Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowena Ondaan

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rowena Ondaan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Avilich (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and South America. Shellwood (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] among many more Dutch sources. Clearly significant figure in Surinamese women's football with ongoing international career and club career abroad. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Those are the same useless sources you added to the Griffith Vaissaire AFD. Dougal18 (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. First source good, not enough on its own. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The first source is a pure Q&A interview with just two sentences of introduction, nowhere close to SIGCOV. And the rest are even worse. No GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the sourcing lacks the necessary depth. Call up announcements do not address her in detail so do not confer notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG; no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Jogurney (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.