Talk:Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever

Film: Canadian / German / Southeast Asian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.66.168 (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I know this isn't a productive comment, but this seriously is the worst movie I have ever seen. Just read over the comments at IMDB. Onishenko 02:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Productive or not, you're absolutely right. It has to be the worst film of the new millenium (2001-2006 so far) that i've ever seen. --Stevekl 20:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i never watched the film but i heard its REALLY BAD ☹ 2601:447:C880:AFE0:EC0E:107C:BF8B:850C (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

THIS MOVIE WAS NOT BAD!!!! I wouldnt say that its the best movie ever but i can name 50 more movies worst than this one... besides Lucy Liu looked gorgeous in this movie.--Oneshyguy46

The movie might be bad, but can someone put a summary of this up? I personally didn't mind it THAT much. 125.228.194.250 11:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I personally loved this movie, I know it's bad. I still love it though. 162.83.149.42 (talk) 19:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to depict coldness cinematically requires a heart, otherwise it just gets detached and uninteresting. 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 12:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2012 update:

I can think of half a dozen Seagal movies at least that came out around the same time that were 10x worse than this film! I edited the plot and removed some of the bad links and gave the overall "feel" of the page a less biased approach. Whoever previously wrote content for the page should remember that this isn't the place for your personal review of the film. You can do that on Rotten Tomatoes or Amazon. User:dojodan

Math?

"...worst reviewed movie ever at 1.5831%, receiving positive ratings from zero out of 102 reviews."

I'll admit, I'm not great at math, but how does 0/102 = 1.5831%? I coulda sworn that 0 out of anything still means 0 in the end. Can anyone explain this? Ghostalker (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Each reviewer gives the movie a score from 0-10. 0 of the reviews were positive, but the average of the 0-10 scare was 0.015831, as some of the reviewers gave 1/10 or higher (but less than 5/10) ratings. This is not really explained well in the article 207.54.56.115 (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who came up with the title?

I'm not sure if it was already mentioned, but who came up with the completely ridiculous movie title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crowdwoker3 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]