User contributions for Grey Clownfish
Appearance
A user with 434 edits. Account created on 1 November 2023.
14 October 2024
- 09:1309:13, 14 October 2024 diff hist −1 Passerine →Phylogeny: fixed cladogram current
- 09:0809:08, 14 October 2024 diff hist +13 Template:Phylogeny/Passerines Made it show Passeriformes, but link to Passerine. Only one article uses this template, namely Passerine. And it shows Passeriformes in bold at the root. current
- 09:0409:04, 14 October 2024 diff hist −1 m Template:Phylogeny/Passerines removed x that was preventing Eupasseres's label from showing up
- 06:2006:20, 14 October 2024 diff hist +1 m Template talk:Create taxonomy/link fixed request by adding missing slash current
- 06:1606:16, 14 October 2024 diff hist +603 Template talk:Create taxonomy/link →Template-protected edit request on 14 October 2024: new section
- 04:3604:36, 14 October 2024 diff hist +388 Template talk:Taxonomy/Euteleostomi →Edit request {{subst:#time:j F Y}}: new section current
13 October 2024
- 10:1410:14, 13 October 2024 diff hist +79 Parakeet taxobox current
- 10:0610:06, 13 October 2024 diff hist +60 Conure No edit summary current
- 10:0410:04, 13 October 2024 diff hist +1 m Conure No edit summary
- 10:0310:03, 13 October 2024 diff hist +486 Conure No edit summary
- 09:4209:42, 13 October 2024 diff hist +240 Bird of prey →Possible inclusion of Cariamiformes: why seriemas don't look like raptors current
- 09:3609:36, 13 October 2024 diff hist +2,887 Bird of prey Section about seriemas. And before you remove my assertion that seriemas are still not considered birds of prey in general parlance as it is uncited, I wish I had a citation for it, but such a thing may be hard to find a citation for. And we cannot call seriemas birds of prey in this article, as they typically aren't considered birds of prey.
- 09:1309:13, 13 October 2024 diff hist +156 Telluraves note about Cariamiformes being birds of prey current
- 09:0809:08, 13 October 2024 diff hist +47 Telluraves No edit summary
- 09:0509:05, 13 October 2024 diff hist +23 N Telluravian ←Redirected page to Telluraves current Tag: New redirect
- 09:0509:05, 13 October 2024 diff hist +82 Bird of prey Separated sentences about extinct telluravians and enanthiornithines with talons. All telluravians evolved from birds of prey.
- 08:5608:56, 13 October 2024 diff hist −281 Bird of prey Removed Cariamiformes, as it is seldom considered a bird of prey.
- 08:4608:46, 13 October 2024 diff hist +1 Pelecaniformes →Systematics and evolution: Separated paragraphs about IOC and cladogram. As it made it seem as though the cladogram is IOC's view. current
- 08:4408:44, 13 October 2024 diff hist +243 User talk:Kevmin →Why I'm pretty sure traditional Pelecaniformes is polyphyletic: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:3608:36, 13 October 2024 diff hist −61 Spix's macaw →Taxonomy: There is no cladogram in Arini (tribe). And there wasn't when this claim was added on the 5th of January 2014 either. I don't understand why this article has been falsely claiming this for over 10 years. Unless you count the listing of Arini genera and the listing of species under them, but it should be obvious that that's not a proper cladogram. current
- 07:2607:26, 13 October 2024 diff hist +728 User talk:Kevmin →Why I'm pretty sure traditional Pelecaniformes is polyphyletic: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 07:0807:08, 13 October 2024 diff hist −1 Template:Taxonomy/Eupsittula Parent is Arini current Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
12 October 2024
- 10:1410:14, 12 October 2024 diff hist +782 User talk:Kevmin →Why I'm pretty sure traditional Pelecaniformes is polyphyletic: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:1410:14, 12 October 2024 diff hist +357 Pelagornithidae added reference for traditional Pelecaniformes being polyphyletic current
- 09:2009:20, 12 October 2024 diff hist −13 Pelecaniformes Undid revision 1250656617 by Kevmin (talk). It's not personal analysis. Taxoboxes should avoid showing potentially non-monophyletic groups. It's a matter of WP:NPOV. By the way, the onus is on whoever thinks Ardei is a clade to prove its monophyly. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 09:1409:14, 12 October 2024 diff hist +4 Pelagornithidae Changed paraphyletic to non-monophyletic. So you reject my claim that Pelecaniformes was polyphyletic as self-analysis? But paraphyletic is actually a more extraordinary claim. It would mean that sunbitterns, kagus, loons, penguins, storks, ibises, spoonbills, herons, shoebills and hamerkops all evolved from traditional Pelecaniformes.You say cite everything. Where is the citation for traditional Pelecaniformes being paraphyletic?
11 October 2024
- 09:5309:53, 11 October 2024 diff hist +389 Talk:Sibley–Ahlquist taxonomy of birds →Which version of the Clements taxonomy?: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:3309:33, 11 October 2024 diff hist −13 Pelecaniformes Removed Ardei, as it is contradicted by the cladogram, so could be paraphyletic. Tag: Reverted
- 09:2909:29, 11 October 2024 diff hist 0 Pelagornithidae Have you seen modern cladograms of Pelecaniformes? It seems very clear to me that pelicans, and probably Suliformes as well, evolved from birds who would have traditionally been considered members of Ciconiiformes, rather than the traditional Ciconiiformes evolving from traditional Pelecaniformes. Traditional Pelecaniformes also included tropicbirds, making it polyphyletic anyway. Tag: Reverted
10 October 2024
- 09:5609:56, 10 October 2024 diff hist +533 Talk:Ratite →Why does Ratitae redirect here?: new section current Tag: New topic
- 09:4709:47, 10 October 2024 diff hist +8 Talk:Grey parrot →Requested move 8 October 2024: updated request
- 09:4609:46, 10 October 2024 diff hist +600 Talk:Grey parrot →Requested move 8 October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:3409:34, 10 October 2024 diff hist +68 Ratite they all can't fly, and lack keels current
- 09:1809:18, 10 October 2024 diff hist +1,254 Talk:Neomura →Neomura the taxon vs neomuran hypothesis: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:3708:37, 10 October 2024 diff hist +923 Talk:Ratite →Monophyletic vs Polyphyletic and the Place of Tinamous: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:5007:50, 10 October 2024 diff hist 0 Eukaryote But Eukaryota is the more common name. And the name is unregulated, so there's no principle of priority. Most sources call it Eukaryota, not Eukarya.
- 07:4707:47, 10 October 2024 diff hist +365 Talk:Asgard (archaea) →Requested move 10 October 2024: new section current Tag: New topic
- 07:4207:42, 10 October 2024 diff hist −1 Asgard (archaea) Inclusive. Eukaryotes are not archaea, but they belong to Archaea.
- 07:3907:39, 10 October 2024 diff hist −17 Eukaryote When is it ever called Eukarya? That name is so rare compared to Eukaryota, it is simply not worth mentioning in the lead, let alone as the first name. It's already mentioned as a synonym in the taxobox. That is enough. Tag: Reverted
- 07:3607:36, 10 October 2024 diff hist +40 Archaea added Eukaryota current
- 07:3307:33, 10 October 2024 diff hist +74 Dinosaur not sure why Saurischia was removed Tag: Reverted
- 07:2507:25, 10 October 2024 diff hist +12 Archaea →Phyla: renamed as we aren't listing the eukaryotic phyla here
- 07:1607:16, 10 October 2024 diff hist +72 Archaea Unlinked Neomura, added citation for it, added Arkarya, and removed superflous comma
- 07:1407:14, 10 October 2024 diff hist +39 Arkarya ←Changed redirect target from Neomura to Archaea current Tag: Redirect target changed
- 07:0807:08, 10 October 2024 diff hist −13,450 Neomura ←Redirected page to Archaea Tags: New redirect Reverted
- 07:0707:07, 10 October 2024 diff hist +76 Archaea added singular
- 07:0407:04, 10 October 2024 diff hist −6 m Archaea unbolded archaebacteria, as it excludes eukaryotes
- 07:0307:03, 10 October 2024 diff hist +78 Archaea removed implications that eukaryotes aren't included in the domain Archaea
- 06:5606:56, 10 October 2024 diff hist +417 Talk:Neomura →Neomura the taxon vs neomuran hypothesis: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:4806:48, 10 October 2024 diff hist +1,673 Talk:Grey parrot →Requested move 8 October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply