Talk:Anthem, Arizona

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Why was my edit with the severely needed warning about bad foundations being put in by Del Webb, against the recomendations of their own engineers, removed?

It is factual and included a citation.

Homes in Anthem are being built on expansive soil, with foundations that are not capable of withstanding any movement.

Please see http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2006-03-16/news/feature.html

This article also appeared in print.

Anyone considering moving to Anthem needs to know more than the PR fluff presented on the current page.

It's not encyclopedic. The New Times always likes inflamattory topics. Either add something that is objective and source it, or don't include it in external links. "Expansive soil" isn't just a problem in Anthem. Wikibofh_(talk) 03:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am removing the Del Webb redirection to Pulte Homes inasmuch as the Pulte Homes article has nary a word about Del Webb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.211.146.204 (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions

72.204.251.224 (talk · contribs) has been adding information without including verifiable references from reliable sources, and without discussing on its user talk page. —Jeff G. ツ 05:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street Circulation of Anthem, Arizona.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Street Circulation of Anthem, Arizona.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

A large number of edits have been made by a user calling themselves "Anthemhoa", and I believe them to be associated with the city, creating a conflict of interest. The page needs to be rewritten in order to make the page more neutral... Paris1127 (talk) 05:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried clean it up a bit. Reorganized, added citations where possible, added new/corrected info based on citations, removed OR, and also removed unsourced claims (those for which I could not find a reliable source) and extraneous/unrelated info. --Brycehughes (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anthem, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]