Talk:Battle of Al-Qa'im (2005)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't see anywhere in the http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8050339/ article that keeps being cited that says 31 killed, nor even anything that can be extrapolated to get that (or any) figure for this location during this timeframe. 76.22.4.86 02:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- The only mention of Al Qaim in the above referenced article is:
“ | Jump in insurgent deaths
But the most dramatic rise in deaths was among insurgents. The huge jump is believed linked to two large-scale U.S. military operations conducted in western Iraq during May, Operation New Market in the town of Haditha and Operation Matador around the town of Qaim, that killed about 140 insurgents and about 100 suicide bombings since April 28, according to an Associated Press count. |
” |
- There is nothing about U.S. casualty count here. — ERcheck (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Al Qaim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213191447/http://icasualties.org/oif/prdDetails.aspx?hndRef=5-2005 to http://www.icasualties.org/oif/prdDetails.aspx?hndRef=5-2005
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Al Qaim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120414151608/http://www.defense.gov//News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=31688 to http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=31688
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)