Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 11, 2024.
Gusty Garden Galaxy
- Gusty Garden Galaxy → Super Mario Galaxy#Music (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Soundtrack not mentioned in the target. Mia Mahey (talk) 23:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - while it's technically part of the subject, (it's a level/location in the game, not just a song) there's no realistic, encyclopedic reason to ever name drop it in the article.) Sergecross73 msg me 23:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete target article does not mention this specific level.--67.70.101.117 (talk) 06:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010
- North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010 → David Taylor (North West Leicestershire MP) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Never happened. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak refine to the "Standing down" section where it gets explained the most. There are a few hits dotted around the web as a by-election was expected. Thryduulf (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- In which case it should be renamed Planned North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010, without leaving a redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- If this were an article I could support moving but only retaining a redirect, as a redirect I can only oppose. The current title is the plausible search term, given that's how UK by-election articles are titled. Thryduulf (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not at all plausible, it's a fictional event. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not it's not fictional. It was an expected event that ended up not happening because it turned out to be a rare exception to the norm of by-elections happening within ~four months of a vacancy arising. Given that norm and the rarity of exceptions, it is very plausible for someone seeing the MP for North West Leicestershire died in late December 2009 to expect there to have been a by-election in the constituency in the first quarter of 2010. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is ultimately fictional, as it never happened and can never happen, as it's no longer 2010. Like I said, the redirect can be moved to serve the same purpose. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not it's not fictional. It was an expected event that ended up not happening because it turned out to be a rare exception to the norm of by-elections happening within ~four months of a vacancy arising. Given that norm and the rarity of exceptions, it is very plausible for someone seeing the MP for North West Leicestershire died in late December 2009 to expect there to have been a by-election in the constituency in the first quarter of 2010. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not at all plausible, it's a fictional event. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- If this were an article I could support moving but only retaining a redirect, as a redirect I can only oppose. The current title is the plausible search term, given that's how UK by-election articles are titled. Thryduulf (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- In which case it should be renamed Planned North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010, without leaving a redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Did the preparations for the by-election actually start? The Banner talk 11:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- AIUI formal preparations can only start once the writ for the election has been issued (which it never was), but it is very likely that at least some informal ones were. Given that those same preparations would have just become preparations for the general election when that was called, and most of them wouldn't have been newsworthy I'm not sure how you'd go about ascertaining, especially at this distance. Thryduulf (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Sonic Wiild Fire
- Sonic Wiild Fire → Sonic and the Secret Rings (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
either an implausible misspelling or an implausible pun. i don't know which outcome is worse, but the term doesn't seem to see much (if any) use in the context of sonic, with or without a space cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment/Weak Keep - Article has mention of "Sonic Wild Fire" as the game's original working title, and a single doubling of a character is a potentially plausible typo, so I don't see a need to go out of our way to delete this thing, but I'll grant that searching the original working title to begin with is a rare proposition, so it's not like I feel strongly about this one. (Entirely possible the redirect creator was making a Wii system pun) Fieari (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:CHEAP. The game was previously named Sonic Wild Fire so the target makes sense. I see no reason to delete. C F A 💬 21:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Mystic Ruins
- Mystic Ruins → Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood#Plot (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
either vague, or more closely associated with sonic adventure cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Biographies of living persons
- Biographies of living persons → Biography (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
This should be a CNR to WP:BLP. All of the 304 links to this redirect are in reference to the Wikipedia policy, rather than the Biography article. It seems unlikely that anyone searching for this would be looking for the encyclopedic article, especially considering the term is never mentioned. It was retarted to Biography from a CNR in 2009. C F A 💬 18:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suppose this could also be retargeted to an encyclopedia article about Wikipedia, like Wikipedia#Policies_and_content, Vandalism on Wikipedia, or List of Wikipedia controversies (Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident), though a project redirect would make the most sense in my eyes. C F A 💬 18:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget (or add encyclopaedic content) This is a very high profile policy that does get referenced frequently off-site so I'm surprised we don't have some encyclopaedic content about it that could host a hatnote to the policy, although finding sources will be tricky due to the large number of Wikipedia mirrors and many other sites that have policies/guidelines with the same title. If we don't have encyclopaedic content then a cross-namespace redirect is the way to go - this is something that needs to be very easy to find, particularly by prospective editors and article subjects who shouldn't have to learn about namespaces first. Thryduulf (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was wondering if there would be enough coverage to write a separate article on the policy. I found it surprising that even the Policies and content section in the main Wikipedia article only briefly mentioned the policy (in reference to the Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident). If someone is willing to do that and they can find enough coverage, then that (with a hatnote) would be my preferred outcome over retargeting. C F A 💬 21:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Its not really a Wikipedia specific term but all Google results are for the policy. Maybe it should be kept as with a link on the DAB page to the BLP policy as well as the current MOS page. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I was considering doing before listing it here, but I decided against it. Do you really think anyone typing "Biographies of living persons" into the search bar is looking for Biography? It is obviously directly referencing the policy and the term isn't even mentioned in the article. C F A 💬 03:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Extoskelitan
- Extoskelitan → Exoskeleton (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
that's 3 separate spelling mistakes cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:CHEAP. C F A 💬 19:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- will disagree with this specific one per wp:costly. aside from wikipedia, there seem to be only 3 other instances of this typo being made, two of those are on user-generated sites, and the other one cites this redirect for some reason cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see no reason why this should be deleted (or even listed here). It does no harm, has a valid target, and is obviously not stealing a red link from a future article. Unless misspellings are so bad that it's not clear what the target should be, I don't think they should ever be listed at RfD. As WP:COSTLY says: "the mere fact that a redirect is listed and discussed at the Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion page creates work for others" and "[don't send] redirects to RFD, unless there is a serious problem that can't be solved any other way (e.g., WP:BLP violations)." It has received 74 pageviews over its 9-year history, probably mostly crawlers, but it has most likely helped someone at least a few times before. C F A 💬 19:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- There are 2,578,125 possible typos of "Exoskeleton" that misses 3 letters, only counting the alphabet, and discounting insertions/removals. You would need to hire 10 people for 8 hours everyday, entering one unique typo per second, for 45 days to have an 50% chance of arriving at this typo. So likely, this redirect have never seen actual human traffic. Ca talk to me! 04:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- if it's discounting insertions, this typo would be out of the question, as there's an added t
- on cfa's note, i doubt the views could reasonably come from any source besides people using the "what links here" tool (like i did), mashing, or somehow finding the 3 instances of this specific misspelling and searching it here for a quick laugh. if someone has to do mental gymnastics to maybe find a possible reason for any given misspelling, there's a good chance it's not plausible cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, but that was hardly my point. I obviously don't care if this useless redirect is deleted, and I don't imagine anyone else on Wikipedia does either. But there's really no point in listing harmless misspellings here as long as they are targeted appropriately: all you're doing is cluttering RfD and making more work for the voters, relisters, closers, etc. Tag them for R3 if you catch them early, but otherwise don't bother. C F A 💬 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you on that on useless but harmless redirects, no need to nominate for deletion; but might as well delete this useless redirect since it have been already nominated for deletion. Ca talk to me! 17:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- There are 2,578,125 possible typos of "Exoskeleton" that misses 3 letters, only counting the alphabet, and discounting insertions/removals. You would need to hire 10 people for 8 hours everyday, entering one unique typo per second, for 45 days to have an 50% chance of arriving at this typo. So likely, this redirect have never seen actual human traffic. Ca talk to me! 04:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see no reason why this should be deleted (or even listed here). It does no harm, has a valid target, and is obviously not stealing a red link from a future article. Unless misspellings are so bad that it's not clear what the target should be, I don't think they should ever be listed at RfD. As WP:COSTLY says: "the mere fact that a redirect is listed and discussed at the Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion page creates work for others" and "[don't send] redirects to RFD, unless there is a serious problem that can't be solved any other way (e.g., WP:BLP violations)." It has received 74 pageviews over its 9-year history, probably mostly crawlers, but it has most likely helped someone at least a few times before. C F A 💬 19:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- will disagree with this specific one per wp:costly. aside from wikipedia, there seem to be only 3 other instances of this typo being made, two of those are on user-generated sites, and the other one cites this redirect for some reason cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, implausible error, not used in practice. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete implausible error that's so incorrect it looks like it's from a different language 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Compounding two errors is much less plausible than a single error. I might accept "exoskelitan" as a plausible phonetic attempt at spelling it. I'd possibly accept "extoskeleton" under similar grounds, though it's a bit more of a stretch. But "extoskelitan" is just too far for me, and I'm a huge believer in WP:CHEAP. Fieari (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Skeltal
that's the "doot" meme. doesn't seem like a plausible misspelling of "skeletal" otherwise, as e is just close enough to t where it'd be hard to forget to type one letter cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:CHEAP. C F A 💬 19:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Skeltal is a variant name of a popular internet meme [1]. Our article on skeleton lack information about this meme, neither do any other article. The intro of WP:REDIRECT, a guideline says
Redirects are used to help people arrive more quickly at the page they want to read
. A generic article about skeletons are not what readers would want to see when they are searching about a meme. Ca talk to me! 05:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Skeltal is a variant name of a popular internet meme [1]. Our article on skeleton lack information about this meme, neither do any other article. The intro of WP:REDIRECT, a guideline says
One PIece
that's an uppercase i cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:CHEAP. C F A 💬 19:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Implausible misspelling. Our search function automatically handles different capitalizations. I tend to agree that effort of listing redirects with minor errors can be used elsewhere, but we might as well delete them as they are listed to reduce maintance work for useless redirects. Ca talk to me! 05:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
M-Block
'm (or 'm block) is a glitch pokémon that shares missingno's "sprite", index number, and some functions, but is otherwise a different glitch. it's not mentioned in the article aside from an offhanded mention in the translation for source 1 cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. AFAIK we don't discuss the 'M glitch in any other capacity, the most common method of finding MissingNo will also turn up 'M, and it doesn't just copy SOME functions, but PRACTICALLY ALL functions. For our intents and purposes, 'M and MissingNo. are the same thing and should be treated accordingly by redirects. Leave further details to Glitch City Labs and Bulbapedia. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- for pedantries that would border on fancruft if there weren't actually a couple of sources behind them...
- missingno (the form everyone recognizes, that is) can be obtained via the old man and mew glitches and the time capsule exploit with certain names, special stats, and gen 2 pokémon respectively, adds 128 items to the item in the 6rd slot of the player's bag, and corrupts hall of fame data
- 'm (specifically 00, as fe and ff are just hybrids) can only be obtained via the old man glitch and shares missingno's sprite, item cloning, and hall of fame corruption as a result of sharing its index number, but has (slightly) different data, such as moves and cries, can evolve into clefairy or kangaskhan, and lets you catch phantom ditto. according to some old stuff i found, it can also apparently spontaneously turn into a rhydon if you have another 'm in your party
- from a quick-ish look, those two sources mention 'm and its differences compared to missingno in some level of detail, an archive of the latter currently being source 9 in missingno's article, so if a mention could be added or discussed, i wouldn't be opposed to it cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Lunamann.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Pokémon incident
- Pokémon incident → Dennō Senshi Porygon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
extremely vague. requires that "pokémon" and "incident" be defined in a way that somehow narrows it down to only this particular episode of the anime generation that also featured jynx and hypno, while excluding every other controversy the franchise has seen cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- should mention that i would favor retargeting it to an article or section of an article detailing most controversies, no such thing exists (yet). the closest i found was pokémon episodes removed from rotation, but even then, that's only for the anime cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as far too vague. When seeing the title I assumed it was some sort of (political) scandal or other real-world incident related to Pokémon in some way. A politician making a gaffe and exposing their ignorance while trying to appear to be a "man of the people" or something like that would have been my first guess. Thryduulf (talk) 17:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- isn't that the plot of swsh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have a clue! I've never watched, read or played Pokémon. Thryduulf (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- isn't that the plot of swsh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - contrary to the above (and a whiny fan base) this is by far the most consequential incident related to the series. This actually ahead real world implications, that reliable sources wrote articles about. Sergecross73 msg me 23:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as WP:PTOPIC. This incident was/is overwhelmingly more impactful than any other. Fieari (talk) 00:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
EP038
vague. i can name at least one other thing with more than 37 episodes cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep Surprisingly to me searching on google this episode of the anime is just about the primary topic - all the results on the first page and a couple on the second are about this. After that we get to product codes and episodes of other things, but still interspersed with the Pokémon anime - no other single thing gets more than two hits. Thryduulf (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- mostly one piece (and drama novels) on my end. google is weird :( cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: per above. Yeah, weirdly enough, a Google search only returns results about this specific episode. Not sure why, but it does appear to be the primary topic for the term. C F A 💬 18:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment DuckDuckGo, which should be free from personalization algorithms, shows that this is the primary topic. Ca talk to me! 16:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- mostly one piece (and drama novels) on my end. google is weird :( cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Heartless Angel
- Heartless Angel → Sephiroth (Final Fantasy) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
a recurring attack for sephiroth in a lot of his appearances since his debut... but also for kefka. if both appear in a playable or boss form in any given game, heartless angel tends to go to whoever pops up first, which is usually kefka. if you want to be technical, sephiroth gets it more often overall because he gets more appearances, but results seem to associate it equally with both (give or take sephiroth being mentioned more often overall). even then, heartless angel isn't mentioned in either of their articles. if not deleted, i don't know if it should be kept there or retargeted to kefka, to final fantasy#gameplay, or to recurring elements in the final fantasy series#gameplay, because it'd be hard to cram an unsourced mention (or worse, a mention with a guide as the source) into those otherwise good or featured articles cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
바나나
rlang seems to apply. i haven't found anything about the koreas in any banana article cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- There have been reports of bananas growing in Seoul due to climate change, but bananas are not closely affined to Korea. Delete per nom. Ca talk to me! 16:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that bananas growing in Seoul is not a strong enough connection to the country to justify the redirect.--67.70.101.117 (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Ramshackle
- Ramshackle → Independent animation (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Ramshackle (film) → Independent animation (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
'Ramshackle' (whatever that is) isn't mentioned anywhere in the target article. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Move Ramshackle (group) over Ramshackle and add a hatnote to Ramshackled (it already has a hatnote to Wiktionary). Delete Ramshackle (film). The only film I can find is Ramshackle House but that's a partial title match. Thryduulf (talk) 12:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- The full title of the film in question is Ramshackle: The Thesis Film. It has a reasonable view count on YouTube, but it's probably not notable enough for its own article - it's not in the same league as Lackadaisy or Helluva Boss. It's not mentioned at Independent animation. Replace with Ramshackle (group) per Thryduulf. Tevildo (talk) 15:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Australia national soccer team
- Australia national soccer team → Australia men's national soccer team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Procedural nomination; I'm not leaving an opinion. This redirect was converted to a disambiguation page by Thrakkx, back to a redirect by Macosal, back again by Joeykai, and then back to a redirect by The Banner earlier today. Keep or disambiguate? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Unfortunately, the men's team is the primary topic (I would love to see the women's team with the same status, but alas). Beside that, it solved a lot of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 09:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate - Looking at the stats, the men's team does get more hits in typical month, but not always (see in August 2023 the women's team's hits completely dwarfed the men's). In the last year, the women's team article has received more views than the men's (745,602 vs 729,076) - which looks like it was largely due to them making it to the semis of the 2023 world cup, something the men's team has not achieved. Can't see an argument that either team is the obvious WP:PTOPIC so disambig looks like the way to go. BugGhost🪲👻 11:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Clarification - I forgot that the women's world cup was in 2023, but the men's world cup was in 2022 - so the stats in that link are a bit skewed because it included one but omitted the other. If you expand the date range to include both world cups, then you see a similar spike in hits for the men's team, and statistically the men's team overall has more views. I still stand by my conclusion that there's no primary topic and we should disambiguate. BugGhost🪲👻 11:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Disambig per Bugghost. Thryduulf (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Disambig as per the stats above. If men's team is primary topic, then WP:RM should be moved to remove men's from the article name, but that is an RM issue not an RFD one. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
ZeroNaseone
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 and WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 12:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- ZeroNaseone → Zerobaseone (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Unexplained and possible test move resulting in this redirect creation. Also not mentioned nor reliably sourced at target, a quick BEFORE also returns nothing other than COMMONNAME results of target nor non-COMMONNAME results showing otherwise. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete via WP:G6 and WP:G7 (Special:Diff/1233837439). Skynxnex (talk) 04:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Naked Rugby League 2007-08
- Naked Rugby League 2007-08 → A League of Their Own (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Implausible redirect. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Naked Rugby League. This was originally created as a redirect to what became (after a series of moves) League of Their Own (calendar), an article about a calendar featuring naked photographs of Rugby league players (principally the 2006-07 edition, but it did include a paragraph about the 2007-08 version), but that article was prodded and subsequently deleted. However, Naked Rugby League is an extant article about the 2007-08 calendar so that is where it should target. The current target is an entirely unrelated 1992 film about baseball that (from a skim-read of the article) contains nothing related to nudity, Rugby league or 2007-08. Thryduulf (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- No objections to a retarget. That makes far more sense than the existing target. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget as above. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)