One-party state: Difference between revisions
m I'll fix it soon bros Tags: nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(33 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Short description|State in which only one party has the right to form the government}} |
{{Short description|State in which only one party has the right to form the government}} |
||
{{About|one-party political states|telephone call recording laws and notification and requirements|Telephone call recording laws#One-party consent states|the album|One Party State (album)}} |
{{About|one-party political states|telephone call recording laws and notification and requirements|Telephone call recording laws#One-party consent states|the album|One Party State (album)}} |
||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{Cleanup rewrite|date=May 2024}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}} |
||
{{party politics}} |
{{party politics}} |
||
Line 7: | Line 11: | ||
A '''one-party state''', '''single-party state''', '''one-party system''' or '''single-party system''' is a governance structure in which only a single [[political party]] controls the ruling system.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Clark |first1=William Roberts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2KFvJwi8_jwC&pg=PA611 |title=Principles of Comparative Politics |last2=Golder |first2=Matt |last3=Golder |first3=Sona Nadenichek |date=23 March 2012 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=9781608716791 |pages=611 |language=en}}</ref> All other parties are either outlawed or only enjoy limited and controlled participation in [[election]]s. Sometimes the term "''de facto'' one-party state" is used to describe a [[dominant-party system]] that, unlike the one-party state, allows (at least nominally) democratic multiparty elections, but the existing practices or balance of political power effectively prevent the opposition from winning power.<ref>{{Cite web |title=One-Party States {{!}} Encyclopedia.com |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/one-party-states |access-date=2023-02-21 |website=www.encyclopedia.com}}</ref> |
A '''one-party state''', '''single-party state''', '''one-party system''' or '''single-party system''' is a governance structure in which only a single [[political party]] controls the ruling system.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Clark |first1=William Roberts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2KFvJwi8_jwC&pg=PA611 |title=Principles of Comparative Politics |last2=Golder |first2=Matt |last3=Golder |first3=Sona Nadenichek |date=23 March 2012 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=9781608716791 |pages=611 |language=en}}</ref> All other parties are either outlawed or only enjoy limited and controlled participation in [[election]]s. Sometimes the term "''de facto'' one-party state" is used to describe a [[dominant-party system]] that, unlike the one-party state, allows (at least nominally) democratic multiparty elections, but the existing practices or balance of political power effectively prevent the opposition from winning power.<ref>{{Cite web |title=One-Party States {{!}} Encyclopedia.com |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/one-party-states |access-date=2023-02-21 |website=www.encyclopedia.com}}</ref> |
||
Membership in the ruling party tends to be relatively small compared to the population.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Angiolillo |first=Fabio |date=2023-04-27 |title=Introducing the One-Party Membership Dataset: A dataset on party membership in autocracies |
Membership in the ruling party tends to be relatively small compared to the population.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Angiolillo |first=Fabio |date=2023-04-27 |title=Introducing the One-Party Membership Dataset: A dataset on party membership in autocracies |journal=Journal of Peace Research |language=en |pages=002234332311552 |doi=10.1177/00223433231155278 |issn=0022-3433|doi-access=free }}</ref> With such a small winning coalition, leaders in one-party states usually lack the incentive to care about the well-being of citizens.<ref>{{Citation |last=Hanson |first=Stephen E. |title=The Contribution of Area Studies |date=2009 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021083.n10 |work=The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics |pages=159–174 |access-date=2023-03-04 |place=1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom |publisher=SAGE Publications Ltd|doi=10.4135/9780857021083.n10 |isbn=9781412919760 |s2cid=184118662 }}</ref> Rather, they give out private goods to fellow elites to ensure continued support. One-party, compared to dominant-party dictatorships, structure themselves unlike democracies. They also turn into democracies at a lower rate than dominant-party dictatorships.<ref name="Political Order and One-Party Rule">{{Cite journal |last1=Magaloni |first1=Beatriz |last2=Kricheli |first2=Ruth |date=2010-05-01 |title=Political Order and One-Party Rule |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=123–143 |doi=10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529 |issn=1094-2939|doi-access=free }}</ref> While one-party states prohibit opposition parties, some allow for elections at the smallest local level. One-party states lack any legitimate competition. Therefore, they place elites and sympathetic candidates in key administrative races.<ref name="dx.doi.org">{{Cite journal |last1=Creak |first1=Simon |last2=Barney |first2=Keith |date=2018-08-10 |title=Conceptualising Party-State Governance and Rule in Laos |journal=Journal of Contemporary Asia |volume=48 |issue=5 |pages=693–716 |doi=10.1080/00472336.2018.1494849 |s2cid=158403649 |issn=0047-2336|doi-access=free }}</ref> For example, the Chinese Communist Party exercises political control by infiltrating village administrations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hassan |first1=Mai |last2=Mattingly |first2=Daniel |last3=Nugent |first3=Elizabeth R. |date=2022-05-12 |title=Political Control |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=155–174 |doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013321 |s2cid=241393914 |issn=1094-2939|doi-access=free }}</ref> They view these positions as crucial for gathering information on the population and maintaining a presence in the far reaches of their borders.<ref name="The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma 2011">{{Cite journal |last1=MALESKY |first1=EDMUND |last2=SCHULER |first2=PAUL |date=2011-10-26 |title=The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x |journal=Legislative Studies Quarterly |volume=36 |issue=4 |pages=491–530 |doi=10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x |issn=0362-9805}}</ref> |
||
One-party states recognize the trade-off between election victory and gathering valuable data.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Frantz | first=Erica |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1202872902 |title=Authoritarianism : what everyone needs to know |isbn=978-0-19-756964-1 |oclc=1202872902}}</ref> To account for this, the regimes have been observed placing local nobility in easy-to-win races.<ref>{{Cite book |author=Frantz, Erica |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1202872902 |title=Authoritarianism : what everyone needs to know |isbn=978-0-19-756964-1 |oclc=1202872902}}</ref> One-party states have also been observed using elections to ensure that only the most popular elites get chosen to office.<ref name="Elections Under Authoritarianism">{{Cite journal |last1=Gandhi |first1=Jennifer |last2=Lust-Okar |first2=Ellen |date=2009-06-01 |title=Elections Under Authoritarianism |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=403–422 |doi=10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434 |issn=1094-2939|doi-access=free }}</ref> They also gather data from elections to indicate if a local official is performing poorly in the eyes of the residents.<ref name="Elections Under Authoritarianism" /> This gives locals the opportunity to monitor local officials and communicate satisfaction with the local government.<ref name="Elections Under Authoritarianism" /> Throughout the country, members of the one party hold key political positions.<ref name="Political Order and One-Party Rule" /> In doing so, the party avoids committing outright fraud and rather sustains their power at the local level with strategic appointment of elites.<ref name="The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma 2011" /> Data on one-party regimes can be difficult to gather given their lack of transparency.<ref name="dx.doi.org" /> |
|||
==Current one-party states== |
==Current one-party states== |
||
As of {{currentyear}} the following countries are legally constituted as one-party states: |
As of {{currentyear}}, the following countries are legally constituted as one-party states: |
||
{|class="wikitable sortable" |
{|class="wikitable sortable" |
||
!Country |
!Country |
||
Line 21: | Line 27: | ||
!Notes |
!Notes |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg}} [[China]]<ref>{{Citation |title=China |date=2023-01-26 |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/china/#government |work=The World Factbook |publisher=Central Intelligence Agency |language=en |access-date=2023-02-05}}</ref> |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg}} [[People's Republic of China]]<ref>{{Citation |title=China |date=2023-01-26 |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/china/#government |work=The World Factbook |publisher=Central Intelligence Agency |language=en |access-date=2023-02-05}}</ref> |
||
|[[File:Xi Jinping 2016.jpg|100px|center]] [[Xi Jinping]] |
|[[File:Xi Jinping 2016.jpg|100px|center]] [[Xi Jinping]] |
||
|[[General Secretary of the Communist Party of China|General Secretary]] |
|[[General Secretary of the Communist Party of China|General Secretary]] |
||
Line 40: | Line 46: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of Eritrea.svg}} [[Eritrea]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2018-07-17 |title=Eritreans hope for democracy after peace deal with Ethiopia |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-44848184 |access-date=2023-02-05}}</ref> |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of Eritrea.svg}} [[Eritrea]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2018-07-17 |title=Eritreans hope for democracy after peace deal with Ethiopia |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-44848184 |access-date=2023-02-05}}</ref> |
||
|[[File: |
|[[File:Isaias Afwerki 2024 (cropped).jpg|100px|center]] [[Isaias Afwerki]] |
||
|[[Party chair|Chairperson]] |
|[[Party chair|Chairperson]] |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the EPLF.svg}} [[People's Front for Democracy and Justice]] |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the EPLF.svg}} [[People's Front for Democracy and Justice]] |
||
Line 57: | Line 63: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of North Korea.svg}} [[North Korea]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=North Korea: Country Profile |url=https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-korea |access-date=2023-02-05 |website=Freedom House |language=en}}</ref> |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of North Korea.svg}} [[North Korea]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=North Korea: Country Profile |url=https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-korea |access-date=2023-02-05 |website=Freedom House |date=18 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
|[[File:Kim Jong-un April 2019 (cropped).jpg|100px|center]] [[Kim Jong-un]] |
|[[File:Kim Jong-un April 2019 (cropped).jpg|100px|center]] [[Kim Jong-un]] |
||
|[[General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea|General Secretary]] |
|[[General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea|General Secretary]] |
||
Line 67: | Line 73: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of Vietnam.svg}} [[Vietnam]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Vietnam: Country Profile |url=https://freedomhouse.org/country/vietnam |access-date=2023-02-05 |website=Freedom House |date=30 March 2022 |language=en}}</ref> |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of Vietnam.svg}} [[Vietnam]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Vietnam: Country Profile |url=https://freedomhouse.org/country/vietnam |access-date=2023-02-05 |website=Freedom House |date=30 March 2022 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
|[[File: |
|[[File:Tolam2024.jpg|100px|center]] [[Tô Lâm]] |
||
|[[General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam|General Secretary]] |
|[[General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam|General Secretary]] |
||
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the Communist Party of Vietnam.svg}} [[Communist Party of Vietnam]] |
|{{flagicon image|Flag of the Communist Party of Vietnam.svg}} [[Communist Party of Vietnam]] |
||
Line 77: | Line 83: | ||
==''De facto'' one-party states== |
==''De facto'' one-party states== |
||
A ''de facto'' one-party system is one that, while not officially linking a single political party to governmental power, utilizes some means of political manipulation to ensure only one party stays in power.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=McLean |first1=Iain |last2=McMillan |first2=Alistair |date=2009 |title=One-Party State |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100250211 |access-date=2023-08-27 |website=Oxford Reference |doi=10.1093/acref/9780199207800.001.0001|isbn=978-0-19-920780-0 }}</ref> Many different countries have been claimed to be ''de facto'' one-party states, with differing levels of agreement between scholars, although most agree that the African continent is marked by this political system.<ref>{{Citation |last=Ziemer |first=Klaus |title=The African One-Party State |date=1995 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23826-2_7 |work=State and Society in Francophone Africa since Independence |pages=97–105 |editor-last=Kirk-Greene |editor-first=Anthony |access-date=2023-08-27 |series=St Antony’s/Macmillan Series |place=London |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-1-349-23826-2_7 |isbn=978-1-349-23826-2 |editor2-last=Bach |editor2-first=Daniel}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mitchinson |first=Naomi |date=January 1984 |title=One party rule in Africa |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00358538408453617 |journal=The Round Table |language=en |volume=73 |issue=289 |pages=38–44 |doi=10.1080/00358538408453617 |issn=0035-8533}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schachter |first=Ruth |date=June 1961 |title=Single-Party Systems in West Africa |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400123329/type/journal_article |journal=American Political Science Review |language=en |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=294–307 |doi=10.2307/1952240 |issn=0003-0554}}</ref> Below are just a few examples of governments that have been claimed to have single party rule due to political manipulation. |
A ''de facto'' one-party system is one that, while not officially linking a single political party to governmental power, utilizes some means of political manipulation to ensure only one party stays in power.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=McLean |first1=Iain |last2=McMillan |first2=Alistair |date=2009 |title=One-Party State |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100250211 |access-date=2023-08-27 |website=Oxford Reference |doi=10.1093/acref/9780199207800.001.0001|isbn=978-0-19-920780-0 }}</ref> Many different countries have been claimed to be ''de facto'' one-party states, with differing levels of agreement between scholars, although most agree that the African continent is marked by this political system.<ref>{{Citation |last=Ziemer |first=Klaus |title=The African One-Party State |date=1995 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23826-2_7 |work=State and Society in Francophone Africa since Independence |pages=97–105 |editor-last=Kirk-Greene |editor-first=Anthony |access-date=2023-08-27 |series=St Antony’s/Macmillan Series |place=London |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-1-349-23826-2_7 |isbn=978-1-349-23826-2 |editor2-last=Bach |editor2-first=Daniel}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mitchinson |first=Naomi |date=January 1984 |title=One party rule in Africa |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00358538408453617 |journal=The Round Table |language=en |volume=73 |issue=289 |pages=38–44 |doi=10.1080/00358538408453617 |issn=0035-8533}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schachter |first=Ruth |date=June 1961 |title=Single-Party Systems in West Africa |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400123329/type/journal_article |journal=American Political Science Review |language=en |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=294–307 |doi=10.2307/1952240 |jstor=1952240 |issn=0003-0554}}</ref> Below are just a few examples of governments that have been claimed to have single party rule due to political manipulation. |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|+ |
|+ |
||
Line 85: | Line 91: | ||
establishment |
establishment |
||
!Information |
!Information |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|[[MPLA|People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola]] |
|||
|11 November 1975 |
|||
|The MPLA has ruled Angola since its declaration of independence from Portugal, starting as a ''de jure'' one-party state, then initiating a multiparty system in 1991. |
|||
⚫ | |||
|{{Flag|Cambodia}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
|7 January 1979 |
|||
|The CPP has ruled since victory in [[Cambodian–Vietnamese War]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
|{{Flag|Republic of the Congo}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
|[[Congolese Party of Labour]] |
|||
|31 December 1968 |
|||
|The People's Republic of the Congo was a one-party state, until the establishment of a multiparty system in 1990 and the subsequent loss of the PCT, leading to a [[Republic of the Congo Civil War (1997–1999)|civil war in 1997]], from which point the PCT has been the sole ruling party since. |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
|[[Democratic Party of Equatorial Guinea]] |
|||
|11 October 1987 |
|||
|Despite not having any constitutional relation between the government and the PDGE, there is a link between the [[1982 Equatorial Guinea constitution|1982 constitution]] and [[Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo|Theodoro Obiang]], leader of the PDGE, leading Equatorial Guinea since 1979, and having won every election by at least 92% approval, with all "opposition" parties adamantly supporting Obiang, and never holding more than 32% of seats in any house. |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{Flag|Singapore}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
|[[People's Action Party]] |
|||
|30 May 1959 |
|||
|While it does not have much electoral controversy, the PAP is essentially linked to governance in Singapore. |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{Flag|Mozambique}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
|[[FRELIMO|Liberation Front of Mozambique]] |
|||
|25 June 1975 |
|||
| The FRELIMO has ruled Mozambique since its declaration of independence from Portugal, starting as a de jure one-party state, then initiating a multiparty system in 1994. |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{Flag|Paraguay}}{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} |
|||
|[[Colorado Party (Paraguay)]] |
|||
|11 September 1887 |
|||
|Since 1947, the Colorado party has been dominant in Paraguayan politics, ruling as the only legal party between 1947 and 1962, and has controlled the presidency since 1948 notwithstanding a brief interruption between 2008 and 2013. With almost 2 million members, it is the largest political party in the country. Despite the party's grip on power, the government still sustains the defining characteristics of a procedural democracy.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.democratic-erosion.com/2020/10/29/the-colorado-party-stealth-authoritarianism-todays-el-stronato/ | title=The Colorado Party & Stealth Authoritarianism: Today's el Stronato }}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable ([[WP:NOTRS]]).|date=May 2024}} |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{Flag|Rwanda}} |
|{{Flag|Rwanda}} |
||
Line 126: | Line 97: | ||
|Although Rwanda is nominally democratic, elections are manipulated in various ways, which include banning opposition parties, arresting or assassinating critics, and [[electoral fraud]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Thomson |first1=Susan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RbxODwAAQBAJ&q=one-party+state |title=Rwanda: From Genocide to Precarious Peace |date=2018 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-23591-3 |page=185 |language=en |author1-link=Susan Thomson}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Ph.D |first1=Joseph Sebarenzi |last2=Twagiramungu |first2=Noel |date=8 April 2019 |title=Rwanda's economic growth could be derailed by its autocratic regime |language=en |work=The Conversation |url=https://theconversation.com/rwandas-economic-growth-could-be-derailed-by-its-autocratic-regime-114649 |access-date=5 September 2023}}</ref> |
|Although Rwanda is nominally democratic, elections are manipulated in various ways, which include banning opposition parties, arresting or assassinating critics, and [[electoral fraud]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Thomson |first1=Susan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RbxODwAAQBAJ&q=one-party+state |title=Rwanda: From Genocide to Precarious Peace |date=2018 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-23591-3 |page=185 |language=en |author1-link=Susan Thomson}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Ph.D |first1=Joseph Sebarenzi |last2=Twagiramungu |first2=Noel |date=8 April 2019 |title=Rwanda's economic growth could be derailed by its autocratic regime |language=en |work=The Conversation |url=https://theconversation.com/rwandas-economic-growth-could-be-derailed-by-its-autocratic-regime-114649 |access-date=5 September 2023}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|{{flag| |
|{{flag|Syria}}<ref>Sources: |
||
*{{Cite news |last=Lucas |first=Scott |date=25 February 2021 |title=How Assad Regime Tightened Syria's One-Party Rule |work=EA Worldview |url=https://eaworldview.com/2021/02/how-assad-regime-tightened-syrias-one-party-rule/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225110507/https://eaworldview.com/2021/02/how-assad-regime-tightened-syrias-one-party-rule/ |archive-date=25 February 2021}} |
|||
*{{Cite book |last=Shively, Schultz |first=W. Phillips, David |title=Power and Choice: An Introduction to Political Science |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2022 |isbn=9781538151860 |pages=188 |chapter=7: Democracies and Authoritarian System}} |
|||
*{{Cite book |last=Derbyshire, Derbyshire |first=J. Denis, Ian |title=Encyclopedia of World Political Systems |publisher=Routledge |year=2016 |isbn=978-0-7656-8025-9 |location=711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA |pages=610 |chapter=Syria}} |
|||
*{{Cite news |date=19 April 2023 |title=Syria country profile |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-14703856 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230420070320/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-14703856 |archive-date=20 April 2023}}</ref> |
|||
|[[Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region|Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party]] |
|||
|2012 |
|||
|While the 2012 constitution introduced by [[Bashar al-Assad]] theoretically enabled the establishment of political parties, Ba'athist Syria remains a de-facto one-party state with an extensive [[General Intelligence Directorate (Syria)|secret police]] apparatus that curtails independent political activities.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lucas |first=Scott |date=25 February 2021 |title=How Assad Regime Tightened Syria's One-Party Rule |work=EA Worldview |url=https://eaworldview.com/2021/02/how-assad-regime-tightened-syrias-one-party-rule/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225110507/https://eaworldview.com/2021/02/how-assad-regime-tightened-syrias-one-party-rule/ |archive-date=25 February 2021}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
|{{flag|Venezuela}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-06-18 |title=NA: "Regime wants to build a one-party political system |url=https://www.eluniversal.com/politica/73521/an-regimen-quiere-construir-un-sistema-politico-unipartidista |access-date=2024-05-10 |website=El Universal |language=es}}</ref> |
|||
|[[PSUV|United Socialist Party of Venezuela]] |
|[[PSUV|United Socialist Party of Venezuela]] |
||
|2017/2024 |
|2017/2024 |
||
| Since 2014, the country has been going through a period of crisis of legitimacy and exceptionality due to the order to close the [[National Assembly (Venezuela)#1999 Constitution|National Assembly]] and the convocation of a [[ |
| Since 2014, the country has been going through a period of crisis of legitimacy and exceptionality due to the order to close the [[National Assembly (Venezuela)#1999 Constitution|National Assembly]] and the convocation of a [[2017 Constituent National Assembly of Venezuela|Constituent Assembly]] by [[Nicolás Maduro]] on May 1, 2017, composed mostly of PSUV politicians. Since then, different laws have been approved to restrict political participation, including informal persecution and the disqualification of certain politicians (including complaints of electoral fraud), concluding in the year 2024 where, thanks to the new laws approved, the majority of [[Venezuelan opposition|opposition politicians]] have been disqualified and their organizations were banned, leaving only a controlled "opposition."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Itriago Acosta |first=Andreina |date=April 2, 2024 |title='Anti-Fascism' Law to Tighten Crackdown on Venezuelan Opposition |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-04-02/-anti-fascism-law-to-tighten-crackdown-on-venezuelan-opposition |access-date=2024-05-10 |website=www.bloomberg.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Maria Delgado |first=Antonio |date=April 5, 2024 |title=Maduro prepared harsh law to further punish criticism of Venezuela regime |url=https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article287431415.html |access-date=May 9, 2024 |work=[[Miami Herald]]}}</ref> |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==Former one-party states == |
==Former one-party states == |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2024}} |
|||
{|class="wikitable sortable" |
{|class="wikitable sortable" |
||
!Country |
!Country |
||
Line 500: | Line 479: | ||
|Asia |
|Asia |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|data-sort-value="China 1935"|{{flagicon image|Flag of |
|data-sort-value="China 1935"|{{flagicon image|Flag of the People's Anti-Imperialist Association.svg}} [[Xinjiang Province, Republic of China|Xinjiang]] |
||
|[[People's Anti-Imperialist Association]] |
|[[People's Anti-Imperialist Association]] |
||
|[[People's Anti-Imperialist Association|Six Great Policies]] |
|[[People's Anti-Imperialist Association|Six Great Policies]] |
||
Line 916: | Line 895: | ||
|[[Kenya African National Union]] |
|[[Kenya African National Union]] |
||
|Kenyan [[nationalism]], [[Conservatism]] |
|Kenyan [[nationalism]], [[Conservatism]] |
||
|1969 (''de facto'')<br>1982 (''de jure'') |
|||
|1982 |
|||
|1991 |
|1991 |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 944: | Line 923: | ||
| |
| |
||
|Europe |
|Europe |
||
⚫ | |||
|data-sort-value="Liberia"|{{flagicon|Liberia}} [[History_of_Liberia#Americo-Liberian_rule_(1847–1980)|Liberia]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
|[[Black conservatism]], [[Centralization]], [[Protectionism]], [[Whig Party (United States)#Ideology and policies|Whiggism]] (until 1940s) |
|||
|1878 |
|||
|April 1980 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Africa |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|data-sort-value="Libya 1971"|{{flagicon|Libya|1969}} [[History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi#Libyan Arab Republic|Libya]] |
|data-sort-value="Libya 1971"|{{flagicon|Libya|1969}} [[History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi#Libyan Arab Republic|Libya]] |
||
Line 1,130: | Line 1,117: | ||
|Asia |
|Asia |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|data-sort-value="Poland 1947"|{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland (1928-1980).svg}}{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland (with coat of arms, 1980-1990).svg}} [[Polish People's Republic|Poland]] |
|data-sort-value="Poland 1947"|{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland (1928-1980).svg}}{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland.svg}}{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland (with coat of arms, 1980-1990).svg}} [[Polish People's Republic|Poland]] |
||
|{{Flagicon image|Polish United Workers' Party flag.svg}} [[Polish United Workers' Party]] ([[Front of National Unity]]) |
|{{Flagicon image|Polish United Workers' Party flag.svg}} [[Polish United Workers' Party]] ([[Front of National Unity]]) |
||
|[[Marxism–Leninism]], [[democratic centralism]], [[state socialism]] |
|[[Marxism–Leninism]], [[democratic centralism]], [[state socialism]] |
||
Line 1,138: | Line 1,125: | ||
|Europe |
|Europe |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|data-sort-value="Poland 1982"|{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland |
|data-sort-value="Poland 1982"|{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland.svg}}{{flagicon image|Flag of Poland (with coat of arms, 1980-1990).svg}} [[Polish People's Republic|Poland]] |
||
|{{Flagicon image|Polish United Workers' Party flag.svg}} [[Polish United Workers' Party]] ([[Patriotic Movement for National Rebirth]]) |
|{{Flagicon image|Polish United Workers' Party flag.svg}} [[Polish United Workers' Party]] ([[Patriotic Movement for National Rebirth]]) |
||
|[[Marxism–Leninism]], [[democratic centralism]], [[state socialism]] |
|[[Marxism–Leninism]], [[democratic centralism]], [[state socialism]] |
||
Line 1,564: | Line 1,551: | ||
*[[Political organisation]] |
*[[Political organisation]] |
||
*[[Two-party system]] |
*[[Two-party system]] |
||
*[[Uniparty]] |
|||
*[[Landslide victory]] |
|||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
Line 1,577: | Line 1,566: | ||
[[Category:Political party systems]] |
[[Category:Political party systems]] |
||
[[Category:Unitary state]] |
[[Category:Unitary state]] |
||
[[Category:Turkish inventions]] |
Revision as of 10:32, 27 August 2024
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Part of the Politics series |
Party politics |
---|
Politics portal |
A one-party state, single-party state, one-party system or single-party system is a governance structure in which only a single political party controls the ruling system.[1] All other parties are either outlawed or only enjoy limited and controlled participation in elections. Sometimes the term "de facto one-party state" is used to describe a dominant-party system that, unlike the one-party state, allows (at least nominally) democratic multiparty elections, but the existing practices or balance of political power effectively prevent the opposition from winning power.[2]
Membership in the ruling party tends to be relatively small compared to the population.[3] With such a small winning coalition, leaders in one-party states usually lack the incentive to care about the well-being of citizens.[4] Rather, they give out private goods to fellow elites to ensure continued support. One-party, compared to dominant-party dictatorships, structure themselves unlike democracies. They also turn into democracies at a lower rate than dominant-party dictatorships.[5] While one-party states prohibit opposition parties, some allow for elections at the smallest local level. One-party states lack any legitimate competition. Therefore, they place elites and sympathetic candidates in key administrative races.[6] For example, the Chinese Communist Party exercises political control by infiltrating village administrations.[7] They view these positions as crucial for gathering information on the population and maintaining a presence in the far reaches of their borders.[8]
One-party states recognize the trade-off between election victory and gathering valuable data.[9] To account for this, the regimes have been observed placing local nobility in easy-to-win races.[10] One-party states have also been observed using elections to ensure that only the most popular elites get chosen to office.[11] They also gather data from elections to indicate if a local official is performing poorly in the eyes of the residents.[11] This gives locals the opportunity to monitor local officials and communicate satisfaction with the local government.[11] Throughout the country, members of the one party hold key political positions.[5] In doing so, the party avoids committing outright fraud and rather sustains their power at the local level with strategic appointment of elites.[8] Data on one-party regimes can be difficult to gather given their lack of transparency.[6]
Current one-party states
As of 2024, the following countries are legally constituted as one-party states:
Country | Head of party | Leader title | Party | Ideology | Date of establishment | Duration | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People's Republic of China[12] | Xi Jinping | General Secretary | Chinese Communist Party | Socialism with Chinese characteristics | 1 October 1949 | 74 years, 350 days | |
Cuba[13] | Miguel Díaz-Canel | First Secretary | Communist Party of Cuba | Marxism–Leninism, Castroism, Guevarism, Left-wing nationalism | 16 April 1961 | 63 years, 152 days | |
Eritrea[14] | Isaias Afwerki | Chairperson | People's Front for Democracy and Justice | Eritrean nationalism, Statism | 24 May 1993 | 31 years, 114 days | |
Laos[15] | Thongloun Sisoulith | General Secretary | Lao People's Revolutionary Party | Kaysone Phomvihane Thought | 2 December 1975 | 48 years, 288 days | |
North Korea[16] | Kim Jong-un | General Secretary | Workers' Party of Korea | Kimilsungism–Kimjongilism | 9 September 1948 | 76 years, 6 days | |
Vietnam[17] | Tô Lâm | General Secretary | Communist Party of Vietnam | Ho Chi Minh Thought | 30 April 1975 | 49 years, 138 days |
De facto one-party states
A de facto one-party system is one that, while not officially linking a single political party to governmental power, utilizes some means of political manipulation to ensure only one party stays in power.[18] Many different countries have been claimed to be de facto one-party states, with differing levels of agreement between scholars, although most agree that the African continent is marked by this political system.[19][20][21] Below are just a few examples of governments that have been claimed to have single party rule due to political manipulation.
Country | Party | Date of
establishment |
Information |
---|---|---|---|
Rwanda | Rwandan Patriotic Front | 1994 | Although Rwanda is nominally democratic, elections are manipulated in various ways, which include banning opposition parties, arresting or assassinating critics, and electoral fraud.[22][23] |
Syria[24] | Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party | 2012 | While the 2012 constitution introduced by Bashar al-Assad theoretically enabled the establishment of political parties, Ba'athist Syria remains a de-facto one-party state with an extensive secret police apparatus that curtails independent political activities.[25] |
Venezuela[26] | United Socialist Party of Venezuela | 2017/2024 | Since 2014, the country has been going through a period of crisis of legitimacy and exceptionality due to the order to close the National Assembly and the convocation of a Constituent Assembly by Nicolás Maduro on May 1, 2017, composed mostly of PSUV politicians. Since then, different laws have been approved to restrict political participation, including informal persecution and the disqualification of certain politicians (including complaints of electoral fraud), concluding in the year 2024 where, thanks to the new laws approved, the majority of opposition politicians have been disqualified and their organizations were banned, leaving only a controlled "opposition."[27][28] |
Former one-party states
See also
- Ban on factions in the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
- Multi-party system
- Outline of democracy
- Political factionalism
- Political organisation
- Two-party system
- Uniparty
- Landslide victory
Notes
- ^ The Republic of China controlled the mainland from 1912 to 1949 and the island of Taiwan since 1945, in which the ROC currently administers the Free area. This government served China in the United Nations from 1945 to 1971. See Political status of Taiwan and the One-China policy for various viewpoints.
- ^ Following the appointment of Marcelo Caetano as Prime Minister in 1968, the opposition was allowed to run to the 1969 Portuguese legislative election, before being banned.
References
- ^ Clark, William Roberts; Golder, Matt; Golder, Sona Nadenichek (23 March 2012). Principles of Comparative Politics. SAGE. p. 611. ISBN 9781608716791.
- ^ "One-Party States | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
- ^ Angiolillo, Fabio (27 April 2023). "Introducing the One-Party Membership Dataset: A dataset on party membership in autocracies". Journal of Peace Research: 002234332311552. doi:10.1177/00223433231155278. ISSN 0022-3433.
- ^ Hanson, Stephen E. (2009), "The Contribution of Area Studies", The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 159–174, doi:10.4135/9780857021083.n10, ISBN 9781412919760, S2CID 184118662, retrieved 4 March 2023
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ a b Magaloni, Beatriz; Kricheli, Ruth (1 May 2010). "Political Order and One-Party Rule". Annual Review of Political Science. 13 (1): 123–143. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529. ISSN 1094-2939.
- ^ a b Creak, Simon; Barney, Keith (10 August 2018). "Conceptualising Party-State Governance and Rule in Laos". Journal of Contemporary Asia. 48 (5): 693–716. doi:10.1080/00472336.2018.1494849. ISSN 0047-2336. S2CID 158403649.
- ^ Hassan, Mai; Mattingly, Daniel; Nugent, Elizabeth R. (12 May 2022). "Political Control". Annual Review of Political Science. 25 (1): 155–174. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013321. ISSN 1094-2939. S2CID 241393914.
- ^ a b MALESKY, EDMUND; SCHULER, PAUL (26 October 2011). "The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition". Legislative Studies Quarterly. 36 (4): 491–530. doi:10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x. ISSN 0362-9805.
- ^ Frantz, Erica. Authoritarianism : what everyone needs to know. ISBN 978-0-19-756964-1. OCLC 1202872902.
- ^ Frantz, Erica. Authoritarianism : what everyone needs to know. ISBN 978-0-19-756964-1. OCLC 1202872902.
- ^ a b c Gandhi, Jennifer; Lust-Okar, Ellen (1 June 2009). "Elections Under Authoritarianism". Annual Review of Political Science. 12 (1): 403–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434. ISSN 1094-2939.
- ^ "China", The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, 26 January 2023, retrieved 5 February 2023
- ^ Roman, Peter (2003). People's Power: Cuba's Experience with Representative Government. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-2564-3.
- ^ "Eritreans hope for democracy after peace deal with Ethiopia". BBC News. 17 July 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
- ^ "Laos: Freedom in the World 2020 Country Report". Freedom House. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
- ^ "North Korea: Country Profile". Freedom House. 18 August 2022. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
- ^ "Vietnam: Country Profile". Freedom House. 30 March 2022. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
- ^ McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2009). "One-Party State". Oxford Reference. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199207800.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-920780-0. Retrieved 27 August 2023.
- ^ Ziemer, Klaus (1995), Kirk-Greene, Anthony; Bach, Daniel (eds.), "The African One-Party State", State and Society in Francophone Africa since Independence, St Antony’s/Macmillan Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 97–105, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-23826-2_7, ISBN 978-1-349-23826-2, retrieved 27 August 2023
- ^ Mitchinson, Naomi (January 1984). "One party rule in Africa". The Round Table. 73 (289): 38–44. doi:10.1080/00358538408453617. ISSN 0035-8533.
- ^ Schachter, Ruth (June 1961). "Single-Party Systems in West Africa". American Political Science Review. 55 (2): 294–307. doi:10.2307/1952240. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1952240.
- ^ Thomson, Susan (2018). Rwanda: From Genocide to Precarious Peace. Yale University Press. p. 185. ISBN 978-0-300-23591-3.
- ^ Ph.D, Joseph Sebarenzi; Twagiramungu, Noel (8 April 2019). "Rwanda's economic growth could be derailed by its autocratic regime". The Conversation. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
- ^ Sources:
- Lucas, Scott (25 February 2021). "How Assad Regime Tightened Syria's One-Party Rule". EA Worldview. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021.
- Shively, Schultz, W. Phillips, David (2022). "7: Democracies and Authoritarian System". Power and Choice: An Introduction to Political Science. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 188. ISBN 9781538151860.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Derbyshire, Derbyshire, J. Denis, Ian (2016). "Syria". Encyclopedia of World Political Systems. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA: Routledge. p. 610. ISBN 978-0-7656-8025-9.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - "Syria country profile". BBC News. 19 April 2023. Archived from the original on 20 April 2023.
- ^ Lucas, Scott (25 February 2021). "How Assad Regime Tightened Syria's One-Party Rule". EA Worldview. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021.
- ^ "NA: "Regime wants to build a one-party political system". El Universal (in Spanish). 18 June 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
- ^ Itriago Acosta, Andreina (2 April 2024). "'Anti-Fascism' Law to Tighten Crackdown on Venezuelan Opposition". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
- ^ Maria Delgado, Antonio (5 April 2024). "Maduro prepared harsh law to further punish criticism of Venezuela regime". Miami Herald. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
- ^ Afghanistan: A Country Study. Claitor's Law Books and Publishing. 2001. ISBN 978-1-57980-744-3.
- ^ "Afghanistan 1977". Princeton University. Archived from the original on 6 April 2012.
- ^ British Documents on Foreign Affairs. Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print: Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Volume 7. October 1947-December 1948. University Publications of America. 2001. p. 45. ISBN 155655768X.
- ^ British Documents on Foreign Affairs. Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print: Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Volume 7. October 1947-December 1948. University Publications of America. 2001. p. 45. ISBN 155655768X.
- ^ Mokam, David (2012). "The Search for a Cameroonian Model of Democracy or the Search for the Domination of the State Party: 1966-2006". Cadernos de Estudos Africanos (23): 85–108. doi:10.4000/cea.533.
- ^ Vehesh, M. M.; Palinchak, M. M.; Marchuk, V. V.; Kontsur-Karabinovych, N. M. (2020). Carpathian Ukraine in the Central European political crisis on the eve of World War II (1938-1939): collective monograph (PDF). Liha-Pres. pp. 21, 22, 24. ISBN 9789663972121. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 May 2023.
- ^ Токар, М. (2004). "Становлення партійної монополії Українського Національного Обʼєднання" (PDF). Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. Серія: Історія (11): 105–112. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 May 2023.
- ^ Токар, М. (2004). "Становлення партійної монополії Українського Національного Обʼєднання" (PDF). Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. Серія: Історія (11): 106. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 May 2023.
- ^ Central African Republic Unions Strike for Democracy 1990-1993
- ^ Schneiderman, Harry (1938). "Danzig". The American Jewish Year Book. 40: 226–228. JSTOR 23602316.
- ^ Hepburn, A. (7 April 2004). Contested Cities in the Modern West. Springer. ISBN 978-0-230-53674-6.
- ^ Delzell, Charles Floyd (18 June 1971). Mediterranean Fascism 1919–1945. Springer. ISBN 978-1-349-00240-5.
- ^ [https://cris.mruni.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/28fde780-25ce-44fa-bbba-7887e33ada25/content Ivanauskaitė-Pettinari, Kristina. POLITINIŲ PARTIJŲ TEISINIO STATUSO RAIDA LIETUVOJE 1918–1940 M. Doctoral dissertation. p. 1937]
- ^ a b MacKinnon, Stephen R. (2007). China at War: Regions of China, 1937-45. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5509-2.
- ^ Bozarslan, Hamit (2019). "Afterword: Talaat's Empire: A Backward Country, but a State Well Ahead of Its Time". End of the Ottomans - The Genocide of 1915 and the Politics of Turkish Nationalism. I. B. Tauris. p. 330. ISBN 978-1-7867-3604-8.
- ^ a b 12th Period - Second Republic of Portugal
- ^ Raby, D. L. (1988). Fascism and Resistance in Portugal: Communists, Liberals and Military Dissidents in the Opposition to Salazar, 1941-1974. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-2514-3.
- ^ a b c d e f Henderson, Jane (4 May 2011). The Constitution of the Russian Federation: A Contextual Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84731-648-6.
- ^ Kumar, Kundan (2003). Ideology And Political System. Discovery Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-7141-638-7.
- ^ Law 21/1976, of 14 June, on the Right of Political Association.
- ^ "Presidential Decree on Syria's New Constitution". Syrian Arab News Agency. 28 February 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2012.
- ^ Chulov, Martin (27 February 2012). "Syrian regime rockets bombard Homs". The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved 14 March 2012.