User talk:Nairji

This is Nairji's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gitanjali Sinha (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gitanjali Sinha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nairji, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gitanjali Sinha (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gitanjali Sinha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 13:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gitanjali Sinha (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still questionable for solid independent notability, still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall, but no press releases or trivial passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gitanjali Sinha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gitanjali Sinha (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm still not confident accepting this yet, please list his entire works as a list with its own section, also please focus with only in-depth third-party news sources overall actually about him, so no trivial passing mentions. Also please no press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gitanjali Sinha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Batra's Positive Health Clinic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Batra's Positive Health Clinic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link to blog of quotes by Meher Baba

Hi Nairiji, firstly there is a content guideline in Wikipedia stating "External links section should be kept to a minimum". This is especially true for GA class articles and we had to filter this section down to the few absolute necessary ones. Secondly, blogs, personal web pages and most fansites should be avoided as external links in Wikipedia. Since the article of Meher Baba has a link to an anthology of quotes by Baba in Wikiquote (down at the bottom) [1] more collections of quotes are not necessary. If you see any important ommissions in the Wikiquote page, you may add a quote there instead. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 15:03, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemendra Aran

Hello Nairji,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hemendra Aran for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mindcap (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hemendra Aran

The article Hemendra Aran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability, no evidence of passing WP:GNG. Basic WP:BEFORE turns up very little coverage and none actually about him. (note: When searching, do not confuse with the film producer of the same name.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nairji. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. David Gerard (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright notice

Your addition to The Indian Card Clothing Company has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meher Miracles

Hello, Nairji. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Meher Miracles, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

John from Idegon (talk) 06:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Healing With Food

Hello, Nairji,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Healing With Food should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healing With Food .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comply with

WP:Paid or you risk a revocation of editing privileges. I want a definitive reply, prior to your next edit over here.∯WBG^converse 10:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The latest addition made was for my Employer and I wasn't aware that employment is a part of "paid" tagging.

Sign your posts by suffixing ~~~~. It won't cost much to be more truthful; try again.∯WBG^converse 11:07, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The latest addition made was for my Employer and I wasn't aware that employment is a part of "paid" tagging.The message tone by you could be a bit more conventional. It won't cost much to be less resentful; try always.Nairji (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indent your messages by prefixing the appropriate series of : sign.

Did you write The Indian Card Clothing Company, Soujan Joseph, Komal Aran Atariya and Hemendra Aran; all out of your own interest? What's your link with Meher Miracles, for a start? ∯WBG^converse 11:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't reply to email from new-users but certainly see them. So, feel free to use that as a medium for sending confidential information but expect any replies (concerned with any non-confidential stuff) over your t/p.

At any case, you have flatly denied any aspect of UPE and have asked for salvaging the articles. I don't have any advice to offer and will instead ask for the final time:- were you employed at any span of time by any of the subjects or were you paid by anyone (payment does not always equate money; any form of favors et al) to write these articles or did you choose the topics out of your own, randomly? ∯WBG^converse 15:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was a consultant for Meher Miracles and as a part of my engagement I had created the articles. Soujan Josseph is a part of the Indian movie industry and I had created that article out of my own interest. Honestly based on my understanding creation of article by paying a writer directly was not acceptable as a part of policies but I did not know that even if I was a consultant and if I write on my own then tagging was required. Having said that, all the articles created were addressed by some other editors and I had changed / corrected everything that was advised by them. If you feel that the articles are not upto the mark and it should be deleted then I do not have a choice but to accept your decision as you seem to be in the Wikipedia ecosystem since long. And moreover if you feel that my editing rights should be revoked, even that I would gracefully accept but I would like to put on record that no addition was made with any malicious intention or to include spam in the Wikipedia database.

Thank you for investing time screening the articles, will ensure that Wikipedia guidelines are followed in future.

Thanks again.Nairji (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's your relation with The Indian Card Clothing Company? ∯WBG^converse 14:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I engaged with Indian Card Clothing as a consultant after the Wikipedia listing. It is a stock-exchange listed company in India and I was doing a bit of research on their stock when I wrote the article.Nairji (talk) 14:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope; you're yet again lying. I also note that you've created an article about Batra's Health Clinic; please mention about whether you have any links to that or just a random stuff. ∯WBG^converse 17:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WBG, prima facie I didn't lie on any of the above communication thread as you have been continuously accusing me of. Specially in context to The Indian Card Clothing, I started the research from March 2017, and from May 2017 I was their consultant. The research was submitted in October 2017 in which Wikipedia draft was one of them. Wiki draft later in October 2017 was submitted for review and acceptance, I believe "Nope; you're yet again lying" statement by you was because I said I engaged after Wiki listing. Coming to Batra's I was employed with them between 2010-2012. Once I understood / learnt above Wikipedia addition and the importance of it I attempted to create "Batra's" page in May 2016. "Batra's" is really a huge brand in India and I strongly believed that information about it should be a part of Wikipedia ecosystem.

I am a marketer with around 2 decades of experience and I respect Wikipedia as an information consumption platform, moreover I respect Wikipedia editors like you for keeping it alive and making continuous effort for keeping it spam-free. But the recent series of discussions that we are having, I look at it or assume as a clear case of personal grudge probably because of the statement by me "It won't cost much to be less resentful; try always" as a response to your statement "It won't cost much to be more truthful; try again.", which I assumed was a sarcastic statement but on further thinking I feel was a friendly statement by you for me to try again. As it was a publicly made statement by Me, I publicly apologize.

As mentioned in my earlier communication, I would accept all and any decision made by you for the articles created by Me. And again I would like to highlight that everything done was with pure intentions and no information was hidden on purpose. It was a classic case of lack-of-knowledge by Me and incomplete understanding of guidelines. Having said that, I will continue to contribute where I feel the communication would be useful to consumers and if the subject is important. But going forward I will ensure that if the subject is related to me professionally I would have appropriate tagging and would educate me to know more about Wikipedia guidelines.

Thank you for investing time on Me, really appreciate it. It was really nice interacting with You.

Nairji (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soujan Joseph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soujan Joseph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soujan Joseph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 11:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hemendra Aran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hemendra Aran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemendra Aran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 12:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Komal Aran Atariya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Komal Aran Atariya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komal Aran Atariya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 12:08, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Druv Kent moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Druv Kent, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ∯WBG^converse 12:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhruv Shrikent

A tag has been placed on Dhruv Shrikent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The article-creator created two articles on the same subject, at two different names. I have already draftified Druv Kent and thus, this may be A10-ed. UPE/SEO spam-ring; see t/p of article-creator for more clues.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ∯WBG^converse 12:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection of Gitanjali Sinha

Per concerns of WP:BLP1E (and coupled with your UPE-spamming); I have decided to blank Gitanjali Sinha and redirect it to Yeh Khula Aasmaan.

If you disagree, feel free to reverse my edit, pending which the fate of the article will be decided over an article for deletion discussion.∯WBG^converse 13:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Druv Kent

Hello, Nairji. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Druv Kent".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Mjs1991 (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarva Yoga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarva Yoga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 01:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarva Yoga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarva Yoga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1292simon (talk) 08:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sarva Yoga

Hello, Nairji. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarva Yoga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]