Talk:Country Fire Authority

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Country Fire Authority article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Australia: Victoria Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Country Fire Authority is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photographs

Can we get a better photograph of firemen in action? The one provided looks pretty tame, apparently some nuisance or hoax fire, judging by the relaxed attitudes of the onlookers. --Surgeonsmate 04:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, when you go out and get a photo yourself or find one thats not a copyright infringement.--Whywhywhy 10:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I've added a photo of my local vols in action at a school fire. Still not the most dramatic photo ever, will keep my eyes, ears, and scanner open for a better photo opportunity. --Richmeister 08:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Hey guys. I plan to help on this page. I've been a CFA vol for 4.5 years and would like to see this page have a little more about what makes CFA unique, that is Management structure, special capabilities, training etc. I can browse through some CFA shots and put uup some of structure, wildfire and trucks if you like, all free of copyright. Good start boys! PS i'm fairly new and will have to work out how to post pictures... --spgoo1

wow this really needs a good working over, for an example of what can be made, check out Country Fire Service, and there is a few joining pages.manny 07:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm on it :) GSPT1 (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Still going through cleanup and breaking up into sections. --Mikecraig 03:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CFAemblem.gif

Image:CFAemblem.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --Richmeister_talk 11:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have added to the image info --Mikecraig 23:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cfa logo.png

Image:Cfa logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CFA vs DSE

Can anyone confirm that, as mentioned on 2009 Victorian bushfires, that the Country Fire Authority is responsible for fires on private property, and the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) is primarily responsible for fires on public land? If DSE has its own fire fighters and equipment I would like mention of that here, and add DSE to the Australian Fire Services template. -- Barrylb (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the DSE web site for confirmation of this^[1] It says "DSE is responsible for the public land which comprises approximately one third of Victoria (much of it forested, remote and with limited accessibility) while the CFA is responsible for providing fire services to the remainder of rural Victoria and parts of metropolitan Melbourne". Totoblue (talk) 09:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Victorian Fire Services" (In case that link is a session based link, see "DSE home" > Fire and Other Emergencies > Other Fire Organisations > Victorian Fire Services)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Country Fire Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Victorian Fire Services" (In case that link is a session based link, see "DSE home" > Fire and Other Emergencies > Other Fire Organisations > Victorian Fire Services)

[1]