Jump to content

Luis de Molina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other people named Luis Molina, see Luis Molina (disambiguation).
The Reverend
Luis de Molina
SJ
Portrait of Luis de Molina
Born(1535-09-29)29 September 1535
Cuenca, Crown of Castile
Died12 October 1600(1600-10-12) (aged 65)
Madrid, Kingdom of Castile, Crown of Castile
Alma materUniversity of Salamanca
Era16th-century philosophy
Second scholasticism
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolMolinism
School of Salamanca
Main interests
Contract law
Economics
Mercantilism
Notable ideas
Introducing Molinism
Part of a series on
Catholic philosophy
  
Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham
Ethics
Metaphysics
Schools
Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Contemporary

Luis de Molina SJ (29 September 1535 – 12 October 1600) was a Spanish Jesuit jurist, economist and theologian.

Follower of the second scholasticism, member of the School of Salamanca, he was at the origin of a particular theory of the relationship between divine grace and human freedom that has since been called Molinism.

Life

[edit]

Born into a noble and wealthy family in Castile, Luis de Molina followed the aspirations of his parents who wanted him to become a jurist. After learning Latin and literature at the Cathedral School of Cuenca, he enrolled at the University of Salamanca[1].

During his studies, Molina discovered the Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius of Loyola, which led him to join the Society of Jesus and abandon his law studies[1]. In 1553, he became a novice in Alcalá de Henares, where he showed a taste and talent for Christian philosophy. In 1554, he was sent by his superiors to study philosophy at the university of Coimbra[1].

Following the advice of Pedro da Fonseca, he continued his studies after obtaining his master's degree in 1558 in order to become a priest and obtain a doctorate in theology. Between 1563 and 1567, he was a professor of philosophy and theology in Coimbra[2]. At the request of their superiors, Molina and Fonseca then left to teach at the University of the Holy Spirit in Évora[2].

After expounding his theological views in his work Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia, better known simply as Concordia and which was a commentary on the first part of the Summa Theologiae of Thomas Aquinas, he was violently attacked by Tomas de Lemos and Domingo Báñez. The latter went so far as to denounce Molina to the Spanish Inquisition[3]. As a result, he returned to his village of Cuenca to serve as a parish priest and write his major work, De iure et iustitia[3].

In 1597, Pope Clement VIII asked Cardinal Michele Bonelli to gather theologians to verify the conformity of Molinism with the Catholic faith. Taking the name of Congregatio de Auxiliis, this assembly would sit until 1607, when Paul V declared this doctrine acceptable[4].

Sent to Madrid in 1600 by his superiors to teach moral theology at the university of Alcalá. He died in that city on October 12, 1600[5].

Doctrin

[edit]

Molinism

[edit]
Main article: molinism

It is to the first of these that his fame is principally due. It was an attempt to reconcile, in words at least, the Augustinian doctrines of predestination and efficacious grace with the new ideals of the Renaissance concerning free will. Assuming that man is free to perform or not to perform any act whatever, Molina maintains that this circumstance renders the grace of God neither unnecessary nor impossible: not impossible, for God never fails to bestow grace upon those who ask it with sincerity; and not unnecessary, for grace, although not an efficient, is still a sufficient cause of salvation (gratia mere sufficiens, "merely sufficient grace"). Nor, in Molina's view, does his doctrine of free will exclude predestination. The omniscient God, by means of His scientia media ("middle knowledge", a phrase of Molina's invention, though the idea is also to be found in his older contemporary Fonseca), or power of knowing future contingent events, foresees how we shall employ our own free-will and treat his proffered grace, and upon this foreknowledge he can found his predestinating decrees.

These doctrines, which opposed both traditional understanding of Augustinism and Thomism concerning the respective roles of free will and efficacious grace, and the teachings of Martin Luther and John Calvin, excited violent controversy in some quarters, especially on the part of the Dominican Order and of the Jansenists, and at last rendered it necessary for the Pope (Clement VIII) to intervene. At first (1594) he simply enjoined silence on both parties so far as Spain was concerned; but ultimately, in 1598, he appointed the Congregatio de auxiliis Gratiae for the settlement of the dispute, which became more and more a party one. After holding very numerous sessions, the congregation was able to decide nothing, and in 1607 its meetings were suspended by Paul V, who in 1611 prohibited all further discussion of the question de auxiliis and of discussions about efficacious grace, and studious efforts were made to control the publication even of commentaries on Aquinas.[citation needed]

Several regent Masters of the Dominican College of St. Thomas, the future Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum), were involved in the Molinist controversy. The Dominicans Diego Álvarez (c. 1550–1635), author of the De auxiliis divinae gratiae et humani arbitrii viribus,[6] and Tomás de Lemos (1540–1629) were given the responsibility of representing the Dominican Order in debates before Pope Clement VIII and Pope Paul V.[7]

Contract law

[edit]

Although he is a convinced supporter of contractual consensualism[8], Molina remains aware of the differences that still exist between civil law and canon law, but calls for their disappearance[9]. With his opinions, he also prepares the emergence of a theory of the autonomy of the will, later formulated by Pedro de Oñate[10].

Like most members of the School of Salamanca, he discusses the respect of the principles of equity and commutative justice in contractual exchanges, which he considers fundamental[11].

But what is introduced for the common good must not be to the detriment of one person rather than another, by excoriating what natural law prescribes, so that you do not do to another what you do not reasonably wish to be done to you. but it would be to the detriment of one rather than the other, if you did not preserve equality

— Luis de Molina, De iustitia et iure, tract.2, disp.350, col.405, n°6

Discussing the “diamond-water paradox”, Molina cogitated a theory of just price where the utility wasn't take into account. Thus, in his De jure et Justitia he said, “the just price of a pearl, which can be used only to decorate, is higher than the just price of grain, bread, or horses, even if the utility of these things is superior.”

Furthermore, he discusses the effect of defects of consent on the validity of contractual commitments[12] and allows, with Lessius, to distinctly separate the matters of contract law and testamentary law[13].

Economy

[edit]

In his writings on economics, Molina helped further develop a theory of price inflation proposed by Juan de Medina and Martín de Azpilcueta in Salamanca, writing that "[i]n equal circumstances, the more abundant money is in one place, so much less is its value to buy things or to acquire things that are not money."[14]

Works

[edit]
  • De liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, praedestinatione et reprobatione concordia, 4 vols., Lisbona, 1588; 2nd ed. Antwerp, 1595.
  • De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura (in Latin). Lugduni: Pedro Landri. 1588.
  • De jure et justitia, 6 vols., 1593–1609.
  • Commentaria in primam partem divi Thomae (in Latin) (2 vols., fol. ed.). Cuenca. 1593.
  • De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura, 1588
    De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura, 1588
  • De iustitia et iure, 1733
    De iustitia et iure, 1733

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c MacGregor 2018, p. 192.
  2. ^ a b MacGregor 2018, p. 193.
  3. ^ a b MacGregor 2018, p. 194.
  4. ^ MacGregor 2018, p. 194-195.
  5. ^ MacGregor 2018, p. 195.
  6. ^ "Diego Alvarez". The Original Catholic Encyclopedia. 21 July 2010. Archived from the original on 2012-03-16. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
  7. ^ "Lemos "lé-", Tomás de". Enciclopedia Treccani (in Italian). Retrieved 9 March 2013.
  8. ^ Decock 2013, p. 142 and 160-161.
  9. ^ Decock 2013, p. 135-142.
  10. ^ Decock 2013, p. 168.
  11. ^ Decock 2013, p. 510.
  12. ^ Decock 2013, p. 231-234 and 297-302.
  13. ^ Decock 2013, p. 399-406.
  14. ^ Luis de Molina, A Treatise on Money Archived 2018-03-03 at the Wayback Machine. CLP Academic, 2015, p.96.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

A full account of Molina's theology will be found in Gerhard Schneeman's Entstehung der thomistisch-molinistischen Controverse, published in the Appendices (Nos. 9, 13, 14) to the Jesuit periodical, Stimmen aus Maria-Laach.

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Luis de Molina.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luis_de_Molina&oldid=1242551918"