User talk:Jim1138
I prefer to keep the conversation on one page. If you leave a message on my talk page here, I will likely reply here. If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. Ping me by adding {{Ping|Jim1138}} at the start of your reply, sign with four tildes (~~~~), and save both at the same time. |
To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you! |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Hi, Jim!
Listen that report should not be there! The user didn't do anything wrong. Also, that user is new, so give the user a break. FYI, the page is small, nobody goes on that page anymore and the user that reported him is silly.
I'm reading the article Jorge Enrique Gonzalez Pacheco, it is wonderful article about living person, I do not understand why is being considered for deletion. When the tag will be removed? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.202.146 (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Demolition (film)
Hi Jim(THX?)1138. If you look at the current synopsis and cast texts within the article, you'll realize they have been vandalized. I figured it is better to see no contents than to see gibberish. Please let me know how i can improve a situation such as this one for the future , thanks.
No worries, Thanks!
No worries, I was shocked that the consensus was changed myself. Anyway, you asked if I needed anything. There is an article on "Burn Notice" that is approved for deletion. It just needs an administrator to click delete. It's the entry page for Burn Notice Season 1 episode 2 "Identity". I would delete it myself but I'm not an administrator. Let me know if you could help out. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.166.159 (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Johari window
Thanks for fixing my mistake - I was actually trying to revert that very text from someone else and apparently did it wrong. Appreciate the assist! - Kyle Maxwell (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Antivirus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
there is no such thing as antivirus? make on then or dont stop me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason patrick meyer (talk • contribs) 00:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thanks
thank you my friend for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undergroundrappersoon (talk • contribs) 03:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
help
man i don't now how to upload pic on wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undergroundrappersoon (talk • contribs) 04:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Courtesy notice
- Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: What!?! You reported me again? ;o) Jim1138 (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Wait... did I ever report you in the past? (IP frivolously reported you so felt you should be aware of the AN3 discussion ^_^ ) EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- {ping|EvergreenFir}} Are you taking me seriously again? Afterall, I did add a smiley ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ) Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Too many beer/wine and too little sleep and too much serious business on Wikipedia. lol my bad. ORZ EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- {ping|EvergreenFir}} Are you taking me seriously again? Afterall, I did add a smiley ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ) Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Wait... did I ever report you in the past? (IP frivolously reported you so felt you should be aware of the AN3 discussion ^_^ ) EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
User TJD2
Hello @Jim1138:,
User TJD2 indicates in his report that he tried to find common ground by talking to me in my page, but that was not the case. I posted on his page that he seemed to pick sides, but he simply ignored me. While I am a DePaul student, I am simply trying to combat user TJD2's apparent bias ,perhaps because he is a fan of Milo's anti-feminism stance? It seems that he edits quite a few pages in regards to anti-feminism. The link he provided in regards to the controversy is a personal blog, which means he needs to find another unbiased source. Furthermore, the phrasing of the controversy indicates that he is picking sides. Also, there were no bullet-points in the controversy section, and he added them.
Best, KhalidMilan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalidmilan (talk • contribs) 05:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC) (Khalidmilan (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC))KhalidMilan
regarding dhakar page edit
Hi Jim, I belong to Dhakad community and i found the reference provided earlier in Dhakar page was provided by someone with very little knowledge about the community. Dhakad community is very community in Madhya pradesh and Rajasthan and also founds in part of Maharashtra , Chattisgarh, Gujarat , Uttar Pradesh. I have also updated community website link. I am afraid it is in Hindi but it has detailed information about the community and i have updated the recent leaders active in Indian politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.220.9.214 (talk) 08:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Désiré Video Game
Please check my post and revert your changes, there was a source for the quote: http://haogamers.com/blog/2016/05/31/desire-and-bleak-indifference-in-modern-society/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9sir%C3%A9_(video_game) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagw (talk • contribs) 13:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Google book on Khabarovsk Trial
Hello there, you recently edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khabarovsk_War_Crime_Trials to reinstate the part about Google Book making "Materials on the Trial of Former Servicemen of the Japanese Army Charged with Manufacturing and Employing Bacteriological Weapons" publicly available and also as an ebook. I only see its contents page on Google and it is definitely not offered as an ebook. Do you see something different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.4.174.217 (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- I see about 580-600 pages on https://books.google.com/books?id=ARojAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false. I see an un-copy/pasteable text. Example on pg 490: Comrades Judges, It is my duty to defend the former Chief of Veterinary Service of the former Kwantung Army, Lieutenant General Takahashi Takaatsu. I'm using Firefox in the USA. Perhaps it is restricted in Japan? It is also available for free after a paid membership from http://newbook.com.readingpdf.com/?book=B000UCPH9C Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Heads up
FYI, an IP has opened a discussion about you at ANI and had failed to notify you. Sergecross73 msg me 14:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
see this thread at admin noticeboard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Explain_this_block_to_me68.48.241.158 (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Nowcasting
I cut the description of MIDAS since it the full description could discract the reader from the basic concept. Instead of the long descroiption I wanted to include the following link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-data_sampling — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.51.227 (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Please respond
Sir, we have asked you nicely to respond to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Explain_this_block_to_me . Now please respond because we need you to explain your behavior. If you do not respond, that will be viewed as you either know what you did was wrong or that you are unwilling to take criticism. You have been given over a day to respond, so please respond right away. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:D9DE:B7A4:E655:796D (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- We? You do not appear to have posted on that thread. No one that I can see asked me any direct questions.
- How would you interpret this Will Guy Jordan continue answering next season or is his time really done? to be discussing improvements to the article? It appears to me to be an attempt to start a discussion about what is coming next year. I notice that two others have remove the IP's comment as well, so I don't appear to be alone on this. If the IP read and understood WP:NOTFORUM, s/he could have made correction to the statement to present it as suggesting improvements. Instead the IP provided no explanation, just reverted. Jim1138 (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
MartinLuse
FYI MarvinLuse has literally only posted on talk pages since January; every edit is some nasty Alt-Right bullshit or personal attacks. They are clearly NOTHERE as they have not made a single mainspace edit. Ogress 19:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Ogress: I agree with your analysis. Probably should start an ANI ticket. But, thought I should give him a warning and such first. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip
Like you said, I meant well. Just wanted to see the page corrected.
If I notice any other errors in the future, I'll be sure to make corrections the right way — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.87.27 (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
same idiot made the same edit, can we get him blocked?18abruce (talk) 23:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
WEBB-JONES ARTICLE
Dear Jim1138.
Please do not confirm the errors made by the user 'INVISIBLE'. Please consult my explanations for the article on the talk-page, which I trust shall suffice. THE ARTICLE IS NOT AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL. My name is not Webb-Jones. I chose this for my username because the purpose of the creation of my account was largely the creation of the article, done for the information of the family of Richard Moody in British Columbia. There are mentions of his name, with sources, on other pages. I am astounded by the self-righteous ignorance of the user 'INVISIBLE' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbjones (talk • contribs) 06:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Stack light
Hi ,
I put that link link because i think that it is relevant.
That android application works like stack light. It means that the android device is placed next to the machine and will run like(simulate) stack light .So it can replace replace physical stck light .
Futhermore the system is communicated the issue with other stack holder .
Olivier Michaud . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliviermichaud (talk • contribs) 07:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Freethining Atheist and Agnostic Kinship
Hi Jim, I created a wikipedia page for a high school club I started in 2009, and it comes up as a top google search result when I type my name in. I get too many questions about it from Clients, and wish to remove it all together if thats possible?
Thanks for the help,
Doug — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8802:3600:4700:556E:DE4D:FBF3:C4DA (talk) 07:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
My comment on your edit/ reversal
Hello, I added an external link to the Indian Mathematics page. The link was to the Chinmaya International Foundation's Vedic Mathematics page. Please note that CIF is a world-renowed body under the Chinmaya Mission, and one of select organisations that are involved in the teaching of Vedic Mathematics. Therefore, I do strongly believe that the link added is of immense informational value to users of Wikipedia; it is not intended to be promotional. Thanks, Manoj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:E800:E617:3A7:342F:D917:767A:39D8 (talk) 08:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Upside Down
Looks like the IP made many more changes to the article with unexplained changes. Much of the content and refs were removed again by the IP. Could you fix his mess? Caden cool 11:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi from Mel!
Great to meet you! Join us 4th Saturday's AM at downtown library! Find us Meetup.com / quality of life experiences.
DrMel (talk) 02:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
((Ping jim 1138))
Hallowed be thy name: its not strange to make a mistake and fil sorry about ,so as i do especialy on wiki platforms where "book worms" are organized and solicited in good faith and such a supreme hospitality,i defenetly wouldnt remove a content,its most regretable so: the truth with fatal results~i Thank U~~((Dikgosi Sejabodile)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dikgosi Sejabodile (talk • contribs) 03:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Remove This Talk
@Jim1138: Give me one reason why are you ignoring me now!!! RedEyed Rocker (talk) 11:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- "Are you dumb or what"? I have no time for this. Stay off my talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
@Jim1138: FINE!!! I'M LEAVING! RedEyed Rocker (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)@RedEyed Rocker: We are not shoutwiki.com, so any problems you have there are not ours. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Remove this talk! RedEyed Rocker (talk) 11:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Roxy the dog: To say the least. Jim1138 (talk) 11:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
HI IM INHABITANT OF PEELOWAINCE AND CORRRECTED THE INFO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.69.11.228 (talk) 11:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
This is a public computer
Hi. Don't know who edited the article, nor who's that Amin Younes. This is a public computer in a library, so who did that is someone's guess.
--194.224.155.86 (talk) 11:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
You'll be the judge
Jim1138, maybe you can give me a fair hearing, I added in this into Robert Kagan info box:
Ethnicity = JewishPodhoretz, Norman Podhoretz (2007). World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 62. {{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(help)
Is there a valid reason for it to be removed? Thank you. 175.156.14.63 (talk) 08:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
MacArthur Park
The same IP that you were dealing with on "Upside Down" has also been making the same massive changes at "MacArthur Park (song)" without explaining his many changes. Caden cool 14:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
re: my talk page
Please see my new response to your undo of my edit 64.121.83.151 (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
ur lame
it was accurate, look it up... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3713:C1A0:E1AE:E70:39EC:DA87 (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Recent PFOA and fluorotelomer edits
@Jim1138:
Hello Jim,
I am a novice at editing in Wikipedia and hope I am following your directions correctly.
The changes I made on fluorotelomer-based polymers (FTPs) were to update the article with the latest information from peer-reviewed literature. The two articles on FTPs that I cite are the latest, most accurate studies on the degradation of commercial FTPs. These studies show conclusively that the the main product of the fluorotelomer industry do in fact degrade over the time scales of decades, a 100-fold shortening of early industry research which was fatally flawed in experimental methods. You can check the veracity of these references yourself in the original peer-reviewed journals. Keeping the older status of the article misrepresents current understanding and wrongly serves the interests of parties with financial interest in this issue.
The changes I made on sludge/biosolids as a source of PFOA are the original scientific literature that the news-article citations use as a source of the information. I added an original research article that shows PFOA was uptaken from sludge-applied soils into fodder grass that is in the human food change.
Thanks for your efforts 47.32.118.71 (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Another note on PFOA page
@Jim1138:
Hi Jim, This regards an edit that I think I did which appears to have been undone. Here is the current problematic sentence: "A current PFOA precursor concern are fluorotelomer-based polymers; fluorotelomer alcohols attached to hydrocarbon backbones via ester linkages may detach and be free to biodegrade to PFOA.[73]"
If you read the previous paragraph, I added reference to recent research that proved that fluorotelomer-based polymers degrade. This sentence confuses the reader by closing the section with reference to a dated article (reference 73) that was written at a time when it was uncertain whether fluorotelomer-based polymers degrade. In light of the previous paragraph, this sentence should be removed entirely or reverted to the edit I had made previously.
Thank you, 47.32.118.71 (talk) 01:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This would read scientifically accurately
@Jim1138:
Here is the current, paragraph that is out-of-date: A majority of waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) that have been tested output more PFOA than is input, and this increased output has been attributed to the biodegradation of fluorotelomer alcohols.[72] A current PFOA precursor concern are fluorotelomer-based polymers; fluorotelomer alcohols attached to hydrocarbon backbones via ester linkages may detach and be free to biodegrade to PFOA.[73]
This would be an up-to-date accurate improvement: A majority of waste-water treatment plants (WWTPs) that have been tested output more PFOA than is input, and this increased output has been attributed to the biodegradation of fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs).[72] A possible cause of this increase is degradation of FTOH precursors such as fluorotelomer-based polymers which are fluorotelomer alcohols attached to hydrocarbon backbones via ester linkages. These ester linkages have been shown to degrade in both biotic and abiotic experiments.[65][66]
47.32.118.71 (talk) 02:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Tekken 7 Trailer
Didn't you watch it yet? On E3 2016?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.193.159.136 (talk) 07:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- "Didn't you watch it yet?" is not a wp:citation of a wp:reliable source Jim1138 (talk) 07:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Its biased information about Subhash Chandra and zee network, who provided you this information to publish? Kindly remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.195.99.48 (talk) 07:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- It appears well sourced to me. Published by Times of India. Jim1138 (talk) 07:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
He's been reported for 3RR and other assorted things...
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Awesome Anti-Vandalism work, keep it up! INVISIBLEknock! 08:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
Hi Jim
My edit to the In Stereo page I would not consider vandalism, I may have put in some funny things but I did put facts in as well, my first edit I mist admit was not correct information but I just wanted to say that my latest edit I would not consider vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennyguin (talk • contribs) 09:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Pennyguin: I would classify both as not constructive. Jim1138 (talk) 09:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Okay thank-you totally understand, one more thing... On the In Stereo page now there are some things that are not correct. Care to check them out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennyguin (talk • contribs) 09:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Pennyquin: In Stereo or In Stereo (band)? Please feel free to fix them. It is protected. See WP:AUTOCONFIRM Please let me know and I will fix it. Or, you can leave a message on the talk page talk:In Stereo or talk:In Stereo (band)) - Use an wp:edit request. I'm about to go to bed. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jim1138,
I have made changes to Otabek Mahkamov's profile in order to accurately reflect his position.
I had the privilege of attending one of Mr Mahkamov's lectures last December in Oxford and he mentioned there that he is employed with the Oxford Education Group. Moreover, I believe the criticism part of his page to be unfounded as my colleagues had seen his diplomas and qualifications that he submitted before commencing his studies & teaching at Oxford.
Please let me know if I can aid you with any further information.
Regards,
Stephen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephentoll124 (talk • contribs) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Barry Watson, Bingley Page
Hi Jim1138, just wanted to let you know about your revert on the Bingley page. Barry Watson is actually from Crossflatts and it is annotated and cited on the Crossflatts page. I didn't want to beat Sadie098 over the head with it as it seems not only had she not put it on without a citation, but it was also on the wrong page. Just information for you if it pops up again. Happy to restate this on her page, just didn't want her to feel we were ganging up on her.The joy of all things (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @The joy of all things: I mostly do wp:RCP and I don't have any recollection on that page(s?). If you would like me to take a look, please leave me a link or two for that/those pages. If you don't think it important, no need to reply. I feel "ganged up" on most of the time anyway. ;o) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
@Jim1138:
Hi Jim1138,
I fail to understand why you maintain that Mahkamov's recent employment can not be added to his Wikipedia. Moreover, I believe that his academic and teaching career at Oxford should be included. What do you think?
thank you. i have reedited it and included sources. i have more and will uploaded them shortly. the previous version was defamatory and very inaccurate. the truth is much more complex (probably less exciting for the public but we need to strive for accuracy) and we need to get that across to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trutheditor100 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Mustaches and black men
Why did you deem the source I initially provided not reliable? 173.247.21.178 (talk) 07:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The article mentions congressmen and judges. How does that get to be A great percentage of black men wear mustaches? That sounds like wp:synth or wp:original research. Jim1138 (talk) 07:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The article also says: "This is a statistical fact: a far greater percentage of African- American males than white males wear mustaches today and have always worn mustaches." The article also references a column from 1963: "Why Negro Men Wear Mustaches." Let me know what kind of reliable source you need if these don't work.173.247.21.178 (talk) 07:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- He doesn't say how he arrived at that conclusion. For it to be statistical, the study would need to be a random sampling of a sufficiently large population. It sounds like he just used public figures: congressmen and judges. I would like to see something that states that the study used a large sampling from a diverse background. And really, corrections would need to be added to compensate for anything that would deviate from a random population. Probably not something that someone would spend much time on (IMO). Jim1138 (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- I will find something that I'm sure will meet your requirements. BTW, are you a moderator here? Why is your opinion considered more powerful than mine?173.247.21.178 (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- He doesn't say how he arrived at that conclusion. For it to be statistical, the study would need to be a random sampling of a sufficiently large population. It sounds like he just used public figures: congressmen and judges. I would like to see something that states that the study used a large sampling from a diverse background. And really, corrections would need to be added to compensate for anything that would deviate from a random population. Probably not something that someone would spend much time on (IMO). Jim1138 (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The article also says: "This is a statistical fact: a far greater percentage of African- American males than white males wear mustaches today and have always worn mustaches." The article also references a column from 1963: "Why Negro Men Wear Mustaches." Let me know what kind of reliable source you need if these don't work.173.247.21.178 (talk) 07:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Hello Jim1138 , The changes that I made in Kali article is detailed and taken from reliable sources.I feel it does not need templates for additional citations. I do not have experiences with removing templates. Can you please guide me how can I commit the changes I made , shall I do it without removing templates? Will it be verified later and removed by other users? Please provide me information . I want keep the changes that I made since the "Dakshina kali" section is not written properly that shall show dakshina kali iconography that differs from vama kali and what shall be the edit summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserK (talk • contribs) 08:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
he
@Jim1138:
I want you to please explain that who has given you the right to moderate pages...(is it like after some period wikipedia makes you one)
i mean why can't i or someone else do what you are doing like i have seen your talk page you are the one removing others content and doing the police job
how can i be in your place and check that where jim is right and wrong and he should give source and all... Oldnewland (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is certain editors that ruin the less frequented pages, but pages that are just as important. Would like to see jim go over to a page like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Morehouse_College_alumni and edit out the not notable people.173.247.21.178 (talk) 02:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Aviron Pictures Page Corrected
@Jim1138:
I did leave an edit note, I'm sorry I wasn't shown to you.
Aviron Pictures and Clarius Entertainment are NOT the same company, and do not have the same key people or film credits. The Clarius page has been turned into the Aviron page, which is not correct.
IMDB has corrected this as well, which you can see at: http://www.imdb.com/find?ref_=nv_sr_fn&q=aviron+pictures&s=all vs http://www.imdb.com/company/co0577011/?ref_=fn_al_co_1
I'm now trying to clean this up at all of the corresponding film pages. If there is a better/faster means to do this, please help!
Thanks.
23.242.16.140 (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Jaguar F Type
Hi! I'm just a kid who likes cars. I always visit Auto Express and apparently, their sources say that the F Type SVR was revealed in 2016. Also, I wanted to put that their sources say that the F Type SVR Convertible can only reach 194mph. Sorry for the inconvenience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.76.205 (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Talk:White Russia
"Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I moved yours to the bottom of Talk:White Russia. See wp:talk pages and wp:Talk page guidelines
Please wp:cite wp:reliable sources to talk pages as well. People won't want to look things up when you can supply them. You might just be ignored otherwise. "
Dear Jim, sources (maps) have been added but Argos keeps deleting them. White Russia is a term used for several historical Russian territories. It had not always been the name for Republic of Belarus.
Vladislav Nikolaevitch (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Replied on Vladislav Nikolaevitch's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your concern and it wont happen again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.201.72.15 (talk) 05:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jim,
This is Dylan Hughes Im replying to your msg, I had removed that content from my wiki page as it was incorrect and It was my personal wish to remove the subjects which was written about me. I see you have put the content back which I had changed if you could please remove this I would appreciate it.
Thank you
Regards
Dylan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifcsports (talk • contribs) 08:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Dylan Hughes
The information I removed is because it is not correct, I am not the sporting director of furstenfeldbruck, this title is hurting my reputation as a professional coach so if you can please remove it I would appreciate this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifcsports (talk • contribs) 09:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Changes to the wikipedia page
Greetings Jim,
I am Terrance Dean and I made the edited changes as the information on the page is derogatory, and defamation of character. I did not create this page. Someone else created it, and are using the page to damage my career, my work, and my life. The person is malicious and ill-intent. Please remove this page as I do not wish to have a wikipedia page. I have never had one and do not wish to begin one. I changed the content in the meantime as it is damaging to my family and my career.
Thank you
Terrance Dean — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrancedean37212 (talk • contribs) 07:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Terrancedean37212: I undid my restoration. The text you removed does seem either unsourced, poorly sourced, or taken out of context. Please, do leave an wp:ES Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello , Jim
User:First_Light requested for better source earlier . I reviewed the sources and added more sources that corresponds to the edits. Now again User:First_Light charged "better source" without even checking the sources. I think you shall go to edit logs and check when User:First_Light started charging "better source" on Kali page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserK (talk • contribs) 07:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Is it possible to remove the wikipedia page, or prevent the user from creating another?
Greetings Jim,
Thank you for being attentive to this matter. I truly appreciate your assistance.
Is it possible to have the page removed? I do not wish to have a wikipedia page. Also, is it possible to prevent the user from creating another page? The person who created this page has an ulterior motive, and is causing malicious harm to my career, my family, and friends. I just learned of this page and I am truly saddened and hurt by this information, and content. If there is anything you can do to be of assistance this will be most helpful.
Thank you,
Terrance Dean