User talk:Darwinerasmus

Welcome!

Hello, Darwinerasmus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Reply to welcome

Thanks - the first five years following my diagnosis i spent actively resarching what schizophrenia meant. it was first coined as 'the schizophrenias' by a humanist doctor as it was previously referred to as s kind of dementia - however it has assumed many negative connotations since. the link between autism and schizophrenia is a promising one as you couldn't possibly get two more diametrically opposed labels in terms of public perception. Some of the original schizophrenias were hebophrenia - from the greek god hebes associated with onset in adolescence , apophenia meaning relating one unconnected thing with another etc etc , however the name has become homogenised over the recent years - there are of course links with previous hypotheses such as the bicameral mind and up and coming theories such as 'unfocussed semantic activation in the right hemisphere of the brain'. i have made a FOIA request to the bbc regarding which WHO ICD classification each criminal that a news story was reported on with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in the previous six months had and recieved the response that they could not disclose this due to patient confidentiality unless it was reported in the open courts which was highly unlikely. i have forwarded their response to the research and information compliance dpeartment of the courts to ask them to consider this. i beleive the next ICD classification is due to be released in 2011/2012 and i intend to continue my campaign for the change of this damaging label till then. I am also a qualified social worker , i was registered unconditionally. Where is the tilde on an apple mac keyboard?? §§§§ lol. i have a pc-keyboard now set to British-PC and still have a mac. Darwinerasmus (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Saw your last comment and thought I might help. On my Mac, the tilde is on the upper right, between the tab and esc. Shift plus that key produces: ~ and the four I'm entering now: Ucucha 20:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC). You can also use a button above the edit screen to enter your signature.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alternative perception spectrum

The article Alternative perception spectrum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-existant disorder or label. I searched in quotes for "Alternative perception spectrum" and brought up no reliable sources which even mentioned this proposed alternative name for schizophrenia so the article name is origional research and original thought.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 09:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Quite along time ago , I moved my musings on this matter to a blog page called notes from the alternative perception spectrum ^[2] Darwinerasmus (talk) 08:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Alternative perception spectrum

I have nominated Alternative perception spectrum, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative perception spectrum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 11:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Social model of disability

I think we can give each other a pat on the back for how we've tidied up the article. We rock! Roger (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I've requested Peer Review, I believe it deserves at least a Class B rating. Let's see what an outsider thinks of it. Roger (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree it was some good teamwork , however i think the format of the references still needs some cleanup and i just realised i made an error in citing statistics - which should read approx one fifth of working age adults were disabled in 2001 - ill correct that now and if i have time see about getting those odd poi type references sorted. (Darwinerasmus (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)).

Merge discussion for Medical model of disability

An article that you have been involved in editing, Medical model of disability , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tcp-ip (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I haven't logged in for quite a while due to other commitments and appeared to have missed this debate entirely ,though i approve of the outcome. I have also just caught up on the peer review of social model of disability page and will give that some attention when i have the time. Darwinerasmus (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Language wheels

{{Helpme}} Wanting to create a stub on 'language wheels' (Darwinerasmus (talk) 19:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)).

I see that you made a start on this, so I'm cancelling this "helpme" request. Feel free to ask for fresh help if you run into problems. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Language wheels

The article Language wheels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

total absence of evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

You seem to have anticipated my prod by creating User:Darwinerasmus/Language wheel. So I have concentrated all your edits there. Needless to say, do not move the article back into (article) space until it is properly referenced. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

That Baltic thing

I've reverted you.

1. Truthfall.com doesn't meet our criteria as a reliable source, see WP:RS

2. You've copied material from that source directly into our article, which is a WP:Copyright violation. See also WP:PARAPHRASE. And note that from a short article, if you want to quote it, the quote itself has to be very very short. I'll have to delete it from your userspace also at some point.

3. The tone made the article, in Wikipedia's voice, present the claims as fact, which we can't do - see WP:NPOV.

Sorry about all this, as I found when I was new and still find, editing Wikipedia isn't as easy as it seems at first! Dougweller (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks i admit that last one was a bit of a lazy edit. I've taken your comments on board in the edit i made today on the article having read the above guidance and hope we can agree on contributing to this article together rather than entering into an edit war. If you have further dispute with my additions , can i request you post your contentions on the articles talk page and we look to resolve them there rather than reverting and deleting the whole thing. Darwinerasmus (talk) 17:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darwinerasmus. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 18:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 18:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal mind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persinger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reputational Currency (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reputational Currency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Darwinerasmus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Flat Out (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social construction of schizophrenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DSM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Reputational Currency concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Reputational Currency, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Darwinerasmus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Darwinerasmus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Orginum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Orginum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 18:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry i cannot remember emplacing originum here. However I did put in on unencycloepedia Darwinerasmus (talk) 12:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Darwinerasmus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reputational Currency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reputational Currency, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hummerrocket (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reputational Currency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reputational Currency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darwinerasmus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darwinerasmus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darwinerasmus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a polymath and a peloton engineer my nom de plume is 'mog' Darwinerasmus (talk) 08:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darwinerasmus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason now that I was blocked , I had posted un-encycloepedic content and not referenced it , although it was mostly small intangible comments on matters that I had taken an interest in , that are perhaps more suited to a theoretical or research wiki.i apologise whole-heartedly if this has damaged the reputation of wikipedia.org , where I have also made many small edits here and there on matters that interest me , co-re written the page on the social model of disability etc and request that I am unblocked so I am able to contribute further in a sensible manner , as the majority of my edits are. Darwinerasmus (talk) 17:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having reviewed your past edits and this request, I see no indication that unblocking you would be a net benefit to the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

@ST47:Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

any progress vis a vis unblocking my account , i have some useful contributions to make. Darwinerasmus (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

additionally , no expiry day was set on my block Darwinerasmus (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

i made some edits on medical cannabis which were reverted or changed ^[3] [[[User:Darwinerasmus|Darwinerasmus]] (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)}

This particular reference to this article was meant to show that I am capable of making good edits to wikipedia online unlike the nonsense on third hand smoke which is unencycloepediable.Do people recall what happened in the 'holocaust' or the protest song 'first they came...' ? ^[4] . nothing about us without us.

i intend to add the full text to wikisource later

Luke 3:23 - 4:4 (YLT) Jesus himself was beginning to be about thirty years of age, being, as was supposed, son of Joseph, 24 the [son] of Eli, the [son] of Matthat, the [son] of Levi, the [son] of Melchi, the [son] of Janna, the [son] of Joseph, 25 the [son] of Mattathias, the [son] of Amos, the [son] of Naum, the [son] of Esli, 26 the [son] of Naggai, the [son] of Maath, the [son] of Mattathias, the [son] of Semei, the [son] of Joseph, the [son] of Juda, 27 the [son] of Joanna, the [son] of Rhesa, the [son] of Zerubbabel, the [son] of Shealtiel, 28 the [son] of Neri, the [son] of Melchi, the [son] of Addi, the [son] of Cosam, the [son] of Elmodam, the [son] of Er, 29 the [son] of Jose, the [son] of Eliezer, the [son] of Jorim, the [son] of Matthat, 30 the [son] of Levi, the [son] of Simeon, the [son] of Juda, the [son] of Joseph, the [son] of Jonan, the [son] of Eliakim, 31 the [son] of Melea, the [son] of Mainan, the [son] of Mattatha, the [son] of Nathan, 32 the [son] of David, the [son] of Jesse, the [son] of Obed, the [son] of Booz, the [son] of Salmon, the [son] of Nahshon, 33 the [son] of Amminadab, the [son] of Aram, the [son] of Esrom, the [son] of Pharez, 34 the [son] of Judah, the [son] of Jacob, the [son] of Isaac, the [son] of Abraham, the [son] of Terah, the [son] of Nahor, 35 the [son] of Serug, the [son] of Reu, the [son] of Peleg, the [son] of Eber, 36 the [son] of Salah, the [son] of Cainan, the [son] of Arphaxad, the [son] of Shem, the [son] of Noah, the [son] of Lamech, 37 the [son] of Methuselah, the [son] of Enoch, the [son] of Jared, the [son] of Mahalaleel, 38 the [son] of Cainan, the [son] of Enos, the [son] of Seth, the [son] of Adam, the [son] of God. 1 And Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, turned back from the Jordan, and was brought in the Spirit to the wilderness, 2 forty days being tempted by the Devil, and he did not eat anything in those days, and they having been ended, he afterward hungered, 3 and the Devil said to him, `If Son thou art of God, speak to this stone that it may become bread.' 4 And Jesus answered him, saying, `It hath been written, that, not on bread only shall man live, but on every saying of God.' Darwinerasmus talk) 07:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)]

what do these archive references mean :

archive 1 through archive six. Darwinerasmus (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

another example on the differences between 'classic' wikipedia and 'modernised' wikipedia'

The article on gender dysphoria is highly unbalanced and should take into account DSM Five (V) . ^[5]^[6] - note the term cardinal should probably be replaced with something else.

[1] ttps://www.wikiwand.com/extension/thank-you

[2] ttps://alternativeperceptionspectrum.blogspot.com/2016/08/reflections-on-being-sectioned.html

[3] ttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_cannabis&oldid=445126792

[4] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...

[5] ttps://www.theravive.com/therapedia/gender-dysphoria-dsm--5-302.85-(f64.9)

[6] ttps://www.wikiwand.com/en/Gender_dysphoria

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]