Jump to content

User talk:DO'Neil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BigrTex (talk | contribs) at 21:37, 17 July 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

Pyromorphite
Pyromorphite is a mineral species composed of lead chlorophosphate: Pb5(PO4)3Cl, sometimes occurring in sufficient abundance to be mined as an ore of lead. First distinguished chemically by Martin Heinrich Klaproth in 1784, it was named pyromorphite by Johann Friedrich Ludwig Hausmann in 1813. It is usually green, yellow or brown in color, with a resinous lustre. Crystals are common and have the form of a hexagonal prism terminated by the basal planes, sometimes combined with narrow faces of a hexagonal pyramid. Other forms include crystals with a barrel-like curvature and globular or reniform masses. Pyromorphite is part of the apatite group of minerals and bears a close resemblance physically and chemically with two other minerals, mimetite and vanadinite. This focus-stacked photograph, merged from 26 separate images, shows a sample of pyromorphite extracted from the Resuperferolitica Mine in Santa Eufemia, in the Spanish province of Córdoba. The sample measures 3.5 cm × 3.0 cm × 1.5 cm (1.38 in × 1.18 in × 0.59 in).Photograph credit: David Ifar

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
  • Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show Preview button to review your edits.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 23:17, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia!

In this discussion you mentioned a Russian friend. What exactly did he say? Has he actually seen the show, do you think? How reliable would you say his information is?

This is not to hassle you. I'm interested to find out. But it may well help to decide the page's fate. Andrewa 18:17, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hideous indeed

So hideous that i almost turned to stone when you forced me to notice it! [smile] Thanks for the edit. --Jerzy(t) 19:36, 2004 Apr 20 (UTC)


Hello DO'Neil!
I have two questions concerning the image Image:Birdparadise111.jpeg: (1) There is no additional information on the origin of this image. Probably it is your own photo? If yes, do you have a higher resolution version. I would like to use it in de:Paradiesvögel in the German Wikipedia. (2) I am not sure, if your determination of the bird is correct. I think it is Raggiana Bird-of-paradise (P. raggiana), not Greater Bird-of-paradise (Paradisaea apoda). Best wishes --Franz Xaver 17:18, 14 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Now I think the image may not be used in Wikipedia at all. I have found a website with this image, which might have been your source: [1] and there is a copyrigth notice. Probably the image must be deleted, as well as Image:Wilsonbirdparadise.jpeg which probably is from [2]. Best wishes --Franz Xaver 19:17, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I didn't notice that. Thanks for pointing it out; they probably should be deleted. DO'Neil 21:01, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]



Hi, DO'Neil,
Not objecting to your edits on the Pius VI article, but the old version wasn't taken from a foreign language; it was lifted from the 1911 Britannica. Complete with the typos in the scanned version that's on the Web, such as Galilean for Gallican (fixed a while ago). Some stuffy old prose there, to be sure. Dandrake 19:38, May 20, 2004 (UTC)


You are now designated the High Priest of the Spoon! and I will call on you if I feel the need for Cortes (yeah, you heard me :) to castrate someone with a wooden spoon. -- Jim Regan 04:25, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Tenochtitlan

Wow! Lots of changes to Tenochtitlán. Actually, by doing so, you've come down very hard on the side of the hispanistas vs. the indigenistas with respect to the pronunciation of those names (Tenochtitlan and Teotihuacan in particular -- I suppose you have to start somewhere). In recent years there's been something of a movement in Mexico to reclaim the more authentic Nahuatl pronunciation with the accent on the penultimate rather than the (Castilianified) last syllable. For the two sides of the debate, take a look (on the Academia Mexicana de la Lengua website) at what Miguel León-Portilla (indigenista) says here and how Yáñez (hispanista) rebukes him in the last para. It's been a long while since I've heard anyone pronounce it 'Tenochtitlán', but maybe that's just the company I keep.

Dunno. Perhaps you were aware of all that already and wanted to come down heavily on that side. FYI just in case you didn't. Hajor 14:32, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I wasn't aware that "Tenochtitlán" was viewed as Castilianified. Interesting. However, I'm not preferring that spelling out of any sort of racism (I have nothing against Nahuatl speakers, and why should I?), but from what I've read in books, Tenochtitlán is more common in English. I've seen Teotihuacan a few times, though. DO'Neil 06:33, Jun 15, 2004 (UTC)

And the problem is, when you see them without an accent in English, you're never quite sure whether they're doing it out of conviction or because of house style (or ignorance) whereby accent marks are omitted. Presumably most serious books will be taking their cue from Spanish publications and, if this is a movement, it'll take some time to filter through into English. <shrug> Hajor 14:02, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Education in East Germany

What a great article. Keep up the good work, don't see many practically Featurable articles after a single edit.--Oldak Quill 12:04, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Why did you move Mikhail Frunze to his name including his patronymic? Do you see Vladimir Putin at Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin? Everyking 07:55, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Also Pavlik Morozov. Everyking 08:03, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
On #wikipedia we decided that patronymics should be used in titles. Others from the period (Lev Borisovich Kamenev, Grigory Yevseyevich Zinoviev and Aleksandr Vasilevich Kolchak, for example) have their patronymics in their article names. Do you suggest that I should change them back to first name - last name? DO'Neil 08:23, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)
It certainly makes more sense to me to title articles according to the most common and basic form of the name. Do you intend to move Putin as well, and Yeltsin, Gorbachev, etc.? I think that would look absurd. Everyking 09:01, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Hmm. I will move them back to first name - last name, along with Lev Borisovich Kamenev, Grigory Yevseyevich Zinoviev and Aleksandr Vasilevich Kolchak. It's inconsistent to have Vladimir Putin and Pavlik Trofimovich Morozov, you're right. DO'Neil 09:11, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)

Our mad little ship

When I have been created stubs, I have been placeing links with info I don't want to deal with/can't deal with on the discussion page for later reference. After we are done doing one per country, I am going to go back and rewrite most of the articles. Burgundavia 09:37, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)

I was on a site about politicians, and I assumed that the Cyril Smith I found was the Cyril Smith on the website. Whoops, I think we'd best remove it. DO'Neil 17:15, Jul 3, 2004 (UTC)

Guadalajara International Airport

Being interested in all things latin, here is one for you to expand, as it needs it very badly: Guadalajara International Airport. Burgundavia 09:35, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)

"Secret Swami"

When its just been copied and pasted from somewhere you can list them on Wikipedia:Copyright problems Secretlondon 12:25, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Cyril Smith

Hi there. I don't know where you got the photo of Cyril Smith from, but it looks nothing like the MP! -- Arwel 17:10, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Booth and Leakey????

Your Frederick Charles Booth entry doesn't seem to compute. Are Booth and Nigel Grey Leakey the same person? Moriori 09:22, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Oh, bugger. A mistake on my part, I'll fix it up. I've been copying and pasting quite a bit, I must've mixed up Leakey and Booth's entry. DO'Neil 09:26, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent nomination to become an administrator. I really appreciate it. blankfaze | •• | •• 14:52, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Television schedules

I've come quite a way. I was going to show you my newest but you had left already. 1990-91 American network television schedule. So now I've done from 1959 to 1991. 33 schedules, I think. Mike H 01:32, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks oh so much for the star! Don't you worry; it didn't mess up a thing. Mike H 01:44, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

Disambiguation of Yugoslavia

Please refer to Talk:Yugoslavia before disambiguating certain instances of Yugoslavia. Thanks. --Shallot 10:53, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Wikistress Level Three

Pretty stressed? Do accept my sincerest condolences. Feel better. :-) Mike H 01:33, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)

Юnicode

Hi, could you please make sure your i18n edits comply with Unicode. Thank Ю! Humus sapiensTalk 21:03, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

What time it is

you might be interested to know that it isn't UTC in Berlin, Warsaw and IIRC also Sarayevo and Paris but a hour more (or two during daylight saving time) :-)

Thanks for starting Rudé Právo but I had to correct some mistakes and simplifications there. Ahoj, --Malyctenar 12:42, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Image:Kooikerhound.jpeg

Hi! You uploaded this lovely photo of a Kookikerhound but without any source or copyright info. Would you be so kind as to identify who took the photo and what its licensing status is, e.g., GFDL? Thanks! Would be nice to be able to comfortably keep using the photo. :-) Elf | Talk 03:25, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Want to join? I'm still formulating policy. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:09, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Klipspringer

Hi DO'Neil, I found this great image uploaded by you. Could you please give the license so that we can reuse it in the German Wikipedia. Thanks a lot, Baldhur 10:09, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Shoebill licence

Hi there! Was File:Shoebill.jpeg taken by you? If so, under what licence do you release it? If not, I'd be very much obliged if you gave me the source of this photo. --TOR 21:56, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image:Mexempire2.JPG

Hi there! Thanks for adding the image Image:Mexempire2.JPG. It currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, and I was hoping that you would add one as untagged images may be deleted eventually. (You can use {{gfdl}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! --David Iberri | Talk 18:22, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

Would you do the same for Image:Mexempire.JPG as well? Thanks! --David Iberri | Talk 18:27, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

Technical limitations

Please limit the use of the technical limitations link to cases where the MediaWiki software (not just it's current English language Wikipedia configuration) prevents the use of a particular title. You can generally test to see whether it is a software limitation by trying to create the page at test.wikipedia.org. Limitations of policy (like use English for page names) or of configuration (UTF8 support at en wikipedia is currently partial) aren't software limitations. Jamesday 21:24, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image:Avrolincoln.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Avrolincoln.jpeg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 19:30, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)


Napoleon the Little Corporal

There's a question for you at Talk:Napoleon I of France regarding an edit you made to the article on Mar 1, 04. Jay 10:08, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

  1. ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
  2. ...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 most active Wikipedians, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles.

Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. -- Ram-Man 17:58, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)


Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 22:36, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

ALSO:

Image copyrights

Thanks for uploading Image:P cimbalom.jpeg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Edwin Stearns | Talk 18:32, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

image vascodagamma

Hi and happy new year. I would like to use the image vascodagamma on a boat from Vasco da Gama for the Czech wikipedia, but could you tell me something about the copyright status and where it is from? Thanks, -jkb- 08:45, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. Please provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Hyacinth 18:43, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

National Medal of Science

Heyas, I saw you made a correction to the National Medal of Science by fixing the Theodore von Kármán link. Nice work. I also saw you did this with a whole bunch of other articles in your edit history so I have awarded you the Barnstar of Diligence on your user page. I hope you enjoy it! Great work and thanks for your awesome contributions to Wikipedia! -SocratesJedi 20:58, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading the image

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Большое спацибо, Kbh3rd 05:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Review request

Hi :) If you have a few minutes it be great if you could have a look at West Papua and the re-name proposal at the bottom of its discussion page. Any input, edits, or opinions be great. I've always tried to ensure there was an abundance of supporting evidence before adding content, and avoid emotive wording; I welcome different opinions, just wish they would explain what it is they disagree with. All Best :)Daeron 17:14, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons

Hi, You have many good pictures uploaded. I have copied two of them to Wikimedia Commons to use them in the german wikipedia. Maybe you can all pictures copy to the Commons, so all Wikis can use them without double uploads? greetings Karrackoo

Wentianxiang.jpeg listed for deletion

An image that you uploaded, Wentianxiang.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion because it lacks source and license information, and it is not used in any articles. Please go there to voice your opinion (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Friendly Chat

I've seen the edits that you've made to some of the articles I've written. I always check out the person who edits anything related to me and I checked you out. I'm really impressed with your ideals and with the fact that you are facinated with Latin-American topics. I have dedicated all of my energy to the topic of Puerto Rico, which is my specialty. Since you're Irish, I was wondering if you would be interested in writting about the Irish migration to Puerto Rico in the mid 1800's. The Spanish government fearing an uprising from the native Puerto Ricans, encouraged the people of Ireland and Corsica (That's where my descendents came from) to migrate to the island, hopeing that they would be loyal to the Spanish Crown. Even though they adopted the language and the culture, they kept their surnames: O'Neil, Cole, McKintock, Garrity etc. By the way, my grandaughter is half-Irish. So, what do you say? Tony the Marine

I'd love the opportunity to write about it, and I'll begin Irish immigration to Puerto Rico if I can get enough information on the subject. DO'Neil 05:19, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

I really enjoyed reading what you've written so far. I would like you to tell me if any of the following surrnames are Irish. Class, Coll, Bernier, Harrison, Lind, Lowell, Watring, Due, Brinn, Bosch, Brocco, Barry, Cofer or Cole. Isn't it interesting that when a Latin-American is born in Latin America his name will contain accents but if he is born in the U.S.A., its without accents? Write to me in my talk page. Take care my Irish friend Tony the Marine

Cloves

Thanks for uploading the image to clove — I had a "what on earth are cloves?" moment last week, and this picture would have helped! Also, don't forget to add a {{GFDL}} tag to images which you upload that you own the copyright to, cheers! — Matt Crypto 12:22, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Feliz Dia de San Patricio

Happy St. Patricks Day. I thought I would let you know that St. Patricks Day is celebrated in Puerto Rico. Today I'm going to drink green beer with my kids. Have a great day! Tony the Marine

History of South Africa

Hey, its 06.42, but I finally finished writing the History of South Africa article. I'd appreciate any comments you have about what I wrote! Páll 11:43, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

removing alcohol

I've added another answer to your query about removing alcohol on Wikipedia:Reference_desk#Removing_alcohol Jooler 12:35, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

El Alamein picture

Mind if I move it to commons? David.Monniaux 10:47, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Not at all. Go ahead. DO'Иeil 10:49, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Italian aircraft

Hi DO'Neil - Italian aircraft are sadly a bit neglected here, so thanks for adding another two! I just wanted to point out the new standard format for specifications that's been in use since last August - Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content. I'd be a real help if you could use this layout for your next aircraft articles. Cheers! --Rlandmann 01:20, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, why has the table fallen out of favour? I think it looks quite a bit nicer than just having "raw statistics". DO'Иeil 08:05, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Also, I just created Piaggio P.108 (another Italian bomber!). I used the table because I wasn't sure what to do, I can change it to something else if that would be preferable. DO'Иeil 10:05, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
The main argument against the table was that it's harder for new editors to work with. Furthermore, they were/are vulnerable to changes in the Wiki software - if you take a look around, you'll see plenty of aircraft articles with data tables now in a font that's too small to easily read - this happened because the table was designed before Wikipedia's last "facelift". Finally, a couple of WikiProject Aircraft participants (the prime movers behind the changeover) argued strenuously for text-based specifications on aesthetic grounds. To see an example of the new format implemented for a WWII bomber, take a look at Petlyakov Pe-8. Cheers --Rlandmann 22:45, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Polish articles

They would hardly write about that, now, would they? :> Thank you for your contributions, I see quite a lot of them on my Watchlist recently. OOC, any special reason for your interest in this area? Or just Wiki-browsing? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:25, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

May I ask why you have licensed this image under GFDL? I notice that it wasn't you who uploaded this 1970s image of the Albanian dictator and usually only the uploader should tag an image with GFDL. Regards, Thuresson 04:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I found the image at Marxists.org which licences all its content under the GFDL. DO'Иeil 08:21, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you (Hammer and sickle)

I wanted to thank and compliment you on recording Hammer and sickle for the spoken Wikipedia project. Well done! Demi T/C 21:24, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)

Reference desk query - Hungarian WWII propaganda poster

If you are still looking for the answer of your query about the Image:Azertis.jpg war propaganda poster: "Azért is" means "In spite of all" in this context - it is an expression of defiance. Either because in the war the tides were turning against the fascists in Hungary -- or, if it is an earlier poster, as an expression of defiance against the unjust terms of the treaty of Trianon (equivalent of Versailles treaty for Hungary) after WWI. The chains might represent the bonds of this surrender treaty. - Marcika 04:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This image looks like part of a painting, but there's no source given and it's listed as GFDL because "user owns copyright"; can you please add the source (photographer, painter, whatever) to the image? Thanks. Elf | Talk 23:03, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Airport on Collaboration of the Week

As grand poobah of Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports, I recently listed airport on Wikipedia:Collaboration of the Week. This article is about to fall off the page due to lack of votes, beaten by an article on ancient rome. You know what to do Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 22:45, May 13, 2005 (UTC)


Military history of Puerto Rico

Hi, how are you? I submitted the above mentioned article to be considered for featured article status. I would be honored if you could take a look and express your opinon here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Military history of Puerto Rico, Thank you very much Tony the Marine

Friendly Chat

Hi, I just thought that I would let you know that Linuxbeak has nominated me for adminship. I would like to invite you to participate at WP:RFA if you wish to do so. Thank you and take care Tony the Marine

Spoken Wikipedia

Well done on your contributions to Spoken Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. We need more Aussies. You might be interested in the proposal I have made on Wikipedia:Barnstar and award proposals#Spoken. — Chameleon 14:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow (band)

Why did you delete 90% of the articel I put together on Tomorrow (band)? quercus robur 23:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:00, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Rick- it still concerns me that someone could delete practically a whole article (see above re. Tommorrow) without giving any sort of reason or explanation, plus ignore questions about this on their talk page, could be seriously being considered for adminship purely on the basis that they 'made lots of edits' Cheers quercus robur 22:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You uploaded these images under the tag {{PD-Germany}}. Unfortunately, the wording of the tag was inaccurate, and the images are not yet PD. They may be usable under fair use, although I have my doubts about the second image. Could you check the criteria for fair use, and consider changing the copyright tags accordingly. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Physchim62 13:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Incorrectly identified image?

Hi, an anon user has claimed that Image:Coronadoportrait.jpeg, uploaded by you, actually is the Duke of Alba rather than Coronado... perhaps you could check it out and clarify matters. Cheers, Fawcett5 15:11, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vasco da Gama

An article that you've edited before (Vasco da Gama) is nominated for Article Improvement Drive. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 02:53, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chesapeake-Leopard Affair

I noticed you uploaded the fanastic drawing. Can you give me an idea where you located it? I'd love to get my hands on large print of it. danheskett-at-gmail.com. Many thanks and great work on the article.

The image itself is from here, and this page tells you how you can obtain a reproduction of it. Thanks for the compliments! DO'Иeil 21:40, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

Hi. What is the source and copyright of Image:Ushanka.jpeg? Evil MonkeyHello 09:07, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the image when I was new and ignorant of the ways of the Wiki: it's from some site about hats (the URL of which I can't seem to find) and is almost certainly copyright. It probably should be deleted, sorry for wasting your time by uploading it. DO'Иeil 09:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From Quercus Robur talkpage

20 Very sorry

Hello, I've been away from Wikipedia for some months and I've recently come back. I was looking through my talk page and noticed that you'd complained that I'd removed 90% of your work from Tomorrow (band). I'm extremely sorry about this, it wasn't intentional at all. I assume I intended to move the bulk of the article below the introduction I had written, but somewhere along the way the rest was deleted and I didn't remedy it. Please accept my apologies both for the initial incident and the time it has taken for me to reply. DO'Иeil 09:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

No problem- thanks for the apology and explanation! quercus robur 17:46, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use outside of article space

Hi. I see that one of your user pages includes one or more "fair use" images (e.g. Image:Americaskeleton.jpeg). You may not be aware that the fair use exception requires a separate justification for each use of an image, and it difficult to make a fair use argument outside of the main article namespace. Please see Wikipedia:Fair_use#Images for details. Cheers, Bovlb 07:54, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Henry the Navigator

An article that you've edited before (Henry the Navigator) is nominated for Biography Collaboration of the Week. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 20:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you have the source for this... or why you put it as GFDL? Thanks. gren グレン 08:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It came from [marxists.org Marxists.org], which states that all of its content is GFDL. —DO'Иeil 08:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Hitler & Blondi

The picture you have uploaded of Hitler and his dog Image:Hitlerwithblondi.jpg has been tagged for deletion. It is not public domain since German law requires life of author +70 years. Please go to the image's page and say where you got it from, that way you can also add a fair-use tag with proper rationale. Thanks. Andrew Levine 17:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I was wondering if you could provide the source of this image—someone has written wishing to reprint it but does not know where it came from to attribute it or ask about the copyright status. Also, all fair use images must be sourced to comply with fair use guidelines. Thanks, Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not much trouble, just told her that sorry, we weren't sure. Also, the book would almost certainly have sufficient source information on it; no reason to delete if you could look that up. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gianlorenzoberniniselfportrait.jpeg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Gianlorenzoberniniselfportrait.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Thuresson 17:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pohutukawa

Hey, thanks for the excellent photo. I've been hoping someone would take something like that. My plan is to feature the article with that photo on the New Zealand portal on New Year's day.-gadfium 05:41, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! It'd be great if we could get it featured. —DO'Neil 05:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Shoebill.jpeg

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shoebill.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Chick Bowen 05:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia in Tetum


=====

Hi there, I'm a 19yo student from Poland (cultural studies about Spain and Latin America), and after having seen just a small part of your articles I'd be delighted to help you in anyway you'd like - regarding Poland, as well as Latin America or military history. I'm not a wikipedist myself, but - not being humble - I often find my knowledge of many very strange topics quite profound and would like to share it, if anybody's interested. Oh, btw, i'm a bit of leftist myself. Ok, a big one. Juru

Pipistrello

Dear DO'Neil, not a big think. I understand that the picture was made by an italien crew-member. Have a nice day! -- Stahlkocher 09:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I can ask...

WTF?!

Yeah, I'm not entirely sure either. My mother brought it back from a trip to Belgium, and it hangs on a hook on the wall behind the computer. It's pretty neat, though, even if it is kind of screwed up. —DO'Neil 20:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ottoernstremer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ottoernstremer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Wilmhosenfeld.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilmhosenfeld.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Adolfgallandportrait.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hansoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hansoster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:11, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Kennethberry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kennethberry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 08:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Walthervonbrauchitsch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 09:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image moved to Commons

Hello, I've moved photo Commons:Showerhead.JPG to Commons. Gr8 photo :) Mlepicki 16:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Guenthervonkluge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guenthervonkluge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 19:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!


I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 18:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hugosperrle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hugosperrle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Erichhoepner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Erichhoepner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barbel

Hello, just to let you know that I've disambiguated barbel into barbel (anatomy) and barbel (fish species). There is a new page barbel (disambiguation) as well.HappyVR 20:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and I've come along and futher merged the barbel (fish species) into the Barbus barbus article. Neil916 15:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, an image you uploaded is currently listed on possibly unfree images. --Gmaxwell 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bertalan Farkas.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhardT 12:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use images are disallowed in user namespace

You have several Fair Use images in your user namespace. This is in violation of Wikipedia:Fair Use. Please remove any fair use images that reside in you user space. To keep the entries without the the image showing you should place a ":" before "Image:" in the image link tag. __meco 09:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Theprocessionofthetrojanhorseintroybygiovannidomenicotiepolo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Theprocessionofthetrojanhorseintroybygiovannidomenicotiepolo.jpeg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:Gottwald and stalin.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Gottwald and stalin.PNG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --85.160.27.169 13:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Frunze.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frunze.jpeg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Rasputincartoon.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rasputincartoon.jpeg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 13:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Artillery piece

Hiyas, was just looking at your picture of the M96nA German artillery piece, and was wondering where this gun is on display. Its physical location isn't mentioned over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Capturedgermanartillery.JPG. Cheers, Bezapt 10:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The M96nA I photographed is actually on display in a war veterans' retirement home here in Sydney, Australia, just outside the home's museum. It's next to a Bofors AA gun, which I also photographed and uploaded to Wikipedia. If you're in Sydney yourself, I could give you an exact address if you'd like. Sorry it took me so long to reply to your question. —DO'Neil 02:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again! was just wondering if at least the suburb where the retirement home is could be added to the picture page, just to help anchor the whereabouts of the artefact in space & time! Bezapt 03:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the specific location to the Commons description page. —DO'Neil 03:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:'Gorky Reading to Stalin' by Viktor Govorov.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:'Gorky Reading to Stalin' by Viktor Govorov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lupo 15:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthem_of_the_peoples_love.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:W00t.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:W00t.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 14:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thedemandisanindicatorofthequality.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:What is an aryan.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:What is an aryan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nilfanion (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shamisen photo

Cool. We don't have street shamisen players that I know of in the U.S., though we had shamisen player give a concert at my univ. a few weeks ago. Try to find out who the guy is and how he picked up the instrument next time you see him. I think the photo from the other angle was better than the one you put in the article. Badagnani 06:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's probably Japanese, as probably only an extremely small number of gaijin take this thing up (as opposed to the shakuhachi and koto, which are more popular). I've played the sanxian, which is the original Chinese verison of the instrument, with a snakeskin (as opposed to cat skin) face. Are you in Seedney? In case you're interested, I'm in one of only a handful of bush bands in the States. Badagnani 09:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Coat_of_arms_Wroclaw_1948_1990.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Colonialhongkongarms.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tu 134.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tu 134.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Azertis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Azertis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 06:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dumitru Prunariu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dumitru Prunariu.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 02:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Todor Zhivkov.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Todor Zhivkov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nicke L 13:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Andreas_baader.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Italianeastafricamap.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Italianeastafricamap.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 12:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo is coming to Sydney

Sorry to spam you if you aren't interested. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney#April 25th for more info if you are interested. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Identified Aircraft

Hi Daniel,

Just a heads-up that I identified your aircraft for you on the Ref Desk. It is Fokker F28 VH-ATG, belonging to the Australian Federal Department of Transport [3][4]. It was sold to a Canadian airline as C-FTAY in 1998. FiggyBee 22:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barbadian Royal Standard.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 16:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated proccess has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:'Gorky Reading to Stalin' by Viktor Govorov.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Art. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-SPEAK TO ME 20:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:10thflotillauxillary.JPG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Propaganda Material. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image:2ofthe47ronin.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:2ofthe47ronin.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Madmedea 21:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:AgitationFreebandphoto.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:AmonDuulYeti.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Annibalebergonzoli.PNG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Anthem of the peoples love.JPG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Art. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:AshRaTempelselftitledalbum.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:ChronicleoftheBlackSword.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:ChurchOfHawkwind.png) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Coatofarmssouthyemen.PNG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Heraldry. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Dark blue world dvd.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/DVD Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Derfuehrersfaceposter.JPG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/DVD Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Disraeligears.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Dumitru Prunariu.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Farcflag.PNG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Heraldry. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:FaustSelfTitled.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Flipthefrog.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/DVD Covers. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:James Clavell.JPG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:MusikVonHarmonia.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DO'Neil. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Myasishchev m-4.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nikolai pavlyuk lenin in his working room.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Art. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PXR5.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ravensbruck camp barracks.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Revolution1917.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Art. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Road to perdition poster.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/DVD Covers. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rodolfograziani.JPG) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Stalin as an Organizer of the October Revolution.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Art. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:TanzDerLemminge.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:TheShiverWalpurgis.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Unitedstatesamericaalbum.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Album Covers. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Wilhelmcanaris.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Workerspartyofethiopia.gif) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Heraldry. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DO'Neil, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Zhugderdemidiyn Gurragcha.jpg) was found at the following location: User:DO'Neil/Images Uploaded/Photographs. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Daddydontdrink.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Daddydontdrink.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Churchdesecrationposter.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Churchdesecrationposter.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rodolfograziani.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rodolfograziani.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:János_Kádár.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:János_Kádár.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 13:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

non-commercial use only

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Felipequispe.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[5][6]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shaddamiv.jpg

I have tagged Image:Shaddamiv.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Princessirulan.JPG

I have tagged Image:Princessirulan.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paulatreides.JPG

I have tagged Image:Paulatreides.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Letoatreides.jpg

I have tagged Image:Letoatreides.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jessicaatreides.JPG

I have tagged Image:Jessicaatreides.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alia.JPG

I have tagged Image:Alia.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coatofarmssouthyemen.PNG

I have tagged Image:Coatofarmssouthyemen.PNG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. BigrTex 19:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Wolfinsheepsclothing.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolfinsheepsclothing.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 19:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:10thflotillauxillary.JPG

I have tagged Image:10thflotillauxillary.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rlest 11:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Azertis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Azertis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rlest 12:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Giuliano de' Medici by Sandro Botticelli.jpeg, by Sailko (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Giuliano de' Medici by Sandro Botticelli.jpeg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

now on commons Image:Giuliano de' Medici by Sandro Botticelli.jpeg


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Giuliano de' Medici by Sandro Botticelli.jpeg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Phantomoftheoperalonchaney.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phantomoftheoperalonchaney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Seyss-inquartmugshot.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Seyss-inquartmugshot.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Italians_in_ethiopia_1935.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Italobalbo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Italobalbo.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Shaumyan.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaumyan.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bernard_coard.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bernard_coard.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Boerboel.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boerboel.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dzerzhinsky_in_crowd.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dzerzhinsky_in_crowd.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Lenin_reading_Pravda.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lenin_reading_Pravda.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Julius_Streicher.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Julius_Streicher.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:ARVN_soldiers.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ARVN_soldiers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Anzacwoundedturk.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Anzacwoundedturk.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Antigua.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Antigua.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:Anton_Denikin.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Anton_Denikin.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flaga Poznan.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flaga Poznan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 08:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC) Conscious 08:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:AshRaTempelselftitledalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AshRaTempelselftitledalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhugderdemidiyn_Gurragcha.jpg

I have tagged Image:Zhugderdemidiyn_Gurragcha.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 21:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Radio_moscow.jpeg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Radio_moscow.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 05:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mpla flag.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mpla flag.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 09:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Boris vladimirski lenin in red dawn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Boris vladimirski lenin in red dawn.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nikolai pavlyuk lenin in his working room.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nikolai pavlyuk lenin in his working room.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Comeconposter.JPG

I have tagged Image:Comeconposter.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Romulusandremuswarbonds.jpg

I have tagged Image:Romulusandremuswarbonds.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yourplaceishere.jpg

I have tagged Image:Yourplaceishere.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 19:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Farcflag.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Farcflag.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LaraLove 15:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Georgi Ivanov.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Georgi Ivanov.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Vladimír Remek.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Vladimír Remek.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wilhelmcanaris.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wilhelmcanaris.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oldmacauflag.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Oldmacauflag.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stalin as an Organizer of the October Revolution.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 21:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Anthem of the peoples love.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:'Gorky Reading to Stalin' by Viktor Govorov.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Return of the winners.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Return of the winners.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 22:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Revolution1917.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Revolution1917.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 22:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Virgin Lands by F. Malaev.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 23:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stalin as an Organizer of the October Revolution.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stalin as an Organizer of the October Revolution.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Argus' final issue.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Argus' final issue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lenin and stalin in the summer of 1917.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lenin and stalin in the summer of 1917.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unitedstatesamericaalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Unitedstatesamericaalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Victoryday.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Victoryday.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AmonDuulYeti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AmonDuulYeti.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brazilianethanolposter.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Brazilianethanolposter.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Buenavistasocialclubalbumcover.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buenavistasocialclubalbumcover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coatofarmssouthyemen.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Coatofarmssouthyemen.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FaustSelfTitled.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FaustSelfTitled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tricontinentalmagazine.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tricontinentalmagazine.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 20:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Mexempire2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mexempire2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --John Bot III (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Paigcsoldiers.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Paigcsoldiers.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Battleofpharsalusmap.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Battleofpharsalusmap.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:AshRaTempelselftitledalbum.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:AshRaTempelselftitledalbum.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BelovedFreak 18:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Francisco de orellana stamp.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Francisco de orellana stamp.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Spanishuniforms.jpeg

Image:Spanishuniforms.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:TypesOfUniformsInTheSpanishInfantry.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:TypesOfUniformsInTheSpanishInfantry.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leander starr jameson.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Leander Starr Jameson.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Portrait of Jacopo Gradenigo.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Portrait of Jacopo Gradenigo.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Shaddamiv.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Shaddamiv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Princessirulan.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Princessirulan.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Paulatreides.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Paulatreides.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Letoatreides.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Letoatreides.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Jessicaatreides.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Jessicaatreides.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Alia.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Alia.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:GojkoMiticRevolver.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ibrahimferrer.jpeg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ibrahimferrer.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 06:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DamoSuzukiBeatClub.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:DamoSuzukiBeatClub.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 07:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fotheringayselftitled.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Fotheringayselftitled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 07:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Azertis.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Azertis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 02:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Italians_in_ethiopia_1935.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Italians_in_ethiopia_1935.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 02:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weirdalpoodlehat.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weirdalpoodlehat.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Putumayoriver.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Putumayoriver.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dumitru Prunariu.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dumitru Prunariu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Cristobalcolónwreck.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Cristobalcolónwreck.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FeuerwerkCast.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:FeuerwerkCast.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 00:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:FeuerwerkCast.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:FeuerwerkCast.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lenin's Room in Simbirsk 1878 to 1887.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Lenin's Room in Simbirsk 1878 to 1887.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lenin and stalin in the summer of 1917.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Lenin and stalin in the summer of 1917.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MeetingofaVillagePartyCell.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MeetingofaVillagePartyCell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dickturpin.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dickturpin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Parrot of Doom 18:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned non-free image (File:Murad Bey cigars.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Murad Bey cigars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 15:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:What is an aryan.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:What is an aryan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello DO'Neil! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Martin Cruz Smith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Pierre vallières.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Pierre vallières.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pedro de Alvarado.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pedro de Alvarado.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Staugustine1760.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Staugustine1760.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Education in the People's Republic of Poland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Artem Karimov (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Trabant601.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Trabant601.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pedrodeampudia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pedrodeampudia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:KarlEduardVonSchnitzlerScreenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KarlEduardVonSchnitzlerScreenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:James Clavell.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:James Clavell.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piauiflagsmall.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Piauiflagsmall.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 10:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pedro de valdivia.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Pedro de valdivia.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Kamov Ka-22.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kamov Ka-22.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 20:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceara jericoacoara2.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ceara jericoacoara2.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ceara jericoacoara2.jpeg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ceara jericoacoara2.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Woodenthompsontoy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Woodenthompsontoy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture. I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.8.9 (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomastroubridge.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thomastroubridge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rd232 talk 01:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Rhinoceros painting.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Rhinoceros painting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rd232 talk 01:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jones Morgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per WP:1E, and even that one event is unverified

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Szczecin CoA.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Buzzybeeride.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Buzzybeeride.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Avenue (talk) 16:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colónpanama1910.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Colónpanama1910.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 03:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:40mmboforsseat.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:53, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Stnicholasharbin.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Stnicholasharbin.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Russiandefencesportarthur.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Russiandefencesportarthur.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Leonardo Loredano.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Leonardo Loredano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Tapestry cushion.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tapestry cushion.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WaikatoTimesSignHamilton.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WaikatoTimesSignHamilton.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Busstopsign.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Busstopsign.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Catsprohibitedsign.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catsprohibitedsign.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:AnchoryDairyOtorohanga.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnchoryDairyOtorohanga.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:OtorohangaKiwianaMural.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OtorohangaKiwianaMural.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dominionposttepapa.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dominionposttepapa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Simon-Moz.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Simon-Moz.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mydogrudi.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mydogrudi.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Compasssmith

The article Compasssmith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Been tagged as unsourced since 2009. The term may be obsolete - the most recent use of it that I can find is 1903.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RockMagnetist(talk) 00:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sovietflagoverportarthur.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sovietflagoverportarthur.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Drukqs album cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drukqs album cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sakhalin map.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sakhalin map.png, which you've attributed to Online Map Creation. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate any input. We really needed a disambiguation page.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szczecin Flag.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Szczecin Flag.png appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

  1. The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
  2. Where and how this particular version was obtained.
  3. When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|DO'Neil}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.


If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szczecin CoA.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Szczecin CoA.png appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

  1. The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
  2. Where and how this particular version was obtained.
  3. When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|DO'Neil}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.


If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fordlândia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/05/31/abandoned-in-the-rainforest-henry-fords-fordlandia-was-to-be-inhabited-by-10000-people-to-secure-a-source-of-cultivated-rubber-for-his-cars/2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Voz de Aztlan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voz de Aztlan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voz de Aztlan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Leonardo Loredano.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. Higher resolution image already available and in use on Commons at File:Giovanni Bellini, portrait of Doge Leonardo Loredan.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 21:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]