Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Hate Boys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.57.5.235 (talk) at 01:30, 5 September 2010 (→‎I Hate Boys). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I Hate Boys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another day, another one region song. Nothing particularly special here that requires an independent article. Per WP:NSONGS the song is not notable. The album has been out for an extended period of time and the song garnered very little independent coverage. It has not charted and there is no indication of a music video therefore per the guidelines the song is unlikely to grow beyond a stub especially considering that it has had little/no coverage from RCA Records (Aguilera's label). It appears that the article was created in hope that it charts and that charting would establish notability yet per the guideline independent articles should only exist where there is enough reliable information to create a detailed page. I recommend redirecting to Bionic (Christina Aguilera album) until/unless coverage of the song increases. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The song has been released to both radio and digital download. And it's also obvious the page needs so work. I notice you nominate articles very quickly, without even trying to make the article have more information. I don't think it's right to jump on it so fast. I agree, maybe this should be redirected (with a discussion first,) but nominating it for deletion isn't necessary. —ΣПDiПG-STΛЯT (talk) 22:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is within the rules of Wikipedia, describing a single/promo single in the same way that the article "Woohoo" and/or "Slow Down Baby" describes. It's an article to expand the information in "Bionic." References are sufficient to support the article.*Fr@nkl!nG* (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]