Talk:Agatha All Along (miniseries)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agatha All Along (miniseries) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Marvel Cinematic Universe Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

September 15 to 21, 2024 (10th)
September 22 to 28, 2024 (18th)

Hulkling

All we have is a single source from an outdated article where the information was later removed. If we’re going to be making claims we should have more than that.

Most likely the author just read that the actor was playing Locke’s boyfriend and said he was Hulkling. It’s just speculation and rumor.

The reason why people keep removing it is because it’s false. Delderd (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the prior discussion on this, it was determined that while the source removed the information, the editor's note it provided did not justify ruling out the removed information as somehow incorrect. WP:Verifiability not truth applies in this case, as the claim is supported by this reliable source. Random Twitter "scoopers" are NOT WP:Reliable sources and cannot be used to verify what you are changing. Similarly, sources directly citing information from an unreliable source (ie the Twitter account) are also unreliable due to WP:FRUIT. For now, this is the most reliably sourced information we have, whether it remains accurate in the end or not. We go by what the sources state. No reliable sources have come out reporting/confirming this is not the case, either, so if all you have to go off of is your own belief and some random Twitter account, the WP:STATUSQUO remains in place unless you convince others to change the current consensus. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how is that single article a reliable source when the relevant information was removed from the article? There are numerous other articles saying the character is undisclosed. Delderd (talk) 23:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And here's the author herself admitting it was a mistake. [1] Delderd (talk) 23:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now, that is a reliable source we can actually go off of. Had you provided this earlier rather than repeatedly reverting back to your preferred version (which, mind you, is against the WP:Edit warring policy), we could have come to this conclusion sooner and easier. I have restored the information of the actor playing Billy's boyfriend as that is still sourced by the article originally and not denied by the author, and that at the very least should not have been removed in favor of saying it is an undisclosed role, though I have kept the Hulkling mention hidden for now given the other cast roles turned out to be accurate. It is always better to be proactive in providing evidence sooner rather than later in a collaborative setting, as the many reverts could have been averted earlier. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rebranding

Please see what to add from this. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe everything that is relevant to this article is already included, but I have added this source as a better one than what we had. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good decision, as it is straight from the horse's mouth (the horse being Winderbaum). Kailash29792 (talk) 12:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Episode titles

For consistency, should we use the titles from Disney+, or the ones given on the title screen? Wcdowchb (talk) 03:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Disney+ because that is how they are titled as and also on the Futon Critic. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change the link for Agatha Harkness

Agatha Harkness has a page for herself and therefor shouldn´t be changed, why would anybody want to see Agatha Harkness on the list of Marvel Cinema characters when they could simply see her page itself? @Merlyn26 StrongALPHA (talk) 07:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MCULINKS, we expect in-universe links to be the MCU link. Where that redirect goes is up for discussion, it should point to the place with the best information about the MCU version of that character. But we should use the MCU link regardless of where it points. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with what adamstorm97 already said. But also, this is even beyond the MCU a standard practice, see various James Bond articles for example where we link specifically to that movies James Bond, and not just James Bond as a general character. How movies portray a character compared to its source material can vastly differ to the point where linking to the source material's article is practically irrelevant. And that is especially the case with how the MCU portrays Agatha Harkness compared to her comic book counterpart, whom basically only share a name and basic color scheme (although the comics are turning her into a villainous role now too, but I digress). YannickFran (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]