Jump to content

Talk:Bruce Cockburn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Experiences in Chiapas, Mexico

[edit]

"The situation was that I'd spent three days in a couple of different Guatemalan refugee camps in Chiapas, in southern Mexico. All the while we were in one of them we could hear one or more helicopters patrollling the border. The week before we were there and the week after we left, this helicopter strafed the camp--as if these people had not suffered enough with the incredible violence they were fleeing in the mountains of Guatemala." from http://www.counterpunch.org/ferner01272004.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbleem (talk • contribs) 01:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Cockburn and CCM

[edit]

I still have a problem with the implication that Gospel of Bondage was in reaction to his music being dropped by Christian music stores. The link provided seemed more to support what I remember of the background for that song, which was that Gospel of Bondage was a reaction to the U.S. religious right, not the CCM music industry. (They are not related.) I never heard Bruce indicate that the song was about being dropped from some Christian music stores, but on many occassions he stated that it was a reaction to the "Moral Majority" and other right-winged Christian movements. He is performing here next week, and I will try to remember to ask him about it.

Unless somebody can come up with a quote that mentions the CCM issue, I recommend that the section be removed, or modified to talk about the perceived contraditions with standard stereotypes. For example, his "I'm a Christian, but not one of those" comments, that he is a gun advocate, collects knives, and is not a pacifist, which doesn't fit the standard "Christian musician". (For example, a recent Christian review assumed that Bruce was a pacifist.[1]) wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 11:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I attended concerts in Toronto in the mid-1980s and recall Cockburn's introductory comments were focussed on the "Sanctuary Movement" (which is/was a left religious group that provided sanctuary to illegal aliens, mostly from Central America, in the USA), and the opposition to it from the religious right. I think I have a recorded radio broadcast of one of these concerts and will check it to see if there is something which can be quoted in that connection. It doesn't seem in character for Cockburn to write songs about the response of others to his music (à la Michael Jackson). -- Slowmover 14:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I spoke to Bruce last night after his concert in Philly, and he confirmed what we have been saying about the origin of "Gospel of Bondage". I have replaced the section with a new one "Difficult to Categorize", and plan to discuss the various aspects of his music that attract people. The hope is to describe how complex the body of his work is, along with the various reasons people become fans. Before I get too far along this path, I thought I would show you the first few points and get some feedback. Is this too much detail? Should we delete the entire section, now that the original "controversy" has been resolved? wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 12:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to review WP:NOR, as I am not sure your recent additions conform to the guidelines there, in particular the personal discussion with Cockburn and using Yahoo groups as a source. We really should stick to published sources as described in the referenced guideline. -- Slowmover 21:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the additions I have made has been based on personal experience, so I don't consider it "original research." (I am one of the original members of the group, and have been a member the entire time.) IMHO, OR would be if I were to draw conclusions or interpret what happened. If you look at the CockburnProject web site, much of that is also from e-mails from various people, often from the humans group.
A good example is the claim by someone that "Gospel of Bondage" was a reaction to CCM stores dropping his albums. I asked him after the Philly show, and he clearly stated that it had nothing to do with it. That (IMHO) isn't original research, since it came from Bruce himself. I have no documentation of the event (I didn't post it to humans since the question was raised on wikipedia), so the question is "can I be considered an authoritative source?" You can ask Bruce or Bernie (his manager), who will confirm all that I stated, but then we end up believing whoever talked to them.
I guess one option would be for me to speak with Bernie and ask him to read the article (Bruce won't read it, since he doesn't use computers much). Bernie could then state whether the article is accurate or not. I could also ask if he and/or Bruce would designate me as a trusted source, if that helps.
I must admit I'm not 100% sure about this position, which is why I had asked for feedback. I am open to comments and suggestions, and would agree to have the entire section deleted if necessary. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 03:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have no reason to doubt what you say, and I agree there's a difference between stating facts known to you and presenting personal opinion. But there is no way to verify what you say. What's to stop some vandal from dropping by tomorrow and making all the claims you just made, but saying something completely false and misleading? Because of that we have the guideline WP:V, which essentially means that personal unpublished knowledge doesn't belong on Wikipedia, unfortunately. -- Slowmover 15:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but what is the criteria for verification? If I include links to either the humans list or the Cockburn Project (which also quotes humans), does that make it verifiable? What if I create a Cockburn page on my web site and point there? Or if I e-mail Bruce's manager with the text and have him confirm the accuracy? I realize the desire (and benefit) to document all the sources, but there are a lot of things that don't appear in books, articles, etc. Actually, there are a lot of things that appear in print that are wrong, for that matter. For practically every review article posted to humans, somebody can find a mistake in the article. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 16:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't really add anything other than to point you back to WP:NOR and WP:V. -- Slowmover 16:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this section, since questions have been raised about verification. I moved it to my talk page User talk:Wrp103/Cockburn, and I will move in back in if/when I resolve those issues. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 17:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link to humans was removed by User:Betacommand, citing spam and a few other guidelines. However, the humans group is recognized by Bruce and his management, and the Cockburn Project that is still linked to gets much of its information from humans. The group has been thanked within liner notes, and many members have gotten special consideration at concerts, the management office, etc.

I realize that it may look like spam, but IMHO it is notable (as one of the oldest fan group, and at one point the only Internet representation of Bruce.) Unless somebody comes up with a strong argument against the link, I suggest that it stays. Thoughts? wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 16:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm for keeping the link for the same reasons. Strobilus 17:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm removing it because it's added incorrectly and it's against WP:ELNO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category Ex-atheists/agnostics

[edit]

User:Rambone has added the category ex-atheists/agnostics to this article and others. I reverted it and left a note on their talk page asking for a basis of that edit. They have since added it again. I don't recall Bruce ever mentioning he was agnostic or atheist. He did have a born-again type experience. I seem to recall him mentioning that he wasn't raised in a religious home, but I don't recall him being agnostic or atheist. Any thoughts? wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 18:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I never got a response, and nobody else has come up with any justification for the category, I have removed it. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BruceCockburn.jpg

[edit]

Image:BruceCockburn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Kit Carson"

[edit]

What is the exact problem with my addition of "Controversy" to the Wiki entry for Bruce Cockburn? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cazedessus (talk • contribs) 22:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problems are:
  1. You are not being neutral
  2. You are not referencing any reliable source let alone a verifable source
  3. That makes it biography of living persons issue
  4. Then you call him a liar, which also isn't the truth as it's simply a song lyric from a different point of view than your own.
All-in-all, you haven't bothered to read the suggestions or warnings on your talk page and since you're intentionally causing problems, you're not being a cooperative editor. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's also major WP:Conflict of interest issues as Caz is attempting to get airtime for his writings. Binksternet (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. First, if he was charged with a hate crime, as was stated, that would have to go through a court. A record of the charge should be added as a reference. The fact that "the Taos Chamber of Commerce has not yet commented on the controversy" means it's pretty lame if even they won't comment on it, and it has apparently gone no further. Statements must be made in a neutral fashion, and this one is misleading.
The editor then goes on to promote a tourist attraction. Does that location have any bearing on the subject? Why was it mentioned?
The song is not "so called", it is called "Kit Carson".
It was written and recorded 20 years ago, but I'm not sure that it's regularly performed as the editor claims.
The response is also not factual when it says that "every line of the song is a falsehood" since there are lines such as "Kit Carson was a hero to some" and if that's a falsehood, that means he's a hero to none, and we know that he is a hero to Cazedessus, so that in itself is a contradiction. I could go through the song one line at a time, but that would be a copyright violation, and that's not acceptable.
Finally, even the reference was added incorrectly. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be clear on Wikipedia policy, if any WP:RS can be found that indicate that the song is inaccurate, it's fair to add that. If a lawsuit has been filed for Mr. Cockburn to cease and desist performance of the song, that could be added. If his label has been ordered to remove that song from future pressings of the album, that is a valid comment to add. However a wild, rambling tirade against the artist, filled with bile and extreme language is not appropriate for Wikipedia. That's what blogs are for. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big Circumstance release date is 1988. I changed it back on the page once before as well. I saw him perform in Royal Oak, MI within a month of purchasing the record album in November of 1988. I also had a copy from True North Records with a date listed as 1988. Someone keeps changing the date back to 1989. The Budzone guy 23:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beadbud5000 (talk • contribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bruce Cockburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Cockburn discography

[edit]

Support split - Discography section takes up more than one third of the page and should be split to a new article entitled Bruce Cockburn discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruce Cockburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cockburn and Christianity

[edit]

"Many of his albums from the 1970s refer to Christianity". They do not. Show me one lyric that refers to Christianity. They cannot be found. However, they do 'refer Christian themes". There is persecution and Christ's second coming ("Wondering Where the Lions Are"), prayer ("All the Diamonds") and many other examples. How you word the rest of the sentence, which I restored to a correct form based on the first phrase. Perhaps http://cockburnproject.net/issues/personal/christianity.html can offer guidance. Or https://imagejournal.org/article/a-conversation-with-bruce-cockburn/ or many of the others. But unless you can find a source that states that his songs or albums "refer to Christianity", it's WP:OR and must be changed to something that is correct. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was simply undoing a basic grammatical mistake that was added to the text. I have no interest in an esoteric debate. PaulCHebert (talk) 04:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your recent correction. That was the correct approach. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Covers of Bruce's songs

[edit]

Does it have to be an album? Today I stumbled on a youtube of Fernanda Cunha (Brazilian, Jazz vocalist) covering Pacing the Cage -- and it wasn't listed here. The youtube is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAZAIycWTPU . Exquisite, even if not deserving of mention. Ansak (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)ansak[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bruce_Cockburn&oldid=1206732117"