Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
April 21
April 21, 2020
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Business and economy
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
April 20
April 20, 2020
(Monday)
Arts and culture
Business and economy
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
Sports
|
Ramos v. Louisiana
Blurb: In Ramos v. Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court rules 6-3 that criminal convictions require a unanimous decision by the jury. (Post)
News source(s): (Reuters), LA Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Elijahandskip (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Article might need some improvement, but it is a big court case in the US. Elijahandskip (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose It doesn’t seem earth-shattering to me; it just requires two states to follow what the other 48 are already doing. P-K3 (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support on notability, I think the effects on criminal law are significant as it's enshrining a fundamental principle as opposed to merely "yeah, it's the law of the land in almost all of America, except when it isn't." However, given the messy verdict the article needs to be expanded to explain why the justices !voted the way they did. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Having expanded the article, the decision affects all of 2 states (Oregon and Louisiana), and even then, only will cause review of OR's and a portion of Louisiana before 2019 (LA had amended its constitution for unanimous jury convictions now). All other states had cases of unanimous convictions on the books long before this. It is a landmark case in US law, as it is another incorporated Bill of Rights against the states, but its impact is minor relative to the big picture that it is not ITN appropriate as it mostly affirms the status quo. --Masem (t) 00:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Support - Milestone court case that has everlasting effects on the United States' entire criminal justice system. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 00:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per Masem, and not seeing this "in the news". --LaserLegs (talk) 00:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's definitely in the news, its not hard to find coverage, just that its net effect has little change on most of the US , much less the rest of the world. --Masem (t) 01:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Weakoppose as someone who's personally interested in this, this is nominally a big deal that overturns a precedent from the 1970s, the "two states" thing notwithstanding. Having said that, I'm not sure if this reaches the level for a blurb that is expected of court cases that aren't directly notable due to the persons involved. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)- I've given some more thought about this, and I've decided that posting this without the context that only two states still allowed non-unanimous convictions might give people a POV view of the United States. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support This case is a rare one, because it makes formal changes to criminal cases; but I take the point most states had already moved in this direction. Nonetheless, it prevents states from exercising their own discretion as to proceedings in their own territory, and it prevents a (granted small) amount of venue shopping. Added LA Times source to the nomination.130.233.3.157 (talk) 06:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose hyperlocalised minor amendment. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support A key decision in the question of states' rights vs federal rights, which strikes at the heart of constitutional law as it applies to the criminal law system. (It might be difficult to appreciate its scope from within countries which have a stronger federal system of government -- which the U.S. emphatically does not. The best way currently to appreciate the differences is to look at the vast differences in COVID-19 governmental response between states -- and to look at how reviled Obama was for centralizing response to swine flu and Ebola a few years earlier. The battle cry of "states' rights" has not tempered much since the U.S. Civil War.) Essentially, this decision tackles the question of the extent to which states have the ability to interpret the U.S. constitution (see Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution). It is in that sense specifically that the wider ramifications make this decision notable, by changing common practice to federal dictum. Although this does fall within the wider spectrum of Supreme Court cases (after the state courts were given the right to hold jury trials) which have generally determined that Bill of Rights amendments (ie. federal constitutional rights) apply to state trials, very few decisions in this millennium have had comparable weight. (Most of this was ironed out in the 1970s civil rights trials or earlier). Certainly none have had equivalent weight in both the legal sphere and public perception. The right to trial by jury is dear to American hearts. - Tenebris 66.11.171.90 (talk) 09:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Price of oil is negative
Blurb: The Price of oil becomes negative in the US. (Post)
News source(s): CNN NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by 2601:602:9200:1310:31C4:B759:FF29:594C (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Price of oil just became negative in the US. That's a giant abnormality, as instead of a commodity, "black gold" is a liability/toxic asset. CNN NYT. 2601:602:9200:1310:31C4:B759:FF29:594C (talk) 22:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- As with the previous stories on the market turndown, we should wait for a trend. If this lasts for a few days, that might be an issue to post, but a daily blip in a financial market should not be an ITN as proven out from before. --Masem (t) 22:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- But NEGATIVE prices is an extreme aberration. It's like having news of a large asteroid with uncertain orbit being predicted to hit Earth, even though later orbit measurements proves "just miss" status. Difference is that this has not happened on the NY Mercantile Exchange since its inception in 1983. 2601:602:9200:1310:31C4:B759:FF29:594C (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- We tend to judge blurbs here, which means you have to have one first. Most of the ideas I have would be greeted with either "trivial!" or "Coronovirus 'impacts' cover this." GreatCaesarsGhost 22:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Again, there's blips in markets. The media jumps at those, we are looking at the larger picutre. A sustained negative price would be something. But even with that, I would expect a more narrow focus article on why it got to negative like this (is this an extension of the russia-opec price war earlier? is this COVID related? etc.) --Masem (t) 00:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- But NEGATIVE prices is an extreme aberration. It's like having news of a large asteroid with uncertain orbit being predicted to hit Earth, even though later orbit measurements proves "just miss" status. Difference is that this has not happened on the NY Mercantile Exchange since its inception in 1983. 2601:602:9200:1310:31C4:B759:FF29:594C (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
*Oppose this is one specific type of oil (West Texas Intermediate) for a specific futures contract (May delivery in Oklahoma, and today was the last day trading was allowed for this contract). All the other major oil indices are still positive. Juxlos (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Change to Weak Support based on media coverage. Juxlos (talk) 05:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support big deal in business news today, article is decent. Weak because of the one sentence update and because the target it "proseline-y" --LaserLegs (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support on notability, this is far crazier than a big one-day drop in stock indices which we routinely post. Needs expansion though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support A huge deal and a milestone on the way towards severe economic downturn. It's not just the government anymore; private companies are willing to pay their customers to stay in business. Contra Juxlos above, this did not just impact WTI; the majority of US-domestic crude went negative. WTI is just the "benchmark" which is reported in the popular press; TX sour was even more negative at ca. -50USD/bbl.130.233.3.157 (talk) 06:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Prime Minister of Israel
Blurb: After an unprecedented three elections in one year, Netanyahu and Gantz sign a unity government agreement ending 17 months of stalemate (Post)
Alternative blurb: The 2019–20 Israeli constitutional crisis ends with Benjamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel.
Alternative blurb II: The Thirty-fifth_government_of_Israel finally approved following agreement of Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz ending a seventeen month caretaker government.
Alternative blurb III: After seventeen months, the Likud and Blue and White parties reach a power-sharing agreement between Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz for the Israeli government.
News source(s): JPost NYTimes, Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Sir Joseph (talk · give credit)
Sir Joseph (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I nominated this and pointed to PM, but it could also go to Netanyahu or Gants. I do think this is notable because Israel had three elections in one year and had a caretaker government for 17 months and almost had 4 elections in one year until they finally got a coalition agreement signed. That seems notable in itself. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I would think there should be a separate article to cover what's been 17 months of stalemate. It might require more digging into regional sources for development. --Masem (t) 18:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- There is one, 2019–20 Israeli constitutional crisis. As for Prime Minister of Israel, it has no updates – in fact it's had only four edits to it this year.-- P-K3 (talk) 18:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Pawnkingthree, That article was for a specific moment in time, not necessarily on the whole shebang, so not sure if that would be a good article for this. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Masem, We have articles on the individual elections, for example, 2020_Israeli_legislative_election. We can also blurb it to Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz form unity government after 17 months of stalemate. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Certainly some summary-level article, maybe looking at it from a timeline POV, could be made. At that level, you don't need the details of the elections, just net result and how one election came out from the previous, etc. Just something to give a better history as a summary style article. --Masem (t) 19:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- There is one, 2019–20 Israeli constitutional crisis. As for Prime Minister of Israel, it has no updates – in fact it's had only four edits to it this year.-- P-K3 (talk) 18:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I would think there should be a separate article to cover what's been 17 months of stalemate. It might require more digging into regional sources for development. --Masem (t) 18:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Note: The story is certainly covered by major news outlets to sufficient depth, but that's only half the necessary bits. We also need a quality article with a sufficient update so readers can get a full story from it. It doesn't have to be specifically about this event, but it does have to have enough information to place the event in historical context and provide enough information to give readers a good understanding. What article are we assessing? The Prime Minister of Israel article does not have a sufficient amount of updated material yet. --Jayron32 19:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) (post ec note): The altblurb bolded article is also not updated. It states the crisis ended on March 26, and contains no information about the current news. --Jayron32 19:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment added less colorful alt-blurb feel free to tweak it in place --LaserLegs (talk) 19:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment what changed? The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 19:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, Sky are now reporting this as a "unity government" in the face of Covid-19. Not quite what I'm seeing here. In any case, not really interesting. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Three elections in one year with a caretaker prime minister, and heading to a fourth election, now the country will have a unity government with a PM and a vice PM and an agreement to split up and then have the PM's swap position. That sounds like news to me and certainly interesting. I don't know of other stable democracies that have had three elections in one year, so that in itself is interesting. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Everything you say may be true; but there is no properly written and sourced text in any target article, so what exactly are we supposed to assess for quality? Instead of spending all of your time arguing with people here, you could be off expanding and referencing an article we could post to the main page. --Jayron32 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the explanation. It sounds more like some Trivial Pursuit question ("In 2019–20, which country had three elections before ending up with a unity government?") but nothing more. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Everything you say may be true; but there is no properly written and sourced text in any target article, so what exactly are we supposed to assess for quality? Instead of spending all of your time arguing with people here, you could be off expanding and referencing an article we could post to the main page. --Jayron32 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Three elections in one year with a caretaker prime minister, and heading to a fourth election, now the country will have a unity government with a PM and a vice PM and an agreement to split up and then have the PM's swap position. That sounds like news to me and certainly interesting. I don't know of other stable democracies that have had three elections in one year, so that in itself is interesting. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, Sky are now reporting this as a "unity government" in the face of Covid-19. Not quite what I'm seeing here. In any case, not really interesting. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Stale? The article on the crisis says that Gantz was chosen as speaker of the Knesset almost a month ago. What about this agreement is new? The article is not particularly clear. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, I didn't put that alt-blurb in and the constitutional crisis was only a specific point in this whole 17 month timeline. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sir Joseph, okay, but I still don't understand the timeline here, and the JPost article didn't help me. I want to support this, but I'm not clear on what happened in this agreement that didn't happen last month. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- There's definitely events today that establish a deal (see NYtimes + Guardian), which appears to be giving Netanyahu 18 add'l months as PM, after which he is to turn it over to Gantz for the rest of the term. --Masem (t) 20:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Masem, that news I can support, if there's a sufficient update to post in an article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, I expanded the article mentioned in the third blurb. Sir Joseph (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Masem, that news I can support, if there's a sufficient update to post in an article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, I didn't put that alt-blurb in and the constitutional crisis was only a specific point in this whole 17 month timeline. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I found an article Thirty-fifth_government_of_Israel that has a good background to the whole mess that should give readers a good primer on this, I added a blurb. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Expand details on today's (20 April) agreement and I'd support this. This is the type of timeline/summary article I spoke to earlier. --Masem (t) 20:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Masem, done, I am working on more, but I started it.
- Expand details on today's (20 April) agreement and I'd support this. This is the type of timeline/summary article I spoke to earlier. --Masem (t) 20:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - I think alternative blurb III is the most thorough. TJMSmith (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, I think alt 3 is the best. Not sure if I can undo the other choices, or my nom for my blurb, but I Support alt 3 blurb. Sir Joseph (talk) 22:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose absolutely no clarity over what is making this in any way significant. Some fluff about a deal, some sharing, some Covid-19, nope, nothing that an encyclopedia should be promoting, perhaps a tabloid. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 21:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
April 19
April 19, 2020
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Closed) 2020 Nova Scotia killings
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: At least 13 are killed in a mass shooting attack in Portapique, Nova Scotia, Canada. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least thirteen people die in a spree killing in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alternative blurb II: At least thirteen people die in a spree killing in rural Nova Scotia, Canada.
News source(s): CBC News, BBC, NYTimes, AP, Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by 142.122.141.211 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Strong support as nominator. 142.122.141.211 (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- FWIW as nominator, it is presumed you support posting. --Masem (t) 00:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support ALT and article seems to be in shaped for ITN. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 00:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Article covers the basics, and with the perp killed, its determining the why which will take take. I offer Alt2 as to note it was in rural NS as Portapique is a bit tooo obscure (but identified in the article now). --Masem (t) 00:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- And to note for others, it was a combination for shootings and arson, to the "13 people die" is the right wording here. --Masem (t) 00:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Article is in acceptable condition and is being worked on. Huge loss of life for Canada. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose / Wait the article is still lean on details, and while tragic this isn't important enough to rush to the main page. I'd like to see a full paragraph on the perpetrator and given the nature of the spree a timeline and some details about the victims. --LaserLegs (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Proving to be one of the deadliest shootings in Canadian history, and has made international headlines. Article has enough information to inform, and is being updated as details are released. Sportyguy03 (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support either alt. Making international news, and the article is decent enough. Natureium (talk) 01:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support with preference to alt2. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 01:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 01:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- You made up your own instead of posting any of the options above? Natureium (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Natureium, that doesn't seem right. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 01:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Would have at least liked to see that particular blurb proposed here instead of having the nominator's disregarded. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Natureium, that doesn't seem right. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 01:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- You made up your own instead of posting any of the options above? Natureium (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I believe there should be reference to it being the deadliest mass shooting rampage in Canada.— Crumpled Fire • contribs • 03:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- We usually don't include such superlatives in blurbs. In the article it is fine. --Masem (t) 03:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Mass shooting is more common and understandable than spree killing. The current blurb seems fine. Gotitbro (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment – Agree with previous re "mass shooting," which is the usual term. "Spree" connotes an element of enjoyment or fun – highly inappropriate for such events. – Sca (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's not what spree killer says, it merely defines it as the killing of two or more people in a short space of time in multiple locations.-- P-K3 (talk) 12:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Stephen knows what he's doing. Let's not jump to premature conclusions.--WaltCip (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. It's obvious that mass shooting is the common term. It's also clear that the blurb was reworded so it didn't mirror (and thus clash) with an existing blurb. This really is nothing to see here territory. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 13:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Wot other blurb does it clash with?" asked William. ——SN54129 14:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Thirty-eight people are killed in ..." The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Check. Well, that's certainly an argument for keeping them apart, but I don't see how calling this a mass shooting or a spree killing makes a difference; the tornado blurb uses neither. Still, I'm more interested in Stephen's supervote than anything else. ——SN54129 14:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support current blurb as nominator. 142.122.141.211 (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I meant avoiding the clash of the portion of the blurb I mentioned, not that the tornado blurb mentions spree killings. And it doesn't take a genius to see that "mass shooting" is about 20 times more common than "spree killing" for this specific news item. We all already know that admins are able to make changes to blurbs to better suit the main page and our readers. This is no different. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 15:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- When they're misleading, absolutely (as opposed to, making them misleading!) ——SN54129 16:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Check. Well, that's certainly an argument for keeping them apart, but I don't see how calling this a mass shooting or a spree killing makes a difference; the tornado blurb uses neither. Still, I'm more interested in Stephen's supervote than anything else. ——SN54129 14:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Thirty-eight people are killed in ..." The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Wot other blurb does it clash with?" asked William. ——SN54129 14:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. It's obvious that mass shooting is the common term. It's also clear that the blurb was reworded so it didn't mirror (and thus clash) with an existing blurb. This really is nothing to see here territory. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 13:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Spree: "A merry frolic; especially, a drinking frolic." – Sca (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC
- Per MW "an unrestrained indulgence in or outburst of an activity" [1] which is probably more the origin where "spree killing" comes from. --Masem (t) 15:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
April 18
April 18, 2020
(Saturday)
Arts and culture
Business and economy
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Posted) RD: Lucien Szpiro
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Colleague website, colleague tweet
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by MarkH21 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: French mathematician, Fellow of the American Mathematical Society, known for Szpiro's conjecture; more refs to follow — MarkH21talk 19:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment – Rather stubby. – Sca (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment – French mathematician with no article in French. Nigej (talk) 21:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I found that quite strange. He has a lengthy one on the German Wikipedia though. — MarkH21talk 21:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Article was recently expanded and is sourced. TJMSmith (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 04:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
April 17
April 17, 2020
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Health and environment
International relations
|
(Posted) RD: Abba Kyari
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Ammarpad (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Nigerian president's chief of staff, COVID-19 death – Ammarpad (talk) 06:47, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment just a couple of refs needed (cn's added), will support when addressed Joseywales1961 (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Norman Hunter
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Black Kite (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Egghead06 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Notable English footballer, COVID-19. Well sourced as I and others rewrote it when he was diagnosed, sadly. Black Kite (talk) 10:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support good to go. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Govvy (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nigej (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted --Jayron32 13:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
April 16
April 16, 2020
(Thursday)
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Jane Dee Hull
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AZCentral
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Almost stale already – Muboshgu (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Althea McNish
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Trinidad and Tobago Newsday
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Proscribe (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Fabric designer Andrew🐉(talk) 17:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm no expert on textile design but seems ok. Nigej (talk) 21:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Ulrich Kienzle
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FAZ
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: German TV personality, Near East and Middle East (interviews with Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein), political debates Frontal, analyzed in at least one book. - The article was basically there, only with zero references which I changed. Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Good work. RD ready.BabbaQ (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support – Copy-edited to Eng. syntax. – Sca (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted. El_C 07:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted to RD) RD: Gene Deitch
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Tagesspiegel Prague Morning Deadline Hollywood
Credits:
- Nominated by Fram (talk · give credit)
- Updated by CherokeeJack1 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Notable animator and comics artist, death noted across multiple countries and languages. Not a Covid19 death. Article seems fully sourced already. Fram (talk) 10:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Article in decent shape. --Masem (t) 20:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. Even without being in RD, this got more than 20,000 page views yesterday (more than what many articles get when listed at RD). Notable subject, good enough article, would be a pity to let it become "stale" for no good reason. Fram (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support. The article looks very good. He was a major figure in animation world. - EugεnS¡m¡on 15:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. Added references for the last two CN tags. SpencerT•C 21:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
RD: Christophe (singer)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: French singer, COVID-related death. Significant lack of sourcing though. Masem (t) 13:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
RD: Luis Sepúlveda
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Alsoriano97 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Renowned Chilean writer and journalist. Dies from COVID-19. I'm trying to update his article as it really need it. User:Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Support in principle but needs some refs. Kingsif (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Largely unsourced. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) South Korean election
Blurb: In the South Korean legislative election, the ruling Democratic Party (leader Lee Hae-chan pictured) and their allies increase their majority in the National Assembly (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Modest Genius (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Some actual news that isn't coronavirus-related. The results table has been updated but there's no prose reaction yet, or description of the extra steps taken to run the election during a pandemic. Modest Genius talk 13:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Well sourced, good length. At least non-coronavirus stuff for a change. TuorEladar (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Decent article. The table in the section on political parties needs to clarify its source. I think it is cited in the text above but it's not completely clear. Otherwise looks good. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Worth adding. Nigej (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Election with decent article. Kingsif (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment though I question our obsession with a prose update for election results, we do tend to require one and this article seems to be lacking it --LaserLegs (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree.
I don't think it's ready yet. Modest Genius talk 21:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree.
- Comment That is not a high-quality image of Lee-Hae Chen. Do we have any better ones? Rockin 04:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per the still-present shortcomings noted by the nominator. Also, the Opinion polls section contains only a link, which I consider to be an empty section.130.233.3.31 (talk) 06:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support per ITN/R, though a lot of commentators on media noted that the party's popularity soared due to COVID so this is somewhat related, but alas. Juxlos (talk) 06:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Juxlos It's unnecessary to say "support per ITNR" as being ITNR means that the merits are not in dispute; only article quality is at issue(and the blurb). 331dot (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wikipedia:In the news § Updated content, needs sourced prose update on the results. Preferably, include a gist of what the reaction is.—Bagumba (talk) 07:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment – Articles, whether about elections, tornadoes or sports events, that rely too heavily on tables, charts, etc., don't serve readers very well. If we're an encyclopedia we should be presenting mainly prose.
Undecided about this one, mainly 'cause it's ITN/R. – Sca (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)- Being on ITNR does not supersede the page meeting quality standards.—Bagumba (talk) 17:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Updated: I've added a section on coronavirus impact, a prose summary of the results, and copyedited the rest of the article. Modest Genius talk 15:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ready thanks Modest Genius. --LaserLegs (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
RD: Keiji Fujiwara
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2] (source in Japanese)
Credits:
- Nominated by Nahnah4 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Windywalk (talk · give credit) and Pokelova (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Japanese voice actor, most famous for dubbing Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man, as well as other Japanese shows including Crayon Shin-chan and Fullmetal Alchemist. Nahnah4 (talk
- Weak Oppose The article is (gasp!) reasonably well sourced. But it consists mostly of tables. Once you take them out you have very little left. Needs some text. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Long list of "Filmography" but the "Biography" is just a series of bullet points. Nigej (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This is very close (surprising given the enormous amount of 'ography), and at 1.5 kB of prose, it's just there. If a Japanese-capable reader could fill in the current disjointed prose with a few more sentences it would pass.130.233.3.31 (talk) 07:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per previous three. As noted above, articles that rely too heavily on tables, charts, etc., don't serve readers very well. If we're an encyclopedia, we should be presenting mainly prose. – Sca (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
RD: Howard Finkel
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USA Today
Credits:
- Nominated by GaryColemanFan (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: World Wrestling Entertainment Hall of Famer, employed by the company for 45ish years and best known as ring announcer. Obviously needs substantial work, but hopefully can get in good shape in the next few days. GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The vast majority of statements in his bio are unsourced. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Would need a significant rewrite/sourcing Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Currently in the ring, weighing in at "immovable object", from Shark Lick, Wyoming...Lethal Lockdown! Seriously though, nothing's getting out or in. For a while, apparently. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Still largely unsourced, and four of the cites are from IMDb as well. Black Kite (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nominator's comment - This article is fully protected, and the content dispute may well carry on in two days when it's unprotected. This has prevented the sourcing from being anywhere close to ready, and I understand that this nomination will go stale. So it goes. Can't blame a guy for hoping. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
April 15
April 15, 2020
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Politics and elections
Sports
|
(Stale) RD: Ranjit Chowdhry
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Yahoo News
Credits:
- Nominated by 7&6=thirteen (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Donaldd23 (talk · give credit) and 7&6=thirteen (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Oppose at the moment. First half of the career section and the filmography are unsourced. Black Kite (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Joe Brown (climber)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, The British Mountaineering Council
Credits:
- Nominated by SchroCat (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: A couple of minor points unreferenced, but will sort these shortly. Now sorted. Brown was one of the greats of mountain climbing and transformed the sport in the 1950s and early 1960s. Numerous 'firsts' in climbing, and pioneered several pieces of safety equipment. SchroCat (talk) 11:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me.-- P-K3 (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support – Looks quite complete & well-referenced. Subject apparently had an international reputation. (German Wiki's RD lists him.) – Sca (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Much improved. Nigej (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted—Bagumba (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
(Stale) RD: Lee Konitz
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, NY Times, The Independent, Billboard, Metro
Credits:
- Nominated by SirEdimon (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Oppose Poorly referenced. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
(Stale) RD: Brian Dennehy
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
(Posted) RD: Adam Alsing
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [3], [4]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by BabbaQ (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: One of Sweden’s best known television presenters. Covid 19 related death. BabbaQ (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support good work turning this article around from a stub, decently referenced Joseywales1961 (talk) 23:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 00:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
(Closed) Tom Moore (soldier) charity
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: ...Tom's 100th Birthday Walk For The NHS has raised millions of pounds to support patients and carers in the COVID-19 pandemic (Post)
News source(s): [5]
Credits:
- Nominated by Pigsonthewing (talk · give credit)
- Created by Tabletop123 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Philafrenzy (talk · give credit) and Pigsonthewing (talk · give credit)
- Oppose good faith nom with regret. It's a great human interest story but there have been a lot of people stepping up during the not so great pestilence. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This would be a good DYK candidate, I'm not sure about ITN.-- P-K3 (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, better for DYK I know "better for DYK" is often seen (rightly) as a sarcastic put-down, but this is genuinely better for DYK and does meet the eligibility requirements AFAICT, so I encourage the nominator to take it there. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose While some major news outlets are carrying the story, I'm not seeing its appearance in the context of those outlets (i.e. the section they put it in, the depth and breadth of coverage, etc.) which indicates to me that the story has the level of significance necessary for an ITN post. --Jayron32 18:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
April 14
April 14, 2020
(Tuesday)
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Margit Feldman
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Created by Missvain (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Hungarian-American public speaker, educator, activist, and Holocaust survivor. COVID-related. TJMSmith (talk) 05:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Kerstin Meyer
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph and Swedish
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bonadea (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Internationally known Swedish mezzo who sang many world premieres. - Referencing was poor ... - more detail in the sources, but I need a break. I referenced the composer below, - very impressed. Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Good to go for RD.BabbaQ (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
(Closed) RD: Dmitri Smirnov (composer)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6], [7]; see also sources in [8]
Credits:
- Nominated by Pigsonthewing (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Support, per nom. Sad. As he died 9 April, I am afraid this should be moved to the date, and is probably too late. Can we make an exception for one of us?? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, his death was in the news on 9 April, this is not the case of a death notice postponed by family/etc. It can be posted if it can be brought to quality but we're not about to make exceptions because someone was a Wikipedian (that's terribly nepotism, the last thing ITN should engage in. Signpost or other WMF venues, sure). --Masem (t) 23:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Eh. "I'm not absolutely opposed to a little nepotism, as long as you keep it in the family." -John F. Kennedy
- Oppose Referencing is dreadful. Willing to consider an IAR RD exception per Gerda if the article can be brought up to speed in a timely manner. But it's going to need some work. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral for IAR, but oppose for the reason that he was a Wikipedian per Masem. It's navel-gazey to do so; if there's another reason for IAR I'd be open to it (pending quality, of course) but we shouldn't be giving ourselves preferential treatment. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Virtually no referencing; it's a massive BLP fail. - SchroCat (talk) 08:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- What a shame.--WaltCip (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Life is a never ceasing string of nonstop disappointment until you die. You should probably learn to expect nothing except such disappointment for every second of existence, or you're in for a long ride. --Jayron32 18:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Hank Steinbrenner
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. Article quality is not great; while referenced, it basically consists of a series of random and contextless quotes by the subject without much narrative flow and leaving huge gaps in his biography. Not really a high-enough quality article for the main page. If the article was expanded and given more narrative structure, I could support this. --Jayron32 16:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Jayron32, I cut some of it, but the thing is... his time as managing partner of the Yankees was spent, publicly at least, being a big mouth. Then he stepped aside and let his quieter brother run the show. I can add more about his business interests in Florida to balance it out, but lots of the stuff about Red Sox Nation is key to his biography. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Cutting wasn't the issue. You don't make this any better by removing anything. I don't mind periodic quotes and paraphrases and the like. The issue wasn't removing those, it was adding more text around them to build up a narrative. --Jayron32 18:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- The trouble is, there isn't much text to add around it. His big time in the public eye was 2007-08. Per ESPN today:
"While Hank was in his 13th season as a general partner and 11th as co-chair, he did not appear to have much involvement in the team's operations in recent years.
– Muboshgu (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- The trouble is, there isn't much text to add around it. His big time in the public eye was 2007-08. Per ESPN today:
- Cutting wasn't the issue. You don't make this any better by removing anything. I don't mind periodic quotes and paraphrases and the like. The issue wasn't removing those, it was adding more text around them to build up a narrative. --Jayron32 18:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Jayron32, I cut some of it, but the thing is... his time as managing partner of the Yankees was spent, publicly at least, being a big mouth. Then he stepped aside and let his quieter brother run the show. I can add more about his business interests in Florida to balance it out, but lots of the stuff about Red Sox Nation is key to his biography. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm not wowed by the article quality, but I think it meets our customary standards for RD. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support While I agree that the composition of the article is not optimal, it contains that essentials of the subject's life, establishes the basis of notability, links out to other articles sufficiently and suitably, and everything is referenced. The Controversial statements section I take in the same manner as the ubiquitous Philanthropy & charity sections in articles about living royals; it just comes with the territory.130.233.2.77 (talk) 05:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Article meets the RD requirements on length and sourcing.-- P-K3 (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Long article, good sources, but do we need a Controversial Statements, though? Also, good linking and has the basics. TuorEladar (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: