Talk:Clent

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No notable residents

Section: Notable Residents deleted. First 100 search results in Google provide no references. Only mention in http://www.j-archive.com/showplayer.php?player_id=322 : Sister of Claudia Perry, a 4-time champion from 1997. Kathryn appeared in the following archived game:

2676, aired 1996-04-01 Gary Fulcomer vs. Kathryn Perry vs. David Sampugnaro David Sampugnaro game 1.

Entry non notable.--Kudpung (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. I thought that was what needed doing, but did not investigate. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rumbow

In the old source used in the article (A History of the County of Worcester: volume 3 pp. 50-54) Rumbold (Rumbow) is listed as a hamlet in the Parish of Clent, while Walton Pool is not mentioned. Walton Pool has more than doubled in size in the last 100 years, and thanks to the motor car replacing horse and shankes' pony it is now further from Clent Church than it was then, because the distance by bridle path is shorter than by tarmacked road.

According to the online Post Office site www2.postoffice.co.uk/postcode-finder Shutmill Lane and Rumbow Lane are in Romsley for postal deliveries, (see two sample post codes B62 0LY and B62 0LX). That is not surprising as it has not been since the 1950s the the post man (on his bike), used to travel over Walton Hill from Walton Pool to deliver post in Rumbow.

Rumbow Lane, Walton Hill, Romsley, Halesowen, B62 0LX (one of several post codes)
Shut Mill Lane, Romsley, Halesowen, B62 0LY (one of several post codes)

However the postal addresses do not match the parish or county boarders as the hamlets close to the church parish in Clent are give a postal address of Clent, STOURBRIDGE, ... Stourbridge is the local sorting office and is in the West Midlands, (Clent is in Worcestershire and in Bromsgrove both at County Council level (Clent Hills, district ward Furlongs) and Parliamentary Constituency), but it is a reasonable indicator that Rumlbow on the other side of the Walton Hill is often not thought of as part of Clent village.

Rumbow is still part of the Parish of Clent as is Calcot on Shutmill lane, but St. Kenelms Church, Chapel Lane B62 0NG is in Romsley parish, Clent Hills county council (but a different district ward Uffdown)

Using the Ordinance Survey map (available at www.streetmap.co.uk ) The hamlets of Clent village are listed from east to west as Lower Clent, Adams Hill, Holy Cross, [Upper] Clent and Walton Pool. The distance from Lower Clent to Walton pool by road is about 2k and about 1.5k from Clent Church (Lower Clent is the furthest of those five hamlets from the parish church). The distance to Rumbow from Clent Church is about 3k by road and about 2k by a footpath over Walton Hill and about 1k from Romsley

-- PBS (talk) 03:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]