Talk:Bright green environmentalism
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bright green environmentalism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days ![]() |
![]() | Neo-environmentalism was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 06 February 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bright green environmentalism. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Merge into ecomodernism
[edit]The title to this article is a neologism that never really caught on. A more common moniker for these ideas is "ecomodernism", and there could be others even more dominant. If I weren't already over stretched, I'd formally propose this article for merging to ecomodernism. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)