Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated disruptive editing/edit warring from an editor after edits were contested, while such edits are under discussion at WT:MCU and Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe in compliance with WP:BRD. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- While I respect the full protection, please note that discussion is not currently underway. It has been nearly 48 hours since the last response on the talk page which was in effect the user requesting protection stating that they did not want an edit that was well-sourced (according to precedent) and relevant to be present on the page without his personal input and ability to contextualize it with other sources. This is an ownership concern. I should not have to wait to put up a well-sourced fact that does not manipulate any details until the user can put his own spin on it using outside sources. ChimaFan12 (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I told Chima, I've been busy in life and in other editing areas, while also reviewing sources for commentary on this matter at large. I have since responded to their message. The full protection is to prevent further edit warring while upholding the WP:STATUSQUO. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I said before, I respect the full protection. What is a problem is you mischaracterizing my edits in order to obstruct any changes being made that you don't like. You say I'm invoking "alternate timelines" but I never did in my edit. The full scope of my edit was to state that Inhumans is not included in the official MCU timeline, which is true. You're obstructing it using the baseless rationale of "well the book only includes phases 1-4 and the shows aren't in any phase!" despite the fact that, immediately after explaining why movies and series from other storytellers and eras of Marvels aren't included, Kevin Feige explicitly describes the book as the full end to end history of the MCU. ChimaFan12 (talk) 06:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I told Chima, I've been busy in life and in other editing areas, while also reviewing sources for commentary on this matter at large. I have since responded to their message. The full protection is to prevent further edit warring while upholding the WP:STATUSQUO. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- While I respect the full protection, please note that discussion is not currently underway. It has been nearly 48 hours since the last response on the talk page which was in effect the user requesting protection stating that they did not want an edit that was well-sourced (according to precedent) and relevant to be present on the page without his personal input and ability to contextualize it with other sources. This is an ownership concern. I should not have to wait to put up a well-sourced fact that does not manipulate any details until the user can put his own spin on it using outside sources. ChimaFan12 (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hilarious continuous petty vandalism by an IP hopping anon, that changes the name of the character Johnny Cage to Janet Cage. Knee slapping funny. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Legende Legende Legende. Remsense聊 04:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 89.205.128.0/20 (talk · contribs) blocked by K6ka. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Who keeps adding Jisshu Sengupta and why?. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Declined I have warned them about putting in unsourced content. Let's see how they react. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Too much hate and vandalism edits Tyman222 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And I left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of IP vandalism the last couple of days. KristofferAG (talk) 06:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent and disruptive addition of unsourced content by multiple IPs (or possibly an IP hopper). CycloneYoris talk! 07:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)