklund at the previous section
- Y added a footnote to all translated quotes; somehow missed the ones in the previous section

Release history

I don't think "Various" is correct for the physical releases. It's usually not the case, and it's not what I see here
- Y changed to source

Spotchecks

1 checks out. You could add the "frostbitten futurism" thing and the info on "Rip" from ref. 1 to the composition paragraph
- Y added.
2: It doesn't confirm After releasing his debut mixtape Gluee in 2014. Add in bold: Stockholm's flourishing cloud rap scene
- Y done... source says Gluee is his debut mixtape, but I added another one in to confirm its release year. Also I do not believe I would need to wikilink Stockholm per MOS:OVERLINKING but let me know if I am wrong.
3 checks out
4 checks out

On hold Skyshiftertalk 19:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.