Talk:AIM-120 AMRAAM

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AIM-120 AMRAAM article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / South Pacific / British / European / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Aviation B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada's Missing AMRAAMs?

In the Foreign Sales section of the article, it is mentioned that Canada had placed an initial order of 256 AIM-120's, but cancelled half of them after engine ignition problems due to cold weather conditions. The article continues by reporting that the AIM-9X & AIM-7 were ordered as replacements, however none of this has been sourced.

I have been able to locate both photo evidence of RCAF Hornets with Aim-120C-5s, and the occasional C-7, as well as documentation with information on the 2003 proposal for 97 Aim-120Cs (of unspecified sub-variant) however, in my research, nothing has verified these two claims of both the number of AMRAAMs and also the replacements with Aim-7s and most questionably, Aim-9X missiles. Now I can assure you that the RCAF has never operated the Aim-9X variant*, instead relying on the vast stocks of Aim-9L and M Sidewinders already in service. The idea of the Aim-7 replacing the supposed cancellation is possible, as Canada had already been operating the Aim-7M since the 1980s, but once again, none of this has been sourced or verified.

*It is worth noting however that the RCAF recently was approved to purchase 50 Aim-9X Block IIs, but that was in 2020, and not in the early 2000s. Perhaps some confusion with dates?

It is entirely feasible that I am missing something, which is very possible due the vast sea that is the internet, however the lack of sourcing and the mentioning of the Aim-9X may be pedaling a false, or at least a modified narrative that will be interpreted as fact. If someone can verify the claims, I would greatly appreciate it, and will apologize for the accusation, but if not, I will be removing this section of the article as there is no evidence to back it up.

Thank you! Leo Gibney (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not finding anything, I'd go ahead and remove the unsourced content. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIM-120 .SVG images

Hello. I uploaded a few months ago some .SVG's that may be useful for the article:

AIM-120

File:AIM-120C5.svg

File:Vista frontal del misil AIM-120C.svg

File:AIM-120C5 AMRAAM rear view.svg

CATM-120

File:CATM-120C.svg

File:CATM-120C AMRAAM rear view.svg

100Polar (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ausairpower citation

Ausairpower is not a reputable source. It should be struck from the article in my opinion. 108.24.79.232 (talk) 03:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]