Talk:Aeryon Scout

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Aviation portal This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This redirect is supported by the aircraft project.

Canada: Ontario

	Canada portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
	Ontario portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

I agree, this is definitely worded like an advertisement, with expressions like "unique", "a flying camera" outlined in italic and "Unlike many other UAVs in this class, the Scout [is] ruggedized and wind sealed" which is not true (most commercial mini/micro UAVs are weather proof as a matter of course, including quadcopters. Many hobbyist quadcopters are not however, but those are irrelevant as comparisons). This is not encyclopedic language. The first sentence in the article is either a blatant attempt to sell the unmanned system or a fan-boyish statement, both of which are inappropriate. Also, factual expressions - while probably true - are peppered with positive adjectives.

"The vehicle can be operated beyond the line of sight up to 3 kilometres (1.9 miles) from the user..." This statement must be wrong, unless the UAV has a satellite transceiver enabling it to communicate without line of sight for RF communications. The seller - sorry, article author - probably meant "beyond visual range" which is entirely different, probably just a few hundred meters for a craft of this small size, rather than at least 10-15 km of typical line of sight for the RF signals (depending on the aircraft altitude of course).

--193.156.31.108 (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This looked very much like it was written by the company PR department, but I have re-written it to correspond with Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content. - Ahunt (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aeryon Scout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613230419/http://aeryon.com:80/component/rsfiles/download-file.html?path=Public/aeryon-scout.pdf&Itemid=279 to http://www.aeryon.com/component/rsfiles/download-file.html?path=Public/aeryon-scout.pdf&Itemid=279

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]