James L. Powell
James Lawrence Powell | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Born | Berea, Kentucky, U.S. | July 17, 1936
Alma mater | Berea College, Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
Scientific career | |
Fields | Geology |
Institutions | Oberlin College, Reed College |
Thesis | The strontium isotopic composition and origin of carbonatites (1962) |
Website | www |
James Lawrence Powell (born July 17, 1936) is an American geologist, writer, former college president and museum director. He chaired the geology department at Oberlin College later serving as its provost and president. Powell also served as president of Franklin & Marshall College as well as Reed College. Following his positions in higher education, Powell presided over the Franklin Institute and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles.
Powell served 12 years on the National Science Board and recently retired as executive director of Graduate Fellowships for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Diversity.[1]
His book, Night Comes to the Cretaceous, explores the scientific debate regarding dinosaur extinction. In Four Revolutions in the Earth Sciences, Powell addresses dinosaur extinction in addition to three other scientific debates: deep time, continental drift and global warming.
Powell has posited that the scientific consensus on global warming nears universality and he actively counters climate change denialism in his research and other publications.
Education
[edit]Powell earned a BA degree in 1958 from Berea College, a private liberal arts college located in Powell's home town of Berea, Kentucky. Powell then received a PhD in Geochemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1962.[2]
Career
[edit]Powell began his career at Oberlin College in 1962 where he held the position of chair of the geology department from 1965 to 1973. He became the associate dean of arts and science in 1973, then vice president and provost in 1975.[2] After serving two years as a visiting administrator at Stanford University, Powell returned to Oberlin to serve as its acting president from 1981 to 1983.[3]
Following a 20-year career at Oberlin, Powell served as president of Franklin and Marshall College from 1983 to 1988,[4] then president of Reed College from 1988 to 1991.[5] Powell left academia to preside over the Franklin Institute (1991–1994)[6] followed by the National History Museum of Los Angeles (1994–2001).[7] Since 2001, Powell has been serving as the executive director of the National Physical Science Consortium.[5][8]
Powell served 12 years on the National Science Board first appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986 and serving as its vice chair in 1990.[9]
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
[edit]In 2015, Powell was named a fellow for the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.[10] He resigned in March 2022 in protest against the publication of an article in Skeptical Inquirer by CSI fellow Mark Boslough regarding the Bunch et al. Tall el-Hammam airburst paper,[11][12], which had been based on research funded by the Comet Research Group (CRG) and authored primarily by its members. He stated that it "violates nearly every tenet of proper skepticism" as defined by CSICOP and CSI, citing CSI-co-founder and executive council member Ray Hyman.[13]
CSI fellow and executive council member, astronomer David Morrison, has commented on the case and agrees with Boslough's position. Two other prominent critics of the Comet Research Group are planetary scientists Clark Chapman and Alan Harris. Both became CSI Fellows in 2024, cited for "…their distinguished contributions to science and skepticism."
On February 15, 2023, the following editor's note was posted on the Bunch et al. paper: "Readers are alerted that concerns raised about the data presented and the conclusions of this article are being considered by the Editors. A further editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues."[14]
Debate on climate change consensus
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/The_Consensus_on_Anthropogenic_Global_Warming%2C_2017.jpg/220px-The_Consensus_on_Anthropogenic_Global_Warming%2C_2017.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/20211103_Academic_studies_of_scientific_consensus_-_global_warming%2C_climate_change_-_vertical_bar_chart_-_en.svg/220px-20211103_Academic_studies_of_scientific_consensus_-_global_warming%2C_climate_change_-_vertical_bar_chart_-_en.svg.png)
Powell has researched the scientific consensus view of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in a series of studies evaluating the peer-reviewed literature. In 2012, Powell reviewed 13,950 peer-reviewed publications between 1991 and 2012 with "global warming" or "global climate change" as keywords. Evaluating this dataset, Powell showed a 99.97% scientific consensus view supporting AGW.[17][18] In 2016, Powell duplicated this method on articles published during 2013 and 2014. In this set, Powell found a 99.99% consensus "verging on unanimity" by the scientific community.[19]
While agreeing that the consensus on AGW is high, other scientists argued ca 2010-2013 that the consensus is closer to 97%.[20] [21] The debate centers around the selection of scientific papers identified as supporting AGW and therefore included in the study.[22] For example, in their 2013 study, Cook et al. excluded 66.4% of the papers examined because the abstracts did not endorse AGW either explicitly or implicitly.[20] Powell reviewed the abstracts of hundreds of articles on plate tectonics, evolution, and impact cratering to show that scientists almost never directly affirm the ruling paradigm of their discipline. On that basis, Powell included papers in the study as long as the abstracts did not explicitly reject AGW.[19]
Powell has further argued that the extent of the scientific consensus is important. In The Consensus on Anthropogenic Warming Matters Powell argues that the "stronger the public believe the consensus to be, the more they support the action on global warming that human society so desperately needs." This metastudy included 54,195 publications from five earlier studies by Powell and others demonstrating that the scientific consensus on AGW is 99.94%.[23]
In November 2019, Powell published "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming."[24] He reviewed over 11,600 peer-reviewed articles published in the first seven months of 2019 but found none that rejected anthropogenic global warming.
Views and scientific activism
[edit]Powell has encouraged scientists to do more than publish in scientific journals. "I think it’s time for scientists to get up from the lab bench and speak out." Concerning the consequences of global warming, Powell said: "I want my grandchildren to be able to say... he did something. He tried to do something."[25]
There is no scientific debate regarding the existence of AGW according to Powell. Through his research and other publications Powell has criticized politicians and others who defy the scientific consensus by denying AGW. [25][19][26]
In a 2014 editorial, Powell urged the university presidents of Brown University and Harvard University to change course by divesting their institutions from fossil fuels.[27] A New York Times editorial co-authored by Powell and Michael E. Mann recommended that the American Museum of Natural History remove Rebekah Mercer from their board as her family foundation supported climate change denialism.[28]
In a self-published 2020 book,[29] Powell defended the controversial Younger Dryas impact hypothesis which has been rejected by the mainstream scientific community. In 2022 he published a paper in the journal Scientific Progress, writing that this scientific rejection was premature.[30] His concerns have been critiqued in a comprehensive review of the literature on this subject [31]
Recognition
[edit]Powell is the recipient of several honorary degrees. Oberlin College awarded Powell an honorary doctorate of science in 1983. The Tohoku Gakuin University of Japan honored Powell with a Doctor of Humane Letters in 1986. Beaver College and Berea College (his alma mater) have also honored Powell with honorary degrees.[2][32]
The minor planet, 9739 Powell, discovered by Carolyn Shoemaker, was named for Powell in 1987.[33]
Books
[edit]- Powell, James Lawrence (1998). Night Comes to the Cretaceous: Dinosaur Extinction and the Transformation of Modern Geology. W.H. Freeman. ISBN 0716731177.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2006). Grand Canyon: Solving Earth's Grandest Puzzle. Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated. ISBN 0452287871.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2008). Dead Pool: Lake Powell, Global Warming, and the Future of Water in the West. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520254770.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2011). The Inquisition of Climate Science]. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231527842.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2011b). 2084: An Oral History of the Great Warming. J.L. Powell. OCLC 958939329.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2014). Four Revolutions in the Earth Sciences: From Heresy to Truth. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231538459.
- Scott, Thomas R.; Powell, James L. (2018). The Universe as it Really Is: Earth, Space, Matter, and Time. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231184946.
- Powell, James Lawrence (2020). Deadly Voyager: The Ancient Comet Strike that Changed Earth and Human History. ISBN 9780578666778. (Amazon Kindle book)
- Powell, James Lawrence (2023). Unlocking the Moon's Secrets: From Galileo to Giant Impact. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0197694862.
References
[edit]- ^ Graduate Fellowships for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Diversity
- ^ a b c Nemeh, Katherine (2014). American Men & Women of Science: A Biographical Directory of Today's Leaders in Physical, Biological and Related Sciences (32nd ed., vol. 5 ed.). Gale Virtual Reference Library. p. 1498. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ "History of Oberlin Presidents". Oberlin College. 2018-04-30. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ "Presidents of Franklin and Marshall College and its Predecessor Institutions, 1787-present". Franklin & Marshall College Library. Archived from the original on 10 January 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ a b "Presidents of Reed". Reed College. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ Anderson, Susan Heller (30 March 1991). "Chronicle". New York Times. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ Hernandez, Sandra (April 24, 1994). "Natural History Museum Names New Head". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ "James Powell Bio". James Powell. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ "Former Board Members". National Science Foundation. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ "Ten Distinguished Scientists and Scholars Named Fellows of Committee for Skeptical Inquiry". Skeptical Inquirer. 39 (6). 2015. Archived from the original on October 16, 2015.
- ^ Boslough, Mark (January 2022). "Sodom Meteor Strike Claims Should Be Taken with a Pillar of Salt: A controversial, widely publicized paper claiming that a cosmic impact destroyed a biblical city has had key images photoshopped and rotated to fit the biblical hypothesis". Skeptical Inquirer. 46 (1). New York City: Committee for Skeptical Inquiry: 10–14. ISSN 0194-6730. Wikidata Q110293090.
- ^ Bunch, Ted E.; LeCompte, Malcolm A.; Adedeji, A. Victor; Wittke, James H.; Burleigh, T. David; Hermes, Robert E.; et al. (20 September 2021). "A Tunguska sized airburst destroyed Tall el-Hammam a Middle Bronze Age city in the Jordan Valley near the Dead Sea" (PDF). Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 18632. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1118632B. doi:10.1038/S41598-021-97778-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8452666. PMID 34545151. Wikidata Q108641540. (erratum)
- ^ Lawrence Powell, James (2022-03-19). "Powell CSI Resignation". Archived from the original on 2022-03-25. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
I hereby resign from the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Please inform the members of the committee of my resignation. My reason is the publication of Mark Boslough's recent article in Skeptical Inquirer. It violates nearly every tenet of proper skepticism as defined by CSICOP and CSI.
- ^ Kincaid, Ellie (February 21, 2023). "Journal investigating Sodom comet paper for data problems". Retraction Watch. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
- ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; et al. (2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. hdl:1983/34949783-dac1-4ce7-ad95-5dc0798930a6.
- ^ Powell, James Lawrence (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
- ^ Plait, Phil (11 December 2012). "Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air". Slate. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ Sheppard, Kate (1 December 2012). "CHART: Only 0.17 Percent of Peer-Reviewed Papers Question Global Warming". Mother Jones. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ a b c Powell, James Lawrence (2015). "Climate Scientists Virtually Unanimous: Anthropogenic Global Warming Is True". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 35 (5–6): 121–124. doi:10.1177/0270467616634958.
- ^ a b Cook, John; Nuccitelli, Dana; Green, Sarah; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Way, Robert; Jacobs, Peter; Skuce, Andrew (15 May 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
- ^ Anderegg, William; Prall, James; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen (6 July 2010). "Expert credibility in climate change". PNAS. 107 (27): 12107–12109. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.
- ^ Skuce, Andrew; Cook, John; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Rice, Ken; Green, Sarah; Jacobs, Peter; Nuccitelli, Dana (2 May 2017). "Does It Matter if the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Is 97% or 99.99%?". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 36 (3): 150–156. doi:10.1177/0270467617702781. S2CID 151358865.
- ^ Powell, James Lawrence (2017-05-24). "The Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Matters". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 36 (3): 157–163. doi:10.1177/0270467617707079. S2CID 148618842.
- ^ Powell, J. (2019). Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467619886266
- ^ a b Powell, James Lawrence (2012-04-20). "James Lawrence Powell: What did Grandpa Do on Earth Day, 2012?". Big Think. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- ^ Abrams, Lindsay (24 March 2014). "10,883 out of 10,885 scientific articles agree: Global warming is happening, and humans are to blame". Salon. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- ^ Powell, James Lawrence (29 January 2014). "Harvard and Brown Fail on Climate". The Nation. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
- ^ Powell, James; Mann, Michael E. (February 5, 2018). "Rebekah Mercer Puts a Museum's Credibility at Risk". New York Times. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
- ^ Powell, James Lawrence (2020). Deadly Voyager: The Ancient Comet Strike that Changed Earth and Human History. ISBN 9780578666778.
- ^ Powell, James Lawrence (January–March 2022). "Premature rejection in science: The case of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis". Science Progress. 105 (1): 1–43. doi:10.1177/00368504211064272. PMC 10450282. PMID 34986034.
- ^ Holliday, Vance T.; Daulton, Tyrone L.; Bartlein, Patrick J.; Boslough, Mark B.; Breslawski, Ryan P.; Fisher, Abigail E.; Jorgeson, Ian A.; Scott, Andrew C.; Koeberl, Christian; Marlon, Jennifer; Severinghaus, Jeffrey; Petaev, Michail I.; Claeys, Philippe (2023-07-26). "Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH)". Earth-Science Reviews: 104502. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502.
- ^ Bradley, James. "Honorary Degrees". Berea College Hutchins Library. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
- ^ "(9739) Powell = 1987 SH7 = 1994 AS1". Minor Planet Center. IAU. Retrieved 5 February 2019.