User contributions for Lennyjamin

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

08:1408:14, 17 April 2024 diff hist +332 m Amherstview, Ontario Added some details on Infrastructure.
08:0208:02, 17 April 2024 diff hist +526 m Riverview Park & Zoo Reworded inital paragraph and added details on the park's history.
07:4607:46, 17 April 2024 diff hist +310 Riverview Park & Zoo →Animals at the zoo: Updated the list of animals and added a source. Tag: Disambiguation links added

23:0723:07, 16 April 2024 diff hist −77 m Stigmata →Description: Historical sources (cited elewhere in this article) more reliable than the blog site used here have described reported cases prior to the thirteenth century.

16:3816:38, 15 April 2024 diff hist −57 m Stigmata The claim that stigmatics only existed after the Great Schism is not stated in the referenced source.
16:3216:32, 15 April 2024 diff hist +601 m Stigmata There was a contradiction between who was the first stigmatic. I reworded sections to remove the contradiction.

05:1105:11, 6 December 2023 diff hist −1 User:Lennyjamin No edit summary current
05:0805:08, 6 December 2023 diff hist +375 N User:Lennyjamin ←Created page with 'I'm a Canadian academic passionate about freedom of information. As such, I enjoy spending a little time upkeeping what is one of the most influential sources of information in the 21st century! I'm not a very experienced editor, mostly fixing errors I find. As such, if you see me doing something wrong (or think there's something I need to improve upon) please let me know.'
04:5304:53, 6 December 2023 diff hist +510 Talk:Stigmata →Apparent contradiction: Reply Tag: Reply
04:5004:50, 6 December 2023 diff hist −125 Stigmata The information here prior was incorrect. The ratio of "7 to 1" appears on page 10, and is clearly female-to-male. I could not find the quoted ratio of 5 to 4 anywhere in the book, and so have not included it. If anyone wishes to check this, the book is availble for free via the Internet Archive.