User contributions for 210.57.254.95
Appearance
Results for 210.57.254.95 talk block log logs global block log filter log
10 February 2022
- 17:2717:27, 10 February 2022 diff hist +14 Gediminas Gediminas is known to have been referred to in extant written sources by others and himself as king (rex); we do not have to get into a dispute here which single title is more appropriate as there can never be consensus - king is the title he was given in the western context while in the Slavic lands he was known as grand duke (equivalent to king, i.e. duke of dukes) Tag: Reverted
- 17:2417:24, 10 February 2022 diff hist +110 Progenitor →Examples of patrilineal progenitors
- 17:1717:17, 10 February 2022 diff hist +61 Crusader states Terra Mariana Tag: Reverted
- 17:1317:13, 10 February 2022 diff hist +64 Boyar Rearranged dubious and unreferenced chronology of precedence of nobility to the best of my knowledge (i.e. starting from Bulgaria on). Russian empire starts in the 1600s, so it makes sense to include its claimed (although disputed) antecedents, from Rus' via Lithuania and Ruthenia, and undisputed antecedent which is Muscovy Tag: Reverted
- 15:4015:40, 10 February 2022 diff hist +19 Polemon II of Pontus Moving sentence to more appropriate place, changing its phrasing slightly
- 15:3615:36, 10 February 2022 diff hist −35 Lithuanian nobility Removing {{Refimprove|date=November 2007}} template; 14+ years on the article has grown significantly although has way to go in consistency etc.
- 15:2515:25, 10 February 2022 diff hist −1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 15:1915:19, 10 February 2022 diff hist +44 Palemonids No edit summary
- 15:0915:09, 10 February 2022 diff hist −3 Lithuanian nobility They were called dukes but were (and were/are called) princes in the western nomenclature
- 15:0615:06, 10 February 2022 diff hist −26 Lithuanian nobility →Lithuania before formal Christianization: Mindaugas did not create a Lithuanian state (if he did, which Lithuania was St Bruno referring to in 1009?); he merely was the first ruled to (briefly and purely for political expediency) become western Christian
- 15:0215:02, 10 February 2022 diff hist +70 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:5814:58, 10 February 2022 diff hist +92 Polemon II of Pontus No edit summary
- 14:5514:55, 10 February 2022 diff hist +23 Family of Gediminas →See also
- 14:5414:54, 10 February 2022 diff hist +4 Family of Gediminas →See also: House of Mindaugas Lithuania's first royal family? It is not as straightforward as that, i.e. it is easily disputed
- 14:5114:51, 10 February 2022 diff hist +8 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:4514:45, 10 February 2022 diff hist +15 Lithuanian nobility →Heraldry
- 14:4514:45, 10 February 2022 diff hist +15 Lithuanian nobility →Heraldry
- 14:4514:45, 10 February 2022 diff hist +6 Lithuanian nobility →Heraldry
- 14:4414:44, 10 February 2022 diff hist +125 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:4114:41, 10 February 2022 diff hist +46 Lithuanian nobility Lithuanian aristocracy had pre-Christian heraldry, so the distinction is important
- 14:3914:39, 10 February 2022 diff hist −3 Lithuanian nobility Vytis/Pagonia was inherited by oldest families, not adopted by influential ones
- 14:3014:30, 10 February 2022 diff hist −1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:2714:27, 10 February 2022 diff hist +14 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:2514:25, 10 February 2022 diff hist +29 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:2314:23, 10 February 2022 diff hist +45 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:2114:21, 10 February 2022 diff hist −1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:1914:19, 10 February 2022 diff hist +54 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 14:1014:10, 10 February 2022 diff hist +158 Talk:Lithuanian nobility →Proposed renaming article to Nobility of Lithuania?: new section
- 12:4612:46, 10 February 2022 diff hist +1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:4512:45, 10 February 2022 diff hist +3 Talk:Lithuanian nobility →7,000-character+ addition by Marcelus
- 12:4512:45, 10 February 2022 diff hist +5 Talk:Lithuanian nobility →7,000-word+ addition by Marcelus
- 12:4412:44, 10 February 2022 diff hist +356 Talk:Lithuanian nobility →7,000-word+ addition by Marcelus: new section
- 12:3612:36, 10 February 2022 diff hist +52 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:3212:32, 10 February 2022 diff hist +23 Lithuanian nobility →Families from Livonia
- 12:2812:28, 10 February 2022 diff hist +1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:2712:27, 10 February 2022 diff hist −25 Lithuanian nobility Correcting my mistake; Prussia was Polish why Livonia was Lithuanian
- 12:2112:21, 10 February 2022 diff hist −5 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:1912:19, 10 February 2022 diff hist +33 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:1712:17, 10 February 2022 diff hist +9 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 12:1612:16, 10 February 2022 diff hist +305 Lithuanian nobility Adding a rephrased sentence from the Wikipedia article on Szlachta
- 12:0512:05, 10 February 2022 diff hist +181 Talk:Nobility privileges in Poland →Renaming to "...in Poland and Lithuania": new section
- 11:5911:59, 10 February 2022 diff hist +1 Lithuanian nobility →Muscovite and later Russian princely and noble families originating in Lithuania: Typo
- 11:5811:58, 10 February 2022 diff hist +3 Lithuanian nobility →Lithuania before formal Christianization
- 11:5611:56, 10 February 2022 diff hist +4 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 11:5511:55, 10 February 2022 diff hist −2 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 11:5411:54, 10 February 2022 diff hist −1 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 11:5311:53, 10 February 2022 diff hist +17 Lithuanian nobility In historical sources Samogitian nobility is treated distinctly from Lithuanian and Ruthenian, OR all 3 as Lithuanian, not a hybrid definition like here on Wikipedia
- 11:5011:50, 10 February 2022 diff hist +57 Lithuanian nobility No edit summary
- 11:4711:47, 10 February 2022 diff hist 0 Lithuanian nobility This is not correct; nobility was not a meritocracy, granted x for y; to grant military services, nobles had to own lands populated by people they could monetize; this mobilization was not even via "feudalism" in the western sense as Lithuania started out as an ethnically homogenous, "tribal" entity with an indigenous religion
- 11:4311:43, 10 February 2022 diff hist −14 Lithuanian nobility Replacing link to privileges (law, not social inequality)