Talk:Creepy (magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Comics: United States C‑class Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Horror B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Capitals?

I think CREEPY is always capitalised. Anyone got an opinion on that?

As far as I can determine, it seems the title CREEPY, like MAD was always in upper case. If that's the case, then both presumably both the name in the article and the name of the article should be the same. Do you agree, or am I wrong?--Alicejenny 07:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings to a fellow parent of 2 kids!

That's a good question. I've only been capitalizing Mad since that's the way it seems to have been established on Wikipedia for some time now and it didn't seem worth fighting, even I've never seen in that way anywhere else.

As for Creepy, I've only seen it upper- and lowercase in all references sources, including the definitive Warren Publishing history at http://enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines.htm , in the big 2003 Warren feature story in The Comics Journal (http://www.tcj.com/253/n_warren.html), one of the leading comics magazines, and elsewhere. Since the logos themselves change -- it was "The Fantastic Four" upper and lower until it became "THE FANTASTIC FOUR" for a while in the '70s, for example -- I tend to go with the style of the majority of reference sources unless, say, the publisher were quoted as saying it were an acronym or something like that. The analogy to this might be the producer of the TV show "thirtysomething" or the poet "e.e. cummings," who both made a specific point that their title/name should be lowercased, and that's how most reference sources list them.

Was this a help? Let me know! Thanks! -- Tenebrae 07:29, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sound fair enough to me. I agree better to stick with the lower case. --Alicejenny 07:36, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History??

"Russ Jones, the founding editor of Creepy in 1964, detailed the magazine's origins and his lengthy negotiations with Warren in the memoir "Creepy & Eerie" at his website."

Wikipedia articles would all be pretty short if all you had to do was link to somewhere else to provide information.DailyRich 18:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major Overhaul

I've done a major overhaul of this article to include a lot more information on Creepy's history and contributors. Much of this information is based on my own personal experience and the book "The Warren Companion". Just a start, I hope to fix this up even further and do the same with Eerie and Vampirella. Quiddity99 04:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Quiddity99[reply]

Dark Horse / New Comic Company

At the San Diego Comic Con this year, Dark Horse was distributing a "Creepy Special #1" from "New Comic Company" and copyright 2007. Is Creepy coming back? Brian 13:34 01 October 2007 (BFG)Brian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.52.115 (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. They are starting out with online comics via Myspace Dark Horse Presents (MDHP). Once enough stories have been created they will take these web comics and print them into issue #1. I found this information here: Creepy is back with all new reasons to be afraid of the dark... 7/24/08

It looks like they have published online a precursor story on MHDP in 10/2008 & I know this months MDHP has a Creepy Story going by the name "Om Nom Nom". Switchbladesista (talk) 00:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Creepy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Creepy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/5qUyTl9z0?url=http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines%20Interviews.htm with https://web.archive.org/web/20120313073508/http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines%20Interviews.htm on http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines%20Interviews.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Creepy (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]