Talk:Dictionary (software)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Untitled

Will someone who actually understands Wikipedia layouts PLEASE fix this page's layout?The Fish 18:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate

From the article: "The application itself uses a new GUI theme, a variation on Aqua which is present in System Preferences. The application also behaves in a different manner than expected to other Macintosh applications, where the application is quit when its sole window is closed, rather than remaining resident when all windows are closed." Actually, if memory serves, that theme is called "Unified." Also, many one-window apps, such as System Preferences and Calculator, also quit when their window is closed. That may even be recommended by the HIG. Anyone else? 70.16.57.154 03:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dictionarycocoa.png

Image:Dictionarycocoa.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dictionarymenu.png

Image:Dictionarymenu.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dictionarywidget.png

Image:Dictionarywidget.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Digital Webster.jpg

Image:OPENSTEP Digital Webster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errata?

There's a section in the article entitled "Errata"; it includes these points:

-- The lexicon of the English language spell checking services (which are also universally accessible in Cocoa applications) are not the same as the Dictionary's lexicon. Thus, the New Oxford American Dictionary 2nd Edition is not the basis for spell checking in Mac OS X "Tiger". -- Double clicking on any word searches for that word in the dictionary again; you can click on almost any word except the pronunciations in phonetic characters and numerals. -- Apple catches any queries to the dict:/// protocol, say from a web browser, and routes them back to the Dictionary application. -- The thesaurus entry for "democracy" has, as its usage sentence, "a democracy in Iraq is quite unlikely for now or any time soon." Some have claimed this was a political comment added by an Apple programmer; however, Oxford University Press has confirmed that this statement originates from their corpora, not Apple, and was not meant to have a political interpretation[2].

This appears to be a list of features and debatable points. Why is it headed "Errata"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.73.247.15 (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Right Word

There's a section on some entries of the app called "The Right Word." Anyone think this is notable enough for the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20Hz (talk • contribs) 02:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dictionary (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120413183326/http://osxdaily.com:80/2009/08/05/get-immediate-dictionary-definitions-using-spotlight/ to http://osxdaily.com/2009/08/05/get-immediate-dictionary-definitions-using-spotlight/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original dictionary in Apple Dictionary?

I was almost certain that the original dictionary in Apple Dictionary was Random House, or, at least NOT the New Oxford American. But, I have not been able to find this information, and what I found online so far only says that NOA was the first. I could have sworn I saw something else years and years ago. And I don't even remember seeing the NOA listed at that time. Anyone else have a similar memory? Misty MH (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A quite belated reply: I was an early adopter of Mac OS X Tiger, and can verify it was New Oxford American from the start—in fact, after the Jobs keynote, the partnership with Oxford University Press was mentioned in the press packet (the second edition of NOA was brand-new in 2005).

However, I believe it was called “Oxford American Dictionaries” in the settings, which may account for the confusion; the NOA branding came somewhat later. TreyHarris (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usage on iOS & iPadOS

The same set of dictionaries in the list of pre-installed dictionaries section of the article are available on iPhones and iPads. Also, the “Look Up” action described in the Functionality section is available on iOS/iPadOS, returning the same information.

However, because there is no Dictionary “app” per se, one cannot access title page, introductory text and tables, appendix material, etc., and the popups have no links. See the first thumbnail:

This is the identical definition to that in the 「スーパー大辞林」 (Super Daijirin) dictionary used in the macOS app. In fact, when you choose the “Look Up” action, you’re presented with a snippet including the reference name “スーパー大辞林”, as can be seen in the second thumbnail image.

Some spot checks on other languages showed this to be the case as well—the same dictionaries used in the Dictionary app are available in i(Pad)OS Settings.

It seems like this information should be included in the article. Googling, I could find no name for this particular usage separate from “Dictionary”, so there’s no obvious other article (or new umbrella-term article) to put it. But where?

I’m inclined to add “iOS, iPadOS” to the “Operating Systems” in the top infobox, then describe the situation—mainly in Functionality, with some mention added to the article’s introduction. Does anyone feel strongly about this?

(p.s. — Another issue I’m not sure is resolvable is finding secondary sources about this. Perhaps someone else can find some?) TreyHarris (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Btw, to be clear: I am not proposing screenshots like the ones above be added to the article.) TreyHarris (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]