Jump to content

Talk:Diane Leather

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.britishathletics.org.uk/e-inspire/hall-of-fame-athletes/diane-leather/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. SFB 18:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 02:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • ... that Diane Leather was the first woman to run a mile in under five minutes?
5x expanded by Oldelpaso (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Oldelpaso (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Can we do better than this? If any woman has run the mile in under 5 minutes, someone had to be the first, and the hook doesn't provide any more information. (t · c) buidhe 23:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying a world record isn't notable and/or hook worthy? Or are you asking for more context such as a link to Mile run world record progression? I was trying to keep the hook as succinct as possible. Oldelpaso (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another issue is that the hook proposed is a "first" hook, which per WP:DYKHOOK usually needs exceptionally strong sourcing given the exceptional claim involved (how are we sure that no other woman before Leather ran a mile in under five minutes?) Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article includes cites describing her in those terms from the World Athletics website (the organisation that ratifies world records in the discipline, formerly known as the IAAF)[1], the BBC [2], Guardian [3], NYT [4], Washington Post [5] and others. Oldelpaso (talk) 21:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could work in some reference to Roger Bannister in the hook, as his far more well-known first sub-four minute mile occurred the same month and thus they are frequently compared, but I'd rather not. It was how overlooked Leather's achievement was compared to the male equivalent that prompted me to expand the article in the first place! Oldelpaso (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A bit of a late comment, but ALT1 is probably a lot better because it's not a "first" hook and is thus more likely to be accurate. Plus it's also arguably more intriguing than a simple "first" hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Oldelpaso: Please address the above. For the record, I'd truncate ALT1 at "world record".--Launchballer 00:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are multiple sentences or paragraphs where the sourcing is unclear. Please see the {{citation needed}} tags added. Also, it appears that this article has not yet had a full review. Does any other user commenting here intend to? Flibirigit (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that the nominator has not edited since October 22. This nomination might need adoption if it will succeed. Flibirigit (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, with six days elapsed since my "Please address the above" comment, I would have threatened to say "I will close this in 24 hours if there is no progress on this".--Launchballer 12:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I posted a message at WT:DYK. Let's see if anyone adopts this. I don't have the time to commit to it myself. Flibirigit (talk) 01:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found one missing reference, but having trouble with the others. But lets please put to bed this silly idea that we need better sourcing for being the first woman to run a 5 minute mile. It only took a few minutes of searching to find dozens of high quality sources for this fact. There is no reasonable doubt that it's true. And that's from somebody who complains about "first" hooks more than almost anybody. RoySmith (talk) 14:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me, however I'm slightly uneasy about ALT0 per WP:FIRSTWOMAN and I'd truncate ALT1 at "world record".--Launchballer 15:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Just to make this more official, here's a formal review:

  • Article is long enough.
  • Article was 5x expanded between 2024-10-08 (3066 prose) and 2024-10-15 (15411 prose)
  • This has appeared on OTD twice, most recently on May 29, 2023. I'n not a fan of rerunning material, but this does technically meet the requirement of WP:DYKNEW.
  • Earwig reports no copyright or close paraphrasing issues.
  • There are 5 "citation needed" tags which need to be resolved before this can be promoted.
  • ALT0 is verified and interesting and thus approved, pending the resolution of the missing citations.
  • I reject the WP:FIRSTWOMAN argument. That's valid for many things, but athletic records are always kept separately for men and women.
  • Oh yeah, QPQ exempt
  • RoySmith (talk) 15:37, 6 December 2024
I did a QPQ anyway when originally nominating - I have several DYKs but all more than 10 years ago, so they must pre-date this system. Oldelpaso (talk) 11:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the message I left on Oldelpaso's talk page, I sent them an email. Between that and the wikiproject request, I think we've done our due dilgence. So as not to be a total roadblock, how about we give it a week to see if any of those bear fruit, and if nothing happens by then, we can call it a day? RoySmith (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds fair, but just to make things clear, the nomination will time out anyway on the 14th, which is a day after one week from December 6. Regardless of what happens, marking the nom for closure on the 13th or 14th if issues remain unaddressed and no one adopts this/the nominator doesn't return seems fair. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the email. I'm only an occasional visitor, and had assumed this had been and gone. I'll look for cites. All things I remember reading, I just have to figure out where. The London Olympiades one in particular is one that can be found easily in less robust sources, but is implied without the neat explicit phrasing in the better ones I've tried so far. Is it me or has Google gone way downhill in the decade since I was a regular editor? Oldelpaso (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for coming back to work on this. I'm not usually a sports fan, but this one caught my eye as something interesting/significant that we should put some extra effort into promoting. RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination will time out on the 14th, so it seems reasonable that any remaining issues need to be addressed before this. @RoySmith: If Oldelpaso cannot address the concerns on time, will you be willing to address the concerns yourself and adopt the nomination? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oldelpaso has already fixed some of them. There's two left. Let's just let him do his thing. RoySmith (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "the nomination will time out on the 14th" Narutolovehinata5? WP:DYKTIMEOUT clearly says "at the discretion of reviewers and promoters". Why would you time out a nomination which does not require much improvement and which the nominator has committed to work on. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was simply saying that the nom would be two months old on the 14th, I wasn't planning on marking it for closure especially now that it's being worked on. It was more of a reminder than a warning. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The tagged statements have cites now. If a cite is needed for the alt hook, the WaPo obituary provided as one of the examples of cites for the original hook covers it. Oldelpaso (talk) 11:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 approved, thank you. RoySmith (talk) 13:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diane_Leather&oldid=1263844881"