Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
→User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ): Page protected (using responseHelper) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}} |
|||
__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}} |
|||
<noinclude>{{pp |
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] [[Category:Wikipedia edit warring]] |
||
{{pp-move|small=yes}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |
||
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = 490 |
||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(2d) |
||
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |
|||
|key = c95548204df2d271954945f82c43354a |
|||
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |
||
}}</noinclude> |
|||
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid="3741656" ns="4" title="Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=> |
|||
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. --> |
|||
== [[User:PaleoFile]] reported by [[User:Bowler the Carmine]] (Result: Warned users) == |
|||
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. --> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br /> |
|||
== [[User:Winkelvi]] reported by [[User:Coretheapple]] (Result: Protected) == |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&oldid=1262755962] |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Bess Myerson}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:'''{{userlinks|Winkelvi}} |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264151620] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264152372] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264152691] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264153515] |
|||
Previous version reverted to: |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641279699&diff=prev] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641280030&diff=prev] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641283354&diff=prev] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=prev&oldid=641306541] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=next&oldid=641306541] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641342397&diff=prev] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=prev&oldid=641345935] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&curid=332914&diff=641346578&oldid=641346350] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=641392107&oldid=641377413] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&curid=332914&diff=641486924&oldid=641486458] |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Winkelvi&diff=641281074&oldid=641055006] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PaleoFile&diff=prev&oldid=1264140186] (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page) |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABess_Myerson&diff=641295549&oldid=641194879] Attempt to resolve dispute on user's talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Winkelvi&diff=641288122&oldid=641281382] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead |
|||
<u>Comments:</u>I see that this editor is no stranger to this noticeboard, and was previously blocked for edit warring in another article[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive248#User:Winkelvi_reported_by_User:Tenebrae_.28Result:_24_hrs.29] and warned three times[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive232#User:Monterrosa_reported_by_User:Winkelvi_.28Result:_Monterorrosa_block.3B_Winkelvi_warned.29][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive258#User:Choor_monster_reported_by_User:Winkelvi_.28Result:_Both_warned.29][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive235#User:Winkelvi_reported_by_User:Msnicki_.28Result:_Warned.29] for edit warring in still others. His behavior in this article has been nothing short of maddening, removing amply sourced content and edit-warring over it. I would like to build this article into Good Article and perhaps even Feature Article status, as the source material is ample (including a biography of Myerson that I own) but it is impossible if this editor makes nonsensical edits such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=641309115&oldid=641308560] and edit wars over them. Myerson, the subject of a page one obit in the New York Times today, is a prominent person who is the subject of <s>two</s> three books, but her highly-trafficked article will remain stuck in "start" status if this tendentious conduct is not curbed. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 22:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC) <br /> The wall-o-text below bears me out. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 22:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
* Note that he has continued to edit war after the filing of this case, such as by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&curid=332914&diff=641346578&oldid=641346350 this edit] insisting upon calling a housing project "Yiddish housing," and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=prev&oldid=641345935 this edit] that, without discussion, removed an essential element of Myerson's story and placing it in incorrect chronological order in the wrong section. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 03:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PaleoFile&diff=prev&oldid=1264158498] |
|||
* Another revert since this report was made, edit summary "unexplained change by IP." [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=641392107&oldid=641377413], marked as a "good-faith edit." The fact that it was "unexplained" or "by an IP" is not a valid reason to violate 3RR. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 12:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
* And now this revert, edit-warring with [[User:Alanscottwalker]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&curid=332914&diff=641486924&oldid=641486458]. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 22:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#1a5fb4,#187148);background-clip:text;color:transparent;">Bowler the Carmine</span>]] | [[User talk:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="color:#813d9c">talk</span>]] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Very one-sided report. Look at the reporting editor's edits and reversions. All he's been doing is adding back in wording he prefers. Wording, I might add, that is extremely close and only slightly paraphrased from the references he's added. For a better idea of both sides of the discussion (which I started at the article talk page, by the way), I will re-post what I've already said there (winkelvi used the same behaviour in the constitucion article [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constituci%C3%B3n,_Chile&action=history]]: |
|||
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on ''[[Monquirasaurus]]'' and ''[[Sachicasaurus]]'' articles. |
|||
*:1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1263958485] |
|||
*:2. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1263972248] |
|||
*:3. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264119948] |
|||
*:4. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264138974] |
|||
*:5. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264332896] |
|||
*:6. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachicasaurus&diff=1264512858&oldid=1264407370] |
|||
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMei23448&diff=1264512763&oldid=1264140229] |
|||
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giganotosaurus&diff=prev&oldid=1264151620] while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) [[User:Ta-tea-two-te-to|Ta-tea-two-te-to]] ([[User talk:Ta-tea-two-te-to|talk]]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. [[User:Mei23448|Mei23448]] ([[User talk:Mei23448|talk]]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's [[Talk:Sachicasaurus|talk page]]. [[User:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#1a5fb4,#187148);background-clip:text;color:transparent;">Bowler the Carmine</span>]] | [[User talk:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="color:#813d9c">talk</span>]] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. [[User:Mei23448|Mei23448]] ([[User talk:Mei23448|talk]]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{ping|ToBeFree}} The problem persists, [[User:Mei23448|Mei23448]] and [[User:PaleoFile]] continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --[[User:Jens Lallensack|Jens Lallensack]] ([[User talk:Jens Lallensack|talk]]) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Thank you very much for the notification, {{u|Jens Lallensack}}. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Napoleonjosephine2020]] reported by [[User:Kline]] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) == |
|||
*RE: Claim in article that she was a subject of anti-semitism and the Jewish community saw her MA win as a "seminal event". The attached reference says nothing of the kind. Anti-semitism is mentioned, but not in relation to Myerson's win. As well, nothing in the article gives proof that Jewish Americans felt her win was "seminal" nor that her win was affirmation. All the obit says is, "To many Jews...the title seemed an affirmation of some sort of acceptance in America." Note the words "To many Jews" and "seemed". Both qualify for [[WP:WEASEL]] status, and neither statements are supported by references. There are no sources attached to either statement that supports these obviously POV, emotional, and hyperbolic claims as being real or anything other than original research and personal opinion by the obit writer. What evidence do we have that the sponsors were actually anti-semitic? None. Both of these claims need to be removed as, even after a BLP article subject dies, [[WP:BLP]] policies still apply to the article for up to two years followig the article subject's death. |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Lindy Li}} <br /> |
|||
*RE: The Ha'Eretz reference used to support "anti-semitism": it is also POV. This would need to be supported by a non-biased source. There is no specificity in the article that gives context, just the claim of anti-semitism. Further, in reading throughly both the obituary and the Ha'Eretz article, you have taken WAY too much of both, paraphrased only slightly, and are bordering on plagiarism and [[WP:COPYVIO]] with the prose and content you keep reverting back in from those articles. For reasons of borderline plagirism and copyvio along with the reasons per BLP guidelines stated above, I am also removing the content you keep putting back in. |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindy_Li&diff=1264113952&oldid=1264083876] |
|||
*RE: Comments about my editing at the article on Jimbo's page... Better to actually discuss than run to Jimbo's talk page and complain about, how did you put it? Oh, yeah: "a singularly difficult editor, which raises one of a number of issues I've seen discussed in the past year or so but never acted on. I.e., how to handle bad editors." (see here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=641306804]) That, in the vein of [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:AGF]], along with your edit warring behavior, plagiarism and copyvios... Doesn't look to good at all. |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
*RE: Editor's claim that I am using POV to edit the article... My feelings have nothing to do with the article content. In fact, I personally lean toward the anti-semitism claim. But my feelings have nothing to do with fact. The feelings of the writers have nothing to do with fact. Making claims of anti-semitism 70 years after he fact with no real evidence of actual anti-semitism is as stupid and POV as the claims of those saying anyone who didn't vote for Barack Obama did so because they are anti-Black. And yes, you did lift content from those articles. It's easy to see. So no, not ridiculous at all. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindy_Li&diff=1264694160&oldid=1264604767] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindy_Li&diff=next&oldid=1264696763] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindy_Li&diff=next&oldid=1264702528] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindy_Li&diff=next&oldid=1264713423] |
|||
Personally, I'd rather see this worked out at the article talk page (which is why I started discussion there yesterday before the reporting editor, in fact). Consensus building is a good thing, even a dispute noticeboard would be fine with me if the other editor doesn't wish to actually discuss and work this out. In light of ignoring BLP guidelines, his copyvios, close-paraphrasing lifted from references, and need to see the article only reflect his content and wording version while trying to take the article single-handedly to FA or GA status (as he admits above), I don't guess he will be willing to discuss properly and work things out. Hence, his reason for coming here instead, I suppose. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 23:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
I find interesting the reporting editor keeps adding diffs to what he sees as edit warring on my part, but is failing to add diffs of his reverts to my edits. Personally, it seems to me that while we aren't agreeing with all of each others' edits, at this point we're just editing the article together and the article is improving little-by-little. That's cooperative editing, isn't it? -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 03:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:I've not been reverting, you have. You're in excess of 3RR and have been working your will in the article almost entirely by edit warring. You used the revert tool to remove the word "cooperative" from the name of the housing project in which Myerson lived as a girl, without discussion, even though you were already well over 3RR[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641342397&diff=prev]. Your edit made something accurate into something inaccurate, but I didn't revert. This edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&curid=332914&diff=641346578&oldid=641346350], insisting upon calling that housing project a "Yiddish housing project," without discussion, even after it was objected to, is revert-warring, and was not reverted by myself. The article currently contains this extremely questionable language, as the result of the edit warring that you've been engaged in. That's how you've edit-warred over one minor aspect of the article! It is, as I said, maddening. If that is your idea of "cooperative editing" you are mistaken. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 03:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:*'''Comment''': "Yiddish housing cooperative" is certainly not a standard term. It's the exact opposite, in fact. Although its meaning is clear to those who know [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A02E3DB143CF934A35752C1A9629C8B63 this bit of NYC/Jewish history], it certainly does not belong in an encyclopedia. Frankly, the Bess Myerson article should merely link to [[Shalom Aleichem Houses]]. (I remark that this is a redirect I just created, but if we have [[Amalgamated Housing Cooperative]], we can have this too.) |
|||
:*One of Winkelvi's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&oldid=641283354 edit summaries] justified a reversion on the grounds that obituaries should not be relied in except for basic facts. He was rebuked by admins in this forum a few months ago when justifying some of his edit warring in [[Helen Hooven Santmyer]] for just this kind of second-guessing about obituary contents. That what's asserted from the source is POV, as Winkelvi claims, is irrelevant. NPOV stands for "Neutral" POV, not "Non" POV. If it seems to be stated in a hyperbolic manner, then phrasing it as "''Time'' said X" should be acceptable. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 15:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANapoleonjosephine2020&diff=1264702601&oldid=1264693478] |
|||
*Apple says, "I've not been reverting, you have." You can't, in all honesty, be serious. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 15:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comments and adding link''' to [[Talk:Bess Myerson|Bess Myerson talk page]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bess_Myerson]) I ask that anyone reading this report please look at the comments contained there. I have repeatedly tried to work with and reason with Coretheapple at the article talk page. His choice has been to make several personal attacks, even after I have asked him to stop doing so and instead talk only about bettering the article. Along with wrongly referring to himself and another editor trading talk page comments in the middle of the night over a span of an hour or so "consensus", his attacks and rude comments to me have been peppered with statements such as, "you have not read and/or comprehended"; "Please stop wasting everybody's time"; "we are adding relevant details, and this is clearly relevant, amply sourced, above dispute--except by you. Again, why are you wasting everybody's time"; "why are you wasting everybody's time"; "This discussion is utterly pointless...Please stop wasting people's time.". When I first went to Core's talk page early on when I was confused by one of his edit summaries, he answered rudely there as well: "And haven't you anything better to do than waste people's time? (page/section link here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coretheapple#Bess_Myerson]). Yesterday, at Jimmy Wales' talk page he referred to me in the following manner: "a singularly difficult editor, which raises one of a number of issues I've seen discussed in the past year or so but never acted on. I.e., how to handle bad editors." (see diff: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=641306804]). I have tried numerous times to work with Coretheapple yesterday, last night, today, on the article talk page. I've asked him to stop being rude and personally attacking me. I've even thanked him (via the "Send Thanks" option) for an edit today that was a particularly good addition. In spite of all this, Coretheapple chooses to remain tendentious, rude, angry, uncivil and non-collegial. All of this, in my opinion, shows that he not only refuses to work with me, but that this report isn't really about edit warring, it's about someone he has chosen to dislike editing an article he's taken an interest in. If it were the opposite, it stands to reason that he would have changed his tone hours ago based on the discussion I keep trying to have with him at the article talk page. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 19:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch. |
|||
::Over the last 24 hours you've edit-warred with myself, an IP editor and [[User:Alanscottwalker]], carrying out a total of 10 reverts at last count, and your wall-o-text rants are totally irrelevant to your incessant edit-warring. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 22:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANapoleonjosephine2020&diff=1264718782&oldid=1264709305] |
|||
:::Winkelvi: It is not a personal attack to identify your lack of comprehension when you have clearly failed to comprehend a source. Your justification of "Yiddish housing cooperative" below is simply your own interpretative original research (and mistranslation to boot). This is just one example: you frequently skim sources, find a few key phrases, paraphrase them into something creatively incorrect, and then aggressively edit-war for your version. My stating this is not a personal attack. It's just a time-wasting, disruptive editing fact of life on WP. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 16:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
*Someone who introduces the phrase "Yiddish housing cooperative" into WP, while having a history of reverting others for using "unencyclopedic" terminology (even when the contrary is documented) is not one to be taken seriously regarding who is or isn't "serious". I will leave the apportionment of blame to more experienced editors and admins, my comments stand on their own. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 16:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::I didn't introduce it, those creating the co-op did. The Shalom Aleichem Houses were originally called "Yiddish Cooperative Heimgesellschaft". In fact, they were called that when Myerson and her family lived there. Here's a great link to a CU discussion on the history [http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/amalgamated/history/40/Shalom_Aleichem_Houses.txt] -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 16:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::Your version, both in your edit and in your statement here, misrepresents the link. In general, official names outside of the actual article on the subject are almost always a distraction at best and more commonly are reader-hostile intrusions, and your habit of edit-warring to make sure they are present is very unhelpful. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 16:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Think what want. You made an unfounded accusation, ridiculed what I added to the article, I showed where the historically correct content came from. If you want to continue with your assault on my character and ability to edit based on that, knock yourself out; It's doing you no favors. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 17:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::::I commented on precisely what I commented, which was in regards to your precise language. Reading it as a comment on language you did not write or on other edits I didn't point out is just pointless thrashing. Also, edit-warring on your [[User:Winkelvi|user page]], where you have decided to implicitly but rather baldfacedly criticize Coretheapple, in open, knowing violation of [[WP:POLEMIC]] (you've done this trash before, and I referred you to it), is also pointless. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 17:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}}The only one edit warring on my User page is you, [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] . In fact, I see it as harassment. You don't have the right to edit the userspace of others. Doing it once is annoying. Doing it twice in edit warring-fashion is what's "pointless". Please stop the harassment. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 17:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
I wholly support Coretheapple. I personally think a ban is in order for Winkelvi. Just based upon my own dealings with user Winkelvi, the user is exceedingly disruptive and seems to be trying to pick edit wars with people. Even with me personally, he seems to be taking to vindictive, touchy and aggressive editing behaviors out of the clear blue sky. He seems to be spoiling for edit warring disputes and seems to be stalking to get that. I don't know what this user's problem is, but I really am in no mood for for his disruptive antics. Like others, I strongly think a ban and cooling off period is in order. We're not here to pick edit war fights and break rules. If you're here for that, take it elsewhere. [[User:AmericanDad86|AmericanDad86]] ([[User talk:AmericanDad86|talk]]) 04:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Note that [[WP:RFC/USER]] has been shut down as a bump on the way to ARBCOM. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 16:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes I see that. One correction to my report: I see that the very final revert that I listed took place after the 24-hour 3RR period. However, I am leaving it in as it is an example of his continuing to edit-war. That has not abated. More recently, he reverted accurately sourced material [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bess_Myerson&diff=641590792&oldid=641589995 here] because he didn't believe what the LA Times reported in its obit. In fact it was accurate, though it could have been more precise in saying that she hosted the TV broadcast and not the pageant itself (Parks did). So the hair-trigger reverting has not ended. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 17:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*Whilst I don't have a real opinion to most things here, your attempt at edit warring on Winkelvi's userpage, [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]], was inadvisable at best; in no way was there such a blatant violation of [[WP:POLEMIC]] that you had the right to remove all of 15 characters from their userpage in the first place, let alone edit war over it and then drag them to ANI over it. Also, AN3 is not the place to hash out content disputes, or request people to be "banned"; it is the place where you make edit-warring cases, and that's it. [[User:Lukeno94|<span style="color:Navy">Luke</span><span style="color:FireBrick">no</span><span style="color:Green">94</span>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 18:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
**One month before—I provided links—the admin [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] had reverted Winkelvi's user page for similar anonymous attacks on the grounds that it did violate [[WP:POLEMIC]], after the issue was first raised on [[WP:ANI]]. I did not claim the new text was a "blatant" violation, merely at the same level as the previous instance. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 20:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::*Which still does not justify the second revert, let alone the ANI thread. Also, I'm not remotely sure how you can justify that claim; the text that Drmies removed ''did'' clearly toe the line of polemic at the very best, whereas what you removed wasn't even close. [[User:Lukeno94|<span style="color:Navy">Luke</span><span style="color:FireBrick">no</span><span style="color:Green">94</span>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 20:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::*The difference is that it's much shorter. Meanwhile it toes the critical line: it's an attack on another editor, the one who brought this very AN3 report in the first, which is why it's getting mentioned in this particular AN3 discussion. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 20:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::*No, the difference is that it ''wasn't a violation''. "laundry list of reversion diffs" cannot remotely be interpreted on its own as polemic, and that is precisely what you were removing. Users are given quite a lot of freedom with what they can say on their userpages, and Winkelvi did not overstep that mark in that text. You had absolutely '''no right''' to act as you did there (you had a right to a single objection, not to two reverts and ANI thread). I'm a little surprised no admin has come in here to deal with the 3RR complaint though, because it does need looking at due to the large amount of reverts. [[User:Lukeno94|<span style="color:Navy">Luke</span><span style="color:FireBrick">no</span><span style="color:Green">94</span>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 21:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::::*I quote from [[WP:POLEMIC]] as to what is not allowed: "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws." Winkelvi introduced the new material later the same day as this report. Whether it was done with this report in mind, or just happens to be a good-faith coincidence, is actually irrelevant, the timing means it "can be viewed as attacking other editors." [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 21:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::::*With specific twisting, almost anything can be viewed as attacking other editors. As I already stated, you had every right to object politely to Winkelvi's edit; you had ''no'' right to revert them twice and then waltz off to ANI over a nothing edit. Besides, if something so simple Winkelvi did offends you this much, you shouldn't have their userpage on your watchlist, or be looking at it at all. [[User:Lukeno94|<span style="color:Navy">Luke</span><span style="color:FireBrick">no</span><span style="color:Green">94</span>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 22:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::*(ec) You have now entered lalaland. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 22:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::*So, let me get this straight; you complain about Winkelvi saying something polemic, and then write that? Well done. [[User:Lukeno94|<span style="color:Navy">Luke</span><span style="color:FireBrick">no</span><span style="color:Green">94</span>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 22:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::*You're being completely ridiculous. This isn't a User page. [[User:Choor monster|Choor monster]] ([[User talk:Choor monster|talk]]) 22:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Result:''' Article protected one week by [[User:CambridgeBayWeather]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 22:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::OK, thanks. And it would be ''awfully'' nice if administrators could monitor the talk page. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 18:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. [[User:Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''Kline'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Kline|<span style="color:#E4117A ">'''talk'''</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''contribs'''</span>]] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Signedzzz<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->]] reported by [[User:Legacypac]] (Result: ) == |
|||
:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? [[User:Napoleonjosephine2020|Napoleonjosephine2020]] ([[User talk:Napoleonjosephine2020|talk]]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Boko Haram<!-- Place name of article here -->}} <br /> |
|||
::@[[User:Napoleonjosephine2020|Napoleonjosephine2020]] |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Signedzzz<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->}} |
|||
::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, [their] own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand [[WP:REVERT]] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. [[User:Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''Kline'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Kline|<span style="color:#E4117A ">'''talk'''</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''contribs'''</span>]] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. [[User:Napoleonjosephine2020|Napoleonjosephine2020]] ([[User talk:Napoleonjosephine2020|talk]]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. [[User:Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''Kline'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Kline|<span style="color:#E4117A ">'''talk'''</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kline|<span style="color:#1666E5">'''contribs'''</span>]] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EncycloDeterminate#:~:text=I’m%20sensitive Here’s the exchange], for those curious. [[User:EncycloDeterminate|EncycloDeterminate]] ([[User talk:EncycloDeterminate|talk]]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C]] and [[User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE]] reported by [[User:Bowler the Carmine]] (Result: Page already protected) == |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br /> |
|||
'''Big Note:''' See the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Signedzzz_reported_by_User:Legacypac_.28Result:_.29_2 new clean report] below - this has gotten quite complex. |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}} |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [ |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warburg_effect_(oncology)&oldid=1264768893] |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warburg_effect_(oncology)&diff=prev&oldid=1264817745] |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warburg_effect_(oncology)&diff=prev&oldid=1264818819] |
|||
Following on this report that was just archived with no action: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive267#User:Signedzzz_reported_by_User:Legacypac_.28Result:_.29] where he went 4RR in one day. He also warned [[User:Lipsquid]] over edit warring as detailed there. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warburg_effect_(oncology)&diff=prev&oldid=1264819110] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=641054947&oldid=641009247] Signedzzz adds text again soon after the last 3RR report, and after I assessed the merits of the issue as an uninvolved editor and posted my assessment. This was a little over 24 hours after the last of the previous round of edit warring not involving me. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warburg_effect_(oncology)&diff=prev&oldid=1264838723] (second IP) |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641496542] Signedzzz adds text again |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641498771] Lipsquid undoes Signedzzz's edit |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641500475] Signedzzz adds text yet again |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641501443] Legacypac undoes Signedzzz this time |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641508865] Signedzzz adds text again and accuses me of edit warring (on my first edit to this section) and stalking. |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABoko_Haram&diff=641495886&oldid=641156427] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641495886] |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#Background_-_APC] |
|||
<u>Comments:While at but not over 3RR in 24 hours right now, this is a long term edit warring situation against consensus and he is at his 8th revert now. He seems to see this as a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=next&oldid=641508865 personal attack (see edit summary)], which it is not. He just will not accept consensus that the info is misleading/not relevant in this particular article and shows no sign of stopping. </u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
:I commend [[User:Lipsquid]] for taking this dispute to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Boko_Haram.23Background_-_APC Dispute Resolution], where I have summarised the dispute the best I can. (Unfortunately, someone has since muddied the waters by adding irrelevant stuff about the infobox, so I doubt anyone will bother with it, now.) I thought the issue had been resolved after talk page discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#Background_-_APC here], which followed extensive discussion on his talk page. I honestly believe his only reason for deleting the sourced, accurate, unbiased material is that he thinks it implies that the APC/ACF support Boko Haram, which is no reason to delete it (Boko Haram are widely assumed to have infiltrated the army and government, so it's hardly beyond the realms of possibility that they have supported them to some unknown degree). |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C&diff=prev&oldid=1264820254] |
|||
:I am perfectly willing to discuss the wisdom of keeping or changing any part of the article. Such a discussion should revolve around rational arguments like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#Terror_campaign_.2F_Insurgency this one did]. However in this case, the idea that material should be deleted is fundamentally flawed (the background section is already a bit short), and the user needs to listen to arguments presented and either present counter-arguments or just edit something else instead. |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page |
|||
:[[User:Legacypac]]'s use of the word 'consensus' here is nonsensical. He has simply agreed with Lipsquid that it looks like the group may support Boko Haram - which is not a reason to delete it, as I have pointed out on the talk page. I'm still waiting for a reply to this point. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 03:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::My assessment as posted was that Lipsquid's conclusion that it should be removed matched my assessment that inclusion implied the APC support Boko Haram, as clearly Signedzzz understands. The information is just tangentially related to the article topic, which is a heck of an argument to remove. If the background section is too short (and it should be short) find something relevant in the vast amount of info published on the group. Consensus is now 3:1. Why should Signedzzz [[WP:OWN]] the article and tell other editors to "just edit somewhere else"? Lipsquid told him that a topic ban would be sought if he continued with the edit warring, before or during the activity in this report. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 03:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C&diff=prev&oldid=1264846509] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE&oldid=1264846503] |
|||
"The main political interest group representing the interests of northern Nigeria" is ''by definition'' the background of Boko Haram (and no argument has been presented to suggest otherwise, obviously). I just checked the talk page, and its still just you and Lipsquid, and still no attempt to reply to me using rational argument. That is not "consensus" (last time I checked, "A process of decision-making that seeks widespread agreement among group members"). [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 03:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
"(Boko Haram are widely assumed to have infiltrated the army and government, so it's hardly beyond the realms of possibility that they have supported them to some unknown degree)." |
|||
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Warburg_effect_(oncology)&diff=prev&oldid=1264829415 talk page comment] stating {{tq|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CipherRephic&diff=prev&oldid=1264821086] after being warned [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CipherRephic&diff=prev&oldid=1264819063] and has not broken 3RR. [[User:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#1a5fb4,#187148);background-clip:text;color:transparent;">Bowler the Carmine</span>]] | [[User talk:Bowler the Carmine|<span style="color:#813d9c">talk</span>]] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
It is entirely possible that penguins in Antarctica have supported Boko Haram, to some unknown degree, but unless I have a reliable source that states "Penguins support Boko Haram", quotes about penguins belong on the penguins page and not on the Boko Haram page. I don't know anything about the APC nor do I really even care about the APC. What I do know is that a statement that infers a relationship between some very bad people and another group, needs to be reliably sourced and not based on your personal belief "that it is not beyond the realm of possibility". As a very casual editor of Wikipedia, I am kind of stunned that it is this painful to fix something that seems to be fairly straight forward [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 03:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|p}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Source says APC does not support BK. Inclusion of the background of BK and a quote from them is misleading and unwarrented. End of discussion. Will Signedzzz drop trying to reinsert this or will he not? [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 03:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::The source says "While not intending to suggest herein"... that they support BH. Legacypac, you need to pay attention to what you are reading. The source '''does not''' say {{green|"APC does not support BK"}}. How many times are you going to repeat that it does? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 03:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::And, again, if the accurate and unbiased info about the APC makes you think they may have supported BH, that is not a reason to delete it. Are you going to come up with a counter argument to this, or just continue ignoring it? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 04:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::'''The source is about the background of Boko Haram. I believe it is a good source for the background section of the article.''' What is so hard to understand about that? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 04:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::Exactly, the source does not say they support BH is says the opposite. So the answer is NO you will not stop with your edit warring and you continue here to argue. Topic ban is in order to go with the ISIL topic ban earned for the same style of editing. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 04:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::'''The article doesn't say they support BH. It just says what the source does. The source doesnt say they support BH either. And nor does it say they don't.''' It's really ''not that complicated''! [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 04:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
I already answered your argument. Penguins... [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 04:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:I have just spent the best part of a hugely unproductive and unpleasant week's editing trying to get some sense out of you. And, it turns out, that is the best you can do? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 04:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Signedzzz please see [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT]] [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 05:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Wrap Up Please:''' Time for admin action. This user is [[WP:NOTHERE]] except to argue and beat up other editors. For background |
|||
# First report by Signedzzz against Lipsquid on this exact wording [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive267#User:Lipsquid_reported_by_User:Signedzzz_.28Result:_No_violation.29 no violation found] |
|||
# Second report by Legacypac against both Signedzzz and Lipsquid on exact same wording [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive267#User:Signedzzz_reported_by_User:Legacypac_.28Result:_.29 not closed] So this is the third trip to 3RR for Signedzzz on the exact same wording. |
|||
# Earlier Signedzzz reports Lipsquid at 3RR [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive261#User:Lipsquid_reported_by_User:Signedzzz_.28Result:_Both_warned.29 both warned] |
|||
# Signedzzz gets a topic ban [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive264 here for very similar behavior]. Based on a report by Legacypac. |
|||
[[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 05:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:99.98.190.59]] reported by [[User:ZimZalaBim]] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) == |
|||
'''The IP in the diff at the top is clearly a sock of Lipsquid.''' I don't believe either of these editors believes a word of what they are saying. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 05:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Marc Benioff}} |
|||
(IP and Lipsquid both edited Talk:Buddhist influences on Christianity, Boko Haram, and very little else. And both have the same "superior" tone.) [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 05:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Also, IP contacted me at my talk page, thanking me for deleting the paragraph that Lipsquid had edit-warred to force me to delete, several weeks ago. No doubt IP/Lipsquid thought that was hilarious, and made him feel enormously superior. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 05:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|99.98.190.59}} |
|||
Ignoring the personal attacks. I am a very casual editor of Wikipedia. I don't usually log in before using Wikipedia and reverted the change without being logged in which was an error, I had no intent to hide and I also stopped after my second revert, for which I did log in, to avoid the 3RR even though my first revert was not logged in. Actions speak to intent, my intention was not to sockpuppet a bunch of changes. I made a change not logged in, I made a second revert while logged in and I stopped after my second revert logged in or not to follow 3RR, even though the prejudicial PoV-based information remains on the page today. [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 16:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
:'''Comment:''' In my opinion [[User:Signedzzz]] should be blocked unless he agrees to wait for consensus before once again adding the paragraph about the [[Arewa People's Congress]] to the [[Boko Haram]] article. He has done so seven times already, from January 2 through 8th. So far as I can tell nobody supports this addition, and the reason to include it in the Boko Haram article is truly unclear. It looks like he will keep reinserting this material forever unless admins do something. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 06:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::The reason is, the source about the background of Boko Haram thinks it's important. "Consensus" consists of Legacypac and Lipsquid/IP, versus me. If admins think the source is wrong/misleading, I'll leave it - obviously. Hopefully someone will explain why they think the source is wrong, first. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 06:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Nobody complained about the addition until Lipsquid did. And no one doesn't support it except him (and Legacypac, of course). [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 06:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]], What you seem to be saying is, anything Legacypac (who has been trying to get me banned+blocked for a while now) + one other person (such as sockmaster Lipsquid) agree to delete gets deleted, regardless of being sourced, etc. No arguments required. That's pretty depressing, then. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 06:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ed gave his CLEAR opinion after looking at the issue, but the editor is too busy with [[WP:IDONTHEARTHAT]] [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 06:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::Ed said the reason for the addition was unclear. I explained the reason was that the source thought it was important. I would like to know his response to that. There really aren't that many good sources about the background of Boko Haram (less than a handful, that I know of). [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 06:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
Found 2438 edits by User:Signedzzz on [[Boko Haram]] (55.31% of the total edits made to the page) The other '''847''' distinct authors made the rest of the edits. I suspected OWN, and based on these stats, the rest of the article should be checked line by line against the sources. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 06:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# {{diff2|1265027253|18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265024592|1265024592]] by [[Special:Contributions/ZimZalaBim|ZimZalaBim]] ([[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]])" |
|||
::That's because I'm well-known for falsifying information, presumably. And it's ok for Legacypac to say that about me, why? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 07:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# {{diff2|1265009969|16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1264902249|1264902249]] by [[Special:Contributions/Augmented Seventh|Augmented Seventh]] ([[User talk:Augmented Seventh|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1264902002|03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1264868382|1264868382]] by [[Special:Contributions/ZimZalaBim|ZimZalaBim]] ([[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1264865734|23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1264776552|1264776552]] by [[Special:Contributions/Zachomatic|Zachomatic]] ([[User talk:Zachomatic|talk]])" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
'''Request Admin Close''' this is totally pointless. Can't or will not understand. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 07:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# {{diff2|1265024674|18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Marc Benioff]]." |
|||
# {{diff2|1265033023|18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule." |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
'''Question:''' while you defend the inclusion of irrelevant penguins can you explain why these facts are not in the article? |
|||
# {{diff2|1265024924|18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more" |
|||
# UN Security Council has designed Boko Haram a terrorist organization [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=624514540&oldid=624513541] |
|||
# They have been linked to al-Qaeda (basically only denials of the link are there) |
|||
# <s>They pledged allegiance to ISIL recently</s> (he is topic banned from ISIL so I should not have asked this) |
|||
# They declared a caliphate |
|||
As the user with 55% of the edits I'd think you are responsible for these facts being excluded. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 08:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Read the article [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 08:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
I'm still wondering if EdJohnston thinks the source is good enough for the background section of the article, by the way. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 07:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:ChasePlowman2014]] reported by [[User:Happily888]] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) == |
|||
Although I've raised factual errors right here (which he refuses to answer) and on the talk page Signedzzz has already [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=641559681&oldid=641556680 reverted my first edit] and removed the POV and accuracy tags. This is going nowhere good. That takes him to 4RR today on the article. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 10:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dune: Part Two}} |
|||
No one has "raised factual errors". Please stop lying about factual errors. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 10:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|ChasePlowman2014}} |
|||
[[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] Changing the article to say 'boko' means 'book' is a factual error (the source in the article says it does not). Do you have a source that says it does mean 'book'? Or did you just pointlessly insert a factual error? And your edit summary "revise unsubstantiated content not found in the source" is factually wrong. There is no "unsubstantiated content not found in the source". [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 11:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::My new text said " ''boko''... originally meaning 'fake' but has come to mean<ref>http://www.gamji.com/tilde/tilde99.htm</ref> and is widely translated and thought to be a corruption of the English word 'book' " For support see pages 2-5 of the preexisting source <ref>http://www.megatchad.net/publications/Newman-2013-Etymology-of-Hausa-boko.pdf</ref> [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 11:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::[[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]], Source no.1 does not say "'boko'... has come to mean book". It doesn't even mention 'book'. It says 'boko' means 'fake'. As does every other RS. |
|||
:::Source no.2 says "It is commonly asserted that boko is derived from the English word book. This widespread view is incorrect." It then goes on to mention a few embarrassing instances of this incorrect translation, beginning with "often unreliable" ''(sic)'' Wikipedia before I started editing. The Boko Haram article, and other articles I have edited, are ''not unreliable''. I would like them to remain that way. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 12:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Reflist-talk}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
== [[User:Loveconquers1]] reported by [[User:Jytdog]] (Result: Indef) == |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Laura Owen}} <br /> |
|||
# {{diff2|1265161751|12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Loveconquers1}} who has also probably been socking as {{u|2601:2:481:21:ACB4:D1B9:74FB:7C14}} and {{u|H1n1fluvirus}} |
|||
# {{diff2|1265079289|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265038799|19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|1264974672|12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
# {{diff2|1265079184|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring." |
|||
# {{diff2|1265080757|00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule." |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
# {{diff2|1265080353|00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section" |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
* note: article was nominated for deletion and the result of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Laura_Owen the discussion] was keep, as of 7 December 2014 (UTC. |
|||
User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. [[User:Happily888|Happily888]] ([[User talk:Happily888|talk]]) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
:{{u|ChasePlowman2014}} is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=641459181&oldid=640335642 diff] by IP address earlier today |
|||
**Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the [[Talk:Dune: Part Two|''Dune: Part Two'' talk page]] explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- [[User:Jasca Ducato|'''Jasca'''Ducato]] <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641459630 diff] after deletions reverted, H1n1fluvirus reverted to delete again |
|||
**:{{u|Jasca Ducato}}, this isn't about the time taken to respond to the noticeboard report. {{u|ChasePlowman2014}} isn't using edit summaries nor talk pages and ignores warnings on their talk page about their behavior. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 04:36, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641500052 diff] after deletions reverted, Loveconquors reverted to delete again |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=641509111&oldid=641503305 diff] made other changes and nominated for speedy delete (?) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641510730 dif] blanked page and left note on page "This Wiki page is under review for deletion." and left first edit note: "malicious administrator / author posted multiple inaccuracies" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641513112 dif] same as above |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641514060 dif] same as above |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Owen&diff=next&oldid=641515446 dif] now with message left on article "WHO ARE YOU? Why are you targeting me? What have I possibly done to offend you? Do you realize that what you are posting about me includes a mix of inaccuracies" |
|||
== [[User:Callmehelper]] reported by [[User:Srijanx22]] (Result: Declined) == |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loveconquers1&diff=next&oldid=641503736 link] |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Ambedkar Jayanti}} <br /> |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Callmehelper}} |
|||
* Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff] |
|||
* warned about socking [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loveconquers1&diff=prev&oldid=641503100 here] (stopping doing that it seems) |
|||
* warned about removing material without edit notes or discussing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loveconquers1&diff=next&oldid=641503100 here] |
|||
* asked user to talk on their Talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loveconquers1&diff=next&oldid=641510810 here] and on article Talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ALaura_Owen&diff=641512919&oldid=641504648 here] |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1263900897] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1265223867 02:20, 26 December 2024] |
|||
Please block, and please block the other two probable sock accounts too. User seems really angry; unclear how to get them to start talking. This is a bummer. User will not talk. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 02:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264971983 17:41, 24 December 2024] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264362506 00:25, 22 December 2024] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264307604 17:57, 21 December 2024] |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
::{{AN3|b}} – Indef for vandalism by [[User:Discospinster]]. Another admin has semiprotected the article for a week. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Funkatastic]] reported by [[User:Mlpearc]] (Result: See a later report) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Top Dawg Entertainment}} <br /> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Neon Icon}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Funkatastic}} |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Callmehelper&diff=prev&oldid=1264323242] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ambedkar_Jayanti#Why_some_editors_don't_Understand_the_basic_things?][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:B._R._Ambedkar#Misleading_Introduction_of_Dr._B.R._Ambedkar_%E2%80%93_Urgent_Revision_Needed] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Top_Dawg_Entertainment&diff=next&oldid=641512624 Top_Dawg_Entertainment] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Top_Dawg_Entertainment&diff=prev&oldid=641511488 Top_Dawg_Entertainment] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Top_Dawg_Entertainment&diff=prev&oldid=641330058 Top_Dawg_Entertainment] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=641026010 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641026010 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=641508672 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641508672 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641511882 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641512603 Neon_Icon] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Callmehelper&diff=prev&oldid=1265301012] |
|||
Comments:User apparently warring on two separate pages with two other editors. <br /> <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 04:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Comments:The above user's report, though true, doesn't include all of the details of the situation. For the [[Neon Icon]] page, I explained to the above user [[User talk:Mlpearc|on his talk page]] that the edit war took place due to myself repairing constant damage (deleting referenced information with no causation) by another user, and I reported said user for doing so. As for the issue on [[Top Dawg Entertainment]] me and the other user have taken to the [[Talk:Top Dawg Entertainment|talk page]] and are waiting for fellow users to get involved before making more changes. [[User:Funkatastic|Funkatastic]] ([[User talk:Funkatastic|talk]]) 04:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Result:''' Funkatastic has been blocked per a later 3RR report. See below. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on [[B. R. Ambedkar]]. [[User:Srijanx22|Srijanx22]] ([[User_talk:Srijanx22|talk]]) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Koala15]] reported by [[User:Mlpearc]] (Result: No action) == |
|||
:It's me @[[User:Callmehelper|Callmehelper]]. |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Neon Icon}} <br /> |
|||
:'''Clarification by my side ; ''' |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Koala15}} |
|||
:Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before. |
|||
:* ''Disputes details'' ; |
|||
:# Firstly , I edit [[Ambedkar Jayanti]] check history of that page from [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1263900897 here] to [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264197402 final version] |
|||
:#''' process of reverting by others and my responses''' |
|||
:** [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264231130 1st Revert] [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264307604 My response] then [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264323194 again revert] and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes [[User talk:Callmehelper#December_2024|see]] then i thought matter would be solved. |
|||
:*But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264959830 see] and my response of revert [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1264971983 here] and discussion on his talk page [[User talk:Srijanx22|here]] |
|||
:Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambedkar_Jayanti&diff=prev&oldid=1265175065 see] |
|||
:Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk [[Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Misleading_Introduction_of_Dr._B.R._Ambedkar_–_Urgent_Revision_Needed|here]] but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on [[Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Request_for_Administrator Review_of_Recent_Edits_on_Dr. B.R._Ambedkar's_Page]] |
|||
:So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically. |
|||
:the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under [[WP:UNDUE]] or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:B._R._Ambedkar#One_Discussion|See]] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet. |
|||
:so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page . |
|||
:'''Conclusion''' |
|||
:So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary. |
|||
:Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources. |
|||
:i left a discussion on [[Ambedkar Jayanti]] page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources [[Talk:Ambedkar Jayanti|look]]. |
|||
:I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on. |
|||
: |
|||
:I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV. |
|||
:Much Regards. [[User:Callmehelper|Callmehelper]] ([[User talk:Callmehelper|talk]]) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{AN3|d}} Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Johnny test person]] reported by [[User:Aoidh]] (Result: Blocked 24h) == |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}} <br /> |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}} |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=641026010 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641026010 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=641508672 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641508672 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641511882 Neon_Icon] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641512603 Neon_Icon] |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [[Special:Diff/1265377722]] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 04:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1265394604|18:34, December 26, 2024]] |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1265395466|18:40, December 26, 2024]] |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1265399005|19:05, December 26, 2024]] |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1265402736|19:31, December 26, 2024]] |
|||
:They are controversial edits, and the editor that added them knows that. They need to be discussed. And days old edits don't count as "edit warring", the statute of limitations is over with. [[User:Koala15|Koala15]] ([[User talk:Koala15|talk]]) 05:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [[Special:Diff/1265395592]] |
|||
:"The editor that knows that" is me, and no the edits are not controversial. One is an additional genre which is attached with a reference that confirms the genre by the artist himself in an interview with [[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard magazine's website]]. Another is information on a bonus track that is exclusive to the vinyl edition of the album, which is attached with a reference to the [[Mad Decent|record label's]] merchandise website. There is a copy of the tracklist in the reference that confirms the change, yet just like the edit before the user above continues to delete this referenced information with no explanation. Additionally, the user continues to change the opening line of the article to claim the album is the "second studio album" and claiming the debut was "The Golden Alien" which was an independently released album with zero record label involvement, while the page [[Riff Raff (rapper)]] already displays the difference between the studio albums and independent albums. He's also deleting a referenced excerpt from the page that mentions the music video released for the album's second single. But apparently music videos are controversial in his eyes. This user has continuously damaged the [[Neon Icon]] page and has given zero explanation for any of his repeated changes. [[User:Funkatastic|Funkatastic]] ([[User talk:Funkatastic|talk]]) 18:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [[User talk:Aoidh#Angelo Rules]] and [[Talk:Angelo Rules#Unsourced character biography section]] |
|||
::An artists calling his album "EDM", does not mean that is the case. Your gonna need a better source than that. "The Golden Alien" was clearly his debut regardless of what he/anyone else says. And my bad, for deleting the music video sources, that was an accident. [[User:Koala15|Koala15]] ([[User talk:Koala15|talk]]) 20:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::This discussion should be taking place on the article's talk page, where it should have started several edits ago. - [[User:SummerPhD|<span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span>]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 20:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Result:''' No action against Koala15. Funkatastic has been blocked for edit warring on the same article per a separate 3RR report. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [[Special:Diff/1265406607]] |
|||
== [[User:DHeyward]] reported by [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof]] (Result: no block, user admonished) == |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Anita Sarkeesian}} |
|||
Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|DHeyward}} |
|||
:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Folawiki]] reported by [[User:Tgeorgescu]] (Result: Indefinitely blocked) == |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Grail Movement}} |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# {{diff2|641532825|05:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} DHeyward self-reverts |
|||
# {{diff2|641530679|04:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 641526877 by [[Special:Contributions/Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) It's not her, it's her series. WP:UNDUE as no terms were released regarding FF's role let alone Sarkeesians" |
|||
# {{diff2|641526379|04:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* Feminist Frequency */ WP:UNDUE - not about Sarkeesian and barely about her video," |
|||
# {{diff2|641374158|08:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 641371608 by [[Special:Contributions/NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) don't edit war over sourced material that is about the same topoic" |
|||
# {{diff2|641371171|07:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted to revision 641362950 by [[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|Starship.paint]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]]): Sourced and easily verified, neutrally worded criticism. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Folawiki}} |
|||
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: |
|||
# {{diff2|641531047|04:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on [[Anita Sarkeesian]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641531221|04:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* January 2015 */ note all four reverts" |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
# {{diff2|641450661|17:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* Intel Partnership */" |
|||
# {{diff2|641453016|18:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* Intel Partnership */" |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
# {{diff2|1265465790|02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265465515|1265465515]] by [[Special:Contributions/Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265465049|02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265464633|1265464633]] by [[Special:Contributions/Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265464033|02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265460975|1265460975]] by [[Special:Contributions/Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265459461|01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1240888069|1240888069]] by [[Special:Contributions/Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]])" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
User was politely asked to self-revert; they simply [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DHeyward&diff=prev&oldid=641531867 reverted] that request. The user has declined to engage in the talk page discussion related to the material in question and has simply engaged in stale revert-warring with no evidence they intend to stop. User is well aware of the 3RR. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 04:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# {{diff2|1265461000|01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Grail Movement]]." |
|||
# {{diff2|1265464521|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* December 2024 */ [[WP:FTN]] notice" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265464576|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on [[:Grail Movement]]." |
|||
# {{diff2|1265465123|02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Grail Movement]]." |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
I don't read your drivel anymore, especially templates, so I didn't see any request. You may revert if you wish, all of them were different topics that you've edit warred for months and it wasn't my intention to edit war. It's off my watchlist and I am not disruptive. You've dragged my name through offsite bullshit so knock it off. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 05:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# {{diff2|1265464764|02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "{{re|Folawiki}} The whitewashing has to stop. [[User:tgeorgescu|tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:tgeorgescu|talk]]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)" |
|||
:Your accusation about something "offsite" is patently false; please refrain from making unsupported and untrue personal attacks about other editors. I have never mentioned any other editor in any offsite context. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 05:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Stop lying. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment&diff=633481886&oldid=633480949]. BTW, I've reverted my edit above but you've never apologized for the above unfounded accusation. [insults redacted]. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 05:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::Your accusation strongly suggested that I had mentioned you in some offsite forum, which is not true. More to the point, I'm not sure what that has to do with this issue. You have self-reverted, however, and I appreciate that. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 05:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::: [insults redacted] --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 05:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
*{{AN3|w}} {{ping|DHeyward}} That self-revert is the only reason I'm not blocking you right now. Your annoyance at a two-month old comment does not excuse you from your obligation to use the talk page to discuss contentious edits. I'm protecting the page and I will consider sanctions if you continue to refuse to engage in discussion and/or berate other editors. If you have an issue with NorthBySouthBaranof's conduct or comments in regards to any GamerGate-related article, please take it to [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Gamergate/Requests_for_enforcement]]. [[User:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">Gamaliel</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">talk</font>]])</small> 06:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Cult whitewashing. [[User:tgeorgescu|tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:tgeorgescu|talk]]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Sol2893781]] reported by [[User:Snowager]] (Result: Indef) == |
|||
*Indefinitely blocked.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:TheHappiestEditor]] reported by [[User:Fylindfotberserk]] (Result: ) == |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|MLG}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Sol2893781}} |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Trisha Krishnan}} |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|TheHappiestEditor}} |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# {{diff2|641555123|09:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "[[WP:AES|←]]Blanked the page" |
|||
# {{diff2|641555191|09:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "[[WP:AES|←]]Blanked the page" |
|||
# {{diff2|641555961|09:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "[[WP:AES|←]]Blanked the page" |
|||
# {{diff2|641556099|09:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "[[WP:AES|←]]Blanked the page" |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: |
|||
# {{diff2|641554000|09:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[Straw bear]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641554086|09:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Only warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[Straw bear]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641555538|09:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[MLG]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641555787|09:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 2 edits by [[Special:Contributions/Sol2893781|Sol2893781]] ([[User talk:Sol2893781|talk]]) to last revision by Snowager. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641556121|09:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[MLG]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641556267|09:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[MLG]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
# {{diff2|1265432813|22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265170057|1265170057]] by [[Special:Contributions/Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]]) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two." |
|||
# {{diff2|1265165246|13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha." |
|||
*Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265432427] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265508561] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265510336] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sai_Pallavi&diff=prev&oldid=1265166036] |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
He kept vandalizing and blanking sections and entire pages in a blink of an eye. He didn't care about his warnings. [[User:Snowager|Snowager]] ([[User talk:Snowager|talk]]) 09:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b}} – Indef for vandalism by [[User:Materialscientist]]. See also the edit filter log. Could be part of a mass attack: see the edit history. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 00:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mrunal_Thakur&diff=prev&oldid=1263316743] - putting fake sources/infomation [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mrunal_Thakur&diff=next&oldid=1263316743] |
|||
== [[User:Amelung10]] reported by [[User:Sveuciliste1669]] (Result: Filer blocked) == |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashmika_Mandanna&diff=next&oldid=1263245390] - putting fake sources/infomation [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashmika_Mandanna&diff=next&oldid=1263317817] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disha_Patani&diff=prev&oldid=1263318880] - putting fake sources/infomation [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disha_Patani&diff=next&oldid=1263318880] |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|University of Zagreb}} <br /> |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATheHappiestEditor&diff=1265510449&oldid=1257089634] |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Amelung10}} |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [diff] |
|||
# [diff] |
|||
# [diff] |
|||
# [diff] |
|||
POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265432427] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265508561] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wamiqa_Gabbi&diff=prev&oldid=1265510336]. The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATheHappiestEditor&diff=1257089634&oldid=1195415825] and a recent one for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheHappiestEditor#December_2024 edit-warring] from {{u|Krimuk2.0}}. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]]) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link] |
|||
:{{u|TheHappiestEditor}}, please respond to these allegations. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff] |
|||
== [[User:103.84.130.238]] reported by [[User:Fylindfotberserk]] (Result: Page protected) == |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Hariprasad Chaurasia}} |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
*'''Result:''' Filer blocked one week for vandalism at [[University of Zagreb]] by [[User:Bjelleklang]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 00:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|103.84.130.238}} |
|||
== [[User:Ryulong]] reported by [[User:ChrisGualtieri]] (Result: Blocked ) == |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Dominion: Tank Police}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Ryulong}} |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1262480024|diff=1265542339|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1265541681|12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1262480024|1262480024]] by [[Special:Contributions/Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]])" |
|||
## {{diff2|1265542339|12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia [for example-Pandit Shivkumar Sharma [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivkumar_Sharma ]" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1262479968] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1260743286] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1259451464] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1259452362] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1259452638] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1259453038] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hariprasad_Chaurasia&diff=prev&oldid=1259453428] |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:103.84.130.238&oldid=1260743606] |
|||
# {{diff2|641567292|12:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:103.84.130.238&diff=next&oldid=1260743606] |
|||
# {{diff2|641567653|12:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641567707|12:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641567787|12:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641568005|12:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641568111|12:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641568235|12:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641568400|12:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641568917|12:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) to last revision by Ryulong. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=641568966|diff=641569521|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC) to 12:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|641569063|12:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Restore version of article produced by copy paste moving" |
|||
## {{diff2|641569521|12:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Use current title until move" |
|||
# {{diff2|641570410|12:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]]: Title of page must be in the first paragraph and be the first thing, until you convince people this page must be renamed this is how it should be set up. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641571513|12:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 641571134 by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]] ([[User talk:MetalMan2015|talk]]) typos can be fixed and [[WP:LEDE]] requires this" |
|||
# {{diff2|641572108|13:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/MetalMan2015|MetalMan2015]]: [[WP:LEDE]] explicitly says the article title must be the subject of the first sentecne and until this article is officially moved that title is not just dominion. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|641572422|13:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Until this page is moved, tank police must be in the first sentence" |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about [[WP:NCIN]] and [[MOS:HON]] in edit summaries and warnings [[User:Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]]) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:103.84.130.238&diff=next&oldid=1260743606 level 4] warning, but was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=1265557054&oldid=1265550737 asked] to report it here. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]]) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|p}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Johnny test person]] reported by [[User:ToBeFree]] (Result:Indefinitely blocked) == |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}} |
|||
Ryulong is well-aware of 3RR rules per his extensive history. MetalMan2015 has been warned and as of this posting, has not made another edit. [[User:ChrisGualtieri|ChrisGualtieri]] ([[User talk:ChrisGualtieri|talk]]) 14:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}} |
|||
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}} [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]], [[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Uqaqtuq (talk)]], [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|Sunasuttuq]] 15:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
**{{AN3|b|24 hours}} for MetalMan2015. In part for the edit war but also he had been warned about the copy and paste move. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]], [[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Uqaqtuq (talk)]], [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|Sunasuttuq]] 15:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
== [[User:Signedzzz<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->]] reported by [[User:Legacypac]] (Result: Blocked) == |
|||
# {{diff2|1265621270|21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265440086|1265440086]] by [[Special:Contributions/ToBeFree|ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265402736|19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265401281|1265401281]] by [[Special:Contributions/Codename AD|Codename AD]] ([[User talk:Codename AD|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265399005|19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265395978|1265395978]] by [[Special:Contributions/Codename AD|Codename AD]] ([[User talk:Codename AD|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265395466|18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265395008|1265395008]] by [[Special:Contributions/Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1265394604|18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1265382744|1265382744]] by [[Special:Contributions/Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]])" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Boko Haram<!-- Place name of article here -->}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Signedzzz<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted] N/A |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=641559681&oldid=641556680] reverting this series of edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=641556680&oldid=641513429] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641509567] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641501443] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641498771] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [this is the 4th trip to 3RR in a few days] |
|||
Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack ([[Special:Diff/1265613452]]) [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
* {{AN3|b| indef}} Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. <b>[[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]]</b><sup>[[User talk:Jauerback|dude?]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jauerback|dude.]]</sub> 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#Background_-_APC] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#POV_Issues] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Signedzzz_reported_by_User:Legacypac_.28Result:_.29] |
|||
<u>Comments: New simple report because the last one was turned into a long [[WP:IDONTHEARTHAT]] debate. Above is clear 4RR within Jan 8 times stamps. If you review the page history it becomes clear that no other editor may make anything but a minor contribution to the article. Signedzzz has 53% of the total edits =over 2400 edits himself on this article and is guarding it, even while he keeps out important info. Debate is over - please act.</u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
:Legacypac has been going on an extended and increasingly hysterical witch-hunt of me, and apparently won't be happy until I give up editing. This has only intensified recently after I was pinged to make a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=641353786 comment at AN/I] about my dealings with him. In the thread above, he discovered that I had written the Boko Haram article, which was supposedly a huge concern due to my habit of "factual innaccuracy". |
|||
:His evidence for my long campaign of deception was 4 facts which were supposedly missing from the article, which he could, of course, have simply added (except, only one of the facts was actually missing). I was unable to comment much on this, as 2 of the facts (which actually are in the article) concerned a subject which he has had me TBANned from. This lead him to add 2 warning banners at the top of the article to warn readers of POV and factual inaccuracy, and he [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boko_Haram#POV_Issues opened a thread] in article talk about the supposed dire condition of the article, listing the 4 missing facts and complaining in outraged tones of the fact that I had written the article. |
|||
:The 1st diff (which occurred after the last 3) is me reverting Legacypac's edit to a different section of the article, which he added, with warning banners, after arguing all night on the thread above. As I explain in the thread above, it introduced a factual error and removed sourced material while claiming it was unsourced. I also removed his unexplained warning banners; I am not sure why he didn't mention that - perhaps because he is aware that they are unambiguous vandalism. |
|||
:In this report, [[User:Legacypac]] again suggests that I have been disruptive by writing an article that needed to be written. He implies that I prevent others from editing it - this is absolute rubbish. And despite his repeated hysterical claims, he has yet to find a single factual inaccuracy. |
|||
:The 2nd, 3rd & 4th diffs are the subject of the thread above. They are me reverting Lipsquid's edit and the edit of his sockpuppet. |
|||
:I notice that Legacypac and Lipsquid have now "taken over" the article. Therefore I wont be contributing to it any more, per [[User:EdJohnston]]'s advice on my talk page, and I sincerely doubt I'll ever edit or disrupt or add factual innaccuracies to any other page either. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Kindly stop with the false allegations and the [[WP:IDONTHEAR]]. When editors point out errors you act like you can't see what they are saying. A number of different editors are working to fix the article up and correct the inaccuracies and missing critical issues. 4 different editors have now assessed the part linked here you inserted 9 times and found it inappropriate for inclusion. Please start listening to what people are saying. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 02:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::'''"False allegations"'''. You've said I'm "hypocritical" and "pushing" a [pro-terrorist] "agenda", for example. So what "false allegations" are you referring to? Or is that just like my "factual inaccuracies", ie. there are none? |
|||
*Since other editors have said they dont like the paragraph I haven't added it |
|||
*Lipsquid used a sockpuppet: evidence is crystal clear in report above. |
|||
*After I discovered his sockpuppet, you proceeded to: |
|||
*added a NPOV tag for no reason. |
|||
*added a Factual accuracy tag for no reason. |
|||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641556680 added] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641620889 re-added] false information: "'Boko'... is widely translated and thought to be a corruption of the English word 'book'" - no source says it means "book", all sources say it means "fake", including the 2 sources cited inline for the statement, one of which ''specifically says it doesn't mean book, and mocks Wikipedia for previously saying it means "book"'' - all of which I explained to you in my very last comment in the thread above, hours ''before'' you added it back again |
|||
*remove sourced info claiming it is "unsubstantiated content not found in the source" when it is in the source |
|||
*You knew I'd revert these edits, so you could try yet again to get me sanctioned |
|||
*yoouve now got the infobox claiming they are allied to al qaeda when the source in the article says they aren't since the middle of last year at least |
|||
*you've changed the infobox to say "strength=9000" when the source says "up to", and the first para says "a few 100s to a few 1000s" (sourced) |
|||
*you've been accusing me of factual errors left right and centre and '''you haven't pointed out one single factual error'''. And before you say "[[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT]]", '''point out a factual error''' |
|||
*Its totally pointless editing if Legacypac's endless mudslinging and Lipsquid's sockpuppetry & trolling (eg [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lipsquid&diff=prev&oldid=640539049 "the word 'Boko Haram' is not in the reference you cited"], referring to "[http://africanarguments.org/2014/05/19/revolt-in-the-north-interpreting-boko-harams-war-on-western-education-by-kirk-ross/ Revolt in the north - Interpreting Boko Haram's war on western education]") allow you to get rid of any editor you don't like and change an article that is totally accurate and balanced that I slaved over into a bunch of lies |
|||
*The fact Legacypac can do all that, and add a "multiple issues" tag is a complete joke. That's all I wanted to say [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 12:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for the update. [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 16:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, socking and trolling is fun, huh, Lipsquid? |
|||
Starting with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641508865 this edit], 1:23, 8 Jan, I count at least 5 reverts for [[User:Legacypac]] in less than 24 hours. Also on the 8th Jan, [[User:Lipsquid]] did 8 or 9 reverts [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&action=history]. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 16:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:The intro and every point in the multi-bullet post is incorrect. Further, either Signedzzz can't count or understand what a revert looks like. He continues to be disruptive and not get the [[WP:POINT]] as shown here. Now can we get an Admin to close this? Either block him completely or do a topic ban. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 18:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Which part of [[WP:3RRNO]] do you think your reverts fall under? |
|||
Unbelievably, [[User:Legacypac]] has "archived" ie. closed all the discussions about content on the [[Talk:Boko Haram]] that just started in the last day or two, preventing ie. [[WP:CENSOR|CENSORING]] any opposing views. And this is the user that sticks a POV tag on the article and repeatedly and without cause accuses me of pushing an agenda. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 18:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks for bring this to my attention - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABoko_Haram&diff=641766624&oldid=641701275 a few hours ago I missed a single { in the archive bottom tag - fixed.] The result was all the subsequent threads were combined in a huge close box. Any editor is allowed to fix such things. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 19:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::Uh, 12 hours ago. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 19:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[Talk:Boko_Haram#POV_Issues]], where you "justify" or "explain" your POV tag which I reverted and you re-reverted, is of course nothing more than one long polemic [[WP:PA]] against me. "55% of the total edits here are by one editor". You incorrectly and irrelevantly list 4 facts supposedly not in the article. Then you merely state without explanation or justification that I have a [pro-terrorism] "agenda that does not meet NPOV". I will have to seek sanctions for this. I didn't write this article to get publicly slandered. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 19:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::I could ask questions or for diffs, but he would just blather on with more nonsense allegations and never answer the questions or justify them. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 19:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] Do you want to name one of these mystery "nonsense allegations"? Or do you just want to delete the (unjustified) tags and corresponding attack thread? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 22:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
I should not feed the trolls, but the source in question -Paul Newman- lists 11 other sources that say Boko also means book as in "Book Learning" or "Western Learning". http://www.megatchad.net/publications/Newman-2013-Etymology-of-Hausa-boko.pdf Which also leads to the most reliably sourced definition of Boko Haram. "Western learning is forbidden". I have not seen any reliable sources that say the translation of Boko haram means - "fake is forbidden". There are 11 points of view available in the link. Only one says definitively that Boko does not mean book, but even 1 against 11 is a fair point to show contention, so I changed the article to take a more neutral stance on the definition of Boko. I am sure this will still lead us spinning off into a new, new, new tangent even though I again am trying to address the concerns you have made in good faith. Having an edit war over insisting that "Boko means book" absolutely must be deleted because you find it in one source while ignoring all other previous sources '''that say it does mean book''', is pretty much the opposite of what an editor should do. You should show both sides, remain neutral and let readers draw their own conclusion whenever there is a discrepancy between sources, which is what I am trying to do in my latest edit. [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 21:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:{{quote|"There are various pieces of evidence that support the view that boko not only '''never meant book,''' but could not have come from book. No one factor is crucial in and of itself, but they add up to the same conclusion, namely that the resemblance between boko and book is purely coincidental and of no historical linguistic import." (page 8, my added emphasis).}} |
|||
:Or just read the first paragraph, the "Abstract", which means "what the entire reference is all about". |
|||
:Could an administrator please look at the ref and try to explain it to the user? I really don't know if he's [[wp:trolling]] or just lacking in [[wp:competence]]. Either way, I'm positive he won't listen to me. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 22:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]], how ''do'' you explain your claim that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lipsquid&diff=prev&oldid=640539049 "the word 'Boko Haram' is not in the reference you cited"] (after you deleted a large paragraph of the article) when the phrase is in the title, and repeated prominently throughout? Were you [[wp:trolling]]? Are you trolling again now? [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 23:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Not taking the bait. Have a nice weekend... [[User:Lipsquid|Lipsquid]] ([[User talk:Lipsquid|talk]]) 23:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:It was an honest question. I suppose I've got to assume that someone who habitually uses [[wp:sockpuppet]]s also enjoys [[wp:trolling]]. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 23:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{AN3|b}} – Signedzzz is blocked four days for long-term edit warring at [[Boko Haram]], as well as a 3RR violation on 8 January. The closure of this complaint was delayed due to discussions which took place both here and in a report above. It appeared for a while that Signedzzz [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=641654926 was agreeing to take a break] from the article, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=prev&oldid=641821080 he made this controversial edit on 10 January which removes article tags], showing that he has not stopped editing at [[Boko Haram]]. This block can be lifted if Signedzzz will accept a topic ban from Islamic extremism and [[Boko Haram]], which will apply everywhere on Wikipedia on articles, talk pages and noticeboards. Signedzzz is already banned from editing on [[WP:GS/SCW]] per an earlier complaint. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:YashShah008]] reported by [[User:Dai Pritchard]] (Result: ) == |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|List of Indian monarchs}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|YashShah008}} |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# {{diff2|641417794|14:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=641418217|diff=641419437|label=Consecutive edits made from 14:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC) to 14:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|641419019|14:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "I removed non Indian monarchs" |
|||
## {{diff2|641419183|14:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "I removed foreign rulers who never actually ruled Indian subcontinent" |
|||
## {{diff2|641419437|14:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "British emperors were never ruling from India subcontinent" |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=641457030|diff=641457463|label=Consecutive edits made from 18:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC) to 18:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|641457365|18:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "These rulers never ruled any part of Indian subcontinent so they cannot be called Indian emperors" |
|||
## {{diff2|641457463|18:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)}} "This not an Indian civilization" |
|||
# {{diff2|641571113|12:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* Foreign Emperors in North-Western India (c. 538 BC – 750 AD) */Persians and seleuid dynasty never ruled indian states they were on other side of Hindu kush and it was alexander who ruled indian states ." |
|||
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=prev&oldid=641417783], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=next&oldid=641417783], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=next&oldid=641423917], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=next&oldid=641453979], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=next&oldid=641457685], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YashShah008&diff=next&oldid=641573523] |
|||
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_Indian_monarchs&diff=641457455&oldid=616246975], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Indian_monarchs&diff=next&oldid=641458301], and subsequent discussion at [[Talk:List of Indian monarchs#Large-scale section blanking]] and at [[User talk:Dai Pritchard#list of indian monarch]]. [[User:Dai Pritchard|Dai Pritchard]] ([[User talk:Dai Pritchard|talk]]) 15:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
== [[User:Sveuciliste1669]] reported by [[User:Amelung10]] (Result: blocked) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|University of Zagreb}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Sveuciliste1669}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Zagreb&diff=641558053&oldid=641557964] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Zagreb&diff=641558098&oldid=641558053] |
|||
# [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Zagreb&diff=641557964&oldid=641557888] |
|||
# [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Zagreb&diff=641557785&oldid=641545569] |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sveuciliste1669] |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:University_of_Zagreb] |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
{{userlinks|Sveuciliste1669}} deleted 9 times the article - without explaining why nor participating in any discussion!! |
|||
*{{AN3|b| 1 week}} [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]] - [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 19:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Funkatastic]] reported by [[User:OccultZone]] (Result: Blocked) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Neon Icon}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Funkatastic}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=641508672&oldid=641339024] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=641511882&oldid=641508672] "(Undid revision 641508672 by Koala15 (talk))" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=641513604&oldid=641512603] "(You have been reported for damaging this page. Undid revision 641512603 by Koala15 (talk))" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=641609499&oldid=641538239] "(Deleting references with no explanation.)" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=641658690&oldid=641657971] "(User continues to make revert edits without explanation, and is not waiting for a compromise to be reached on the talk page.)" |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Funkatastic&diff=641517971&oldid=641512888] |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neon Icon#Video track] |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
*Article concerns a [[WP:BLP]] and these edits are poorly sourced. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 01:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:*Funkatastic had just removed this report.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=641659979&oldid=641659536] [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 01:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:*'''NOTE''': User has open report for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=641661121#User:Funkatastic_reported_by_User:Mlpearc_.28Result:_.29 same page] <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 01:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::*{{yo|Mlpearc}} if you look at the above report, they are not really "reverts" and they weren't made under 24 hours. Compare [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=641026010] with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neon_Icon&diff=next&oldid=641511882] 6 revisions in 4 days, and they are rather a few edits that were being removed. These 4 are perfectly 4 reverts and easier to review. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 01:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::I was not arguing your point just making note of other issues. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 01:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thanks for this clarification. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 02:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::{{AN3|b}} – 31 hours to Funkatastic for violation of 3RR. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:88.73.246.78]] reported by [[User:OccultZone]] (Result: 8 hours) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|PEGIDA}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|88.73.246.78}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641633309&oldid=641631476] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641633641&oldid=641633309] "21:43, 8 January 2015 - 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,781 bytes) (-63) . . (No it is discrimination for style of some peoples here go away with your nonsense templates) " |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641636267&oldid=641636047] "22:05, 8 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,781 bytes) (-63) . . (You are not efficient and paid by the BB) " |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641646766&oldid=641644538] "23:30, 8 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,781 bytes) (-63) . . (undo)" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641648222&oldid=641647979] "23:42, 8 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,781 bytes) (-63) . . (Undid revision 641647979 by JimRenge (talk) nonsense)" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641706649&oldid=641704419] "09:15, 9 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,825 bytes) (-63) . . (removed nonsense)" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641707637&oldid=641707578] "09:25, 9 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,963 bytes) (-63) . . (nonsense)" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PEGIDA&diff=641708181&oldid=641707914] " 09:31, 9 January 2015 88.73.246.78 (talk) . . (22,964 bytes) (-63) . . (reverted nonsense by paid British)" |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:88.73.246.78&oldid=641707317] |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
* Continuous removal of maintenance template. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 09:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*Blocked for 8 hours. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 12:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:winkelvi]] reported by [[User:213.7.149.151]] (Result:) == |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Stephen_Collins}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Winkelvi}} |
|||
Please see edit warring on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Collins&action=history |
|||
Deleting information because he feels the source is not reliable. Fails to improve the alleged grammar problems or provide more references. He argues that TMZ is not a valid reference. Who has made that decision? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.7.149.151|213.7.149.151]] ([[User talk:213.7.149.151|talk]]) 15:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Have just filed a page protection request because of the reporting IP here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Stephen_Collins_.28edit.C2.A0.7C_talk.C2.A0.7C_history.C2.A0.7C_protect.C2.A0.7C_delete.C2.A0.7C_links.C2.A0.7C_watch.C2.A0.7C_logs.C2.A0.7C_views.29]. Protection request reads as follows: Persistent vandalism – Sensitive BLP due to recent sexual abuse allegations against article subject. IP reverting back in bad content, content not referenced by reliable sources, using bogus reasons for reversions. Likely same sockpuppet IP from [[Constitucion, Chile]] article - that article had to be protected, as well, and the IP has a vendetta against me. IP is using proxies. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 15:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
** Allegations are completely unjustified, [[user:winkelvi]] is rigourously edit warring to secure his revisions. He is not making an attempt to improve the article. [[user:winkelvi]] is currently banned from editing the [[Bess Myerson]] article due to edit warring. |
|||
** please see winkelvi's current ban here [http://Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Winkelvi_reported_by_User:Coretheapple_.28Result:_Protected.29 Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Winkelvi_reported_by_User:Coretheapple_.28Result:_Protected.29] <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.109.135.183|93.109.135.183]] ([[User talk:93.109.135.183|talk]]) 15:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Reporting user is IP hopping again. And no, I am not "banned" from editing any articles. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 15:50, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
** using a satelite internet connection is not banned by wikipedia. Satelite ISP's use dynamic adresses which periodically change. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.109.135.183|93.109.135.183]] ([[User talk:93.109.135.183|talk]]) 15:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
**[[user:winkelvi]] why did you remove the AN3 notice from your page? [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Winkelvi&diff=prev&oldid=641742115]] <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.184.196.11|91.184.196.11]] ([[User talk:91.184.196.11|talk]]) 16:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::I removed it because you are an IP-hopping sockpuppet who is [[WP:TROLL|trolling]] and this report is completely bogus. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 17:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Might interest some that User:Winkelvi was reported just a couple days ago by [[User:Coretheapple]] for similar edit warring 3RR violations, as shown here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=641313720]. Additionally, Winkelvi has engaged in similar behaviors toward myself [[User:AmericanDad86|AmericanDad86]] ([[User talk:AmericanDad86|talk]]) 20:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}}Based on this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=641773157&oldid=641773008] and then this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=next&oldid=641773464], I'm now wondering if the reporting IP and edit warring IP at [[Stephen Collins]] (see here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Collins&diff=641739431&oldid=641545450], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Collins&diff=next&oldid=641739930], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Collins&diff=next&oldid=641756833], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Collins&diff=next&oldid=641759223]) isn't actually [[User:AmericanDad86]] behaving in a sockpuppet fashion in order to fulfill his current agenda: seeking to have me blocked (or "banned" as he erroneously stated in the report here and at the report he referenced above and commented on yesterday). -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 20:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': I just semi-protected the article for 10 days as a result of the ips edit warring. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]] - [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 22:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Many thanks, [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]]. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 22:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:XxDMAN00xX]] reported by [[User:MrX]] (Result: indef) == |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Death of Leelah Alcorn}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|XxDMAN00xX}} |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# {{diff2|641743824|15:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|641744749|16:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|641745354|16:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|641745819|16:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|641746177|16:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|641746302|16:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: |
|||
# {{diff2|641744652|16:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "/* Leelah Alcorn */ new section" |
|||
# {{diff2|641746096|16:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on [[Death of Leelah Alcorn]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])" |
|||
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
# {{diff2|641744652|15:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC) on User talk:XxDMAN00xX}} "Leelah Alcorn" |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
* '''Blocked indefinitely''' by HJMitchell for violations of BLP. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 22:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:36.72.191.4]] reported by [[User:ChamithN]] (Result: ) == |
|||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Jessica Jung}} |
|||
;User being reported: {{userlinks|36.72.191.4}} |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# {{diff2|641668764|02:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Hi, haters! Why don't you remove Barbie & Ken Awards from all Korean celebrities who win it but keep remove it from this page?" |
|||
# {{diff2|641669281|02:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 641668982 by [[Special:Contributions/TerryAlex|TerryAlex]] ([[User talk:TerryAlex|talk]]) You OT8 stan, Jessica haters has no life!!!" |
|||
# {{diff2|641702679|08:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> |
|||
== [[User:176.195.15.246]] reported by [[User:Favonian]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Stepan Bandera}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|176.195.15.246}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&oldid=641050953] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=prev&oldid=641734805] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=prev&oldid=641736509] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=prev&oldid=641743062] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=prev&oldid=641765747] |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:176.195.15.246&oldid=641744477] |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
<!-- Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff] --> |
|||
<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:176.195.15.246&diff=641766041&oldid=641744477 This salvo] doesn't seem to indicate a willingness to compromise. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 19:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
== [[User:173.71.99.175]] reported by [[User:TheGoofyGolfer]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|WMGM-TV}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|173.71.99.175}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WMGM-TV&diff=641540217&oldid=641539913 |
|||
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WMGM-TV&diff=641628964&oldid=641540217 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WMGM-TV&diff=641763350&oldid=641640910 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WMGM-TV&diff=641763803&oldid=641763661 |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link] |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff] |
|||
Comments: This IP user is insistent of changing the opening paragraph from "WMGM-TV, virtual channel 40 (UHF digital channel 36) is a television station licensed to Wildwood, New Jersey" to "WMGM-TV, virtual channel 40 (UHF digital channel 36) is a Soul of the South affiliate licensed to Wildwood, New Jersey." First off opening paragraphs of broadcast stations always start with W*** is a television station or radio station following by its channel/frequency location and city of license then a description of the station including its affiliation is there is any. It has already been established in the InfoBox and in the article that WMGM is a Soul of the South affiliate so it is completely redundant and unnecessary to include this in the opening paragraph plus everytime their edits are reverted they re-revert it in violation of the 3RR. They have been warning via Twinkle on their talkpage by myself and another user. [[User:TheGoofyGolfer|TheGoofyGolfer]] ([[User talk:TheGoofyGolfer|talk]]) 21:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
== [[User:Spshu]] reported by [[User:Nathan3068alt]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Spshu}} |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. --> |
|||
;Previous version reverted to: |
|||
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. --> |
|||
;Diffs of the user's reverts: |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Artists&diff=641816922&oldid=641813499 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metro_Pictures&diff=641817415&oldid=641813686 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MGM_Holdings&diff=641636680&oldid=641583651 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=POW!_Entertainment&diff=641818262&oldid=641818227 |
|||
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> |
|||
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. --> |
|||
;Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Artists&diff=641816962&oldid=641816922 |
|||
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too --> |
|||
;Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: |
|||
;<u>Comments:</u> <br /> |
|||
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> |
|||
Bloodthirsty, nonstop vandal with sockpuppet IPs who kept pointlessly pretending to be admin, but is no admin at all. All he does is destroy lots of entertainment company articles by eliminating useful information and botching up the grammar, spelling and formatting, removing the owner/parent company lists on infoboxes because they think they apply to pages for defunct companies only (C'mon, just because a company like MGM has gone through ownership changes doesn't mean it's defunct), renaming the era headings of history sections to past company names without any explanation, and reverting any of the old revisions I'm trying to bring back. Heck, he want these pages to stay like that for life, but no, his edits are nothing but persistent vandalism, and he just never leaves the pages alone. [[User:Nathan3068alt|Nathan3068alt]] ([[User talk:Nathan3068alt|talk]]) 02:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:24, 27 December 2024
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
- See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
- If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.
You must notify any user you have reported.
You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
- Additional notes
- When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
- The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
- Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
- Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
- Definition of edit warring
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
- Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
 | Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs. |
User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)
[edit]Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [1]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6] (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [7]
Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Both users have been
Warned. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Those users and Mei23448 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) seems continuing edit wars on Monquirasaurus and Sachicasaurus articles.
- 1. [8]
- 2. [9]
- 3. [10]
- 4. [11]
- 5. [12]
- 6. [13]
- In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.[14]
- Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing,[15] while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- 17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. Mei23448 (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's talk page. Bowler the Carmine | talk 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. Mei23448 (talk) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- 17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. Mei23448 (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: The problem persists, Mei23448 and User:PaleoFile continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the notification, Jens Lallensack. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Napoleonjosephine2020 reported by User:Kline (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
[edit]Page: Lindy Li (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [16]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [21]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Zilch.
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [22]
Comments:
Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. Kline • talk • contribs 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Napoleonjosephine2020
- "This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, [their] own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. Kline • talk • contribs 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. Kline • talk • contribs 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). Here’s the exchange, for those curious. EncycloDeterminate (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EvergreenFir (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C and User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Page already protected)
[edit]Page: Warburg effect (oncology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [23]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [28]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [29] [30]
Comments:
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a talk page comment stating I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.
, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. CipherRephic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop [31] after being warned [32] and has not broken 3RR. Bowler the Carmine | talk 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
User:99.98.190.59 reported by User:ZimZalaBim (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)
[edit]Page: Marc Benioff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 99.98.190.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265024592 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
- 16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264902249 by Augmented Seventh (talk)"
- 03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264868382 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
- 23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264776552 by Zachomatic (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Marc Benioff."
- 18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"
Comments:
- Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)
[edit]Page: Dune: Part Two (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ChasePlowman2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
- 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
- 19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""
- 12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
- 00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"
Comments:
User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. Happily888 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- ChasePlowman2014 is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the Dune: Part Two talk page explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Jasca Ducato, this isn't about the time taken to respond to the noticeboard report. ChasePlowman2014 isn't using edit summaries nor talk pages and ignores warnings on their talk page about their behavior. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:36, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the Dune: Part Two talk page explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Callmehelper reported by User:Srijanx22 (Result: Declined)
[edit]Page: Ambedkar Jayanti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Callmehelper (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [33]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [34]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [35][36]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [37]
Comments:
Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on B. R. Ambedkar. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's me @Callmehelper.
- Clarification by my side ;
- Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
- Disputes details ;
- Firstly , I edit Ambedkar Jayanti check history of that page from here to final version
- process of reverting by others and my responses
- 1st Revert My response then again revert and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes see then i thought matter would be solved.
- But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement see and my response of revert here and discussion on his talk page here
- Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there see
- Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk here but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Request_for_Administrator Review_of_Recent_Edits_on_Dr. B.R._Ambedkar's_Page
- So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
- the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under WP:UNDUE or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page [[38]] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
- so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
- Conclusion
- So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
- Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
- i left a discussion on Ambedkar Jayanti page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources look.
- I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
- I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
- Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Johnny test person reported by User:Aoidh (Result: Blocked 24h)
[edit]Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1265377722
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1265395592
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User talk:Aoidh#Angelo Rules and Talk:Angelo Rules#Unsourced character biography section
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1265406607
Comments:
Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - Aoidh (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Folawiki reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: Indefinitely blocked)
[edit]Page: Grail Movement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Folawiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision 1265465515 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
- 02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265464633 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
- 02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265460975 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
- 01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1240888069 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Grail Movement."
- 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "/* December 2024 */ WP:FTN notice"
- 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Grail Movement."
- 02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Grail Movement."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "@Folawiki: The whitewashing has to stop. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"
Comments:
Cult whitewashing. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
User:TheHappiestEditor reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: )
[edit]Page: Trisha Krishnan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TheHappiestEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265170057 by Fylindfotberserk (talk) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
- 13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."
- Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
- [43] - putting fake sources/infomation [44]
- [45] - putting fake sources/infomation [46]
- [47] - putting fake sources/infomation [48]
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few [50] [51] [52]. The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove [53] and a recent one for edit-warring from Krimuk2.0. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- TheHappiestEditor, please respond to these allegations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Page protected)
[edit]Page: Hariprasad Chaurasia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 103.84.130.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1262480024 by Fylindfotberserk (talk)"
- 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC) ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia [for example-Pandit Shivkumar Sharma [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivkumar_Sharma ]"
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
- [58]
- [59]
- [60]
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about WP:NCIN and MOS:HON in edit summaries and warnings Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a level 4 warning, but was asked to report it here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Johnny test person reported by User:ToBeFree (Result:Indefinitely blocked)
[edit]Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265440086 by ToBeFree (talk)"
- 19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265401281 by Codename AD (talk)"
- 19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395978 by Codename AD (talk)"
- 18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395008 by Aoidh (talk)"
- 18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265382744 by Aoidh (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (Special:Diff/1265613452) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
