Chandragomin
![]() | This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (September 2022) |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/The_Mahasiddha_%28Great_Adept%29_Chandragomin_LACMA_AC1992.208.2_%281_of_5%29.jpg/275px-The_Mahasiddha_%28Great_Adept%29_Chandragomin_LACMA_AC1992.208.2_%281_of_5%29.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/11th-century_Shisyalekha_palm_leaf_mauscript%2C_5th-century_CE_Buddhist_epistolary_text_by_Candragomin%2C_Devanagari_script%2C_Nepal_talapatra.jpg/280px-11th-century_Shisyalekha_palm_leaf_mauscript%2C_5th-century_CE_Buddhist_epistolary_text_by_Candragomin%2C_Devanagari_script%2C_Nepal_talapatra.jpg)
Chandragomin (Skt. Candragomin) was an Indian Buddhist lay scholar and poet from the Varendra region of Eastern Bengal.[1] The Tibetan tradition believes challenged Chandrakirti. Chandragomin was a teacher at Nalanda Monastic University during the 5th century. [2] [3] It is unclear when Chandragomin lived, with estimates ranging between 5th to 6th-century CE,[4][5] but his position at Nalanda signifies he lived during the 5th century.
In the Buddhist records, Chandragomin is described as the one who debated Candrakīrti (Devanagari: चन्द्रकीर्ति, Tib. Dawa Drakpa) the Arya Tripitaka Master Shramana who was the Khenpo at Nalanda Mahāvihāra Monastery. Their debate was said to have continued for many years. Chandragomin held the Chittamatra (consciousness-only or Yogachara) view, and Chandrakirti gave his interpretation of Nāgārjuna's view, eventually creating a new school of Madhyamaka known as Prasangika. This Nalanda tradition school is known as Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka or rendered in English as the "Consequentialist" or "Dialecticist" school.
According to Thrangu Rinpoche, Chandragomin was slow in the debate but always had the right answers because each time a question was posed by Chandrakirti, Chandragomin would insist on giving the answer the next day after praying to Avalokiteshvara who would tell him the right answer. [6]
The description of Nalanda Monastery's seven-year debate between Candrakīrti and Candragomin should be Tāranātha's biggest academic mistake in his life. It is believed that with his erudition, he should have read the Commentary on "Mañjuśrī-Nāma-Saṃgīti" of Candragomin for sure. In the 135th verse of the commentary, it is an analysis of the Mādhyamaka and Yogācāra of the Mahāyāna schools. It should not be difficult for Tāranātha to conclude that Candragomin is a Mādhyamika according to Candragomin's commentary on the 135th verse of "Mañjuśrī-Nāma-Saṃgīti". The seven-year debate between Candragomin and Candrakīrti is not a debate between Mādhyamaka and Yogācāra school, but a debate on the nuanced differences of view of the Mādhyamaka school.
Major works
[edit]Part of a series on |
Tibetan Buddhism |
---|
![]() |
- Chadragomin's writings include Letter to a Disciple (Śiṣyalekha) - published by Dharma Publishing as 'Invitation to Enlightenment' ISBN 0-89800-298-2)
- Twenty Verses on the Bodhisattva Percepts (Bodhisattvasaṃvaraviṃśaka).[7]
- Confessional Praise (Deśanāstava)
Translated from the original Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit into Tibetan is Chandragomin's 'Shurangama Mantra Sadhana' (Tibetan canon Tengyur Karchag Phangthangma Toh 3096, Toh 593/2/1). It is titled Sarvatathāgataoṣṇīṣaśitātapatrā-nāmāparājitā-mahāpratyangirā-mahāvidyārājñī-nāma-dhāraṇī; Tibetan name is ['phags pa] De bshin gshegs pa'i gtsug tor nas byung ba'i gdugs dkar po can gshan gyi mi thub pa phir bzlog pa chen mo mchog tu grub pa shes bya ba'i gzungs.
Quote
[edit]Peerless king of physicians, guru of the world,
Totally faultless one, source of virtuous qualities,
Having visualised you, 0 refuge, I, always ill,
Shall confess, describing my changes of fault.
...
With whatever high mind is appropriate,
Abiding in whatever calm state is appropriate,
Who pacifies all the faults in all the modes,
Whatever the Lord may be, that I salute.
Praise in Confession (http://www.bodhicitta.net/Chandragomin%27s%20Praises.htm Archived 25 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine)
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Tatz, Mark (1982). "The Life of Candragomin in Tibetan Historical Tradition". The Tibet Journal. 7 (3): 3–22. JSTOR 43302172.
- ^ Geshe Kelsang Gyatso (2000). Ocean of Nectar: Wisdom and Compassion in Mahayana Buddhism. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-81-208-1730-2.
- ^ Khenchen Palden Sherab Rinpoche, Illuminating the Path, pg 187-188. Padmasambhava Buddhist Center, 2008.
- ^ Śiṣyalekha (MS Add.1161), Cambridge University, Camillo Formigatti and Daniele Cuneo (2016)
- ^ Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (1943). The History of Bengal. University of Dacca. pp. 298–299.
- ^ Venerable Khenchen Thrangu Rinpoche. "Chandragomin and Chandrakirti". Venerable Khenchen Thrangu Rinpoche. Archived from the original on 27 April 2010. Retrieved 18 September 2009.
- ^ Mātr̥Ceṭa (1999). Invitation to Enlightenment: Letter to the Great King Kaniṣka. ISBN 0898002982.
Further reading
[edit]- Geshe Sonam Rinchen, The Bodhisattva Vow, translated and edited by Ruth Sonam, Snow Lion, 2000
- Candragomin, Difficult Beginnings: Three Works on the Bodhisattva Path, translated, with commentary by Mark Tatz, Shambhala, 1985
- Chandragomin - Praise in Confession Archived 25 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine
External links
[edit]- Candrakiirti's critique of Vijñaanavaada, Robert F. Olson, Philosophy East and West, Volume 24 No. 4, 1977, pp. 405–411
- Candrakiirti's denial of the self, James Duerlinger, Philosophy East and West, Volume 34 No. 3, July 1984, pp. 261–272
- Candrakiirti's refutation of Buddhist idealism, Peter G. Fenner, Philosophy East and West, Volume 33 No. 3, July 1983, pp. 251–261