Talk:A.T.O.M. (TV series)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 13 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from A.T.O.M. to A.T.O.M. (TV series). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Untitled
[edit]я хочю чтоб каждый день показывали A.T.O.M. (Translation: I wish they every day showed A.T.O.M.)
- Please, write in English! Not everyone understands you. Can someone who knows Russian assist ?T-borg 12:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah! Keaze
Characters Section
[edit]I think we should organize it into two sub-sections - heroes and villains. What do you think? T-borg 12:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Good idea! Keaze (again)
The heroes/villains idea is fine as long as every single character can clearly be defined as just one or the other. If they start having ambiguous characters, then that sort of separation just becomes more trouble than it's worth. -- Supermorff 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe we could have three sub-categories? Like Heroes, Villians, and just other? Judomo 21:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's fine, although the same problem stands. I don't know all that much about the show, so if you think the characters are easily labelled as "Heroes", "Villains" or "Other" then go for it. Some sort of structure is certainly needed. ED: Ah, I see it's already done. Never mind then. -- Supermorff 22:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- I played around with it a little. Maybe once I see a couple more episodes I can make sure Judomo 00:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Episode List
[edit]Why does the episode list look like that?T-borg 19:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Image request
[edit]Episode summaries
[edit]I really don't think that they should be copied straight from TV.com. It isn't encyclopedic at all. The plot should be summarised in it's own section, and the episode summaries- deleted. After all, Wikipedia is not a TV guide. T-borg 10:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC) PS: Note the similar situation on the article about W.I.T.C.H. (animated series).
Vehicles
[edit]Do we realy even need this section, since it was added as part of the character bios? Judomo 21:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Some information
[edit]1). About phrase spelled on Russian that means: I want A.T.O.M. to be showed everyday! 2). Can someone answer to me: do A.T.O.M. have any future? Or this series will die uncompleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.20.119.87 (talk) 16:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
This film has been very popular in Europe, so it may be continued by SIP and Jetix. Though, I can't say when they will produce the next series. For example, What's with Andy was put on hold for two years, and last year it was continued again with the support of Super RTL. --Mégara (Мегъра) - D. G. Mavrov (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ATOM grupo.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:ATOM grupo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Season 3?!
[edit]Where did the season 3 info come from!
GohanRulezGX (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
official website down...
[edit]the official website is down/redirecting to some stupid ads site... Divinity76 (talk) 13:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:S.T.S. which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class European animation articles
- Mid-importance European animation articles
- European animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated television articles
- Unknown-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class Toys articles
- Low-importance Toys articles
- WikiProject Toys articles
- C-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages