Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Line 868: Line 868:
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Scripts%2B%2B/Subscribe&oldid=1208842903 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Scripts%2B%2B/Subscribe&oldid=1208842903 -->

== Question from [[User:Exotic1861|Exotic1861]] (10:15, 1 March 2024) ==

Hello,
I already have 16 edits and 5 days of editing, is there a reason that I have not been autoconfirmed yet?
Thank you
Exotic --[[User:Exotic1861|Exotic1861]] ([[User talk:Exotic1861|talk]]) 10:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:16, 1 March 2024

Discussions

Centralized discussions

Village pump

Village Pump (policy) (9 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (16 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (8 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (15 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (8 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (8 threads)


Administrative noticeboards

Administrators' noticeboard (37 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (38 threads)
Administrative action review (1 thread)
Most recent:
Edit warring noticeboard (8 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (10 threads)
Bots noticeboard (5 threads)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (6 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (17 threads)


Editors requesting help

Wikipedians looking for help (1 requests)
1 page(s) currently transcluding the {{Help me}} template.


Requests for adminship

Requests for adminship


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Voorts 142 11 5 93 21:06, 8 November 2024 1 day, 19 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Recent RfA, RfBs, and admin elections (update)
Candidate Type Result Date of close Tally
S O N %
FOARP AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 268 106 242 72
Peaceray AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 270 107 239 72
Sohom Datta AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 298 108 210 73
DoubleGrazing AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 306 104 206 75
SD0001 AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 306 101 209 75
Ahecht AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 303 94 219 76
Dr vulpes AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 322 99 195 76
Rsjaffe AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 319 89 208 78
ThadeusOfNazereth AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 321 88 207 78
SilverLocust AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 347 74 195 82
Queen of Hearts AE Successful 4 Nov 2024 389 105 122 79




Wikidata weekly summary #608

Wikidata weekly summary #609

Wikidata weekly summary #610

Wikidata weekly summary #612

Missed project

[1] from a couple of weeks ago. Bot missed the water polo project. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could run through those again? There are a lot of water polo articles in Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MSGJ, it's not in any category I can use to detect it. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you fix the water polo articles? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, I could add Template:WikiProject Water polo to Category:WikiProject banner wrapper templates? — Qwerfjkltalk 17:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, I've fixed them. — Qwerfjkltalk 19:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stopping notifications

Hi there, for the last 7-10 days I've been getting multiple (up to 20/day) email notifications from this bot of changes to talk pages and article pages. Can these be stopped? Thanks. MurielMary (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can select your preferences at Special:GlobalPreferences#mw-prefsection-echo — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am also getting hundreds of these notices which are extremely annoying. I tried all kinds of ways to stop this. You say "select your preferences" above but I have no idea which preferences to select..--Hazooyi (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Would you be so good as to stop sending me changes from this bot also. Something has gone wrong, I think. I have never asked to be apprised of changes to this page. I am getting a lot of notifications about changes to it also. Many thanks. William Macadam (talk) 12:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
William Macadam, I have no control over your notifications, nor do I know what preferences you have enabled. Try fiddling around with your notification preferences. — Qwerfjkltalk 12:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One way to stop getting these bot activity notifications would be to turn off all notifications, which is the first option in the "Notifications" tab – change the "Send me" pulldown to "Do not send me any email notifications". This is, however, probably more than you would want. Another option would be to change from individual e-mails to a single daily summary (same pulldown). Otherwise, set a rule in your e-mail client to just delete any e-mail with "Qwerfjkl (bot)" in the subject line — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a progress report for the bot? About how long will it take to finish the run? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GhostInTheMachine, hard to say. Currently I'm running the bot on Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell without a project-independent quality rating which has about a million members left, and had about 2 million when I started a week or two ago. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will add a cat counter to my daily report — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yet again I am here. Please avoid edits like these [2]. Kanashimi, your bot is problematic. It is the one right now with the most spam, as Qwerfjkl bot has noticeably slowed down (thank you for that). It was keeping both the blp and living parameters, and it does not remove this 1= thing. It also uses an alphabetic order instead of random selection like Qwerfjkl bot does. Is it not possible for you two to share the code of your bots, so that they synchronise? I don't even know why are we using two bots instead of one on a faster editing rate. Super Ψ Dro 10:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Umm, that was Qwerfjkl (bot) that made that edit — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know, that's why I left a message here and not at Kanashimi's talk page. Super Ψ Dro 14:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then, I have a minimum idea of how programming languages work so I trust you on it being hard. Super Ψ Dro 14:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from ManuGood (17:48, 14 February 2024)

Hi! Just wanted to ask a quick question about the notice triangle at the top left part of an article being drafted. If the notice says: "find sources," and sources are added, but the notice is still showing, does that mean the sources added do not fit the requirements? Thank you! --ManuGood (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ManuGood, no, the template has no way of detecting whether you've added sources or not (and more sources is always better, so long as the sources are reliable). — Qwerfjkltalk 18:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, very helpful. Thank you! ManuGood (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The invention of "Paint By Numbers" (PBN) in 1927

My Father, Joseph E. Elicker,(1909-1991) when he was just 18 years old, and being in show business, saw the need for large movie posters for the fronts of movie theaters. No printing presses were large enough to print posters so he started "Poster Design Service" on Broadway in New York city. He hired illustrative artists in Hollywood to paint several paintings showing the stars of movie films as they were produced and include the theme of the movie (ie. cowboy, military , dancing, etc.) These were all copyrighted, then sent back to NYC where they were transformed into Paint by Numbers format with numbers of the various colors to recreate an original. Theater owners subscribed to the service and received a filmstrip with the portraits in PBN format, projected to the wall on poster board and fill in the numbers with numbered paints supplied by the company. Then fill in the numbers and he had any sized large poster desired. The company failed in 1932 when presses we introduced. In 2002 I visited the Smithsonian in DC and met with the curator, Mr. Larry Byrd and he was extremely excited to see the hundreds of PBN paintings that I still own. All of the STARS of Hollywood. 2601:41:C781:A690:1088:378F:8A69:783C (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick PIQA question

I may be missing something, but how come Qwerfjkl (bot) removed the class=stub parameters from the individual wikiprojects in Special:Diff/1207922746? All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 03:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A smart kitten, it looks like the bot recognised that the majority rating was stub, realised there was already a class in WPBS, but still removed the classes from the wikiprojects because they had the majority rating. Should be fixed now. — Qwerfjkltalk 11:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info :) Do you know if this bug only affected talk pages that had WikiProjects with a conflicting quality rating to the project-independent rating in the banner shell? If so, unless I'm missing something, I can use Quarry to generate a list of affected talk pages by querying the recentchanges table for bot edits that removed a page from Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings - see quarry:query/80446 for what I've just chucked together. (I'm not sure if there's an easy way to find affected talk pages that were edited >30 days ago, though.) All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 16:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A smart kitten, yes, your assumption is correct. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a concerning error. How was stub the majority rating? The majority was List-class which is why Cewbot made that the PIQA rating in the edit before yours. You two really need to coordinate so that you don't process the same articles. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, because two wikiprojects had stub-class and only one (the WPBS) had list-class. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a false comparison as it is actually 3/2 isn't it? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, that's not how the bot considers classes, regardless of the technical accuracy. — Qwerfjkltalk 22:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Gvtyhbiju (07:46, 16 February 2024)

How do I upload a image --Gvtyhbiju (talk) 07:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gvtyhbiju, see Help:Uploading images. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting after CFD

Hi, thanks for all you do at CFD. With the current volumes of work I don't blame anyone for oversights, but please look out for cases that should be redirected for category navigation or other reasons (e.g. Cape Colony people), and include * REDIRECT at the start of each line when listing those at WT:CFDW. – Fayenatic London 17:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fayenatic london, I normally only add REDIRECT if explicitly mentioned in the discussion. I'll try to add it in cases where it would be useful even if not discussed. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Shell

FYI, this edit didn't go perfectly, and I think it messed up Cewbot's edit right after yours. The expected content was lower down the page instead of at the top, and you added a duplicate shell, so Cewbot then just moved it from the lower to the top and left the lower shell in place. I fixed it here. Pinging Cewbot operator @Kanashimi: ) for awareness. Thank you both for your edits. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zinnober9, my bot only looks at the first section, it ignores the rest of the page. (It would also skip the page if it saw multiple WPBSes.) — Qwerfjkltalk 22:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually have a design that the robot will clean up empty WPBS. looks like I need to make the robot smarter. Kanashimi (talk) 23:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Pham199320 (08:22, 17 February 2024)

OK --Pham199320 (talk) 08:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from PaulBKilmer on User:Qwerfjkl (17:24, 17 February 2024)

Hello. I’m trying to add a name (Nicholas Di Virgilio, internationally acclaimed opera singer) to the “notable people” paragraph of the Wikipedia article on North Tonawanda, NY. It won’t publish because I can’t figure out how to provide sources. Two such sources are contained in other Wikipedia articles on the Benjamin Britten “War Requiem” and the “Mozart Requiem” performance at the memorial service for President John F. Kennedy with the Boston Symphony, Eric Leinsdorf conducting. How do I cite such sources when confronted with with the filter rejection of my addition? Thank you! Paul Kilmer --PaulBKilmer (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PaulBKilmer, I can see you were hit by Special:AbuseLog/37029463. I'm not quite sure how that filter works, but you can file a false positive report at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives. — Qwerfjkltalk 19:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!! PaulBKilmer (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I got it to work. Thank you!! PaulBKilmer (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page layout questions

Hi there! Could you please review how your bot reorganized the templates in this edit and this edit? It seems that the bot's edits did not conform with WP:TPL. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GoingBatty, I'm using Category:Talk message boxes per User talk:Kanashimi/Archive 1#Talk page layout. — Qwerfjkltalk 12:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reply. The discussion you mentioned shows that Kanashimi has changed their bot when I've pointed out issues. GoingBatty (talk) 15:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GoingBatty, we were talking about talk order and you suggested Category:Talk message boxes should be used. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: No, I said:
I've added {{Old peer review}} to WP:TPL, as you requested. However, there are 800+ talk message boxes (plus their redirects) that aren't listed there. The use of "such as" and "e.g." on WP:TPL indicate to me that there is not consensus to have that page be a comprehensive list of every template.
Could you please change your bot so that WikiProjects are not moved below {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn}} and {{Annual readership}}? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GoingBatty, looks like I misinterpreted that. Done. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Avpreddy (04:09, 18 February 2024)

What is your name bro --Avpreddy (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl. — Qwerfjkltalk 08:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to font design

Thank you for the reply, could you help direct me to where you said I could change to font design to what it was pre Thursday on my mobile phone for Wiki on the topic page please. VileName8089289 (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SqWiki bot adoption

Hello! I finally managed to finish all the error messages your bot can give. I currently have imported the User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/top-middle-bottom pages. I removed the last part from the bottom one not being sure if that would be really needed at our community or not. Can you take a look at those pages and let me know if they seem good and what would be the next step to make your bot work for us? Thank you in advance! - Klein Muçi (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klein Muçi, great, I'll start testing the code to make sure everything works as it should. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, can you intentionally trigger an error on sqwiki? I'd like to test if the code actually works. (It won't notify you, but it will log it.) — Qwerfjkltalk 19:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm, how? - Klein Muçi (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, just make any change that would cause an error, like removing the title from a template. (Sorry for the late response, there were some other bugs in the code I had to fix first.) — Qwerfjkltalk 18:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. See this as an example of what the bot currently outputs. — Qwerfjkltalk 19:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like there are a few more messages that need translation: the edit summary, the section header, and the "A (foo) error" message. These are all embedded in the code.
The relevant parts of the code are:
  • f"A \"[[:{cause(category)}]]\" error"
  • f'Notification of CS1 error(s) on [[{title}]] ([[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 17|Task 17]])'
  • f"== CS1 error on [[{title}]] =="
Can you also translate these? Leave the code parts (i.e. the bits in curly brackets) as is. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the first part leave just the error category itself without the "a" or " error" part;
  • f'Njoftim për gabim(e) me referimet te [[{title}]]... Task 17 → Puna 17
  • Gabime me referimet te [[{title}]]
Are they understandable for you or should I rewrite them to strictly follow the format? - Klein Muçi (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, that's great. I'll modify the code to use these. I suppose the edit summary should be changed, as enwiki bot approvals aren't relevant on sqwiki? — Qwerfjkltalk 20:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but I'm also not sure if the numbered task structure is relevant to sqwiki either. How are you planning to organize it in general? — Klein Muçi (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, sorry, I'm not quite sure what you mean. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What we usuallly do in SqWiki is to ask for a bot operator to do 30-50 edits with its bot and if it gets approved/flagged, the bot operator is free to use it as it sees fit for as long as it doesn't bring any harm, without further requests for individual tasks. — Klein Muçi (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Klein Muçi, I think I'll just remove the ([[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 17|Task 17]]) bit from the edit summary. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I agree. Want me to show you the page for the bot approval request? It's on the sidebar, should read something related to bots in English. If you can't find it or if you find the process confusing, I can link and explain more thoroughly. — Klein Muçi (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, I can see w:sq:Wikipedia:Robotët and a button to create a new task. I can fill out the preload in English. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Also transclude the request subpage in the mainpage in the end. Thank you! — Klein Muçi (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, okay, will do. Currently the message look like this, is that alright? — Qwerfjkltalk 18:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it says "Please make 30 edits to show how the robot works." I assume I do that before submitting the bot task? — Qwerfjkltalk 19:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. But the reports need a little tweaking:
The "Kategoria... :Mirembajtje/Gabime part should be removed, leaving only the parts after the colon. Secondly, some of them do include the help instruction part and some don't. Normally they all should, what is the difference between those cases? — Klein Muçi (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also the title should be changed to include one more word (faqja/artikulli) and the title should be italicized:
Gabime me referimet te {[Title]} → Gabime me referimet te faqja {[Title]}
The word should be "faqja" if the bot checks for ref-errors in all namespaces (for example, template documentations) and "artikulli" if it checks for ref-errors only on the main namespace. — Klein Muçi (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The same word should be added before the title in the summary as well. Either "faqja" or "artikulli" depending on the fact if the bot works in all namespaces or only on the main one. — Klein Muçi (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, okay, I think I've updated all of the translations. The issue with the category bit showing was I forgot to link the category, now fixed. The help instruction part is probably from earlier tests. — Qwerfjkltalk 19:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm... I'm not sure I follow. I'm talking about this string: Për ta zgjidhur këtë problem...
Normally that should be present in every error, helping people understand how to fix the said error. In some cases that's true, in some it is missing. — Klein Muçi (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Klein Muçi, that's handled by w:sq:Përdoruesi:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/middle, where it seems to be missing from some. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it? When I Ctrl+F Për ta zgjidhur këtë in that page, every string seems to have it with different words following it, beside 1–2 in the end (which shouldn't). :/ — Klein Muçi (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The new upcoming messages seem correct though. Maybe it was the whitespace thing issue you mentioned in the beginning and now it is fixed. I'll do some minor changes to the overall message to make it seem more natural in Albanian and our wiki we can procced with the request. — Klein Muçi (talk) 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changed them.
Can you also change the title format from
Gabime me referimet te artikulli [Title]
to
Probleme me referimet te artikulli [Title]
And the summary from
Njoftim për gabim(e) me referimet te artikulli [Title]
to
Probleme me referimet te artikulli [Title]?
Title and summary should be the same basically. Also if you could make them customizable on-wiki like you've done with the other parts maybe that could be beneficial in the long run if there are other attempts in globalizing the bot but I do understand how pywikibot parameters work and keeping them like they are its not bad either. — Klein Muçi (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, shouldn't the other comments in ~/middle be included in the void template too? — Klein Muçi (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, okay, I've updated the translations. I'll move it onwiki tomorrow, but for security it would need to be interface-protected.
The other comments don't need to be voided, it was just because the matching string was in the first line, so the switch was matching the category and the comment, when the comment needs to be ignored. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm planning to protect any page related to the bot after we get it to work normally so no problem on that. (Or at least semi-protect them.) Speaking of that, is there any other page that needs to be imported/created for it? Maybe its user page if nothing else?
Meanwhile I keep doing micro-edits on its messages to make them appear more natural in Albanian. I have two requests for you:
  • Currently the errors themselves (which are category links) have a full stop/period in the end. Can you remove that please so it can be better integrated with the adjacent explanation coming after the hyphen?
  • There are cases where the same error is done multiple times in the same edit which make for a rather strange message. For an example of this, check the notification about Neptune in your sandbox, currently the last notification. I believe only one notification should be sent per type of error. A better overall handling of this could be to actually link and highlight each problematic citation individually on the actual state of the article (and maybe ditch the edit history link) but maybe that's out of reach for the moment since you haven't implemented that functionality anywhere yet.
— Klein Muçi (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, okay. I've made a configuration page at User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/CategoryMonitorConfig.json. I removed the full stop from w:sq:Përdoruesi:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/middle.
I actually have no idea how the duplicate reference thing happened. I have code that filters out duplicates already, and I can't understand why it didn't work in this case.
It would require me to essentially rewrite the whole code if I wanted to look at each problematic citation - I do it via categories because it's much easier. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I thought it would be per local wiki but this works too I guess. Thank you! I actually wanted to ask about that part. Where, if anywhere, is the {{{causes|Problem me referimet}}} part used?
And yes, I understand that it is a completely different logic so no worries. Maybe it serves as an idea for a future project.
There is a small problem: This section includes a cut category name because you've accidently cut two-part category names when you removed the "category:" part. I'm guessing it has to do with the colon regex.
Ultimately, the edits are currently coming from your account. I'm guessing that will change when the bot gets flagged? — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, the causes part is passed into w:sq:Përdoruesi:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/middle.
Yes, I do indeed use something similar to colon regex (I don't actually use regex, just string manipulation). It takes the name of the error as whatever is after the last colon. I suppose instead using everything after the second colon would work?
I'm running it on my account just for testing purposes. If I change the code to actually add the notifications to talk pages, I'll use my bot account. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Oops, just looked at my code and found I don't filter out duplicate categories. Should now be fixed. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that logic would work I think.
Okay, thank you for the fix! So I suppose no need to import any other page for your bot other that what we currently have. Do we create a user page for it? A small presentation for its purpose and its operator? Do you have a kind of information page already available for the task which I can base the description on? I'm guessing after we're done with that, you can create the request for the flag and put the sandbox page as a link for the 30 edits. — Klein Muçi (talk) 20:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, yes, a user page for the bot would be good. The closest thing to an information page about it is probably Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 17. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you! I will create that and hopefully create a preset way to report problems to my page as well and then I'll protect all pages and I'm guessing we're done. — Klein Muçi (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I created a user page for it. Is your bot a Pywikibot? Asking just because I've put the Pywikibot notice on it so I remove it if not.
The text on it reads:
Hello!
I'm a bot controlled by user Qwerfjkl, and I automatically notify users when I find that their edits cause problems with references.
If I make a mistake, please leave a message to user Klein Muçi indicating the article in which the mistake occurred.
I intend to create a preset for such messages tomorrow and we're done. — Klein Muçi (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you change the diff link in the top part of the message to include the two "before-after" panels diff-view instead of opening the said diff? It's easier for new users to see and understand what they've actually done like that and they don't risk starting to edit old/past versions instead of the current ones. — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, my bot does run on pywikibot.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by changing the diff link. If it's something that needs to be changed in the template, it's in /top. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you!
Sorry, let me try and be a bit more clear:
Your bot currently links like this: User talk:Qwerfjkl (revision 1210452742)
I wanted it to link like this: User talk:Qwerfjkl (Diff ~1210452742)
The diff instead of the old version. Is it any clearer now? — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, it does link to the diff (example). It won't in cases like this where the page is created in the edit. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! I was thinking that but it was happening too often and... Okay then, thank you!
I was trying to modify the bottom part now like I said so that when my talk page link is clicked a preset title is added. Something like "Qwerfjkl bot - Question [Date]". Is there a way to do that without using inputbox? I can achieve it with that but it would require me to use some CSS to remove the button appearance and I don't want to go that way.
Also, as you'll see in your sandbox, the bot now adds the name of the person it's talking to in the initial greeting (through a magic word - is it the correct magic word for this case?). Do you think the said magic word should be substituted or do you think it's good like it currently is? What is the usual practice in EnWiki in regard to this, if you happen to know? - Klein Muçi (talk) 01:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Klein Muçi, I would suggest substituting everything, because messages typically shouldn't change after they're initially posted.
For the date, you can probably use {{#time}}. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. I will do so. But how can I make it preload a templated title? So I can easily distinguish messages that are related to the bot? - Klein Muçi (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, look at User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/bottom which contains
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20{{subst:<noinclude />urlencode:{{subst:<noinclude />PAGENAME}}|wiki}}&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:{{{page|}}}}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{{diff|}}} report it to my operator]

report it to my operator
You can change preloadtitle to whatever suits you.
{{Request edit button}} uses {{<noinclude></noinclude>subst:#time:j F Y}} to produce a timestamp. (Obviously you'd need to URI encode it.) — Qwerfjkltalk 16:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've never used the URL method for preloading elements before. Can you please produce the link for me? :/ [Qwerfjkl (bot) - Problem me referimet ({{subst:#time:j F Y, H:i}})] — Klein Muçi (talk) 17:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the title.
Also, have I done the subst process correctly here: w:sq:Përdoruesi:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/top ? — Klein Muçi (talk) 17:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, something like:
[{{fullurl:User talk:Klein Muçi|action=edit&preload=PRELOADPAGE&preloadtitle={{safesubst:<noinclude />Replace|{{safesubst:<noinclude />urlencode:Qwerfjkl (bot) - Problem me referimet ({{safesubst:<noinclude>#time:j F Y, H:i}})|wiki}}|_|%20}}&section=new}} foo]
(not sure if you have the equivalent of {{Replace}} on sqwiki). Replace PRELOADPAGE with a page containg the preloaded text. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do. What if I don't have a preloaded text beside the title? Just remove that part I suppose, no? — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, yes (example). — Qwerfjkltalk 18:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
w:sq:Përdoruesi:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/bottom
Tried it but it doesn't work for some reason. :/ — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, I've fixed it. You missed out an &. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Thanks a lot! Well, I'm guessing everything is done now. I semi-protected all pages. Can you do the formal request? I'll see to accept it in 1-2 days. — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klein Muçi, okay, I've done so. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! If there aren't any unexpected issues, I'll accept it in two days. — Klein Muçi (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #617

Question from Moteitbe333 (16:41, 20 February 2024)

Hello. How do I create a wiki page on a local artist? --Moteitbe333 (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moteitbe333, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing six million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read WP:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out WP:TUTORIAL; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 16:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Praise Joseph on Rebag (10:31, 21 February 2024)

Hello can you help me edited an article --Praise Joseph (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Praise Joseph, what exactly do you need help with? — Qwerfjkltalk 19:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

I hope you are well. I came across some of the categories mentioned in this nomination on an Empty Category list and I'm hoping you can adjust your CFD closure here. Could you please state what categories these nominated categories are supposed to be MERGED to? It's not clear to me. There are dozens of categories listed and I'm not proposing you go through each one on that long list and state what the merge target article is, but could you just include a statement in the closure stating what category tree they are being merged to? I'd appreciate it and I think if future editors want to know what happened to these cultural infrastructure categories, it's better to note this in the closure statement than try other ways to track down that answer should someone try to recreate these categories. Many thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, I thought it was straightforward because it's mentioned directly below the nominator's statement, Merge all to the buildings and structures category of the same year. I can modify the list of categories to add the merge targets if that'd help (it's a simple regex pattern), or I could just add "to buildings and structures tree" to the closing statement? — Qwerfjkltalk 21:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Joy

Page: Sofronije_Podgoričanin

Diff: Special:Diff/1210202786

Comment/question: The bot is notifying me about a syntax issue, but the real issue is semantic: the previous content was formatted with nominally working syntax but was useless from the point of view of verifiability. I added some more cleanup tags in subsequent edits, please advise on ways to stop the bot from telling me water is wet in the future. TIA.

Joy (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joy, well, you can stop the bot notifying you about reference errors. Not much more that can be done. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl could we make it not trigger if we add {{title missing}} or {{author missing}} in the same commit or something? --Joy (talk) 18:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Joy, I'm not sure how easy that would be to do (I'd have check both versions of the wikitext for the templates and all of their redirects). I could do it, but it seems like an edge case that's not worth it. You can always just ignore the notifications. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Samvitgaragetools (16:54, 26 February 2024)

Why is wheel alignment essential for maintaining optimal performance and safety in our four-wheeler vehicles? --Samvitgaragetools (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samvitgaragetools, is this question related to Wikipedia? If not, try WP:Reference desk. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from TSECorporation (18:39, 26 February 2024)

How do I create a Wikipedia business page for the company I work for with a focus on SEO best practices?

Business Name: Triple Shift Entertainment --TSECorporation (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TSECorporation, first of all, you need to review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and disclose your conflict of interest (COI). You should also make sure that the company meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies, and you should note that you don't own Wikipedia pages - it can contain negative portrayals of the company.
You may also wish to review WP:SEO. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TSECorporation, there's one very important thing I forgot to mention in my earlier comment: you are not allowed to have the username you currently have (per WP:CORPNAME). The easiest way to do this is simply to create a new account (making sure that the name is in line with the policy I linked above, WP:CORPNAME). — Qwerfjkltalk 20:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Truthanado

Page: Culver_Field

Diff: Special:Diff/1209637785

My edits were just to change the way info was referenced to be consistent with Wikipedia guidelines. so that the reference shows up in the References section of the article. The info in the article did not contain a title, and I was unable to determine the title, though the source and date were available.

Truthanado (talk) 14:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Truthanado, that's fine, if you can't find the title, you can leave it without one. (Though you do seem to have put the newspaper as part of author.) — Qwerfjkltalk 16:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Justforfun483 (18:27, 28 February 2024)

how to become a contributor --Justforfun483 (talk) 18:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Justforfun483, see Wikipedia:Task centre. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 24

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Exotic1861 (10:15, 1 March 2024)

Hello, I already have 16 edits and 5 days of editing, is there a reason that I have not been autoconfirmed yet? Thank you Exotic --Exotic1861 (talk) 10:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]