Jump to content

Talk:Auburn, New Hampshire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Hey guys, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article; if you need advice on how to improve it, just come and give me a holler on my talk page! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 06:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest merge

[edit]

Valid information that is sourced by reliable secondary and tertiary sources in the Auburn Village School can be merged to this article. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it is nowhere near complete, there is already too much information in the school article to merge here.--Hjal (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the AFD is closed with a consensus to redirect here, so I would suggest that the content of the original article be trimmed to fit into one section of this article. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean, closed? Is 17 hours really the norm for holding a discussion and acting, even when the first responder is against it? Actually, count me as opposed to the merge as well, for the same reasons as Hjal. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I saw this discussion and missed the separate one under the Article for Deletion. I'll revert myself. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Auburn, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Auburn, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion of measurements, feet to meters, is not working right

[edit]

Two measurements of mountain heights use the convert code to show the meter conversion of the heights given in feet. I don't know why, but it isn't working. The first conversion says 582 feet = 177 meters. (This is independently verified outside Wikipedia.) The second conversion says 580 feet (a shorter height than the first) = 180 meters (a taller height than the first). I don't know why this would happen, and raise the issue here for people who might be able to track down the source of error. Jtellerelsberg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. Turns out that the "convert" tool automatically guesses the amount of precision needed when converting. You would think it would convert each number to the nearest whole digit, but actually it converted the 580 feet (ending in zero) to another number ending in 0. I fixed the parameters so each conversion would go to the closest whole number. Ken Gallager (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]