Jump to content

Talk:Abbey College, Malvern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed content

[edit]

@John Lewis as per your edit summary can you explain why you have removed well referenced passage:

(content removed) [removed content re. ticket:2014032510009565 -- John F. Lewis (talk) 00:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)][reply]

form this article? 86.4.25.180 (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has been removed as being a piece of libel text bluntly. The OTRS ticket shows a log of communication regarding the discussion and in the discussion official documents were exchanged backing up the references to be one-sided and inaccurate. The user on the other end has filed requests for redaction to The Daily Mail and the Telegraph regarding both sources. The Telegraph have agreed to comply and The Daily Mail are entering legal discussions. I ask for respect regarding the removal and that it was done in good faith and I have used my full judgement in the topic. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how the report of a court case can be classed as libel?86.4.25.180 (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are more than welcome to open a discussion, but as I said before - I ask you respect the decision I came to using information you do not have access to. I have provided a rationale for my actions which is sufficient. Currently it does not add much to the article so a discussion instead of useless revert war will suffice. John F. Lewis (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

[edit]

I am confused as to why John F. Lewis has deleted a well referenced item from this page citing a 'lack of consensus'.

The only person who appears to be objecting (in various guises) is blatantly connected to the subject matter and has a commercial interest in removing unfavorable facts from the page. Their claims of slander are plainly laughable given the reputable sources quoted including a judge and the Daily Telegraph. I have to admit to a suspicion in the absence of any real reason given for the item's deletion that we are seeing something like this [[1]] in reverse. Lampshade Dog (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? is there anyone there? In particular someone who wants to put a coherent reason as to why this well referenced passage about this institution should not be in the article? Lampshade Dog (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the section literally above this one. Also removed content per above too. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abbey College, Malvern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]