Talk:Cohen Milstein

Removing Anita Hill

Anita Hill has left the firm. She is no longer listed among the professionals on Cohen Milstein's website: https://www.cohenmilstein.com/our-people/H. Could someone please remove the sentence referencing her in the first paragraph? 38.142.23.130 (talk) 13:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I changed Anita Hill to the past tense for now. Someone else can decide if she should be completely removed from the article.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for following WP:COI procedure, by the way.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Number of offices

I'm an employee of Cohen Milstein. I just wanted to point out that the firm now has eight offices, not six: https://www.cohenmilstein.com/about-us/#locations

Could someone please update? 38.142.23.130 (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Correcting the Firm's Name

Hello editors! Cohen Milstein has hired me to update its Wikipedia page. I'd like to start with a simple request about the firm's name. What do you think? Many thanks. Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The first sentence says this:

Cohen Milstein is an American plaintiffs' law firm...

We’d like to use the firm’s full name, which you can verify in these articles from Reuters and in Cohen’s privacy policy. Thus:

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC is an American plaintiffs' law firm…

Alternatively, we might use both the full and short name, as the pages for Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom do:

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (often simply known as Cohen Milstein) is an American plaintiffs' law firm...

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (typically shortened to Cohen Milstein) is an American plaintiffs' law firm...

Done. Marquardtika (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Donald Trump and Anita Hill

Hello editors! Cohen Milstein has hired me to update its Wikipedia page. I'd like to submit two requests for your consideration. Thanks so much! Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Trump Lawsuits

The lead section says this:

The firm filed a number of lawsuits against Donald Trump during and after his presidency, including a lawsuit which successfully blocked the Trump administration's attempt to roll back the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

This is incorrect: As the footnotes in the “Lawsuits against Donald Trump” section make clear, two lawsuits were filed against Trump; a third (DACA) was filed against the Trump administration. Thus, can we tweak the sentence as follows:

The firm has filed two lawsuits against Donald Trump during and after his presidency, as well a lawsuit which successfully blocked the Trump administration's attempt to roll back the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Anita Hill

The lead section says this:

Anita Hill was formerly of counsel at Cohen Milstein.

Calling out an individual in the lead section seems to give the individual undue weight (violating WP:WEIGHT) — especially when that individual is not named elsewhere. Similarly, the individual’s association with Cohen Milstein isn’t terribly newsworthy (violating WP:LEADREL). We therefore request that this sentence be removed from the lead.

At the same time, might it make sense to create a “notable alumni” section — similar to what’s done in the pages for other law firms such as King & Wood Mallesons and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom — and include Hill here? Here's sample language:

Notable alumni
The following people have worked at Cohen Milstein:

* Anita Hill
* Lina Khan
* Kalpana Kotagal
* Jenny R. Yang

I’m tagging @Skywatcher68, since they were part of a conversation, from 2022, about removing Hill.

Opioids and Flint

Hello editors! Cohen Milstein has hired me to request updates to its Wikipedia page. I'd like to submit two edits for your consideration. Thank you. Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Opioids

We’d like to add the following paragraph to the end of the section, “Lawsuits on behalf of state attorneys general”:

The firm has represented various states against entities involved in the opioid epidemic.

These states include Indiana, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Here are sources:

Indiana, as detailed in a 2018 article from Reuters ("Indiana gears up for opioid litigation by hiring Cohen Milstein"): “Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill said his office had signed a contract with the plaintiffs' law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll to represent the state in lawsuits against companies responsible for marketing and selling opioids.”

New Hampshire, as detailed in a 2017 article from Bloomberg (“Drugmakers in N.H. Opioid Probe Lose Bid to Oust Cohen Milstein”): “A New Hampshire assistant attorney general expressed relief about a recent court ruling that will allow his office to retain a prominent plaintiffs’ law firm to investigate whether five U.S. pharmaceutical giants fueled opioid addiction through deceptive marketing practices … New Hampshire retained Cohen Milstein because the state’s lawyers lacked the resources and expertise.”

Vermont, as detailed in a 2022 article from Vermont Public ("Vermont is getting more than $100 million from opioid lawsuits, with more on the way. What will it do with the windfall?"): “Some of the money that goes directly to the state will be used to cover legal fees the AG’s office incurred when it hired a third-party law firm, Washington D.C.’s Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll, to help with the opioid litigation.”

 Go ahead and add this to the article. Rusalkii (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rusalkii Thank you! Done. Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 22:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Flint Water Crisis

It’s odd that Wikipedia doesn’t mention the firm’s work in the Flint water crisis, which has resulted in more than $600 million. Surely readers will want to know about this. Accordingly, we propose creating a new section, “Flint water crisis.” I’ve drafted, and footnoted, language for your consideration:

Cohen Milstein served as interim co-lead counsel in In re Flint Water Cases, a class action arising from the Flint water crisis that resulted in a $626 million settlement. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of residents of and businesses in Flint, Michigan against defendants including the State of Michigan and former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder. Relatedly, the firm settled litigation against engineering companies Veolia North America and Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam for their alleged role in the water crisis.

I know these are a lot of footnotes (including what appear to be duplicate stories [they're not]; I wanted to make sure that every claim is footnoted.

Not done for now I can't access sources 2-4, and of the ones I can access only one mentions the firm in passing. Unless the sources I can't see mention the firm in more depth, I'm not sure this is due weight. Rusalkii (talk) 19:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rusalkii Many thanks for your close review. You’re right — these articles mention Cohen only in passing. Let me offer several thoughts for your consideration:

THOUGHT 1. In this case, might we consider media coverage holistically? For example, might the accumulation of references to the firm’s role — as seen in the news articles below — suffice to establish weight? Here are the key quotes:

Footnote 2 (https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americas-news-now/some-disappointed-with-626-million-flint-water-crisis-settlement) describes Ted Leopold as the “court-appointed interim co-lead counsel, and Partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.”

Footnote 3 (https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2021/11/15/meet-the-south-florida-litigator-who-co-led-the-626m-partial-settlement-in-the-flint-water-crisis/) refers to “Theodore J. Leopold, a partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll in Palm Beach Gardens [who] said that reaching this partial settlement as co-lead counsel for the victims required overcoming several obstacles.”

Footnote 4 (https://www.law360.com/healthcare-authority/articles/1588467) says, “The Flint water plaintiffs are represented by co-lead class counsel Theodore J. Leopold of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC and Michael L. Pitt of Pitt McGehee Palmer Bonanni & Rivers PC.”

Footnote 5 (https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2024/02/01/flint-residents-class-action-settlement/72435816007/) refers to “Co-Lead Counsel Ted Leopold, of the Flint Water Litigation Class and partner to Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.”

Footnote 6 (https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2024/02/01/flint-residents-class-action-settlement/72435816007/) refers to “Ted Leopold, one of the plaintiffs' court-appointed attorneys and co-lead trial counsel and partner at law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll.”

If it helps, I can provide additional sources (like NPR and ABC) which similarly name-check Cohen. Also, in re paywalls, https://archive.ph can be helpful.

THOUGHT 2. Other footnotes on the page cite the firm only in passing. For example, in the section, “Lawsuits against Donald Trump,” the first sentence — “The firm assisted District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine and Attorney General of Maryland Brian Frosh in filing a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of using his hotel in Washington D.C. to unconstitutionally profit from his political office” — is sourced to https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/03/subpoenas-trump-hotel-emoluments-1041324. This article says simply, “Lawyers from Cohen Milstein ... are assisting Racine and Frosh on the litigation.” That single, passing mention sufficed for the Trump case; can five, passing mentions suffice for Flint?

THOUGHT 3. I know this isn’t a news article, and I know awards don’t count for much, but for what it’s worth, the organization Public Justice named Cohen a finalist for Trial Lawyer of the Year in 2022 for Cohen’s work on Flint. Here’s the news release, and here’s the video.

THOUGHT 4. It's true: There has not been in-depth coverage of Cohen’s role in the Flint cases. Instead, the media has focused on the lawsuits and the results. That said, many articles do mention the firm as co-lead counsel, and it seems that Wikipedia readers will want to know that Cohen played a key role, as the lead lawyers, in two landmark cases that resulted in more than $600 million.

At your convenience, I’d welcome your feedback. Many thanks.

Signed,

BlueRoses13 (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Antitrust

Hello editors, It’s odd that Wikipedia doesn’t mention Cohen's antitrust work, which has resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements. Surely readers will want to know about this. Accordingly, what do you think about creating a new section, “Antitrust”? I’ve drafted, and footnoted, straightforward language for your consideration, and I've disclosed my COI here and my on user page. Thank you. Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 20:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Cohen Milstein has played a leading role in major antitrust cases involving price fixing and wage suppression.

The firm sued the National Association of Realtors for inflating real estate broker commissions. A settlement of $418 million was reached in 2024.

Cohen Milstein served as co-lead counsel in In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation, which resulted in an $835 million settlement with Dow Chemical for artificially inflating the price of polyurethane.

In case you have trouble accessing the footnotes, here are the key excerpts:

Footnote 1 (https://www.law.com/2024/03/18/national-association-of-realtors-reaches-418m-settlement-to-resolve-antitrust-class-actions/) quotes “plaintiffs’ attorney, Robert A. Braun of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.”

Footnote 2 (https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/realtors-settlement-change-buy-sell-homes-da45eb23) quotes “Benjamin Brown, co-chair of the antitrust practice at Cohen Milstein, one of the firms representing plaintiffs in the Chicago case.”

Footnote 3 (https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/almID/1202607833422/#ixzz2Z7dOLVE5) says, “The plaintiff class of direct purchasers, led by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll; Fine, Kaplan and Black; Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg Urias & Ward; and Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, also defeated Dow's bid to decertify the class.” (Similarly, https://casetext.com/case/in-re-urethane-antitrust-litigation-25 says, “The court is satisfied that the law firms of Fine, Kaplan and Black, R.P.C. and Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C. satisfy these criteria and will adequately represent the interests of the class as lead counsel.”)

References

 Not done for now: Do you have additional sources that show notability? Specifically, meta-coverage of the firm's work on antitrust cases? Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)