Talk:Disgraced
![]() | Disgraced has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 7, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Disgraced is a Pulitzer Prize-winning play that depicts the challenges for upwardly mobile Muslim Americans in the post-9/11 America? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CSD
[edit]According to the logs, this article was deleted on 01:40, 23 June 2011 by Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs) as a WP:CSD#A7 (Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Disgraced/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Quadell (talk · contribs) 23:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Nominator: TonyTheTiger
Hello again. This looks like a fascinating play, and the article is a strong GA nominee. Most of the GA criteria pass right away, but I have found a few issues.
Resolved issues
|
---|
|
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- All issues have been resolved, and I'm happy to promote this article. – Quadell (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Outside opinions
[edit]I always welcome outside opinions, though I will pass or fail this article based on my own assessment of whether the article fulfills our GA criteria. – Quadell (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- FYI, Ssilvers always has a lot of commentary on the plays and musicals. I suspect he may have more comments than you. He always is of the opinion that there is a lot more work to meet his standards. Expect a 2nd opinion regardless of what you think about this. He is also likely to help me respond to your concerns.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have been summoned! I don't care about this article, but it is not GA quality yet. Just looking at it for 2 seconds, I see that it does not have an adequte WP:LEAD section or plot summary, and little discussion of the original production: how was it designed and staged? How did the staging illuminate the themes? -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't care about Pulitzer Prize-winner? Given some of the small-time things that I have done that you have spent time with, I am a bit surprised. Well, I didn't want to sneak one past you since you always seem to want to comment. Feel free to go back to whatever you were doing.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have been summoned! I don't care about this article, but it is not GA quality yet. Just looking at it for 2 seconds, I see that it does not have an adequte WP:LEAD section or plot summary, and little discussion of the original production: how was it designed and staged? How did the staging illuminate the themes? -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've read the article. It is not well written and fails to engage the reader. Also noticeable lack of images from either production or the cast.Turnitinpro (talk) 02:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Lack of images is irrelevant to a WP:GAN. Not sure where engaging the reader falls in relation to WP:WIAGA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Images are the 6th criteria for WP:GACR. Failed to engage me because prose lacked something in its clarity and brevity.Turnitinpro (talk) 03:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Images have never been required for a WP:GAC. If you have them they have to follow WP:GACR, but they are not required.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Prose suggestions welcome.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Turnitinpro, Your edits [1] have now screwed up the template at the top twice. What are you doing?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- There's an HTML error in the template. WTF is "
"? It was deprecated in 2004, W3C fought over it and then it got back as "
" in 2009. I use a proprietary (non-free) browser purchased in 2007 which can't abide sloppy coding.Turnitinpro (talk) 12:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- There's an HTML error in the template. WTF is "
- Images are the 6th criteria for WP:GACR. Failed to engage me because prose lacked something in its clarity and brevity.Turnitinpro (talk) 03:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Lack of images is irrelevant to a WP:GAN. Not sure where engaging the reader falls in relation to WP:WIAGA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Disgraced. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130506170638/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/176577-Lucille-Lortel-Nominees-Include-The-Flick-Murder-Ballad-Jake-Gyllenhaal-Vanessa-Redgrave to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/176577-Lucille-Lortel-Nominees-Include-The-Flick-Murder-Ballad-Jake-Gyllenhaal-Vanessa-Redgrave
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/177151-Pippin - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605004632/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/178152-Detroit-Grimly-Handsome-Eisa-Davis-John-Rando-Shuler-Hensley-and-More-Are-Obie-Winners to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/178152-Detroit-Grimly-Handsome-Eisa-Davis-John-Rando-Shuler-Hensley-and-More-Are-Obie-Winners
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Disgraced. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605004619/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/178187-Natasha-Vanya-and-Sonia-Closer-Than-Ever-The-Piano-Lesson-and-More-Win-Off-Broadway-Alliance-Awards to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/178187-Natasha-Vanya-and-Sonia-Closer-Than-Ever-The-Piano-Lesson-and-More-Win-Off-Broadway-Alliance-Awards
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150430194929/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/69th-annual-tony-awards-nominations-announced-fun-home-and-american-in-paris-lead-347781 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/69th-annual-tony-awards-nominations-announced-fun-home-and-american-in-paris-lead-347781
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150729171641/http://playbill.com/news/article/drama-desk-nominations-announced-hamilton-tops-the-list-347557 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/drama-desk-nominations-announced-hamilton-tops-the-list-347557
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Disgraced. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213064723/http://playbill.com/events/event_detail/disgraced-at-lyceum-theatre-321154 to http://www.playbill.com/events/event_detail/disgraced-at-lyceum-theatre-321154
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921061025/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/177727-Off-Broadway-Alliance-Awards-Nominees-Announced-Christopher-Durang-Sigourney-Weaver-Also-Honored to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/177727-Off-Broadway-Alliance-Awards-Nominees-Announced-Christopher-Durang-Sigourney-Weaver-Also-Honored
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150609202614/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/fun-home-curious-incident-kelli-ohara-helen-mirren-michael-cerveris-alex-sharp-top-69th-annual-tony-awards-350681 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/fun-home-curious-incident-kelli-ohara-helen-mirren-michael-cerveris-alex-sharp-top-69th-annual-tony-awards-350681
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213064723/http://playbill.com/events/event_detail/disgraced-at-lyceum-theatre-321154 to http://www.playbill.com/events/event_detail/disgraced-at-lyceum-theatre-321154
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Pakistan articles
- Low-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- GA-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- GA-Class Theatre articles
- Mid-importance Theatre articles
- WikiProject Theatre articles