User contributions for 109.77.200.184
Appearance
Results for 109.77.200.184 talk block log logs global block log filter log
8 July 2024
- 04:1604:16, 8 July 2024 diff hist −60 X-Men (film) WP:OR article body does not support overblown claims. Batman, Superman, Spider-Man ... the superheroes genre has been fairly persistent over the years, X-Men simply continued the trend.
- 04:0904:09, 8 July 2024 diff hist +1,667 Talk:Horizon: An American Saga Premature film series article.
- 03:4903:49, 8 July 2024 diff hist −21 Oh, God! (film series) MOS:SMALLFONT should be avoided in Infobox. Please stop adding unnecessary formatting.
- 03:4703:47, 8 July 2024 diff hist −14 Oh, God! (film series) Only one budget figure available. Misleading to present it as if the budget for three films.
- 03:4603:46, 8 July 2024 diff hist −148 Oh, God! (film series) MOS:BOLD] and other excessive formatting
- 03:3803:38, 8 July 2024 diff hist −57 Dafne Keen Please follow the simple rules and explain why you think this image is necessary. Please make sure to include a meaningful caption when adding an image. Undid revision 1231072530 by 2800:2508:137:37F3:17DC:60CD:338B:1AD7 (talk) Tags: Undo Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits
- 03:3703:37, 8 July 2024 diff hist −71 Dafne Keen Rever unexplained insert of another image that makes the article overcrowded. Undid revision 1231072619 by 2800:2508:137:37F3:17DC:60CD:338B:1AD7 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 03:3503:35, 8 July 2024 diff hist −9 The Meg Chinese American co-production so neither gets mentioned in the first sentence per WP:FILMLEAD. Undid revision 1232845814 by 180.244.128.207 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 03:3403:34, 8 July 2024 diff hist +8 The Meg Revert vandalism. Production section clearly states that this was a Chinese coproduction. Undid revision 1230164710 by 41.33.36.215 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 03:3203:32, 8 July 2024 diff hist −17 Solo: A Star Wars Story Metacritic score is normalized using a weighted average. Copyedit.
- 03:3003:30, 8 July 2024 diff hist −9 Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F WP:SDEXAMPLES year film by director.
- 03:2703:27, 8 July 2024 diff hist −28 Dune (2021 film) WP:IDIOM avoid unnecessary idiom. also no "on the first hand" so it doesn't make sense to talk about "on other hand".
- 03:1803:18, 8 July 2024 diff hist −2 Dune: Part Two Gross figure in Infobox should match article body and lead section. Tag: Reverted
- 03:1203:12, 8 July 2024 diff hist −149 Smallfoot (film) Long plot. Nearly 900 words. Should be 400 to 700 words. WP:FILMPLOT
- 03:1003:10, 8 July 2024 diff hist −34 Smallfoot (film) Accolades table cleanup. Tag: Undo
- 03:0803:08, 8 July 2024 diff hist +36 The Mitchells vs. the Machines Two separate people, two separate list items (irrespective of them sharing a Wikipedia page for weird historical reasons)
- 03:0803:08, 8 July 2024 diff hist +35 Strays (2023 film) Two separate people, two separate list items (irrespective of them sharing a Wikipedia page for weird historical reasons)
- 03:0703:07, 8 July 2024 diff hist +54 Project Hail Mary (film) Two separate people, two separate list items (irrespective of them sharing a Wikipedia page for weird historical reasons)
- 03:0603:06, 8 July 2024 diff hist −138 The Lego Movie WP:FILMGENRE animated with one brief live action scenes. Almost entirely animated. This aint Who Framed Roger Rabbit or Cool World, misleading to suggest otherwise. (This is effectively a manual revert.)
- 03:0303:03, 8 July 2024 diff hist +54 The Lego Movie Two seperate people, restore two seperate list items (irrespective of them sharing a wikipedia page for weird historical reasons)
- 03:0003:00, 8 July 2024 diff hist +8 The Lego Movie Gross in lead section does not match gross in article body.
- 02:5702:57, 8 July 2024 diff hist −25 The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part Revert unexplained changes. Previous version without long run on sentence was better. Tag: Undo
- 02:5502:55, 8 July 2024 diff hist −49 Accident Man WP:OVERSECTION. Undid revision 1215796811 by 2.147.217.218 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 02:5102:51, 8 July 2024 diff hist −224 Palm Royale Remove duplicate reference. Rotten Tomatoes audience score not allowed. WP:UGC Undid revision 1233205078 by Mahalowallow (talk) Tags: Undo references removed
- 02:5102:51, 8 July 2024 diff hist −78 Generation War WP:UGC and WP:TVRECEPTION audience scores are not allowed. Tag: Undo
- 02:5002:50, 8 July 2024 diff hist −14 Beware the Slenderman Audience scores not allowed. WP:UGC how many reviews counted to get the critic score?
- 02:4802:48, 8 July 2024 diff hist 0 Dough (film) Ref cleanup
- 02:4702:47, 8 July 2024 diff hist −24 Dough (film) WP:OVERSECTION only one section, no subsection heading needed.
- 02:4602:46, 8 July 2024 diff hist −110 Dough (film) WP:UGC audience scores are not allowed. Robbie Collin review original review should be properly referenced
- 02:4502:45, 8 July 2024 diff hist −214 1 Mile to You WP:UGC audience scores are not allowed. Tag: references removed
- 02:4402:44, 8 July 2024 diff hist −63 Squatters (film) WP:FILMCAST cast in cast section, do not repeat in Plot section.
- 02:4302:43, 8 July 2024 diff hist −266 Squatters (film) WP:UGC still applies. Undid revision 1231477290 by 70.30.36.200 (talk) Tags: Undo section blanking
- 02:4202:42, 8 July 2024 diff hist −77 Nefarious (film) Still no. Unless reliable secondary sources report on this discrepancy it isn't noteworthy. Undid revision 1226477975 by Argema69 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 02:4102:41, 8 July 2024 diff hist −143 Nefarious (film) WP:UGC audience scores are still not allowd. Undid revision 1228934177 by 69.92.245.196 (talk) Tags: Undo references removed
- 02:3702:37, 8 July 2024 diff hist −24 Free Guy Revert edit by 86.44.172.205 the point was to list the main films highlighted by _both_ sources.
- 02:3302:33, 8 July 2024 diff hist +545 Talk:Sticks & Stones (2019 film) More hatchet job? current
- 02:2502:25, 8 July 2024 diff hist −13 Hannah Gadsby: Nanette Redundant. manual revert.
- 02:2302:23, 8 July 2024 diff hist −61 Transformers: Dark of the Moon – The Score WP:NPOV just the facts. Don't speculate about fan opinion, the sources doesn't make any such assertions. Jablonsky disappointment is implied but not stated outright by the source.
- 02:1202:12, 8 July 2024 diff hist −171 Terror on the Prairie Redundant. Release section already covers this. Tag: Reverted
- 02:0902:09, 8 July 2024 diff hist −34 Terror on the Prairie Misleading and unhelpful. Undid revision 1204330267 by David Gerard (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 02:0502:05, 8 July 2024 diff hist +521 Talk:The Bricklayer No Butler
- 02:0202:02, 8 July 2024 diff hist −20 The Bricklayer Zero evidence that Butler was involved in any way with the final film. See talk page. Undid revision 1231803560 by H2226 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 01:5601:56, 8 July 2024 diff hist +89 The Beekeeper (2024 film) WP:ALT image description should be something like this. Feel free to write a better version.
- 01:5401:54, 8 July 2024 diff hist −26 The Beekeeper (2024 film) Warning comment ignored. The WP:ALT description is supposed to describe the poster image and its contents, not redundantly repeat the generic caption. Undid revision 1232492901 by TadgStirkland401 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 01:4801:48, 8 July 2024 diff hist −46 The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift Has a "cult following" (per source) is not the same as it being generally considered "is a cult film" which the lead section misleadingly claims. Wikipedia editors love to claim films are "cult" based on no evidence (or in this case weak evidence).
- 01:4101:41, 8 July 2024 diff hist −15 Stardust (2007 film) Seems entirely unnecessary. WP:NOSOCIAL Undid revision 1228130462 by Jmg38 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 01:3601:36, 8 July 2024 diff hist −2 Stardust (2007 film) Fix reference. Another problem caused by Special:Contributions/2.51.87.235
- 01:3501:35, 8 July 2024 diff hist +15 Stardust (2007 film) Restore author parameter erroneously deleted from reference.
- 01:3101:31, 8 July 2024 diff hist +1 Stardust (2007 film) Move Michelle Pfeiffer down. Picture from premiere unrelated to Visual Effects section.
- 01:1701:17, 8 July 2024 diff hist +2 Popeye (film) Vincent Canby review apparently counts as positive overall (if you believe Rotten Tomatoes, mixed on Metacritic) although it might not seem positive from that pull quote.