Auxiliary normed space: Difference between revisions
Added info |
"In functional analysis" fails to tell the lay reader that mathematics is what this is about. |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{More footnotes|date=April 2020}} |
{{More footnotes|date=April 2020}} |
||
In [[functional analysis]], two methods of constructing [[Normed vector space|normed spaces]] from [[Absolutely convex set|disk]]s were systematically employed by [[Alexander Grothendieck]] to define [[nuclear operator]]s and [[nuclear space]]s.{{sfn |
In [[functional analysis]], a branch of mathematics, two methods of constructing [[Normed vector space|normed spaces]] from [[Absolutely convex set|disk]]s were systematically employed by [[Alexander Grothendieck]] to define [[nuclear operator]]s and [[nuclear space]]s.{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
||
One method is used if the disk |
One method is used if the disk <math>D</math> is bounded: in this case, the '''auxiliary normed space''' is <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> with norm |
||
<math display="block">p_D(x) := \inf_{x \in r D, r > 0} r.</math> |
|||
The other method is used if the disk {{mvar|D}} is [[absorbing set|absorbing]]: in this case, the auxiliary normed space is the [[Quotient space (linear algebra)|quotient space]] {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''D''}}(0)}}. |
|||
The other method is used if the disk <math>D</math> is [[absorbing set|absorbing]]: in this case, the auxiliary normed space is the [[Quotient space (linear algebra)|quotient space]] <math>X / p_D^{-1}(0).</math> |
|||
If the disk is both bounded and absorbing then the two auxiliary normed spaces are canonically isomorphic (as [[topological vector spaces]] and as [[normed space]]s). |
If the disk is both bounded and absorbing then the two auxiliary normed spaces are canonically isomorphic (as [[topological vector spaces]] and as [[normed space]]s). |
||
==Induced by a bounded disk – Banach disks== |
|||
== Preliminaries == |
|||
Throughout this article, <math>X</math> will be a real or complex vector space (not necessarily a TVS, yet) and <math>D</math> will be a [[Absolutely convex set|disk]] in <math>X.</math> |
|||
:'''Definition''': A subset of a vector space is called a '''[[Absolutely convex set|disk]]''' and is said to be '''disked''', '''[[Absolutely convex set|absolutely convex]]''', or '''convex balanced''' if it is [[Convex set|convex]] and [[balanced set|balanced]]. |
|||
===Seminormed space induced by a disk=== |
|||
:'''Definition''': If {{mvar|C}} and {{mvar|D}} are subsets of a vector space {{mvar|X}} then we say that {{mvar|D}} '''[[Absorbing set|absorbs]]''' {{mvar|C}} if there exists a real {{math|''r'' > 0}} such that {{math|''C'' ⊆ ''aD''}} for any scalar {{mvar|a}} satisfying {{math|{{mabs|a}} ≥ ''r''}}. We say that {{mvar|D}} is '''absorbing''' in {{mvar|X}} if {{mvar|D}} absorbs {{math|{ ''x'' }}} for every {{math|''x'' ∈ ''X''}}. |
|||
Let <math>X</math> will be a real or complex vector space. For any subset <math>D</math> of <math>X,</math> the ''[[Minkowski functional]]'' of <math>D</math> defined by: |
|||
:'''Definition''': A subset {{mvar|B}} of a [[topological vector space]] (TVS) {{mvar|X}} is said to be '''[[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]]''' in {{mvar|X}} if every neighborhood of the origin in {{mvar|X}} absorbs {{mvar|B}}. |
|||
*If <math>D = \varnothing</math> then define <math>p_{\varnothing}(x) : \{0\} \to [0, \infty)</math> to be the trivial map <math>p_{\varnothing} = 0</math>{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=169}} and it will be assumed that <math>\operatorname{span} \varnothing = \{0\}.</math><ref group=note>This is the smallest vector space containing <math>\varnothing.</math> Alternatively, if <math>D = \varnothing</math> then <math>D</math> may instead be replaced with <math>\{0\}.</math></ref> |
|||
*If <math>D \neq \varnothing</math> and if <math>D</math> is [[Absorbing set|absorbing]] in <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> then denote the [[Minkowski functional]] of <math>D</math> in <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> by <math display="block">p_D : \operatorname{span} D \to [0, \infty)</math> where for all <math>x \in \operatorname{span} D,</math> this is defined by <math display="block">p_D (x) := \inf_{} \{r : x \in r D, r > 0\}.</math> |
|||
Let <math>X</math> will be a real or complex vector space. For any subset <math>D</math> of <math>X</math> such that the Minkowski functional <math>p_D</math>is a [[seminorm]] on <math>\operatorname{span} D,</math> let <math>X_D</math> denote |
|||
:'''Definition''':{{sfn | Narici | Beckenstein | 2011 | pp=441-457}} A subset of a TVS {{mvar|X}} is called '''[[Bornivorous set|bornivorous]]''' if it absorbs all bounded subsets of {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
<math display="block">X_D := \left(\operatorname{span} D, p_D\right)</math> |
|||
which is called the ''[[seminormed space]] induced by <math>D,</math>'' where if <math>p_D</math> is a [[Norm (mathematics)|norm]] then it is called the ''[[normed space]] induced by <math>D.</math>'' |
|||
'''Assumption''' ('''Topology'''): <math>X_D = \operatorname{span} D</math> is endowed with the seminorm topology induced by <math>p_D,</math> which will be denoted by <math>\tau_D</math> or <math>\tau_{p_D}</math> |
|||
== Induced by a bounded disk – Banach disks == |
|||
Importantly, this topology stems ''entirely'' from the set <math>D,</math> the algebraic structure of <math>X,</math> and the usual topology on <math>\R</math> (since <math>p_D</math>is defined using {{em|only}} the set <math>D</math> and scalar multiplication). This justifies the study of Banach disks and is part of the reason why they play an important role in the theory of [[nuclear operator]]s and [[nuclear space]]s. |
|||
=== Seminormed space induced by a disk === |
|||
The inclusion map <math>\operatorname{In}_D : X_D \to X</math> is called the ''canonical map''.{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
|||
Henceforth, {{mvar|X}} will be a real or complex vector space (not necessarily a TVS, yet) and {{mvar|D}} will be a disk in {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
Suppose that <math>D</math> is a disk. |
|||
{{Quote frame|1='''Definition''' ('''[[Minkowski functional]]'''): Let {{mvar|X}} will be a real or complex vector space. |
|||
Then <math display="inline"> \operatorname{span} D = \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} n D</math> so that <math>D</math> is [[Absorbing set|absorbing]] in <math>\operatorname{span} D,</math> the [[linear span]] of <math>D.</math> |
|||
For any subset {{mvar|D}} of {{mvar|X}}: |
|||
The set <math>\{r D : r > 0\}</math> of all positive scalar multiples of <math>D</math> forms a basis of neighborhoods at the origin for a [[locally convex topological vector space]] topology <math>\tau_D</math> on <math>\operatorname{span} D.</math> |
|||
<ul> |
|||
The [[Minkowski functional]] of the disk <math>D</math> in <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> guarantees that <math>p_D</math>is well-defined and forms a [[seminorm]] on <math>\operatorname{span} D.</math>{{sfn|Trèves|2006|p=370}} |
|||
<li>If {{math|1=''D'' = ∅}} then define {{math|''p''<sub>∅</sub> : { 0 } → [0, ∞)}} to be the trivial map {{math|1=''p''<sub>∅</sub> = 0}}{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=169}} and we assume that {{math|1=span ∅ := { 0  }}}.<ref group=note>This is the smallest vector space containing {{math|∅}}. Alternatively, if {{math|1=''D'' = ∅}} then one may instead replace {{mvar|D}} with {{math|{ 0 }}}.</ref> |
|||
The locally convex topology induced by this seminorm is the topology <math>\tau_D</math> that was defined before. |
|||
</li> |
|||
<li>If {{math|''D'' ≠ ∅}} and if {{mvar|D}} is [[Absorbing set|absorbing]] in {{math|span ''D''}} then denote the [[Minkowski functional]] of {{mvar|D}} in {{math|span ''D''}} by |
|||
::{{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub> : span ''D'' → [0, ∞)}} |
|||
where for all {{math|''x'' ∈ span ''D''}}, this is defined by |
|||
::{{math|1=''p''<sub>''D''</sub>(''x'') := inf { ''r'' : ''x'' ∈ ''rD'', ''r'' > 0 }}}. |
|||
</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
}} |
|||
===Banach disk definition=== |
|||
{{Quote frame|1='''Definition''' ('''Induced normed space'''): Let {{mvar|X}} will be a real or complex vector space. For any subset {{mvar|D}} of {{mvar|X}} such that the Minkowski functional {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is a [[seminorm]] on {{math|span ''D''}}, let {{math|''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}} denote |
|||
:{{math|1=''X''<sub>''D''</sub> := (span ''D'', ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} |
|||
which is called the '''[[seminormed space]] induced by''' {{mvar|D}} where of course we say "'''normed'''" if {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is a [[Norm (mathematics)|norm]]. |
|||
A [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]] [[Absolutely convex set|disk]] <math>D</math> in a [[topological vector space]] <math>X</math> such that <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is a [[Banach space]] is called a '''Banach disk''', '''infracomplete''', or a '''bounded completant''' in <math>X.</math> |
|||
'''Assumption''' ('''Topology'''): {{math|1=''X''<sub>''D''</sub> = span ''D''}} is endowed with the seminorm topology induced by {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}}, which we will denote by {{math|𝜏<sub>''D''</sub>}} or {{math|𝜏<sub>''p''<sub>''D''</sub></sub>}} |
|||
* Note that this topology stems ''entirely'' from the set {{mvar|D}}, the algebraic structure of {{mvar|X}}, and the usual topology on {{math|ℝ}} (since {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is defined using ''only'' the set {{mvar|D}} and scalar multiplication). This justifies the study of Banach disks and is part of the reason why they play an important role in the theory of [[nuclear operator]]s and [[nuclear space]]s. |
|||
If its shown that <math>\left(\operatorname{span} D, p_D\right)</math> is a Banach space then <math>D</math> will be a Banach disk in {{em|any}} TVS that contains <math>D</math> as a bounded subset. |
|||
'''Definition''' ('''Canonical map'''): The natural inclusion {{math|In<sub>''D''</sub> : ''X''<sub>''D''</sub> → ''X''}} is called the '''canonical map'''.{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=97}} |
|||
}} |
|||
This is because the Minkowski functional <math>p_D</math>is defined in purely algebraic terms. |
|||
Suppose that {{mvar|D}} is a disk. |
|||
Consequently, the question of whether or not <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> forms a Banach space is dependent only on the disk <math>D</math> and the Minkowski functional <math>p_D,</math> and not on any particular TVS topology that <math>X</math> may carry. |
|||
Then {{math|1=span ''D'' = {{big|∪}}{{su|p=∞|b=''n''=1}} ''nD''}} so that {{mvar|D}} is [[Absorbing set|absorbing]] in {{math|span ''D''}}, the [[linear span]] of {{mvar|D}}. |
|||
Thus the requirement that a Banach disk in a TVS <math>X</math> be a bounded subset of <math>X</math> is the only property that ties a Banach disk's topology to the topology of its containing TVS <math>X.</math> |
|||
Note that the set {{math| { ''rD'' : ''r'' > 0 }}} of all positive scalar multiples of {{mvar|D}} forms a basis of neighborhoods at 0 for a [[locally convex topological vector space]] topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''D''</sub>}} on {{math|span ''D''}}. |
|||
The [[Minkowski functional]] of the disk {{mvar|D}} in {{math|span ''D''}} guarantees that {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is well-defined and forms a [[seminorm]] on {{math|span ''D''}}.{{sfn | Treves | 2006 | p=370}} |
|||
The locally convex topology topology induced by this seminorm is the topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''D''</sub>}} that was defined before. |
|||
=== |
===Properties of disk induced seminormed spaces=== |
||
'''Bounded disks''' |
|||
{{Quote frame|1='''Definition''' ('''Banach disk'''): A [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]] [[Absolutely convex set|disk]] {{mvar|D}} in a [[topological vector space]] {{mvar|X}} such that {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} is a [[Banach space]] is called a '''Banach disk''', '''infracomplete''', or a '''bounded completant''' in {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
}} |
|||
Observe that if its shown that {{math|(span ''D'', ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} is a Banach space then {{mvar|D}} will be a Banach disk in ''any'' TVS that contains {{mvar|D}} as a bounded subset. |
|||
This is because the Minkowski functional {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is defined in purely algebraic terms. |
|||
Consequently, the question of whether or not {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} forms a Banach space is dependent only on the disk {{mvar|D}} and the Minkowski functional {{math|''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}}, and not on any particular TVS topology that {{mvar|X}} may carry. |
|||
Thus the requirement that a Banach disk in a TVS {{mvar|X}} be a bounded subset of {{mvar|X}} is the only property that ties a Banach disk's topology to the topology of its containing TVS {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
=== Properties of disk induced seminormed spaces === |
|||
;Bounded disks |
|||
The following result explains why Banach disks are required to be bounded. |
The following result explains why Banach disks are required to be bounded. |
||
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn |
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn|Trèves|2006|pp=370-373}}{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}}{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |math_statement= |
||
If |
If <math>D</math> is a disk in a [[topological vector space]] (TVS) <math>X,</math> then <math>D</math> is [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]] in <math>X</math> if and only if the inclusion map <math>\operatorname{In}_D : X_D \to X</math> is continuous. |
||
}} |
|||
{{math proof|proof= |
|||
If the disk <math>D</math> is bounded in the TVS <math>X</math> then for all neighborhoods <math>U</math> of the origin in <math>X,</math> there exists some <math>r > 0</math> such that <math>r D \subseteq U \cap X_D.</math> |
|||
It follows that in this case the topology of <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is finer than the subspace topology that <math>X_D</math> inherits from <math>X,</math> which implies that the inclusion map <math>\operatorname{In}_D : X_D \to X</math> is continuous. |
|||
<!--<math>X_D</math>'s topology is in fact finer than even the subspace topology that <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> inherits from <math>X_{\tau},</math> which is <math>X</math> with the [[Mackey topology]].--> |
|||
Conversely, if <math>X</math> has a TVS topology such that <math>\operatorname{In}_D : X_D \to X</math> is continuous, then for every neighborhood <math>U</math> of the origin in <math>X</math> there exists some <math>r > 0</math> such that <math>r D \subseteq U \cap X_D,</math> which shows that <math>D</math> is bounded in <math>X.</math> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{collapse top|title=Proof|left=true}} |
|||
If the disk {{mvar|D}} is bounded in the TVS {{mvar|X}} then for all neighborhoods {{mvar|U}} of 0 in {{mvar|X}}, there exists some {{math|''r'' > 0}} such that {{math|''rD'' ⊆ ''U'' ∩ ''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}}. |
|||
It follows that in this case the topology of {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} is finer than the subspace topology that {{math|''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}} inherits from {{mvar|X}}, which implies that the natural inclusion {{math|In<sub>''D''</sub> : ''X''<sub>''D''</sub> → ''X''}} is continuous. |
|||
<!-- {{math|''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}}'s topology is in fact finer than even the subspace topology that {{math|span ''D''}} inherits from {{math|''X''<sub>𝜏</sub>}}, which is {{mvar|X}} with the [[Mackey topology]]. --> |
|||
Conversely, if {{mvar|X}} has a TVS topology such that {{math|In<sub>''D''</sub> : ''X''<sub>''D''</sub> → ''X''}} is continuous, then for every neighborhood {{mvar|U}} of 0 in {{mvar|X}} there exists some {{math|''r'' > 0}} such that {{math|''rD'' ⊆ ''U'' ∩ ''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}}, which shows that {{mvar|D}} is bounded in {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
{{collapse bottom}} |
|||
'''Hausdorffness''' |
|||
The space |
The space <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] if and only if <math>p_D</math>is a norm, which happens if and only if <math>D</math> does not contain any non-trivial vector subspace.{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=115-154}} |
||
In particular, if there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology on |
In particular, if there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology on <math>X</math> such that <math>D</math> is bounded in <math>X</math> then <math>p_D</math>is a norm. |
||
An example where |
An example where <math>X_D</math> is not Hausdorff is obtained by letting <math>X = \R^2</math> and letting <math>D</math> be the <math>x</math>-axis. |
||
'''Convergence of nets''' |
|||
Suppose that |
Suppose that <math>D</math> is a disk in <math>X</math> such that <math>X_D</math> is Hausdorff and let <math>x_\bull = \left(x_i\right)_{i \in I}</math> be a net in <math>X_D.</math> |
||
Then |
Then <math>x_\bull \to 0</math> in <math>X_D</math> if and only if there exists a net <math>r_\bull = \left(r_i\right)_{i \in I}</math> of real numbers such that <math>r_\bull \to 0</math> and <math>x_i \in r_i D</math> for all <math>i</math>; |
||
moreover, in this case |
moreover, in this case it will be assumed without loss of generality that <math>r_i \geq 0</math> for all <math>i.</math> |
||
'''Relationship between disk-induced spaces''' |
|||
If <math>C \subseteq D \subseteq X</math>then <math>\operatorname{span} C \subseteq \operatorname{span} D</math> and <math>p_D \leq p_C</math> on <math>\operatorname{span} C,</math> so define the following continuous{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} linear map: |
|||
If <math>C</math> and <math>D</math> are disks in <math>X</math> with <math>C \subseteq D</math> then call the inclusion map <math>\operatorname{In}_C^D : X_C \to X_D</math> the ''canonical inclusion'' of <math>X_C</math> into <math>X_D.</math> |
|||
}} |
|||
In particular, the subspace topology that { |
In particular, the subspace topology that <math>\operatorname{span} C</math> inherits from <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is weaker than <math>\left(X_C, p_C\right)</math>'s seminorm topology.{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} |
||
'''The disk as the closed unit ball''' |
|||
The disk <math>D</math> is a closed subset of <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> if and only if <math>D</math> is the closed unit ball of the seminorm <math>p_D</math>; that is, |
|||
<math>D = \left\{x \in \operatorname{span} D : p_D(x) \leq 1\right\}.</math> |
|||
If <math>D</math> is a disk in a vector space <math>X</math> and if there exists a TVS topology <math>\tau</math> on <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> such that <math>D</math> is a closed and bounded subset of <math>\left(\operatorname{span} D, \tau\right),</math> then <math>D</math> is the closed unit ball of <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> (that is, <math>D = \left\{x \in \operatorname{span} D : p_D(x) \leq 1\right\}</math> ) (see footnote for proof).<ref group=note>Assume WLOG that <math>X = \operatorname{span} D.</math> Since <math>D</math> is closed in <math>(X, \tau),</math> it is also closed in <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> and since the seminorm <math>p_D</math> is the [[Minkowski functional]] of <math>D,</math> which is continuous on <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right),</math> it follows {{harvtxt| Narici|Beckenstein| 2011|pp=119–120}} that <math>D</math> is the closed unit ball in <math>\left(X_D, p\right).</math></ref> |
|||
<ul> |
|||
<li>If {{mvar|D}} is a disk in a vector space {{mvar|X}} and if there exists a TVS topology {{math|𝜏}} on {{math|span ''D''}} such that {{mvar|D}} is a closed and bounded subset of {{math|(span ''D'', 𝜏)}}, then {{mvar|D}} is the closed unit ball of {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} (i.e. {{math|1=''D'' = { ''x'' ∈ Span ''D'' : ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>(''x'') ≤ 1 }}}) (see footnote for proof).<ref>Assume WLOG that {{math|1=''X'' = span ''D''}}. Since {{mvar|D}} is closed in {{math|(''X'', 𝜏)}}, it is also closed in {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}} and since the seminorm {{math|1=''p''<sub>''D''</sub>}} is the [[Minkowski functional]] of {{mvar|D}}, which is continuous on {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>)}}, it follows{{harvnb | Narici | 2011 | pp=119–120}} that {{mvar|D}} is the closed unit ball in {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p'')}}.</ref></li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
=== |
===Sufficient conditions for a Banach disk=== |
||
The following theorem may be used to establish that |
The following theorem may be used to establish that <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is a Banach space. |
||
Once this is established, |
Once this is established, <math>D</math> will be a Banach disk in any TVS in which <math>D</math> is bounded. |
||
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn |
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-442}}|math_statement= |
||
Let |
Let <math>D</math> be a disk in a vector space <math>X.</math> |
||
If there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology |
If there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology <math>\tau</math> on <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> such that <math>D</math> is a bounded [[sequentially complete]] subset of <math>(\operatorname{span} D, \tau),</math> then <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is a Banach space. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{math proof|proof= |
|||
{{collapse top|title=Proof|left=true}} |
|||
Assume without loss of generality that |
Assume without loss of generality that <math>X = \operatorname{span} D</math> and let <math>p := p_D</math> be the [[Minkowski functional]] of <math>D.</math> |
||
Since |
Since <math>D</math> is a bounded subset of a Hausdorff TVS, <math>D</math> do not contain any non-trivial vector subspace, which implies that <math>p</math> is a norm. |
||
Let |
Let <math>\tau_D</math> denote the norm topology on <math>X</math> induced by <math>p</math> where since <math>D</math> is a bounded subset of <math>(X, \tau),</math> <math>\tau_D</math> is finer than <math>\tau.</math> |
||
Because <math>D</math> is convex and balanced, for any <math>0 < m < n</math> |
|||
:{{math|1=2<sup>-(''n''+1)</sup>''D'' + ⋅⋅⋅ + 2<sup>-(''m''+2)</sup>''D'' = 2<sup>-(''m''+1)</sup>(1-2<sup>''m''-''n''</sup>) ''D'' ⊆ 2<sup>-(''m''+2)</sup>''D''}}. |
|||
<math display="block">2^{-(n+1)} D + \cdots + 2^{-(m+2)} D = 2^{-(m+1)} \left(1 - 2^{m-n}\right) D \subseteq 2^{-(m+2)} D.</math> |
|||
Let {{math|1=''x''<sub>•</sub> = (''x''<sub>''i''</sub>){{su|p=∞|b=''i''=1}}}} be a Cauchy sequence in {{math|(''X''<sub>''D''</sub>, ''p'')}}. |
|||
By replacing {{math|''x''<sub>•</sub>}} with a subsequence, we may assume without loss of generality<sup>†</sup> |
|||
that for all {{mvar|i}}, |
|||
:{{math|''x''<sub>''i''+1</sub> - ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> ∈ {{sfrac|1|2<sup>''i''+2</sup>}} ''D''}}. |
|||
Let <math>x_{\bull} = \left(x_i\right)_{i=1}^{\infty}</math> be a Cauchy sequence in <math>\left(X_D, p\right).</math> |
|||
This implies that for any {{math|0 < ''m'' < ''n''}}, |
|||
By replacing <math>x_{\bull}</math> with a subsequence, we may assume without loss of generality<sup>†</sup> that for all <math>i,</math> |
|||
:{{math|1=''x''<sub>''n''</sub> - ''x''<sub>''m''</sub> = (''x''<sub>''n''</sub> - ''x''<sub>''n''-1</sub>) + ⋅⋅⋅ + (''x''<sub>''m''+1</sub> - ''x''<sub>''m''</sub>) ∈ 2<sup>-(''n''+1)</sup>''D'' + ⋅⋅⋅ + 2<sup>-(''m''+2)</sup>''D'' ⊆ 2<sup>-(''m''+2)</sup>''D''}} |
|||
<math display="block">x_{i+1} - x_i \in \frac{1}{2^{i+2}} D.</math> |
|||
This implies that for any <math>0 < m < n,</math> |
|||
so that in particular, by taking {{math|1=''m'' = 1}} we see that {{math|''x''<sub>•</sub>}} is contained in {{math|''x''<sub>1</sub> + 2<sup>-3</sup>''D''}}. |
|||
<math display="block">x_n - x_m = \left(x_n - x_{n-1}\right) + \left(x_{m+1} - x_m\right) \in 2^{-(n+1)} D + \cdots + 2^{-(m+2)} D \subseteq 2^{-(m+2)} D</math> |
|||
Since {{math|𝜏<sub>''D''</sub>}} is finer than {{math|𝜏}}, {{math|''x''<sub>•</sub>}} is a Cauchy sequence in {{math|(''X'', 𝜏)}}. |
|||
so that in particular, by taking <math>m = 1</math> it follows that <math>x_{\bull}</math> is contained in <math>x_1 + 2^{-3} D.</math> |
|||
Note that for all {{math|''m'' > 0}}, {{math|2<sup>-(''m''+2)</sup>''D''}} is a Hausdorff sequentially complete subset of {{math|(''X'', 𝜏)}}. |
|||
Since <math>\tau_D</math> is finer than <math>\tau,</math> <math>x_{\bull}</math> is a Cauchy sequence in <math>(X, \tau).</math> |
|||
In particular, this is true for {{math|''x''<sub>1</sub> + 2<sup>-3</sup>''D''}} so there exists some {{mvar|''x'' ∈ ''x''<sub>1</sub> + 2<sup>-3</sup>''D''}} such that {{math|''x''<sub>•</sub> → ''x''}} in {{math|(''X'', 𝜏)}}. |
|||
For all <math>m > 0,</math> <math>2^{-(m+2)} D</math> is a Hausdorff sequentially complete subset of <math>(X, \tau).</math> |
|||
In particular, this is true for <math>x_1 + 2^{-3} D</math> so there exists some <math>x \in x_1 + 2^{-3} D</math> such that <math>x_{\bull} \to x</math> in <math>(X, \tau).</math> |
|||
Since |
Since <math>x_n - x_m \in 2^{-(m+2)} D</math> for all <math>0 < m < n,</math> by fixing <math>m</math> and taking the limit (in <math>(X, \tau)</math>) as <math>n \to \infty,</math> it follows that <math>x - x_m \in 2^{-(m+2)} D</math> for each <math>m > 0.</math> |
||
This implies that |
This implies that <math>p\left(x - x_m\right) \to 0</math> as <math>m \to \infty,</math> which says exactly that <math>x_{\bull} \to x</math> in <math>\left(X_D, p\right).</math> |
||
This shows that <math>\left(X_D, p\right)</math> is complete. |
|||
<sup>†</sup>This assumption is allowed because |
<sup>†</sup>This assumption is allowed because <math>x_{\bull}</math> is a Cauchy sequence in a metric space (so the limits of all subsequences are equal) and a sequence in a metric space converges if and only if every subsequence has a sub-subsequence that converges. |
||
}} |
|||
{{collapse bottom}} |
|||
Note that even if |
Note that even if <math>D</math> is not a bounded and sequentially complete subset of any Hausdorff TVS, one might still be able to conclude that <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right)</math> is a Banach space by applying this theorem to some disk <math>K</math> satisfying |
||
<math display="block">\left\{x \in \operatorname{span} D : p_D(x) < 1\right\} \subseteq K \subseteq \left\{x \in \operatorname{span} D : p_D(x) \leq 1\right\}</math> |
|||
:{{mvar|K}} satisfying {{math|{ ''x'' ∈ span ''D'' : ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>(''x'') < 1 } ⊆ ''K'' ⊆ { ''x'' ∈ span ''D'' : ''p''<sub>''D''</sub>(''x'') ≤ 1 }}} |
|||
because <math>p_D = p_K.</math> |
|||
since {{math|1=''p''<sub>''D''</sub> = ''p''<sub>''K''</sub>}}. |
|||
The following are consequences of the above theorem: |
The following are consequences of the above theorem: |
||
*A sequentially complete bounded disk in a Hausdorff TVS is a Banach disk.{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} |
|||
<ul> |
|||
*Any disk in a Hausdorff TVS that is complete and bounded (e.g. compact) is a Banach disk.{{sfn|Trèves|2006|pp=370–371}} |
|||
*The closed unit ball in a [[Fréchet space]] is sequentially complete and thus a Banach disk.{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} |
|||
<li>The closed unit ball in a [[Fréchet space]] is sequentially complete and thus a Banach disk.{{sfn | Narici | Beckenstein | 2011 | pp=441-457}}</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
Suppose that |
Suppose that <math>D</math> is a bounded disk in a TVS <math>X.</math> |
||
*If <math>L : X \to Y</math> is a continuous linear map and <math>B \subseteq X</math> is a Banach disk, then <math>L(B)</math> is a Banach disk and <math>L\big\vert_{X_B} : X_B \to L\left(X_B\right)</math> induces an isometric TVS-isomorphism <math>Y_{L(B)} \cong X_B / \left(X_B \cap \operatorname{ker} L\right).</math> |
|||
<ul> |
|||
<li>If {{math|''L'' : ''X'' → ''Y''}} is a continuous linear map and {{math|''B'' ⊆ ''X''}} is a Banach disk, then {{math|''L''(''B'')}} is a Banach disk and {{math|''L''{{big|{{!}}}}<sub>''X''<sub>''B''</sub></sub> : ''X''<sub>''B''</sub> → ''L''(''X''<sub>''B''</sub>)}} induces an isometric TVS-isomorphism {{math|''Y''<sub>''L''(''B'')</sub> ≡ ''X''<sub>''B''</sub> / (''X''<sub>''B''</sub> ∩ ker ''L'')}}.</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
=== |
===Properties of Banach disks=== |
||
Let |
Let <math>X</math> be a TVS and let <math>D</math> be a bounded disk in <math>X.</math> |
||
If <math>D</math> is a bounded Banach disk in a Hausdorff locally convex space <math>X</math> and if <math>T</math> is a barrel in <math>X</math> then <math>T</math> [[Absorbing set|absorbs]] <math>D</math> (that is, there is a number <math>r > 0</math> such that <math>D \subseteq r T.</math>{{sfn|Trèves|2006|pp=370-373}} |
|||
<ul> |
|||
<li>If {{mvar|D}} is a bounded Banach disk in a Hausdorff locally convex space {{mvar|X}} and if {{mvar|T}} is a barrel in {{mvar|X}} then {{mvar|T}} [[Absorbing set|absorbs]] {{mvar|D}} (i.e. there is a number {{math|''r'' > 0}} such that {{math|''D'' ⊆ ''rT''}}).{{sfn | Treves | 2006 | pp=370-373}}</li> |
|||
<li>If {{mvar|U}} is a convex balanced closed neighborhood of 0 in {{mvar|X}} then the collection of all neighborhoods {{math|''rU''}}, where {{math|''r'' > 0}} ranges over the positive real numbers, induces a topological vector space topology on {{mvar|X}}. When {{mvar|X}} has this topology, it is denoted by {{math|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}}. Since this topology is not necessarily Hausdorff nor complete, the completion of the Hausdorff space {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0)}} is denoted by {{math|{{overline|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}}}} so that {{math|{{overline|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}}}} is a complete Hausdorff space and {{math|1=''p''<sub>''U''</sub> := }}{{underset|{{math|''x''∈''rU'', ''r''>0}}|inf}} {{math|''r''}} is a norm on this space making {{math|{{overline|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}}}} into a Banach space. The polar of {{mvar|U}}, {{math|''U''°}}, is a weakly compact bounded equicontinuous disk in {{math|''X'' {{big|{{'}}}}}} and so is infracomplete.</li> |
|||
<li>If {{mvar|X}} is a [[Metrizable topological vector space|metrizable]] [[Locally convex topological vector space|locally convex]] TVS then for every [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]] subset {{math|B}} of {{mvar|X}}, there exists a bounded [[Absolutely convex set|disk]] {{mvar|D}} in {{mvar|X}} such that {{math|''B'' ⊆ ''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}}, and both {{mvar|X}} and {{math|''X''<sub>''D''</sub>}} induce the same [[subspace topology]] on {{mvar|B}}.{{sfn | Narici | Beckenstein | 2011 | pp=441-457}}</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
If <math>U</math> is a convex balanced closed neighborhood of the origin in <math>X</math> then the collection of all neighborhoods <math>r U,</math> where <math>r > 0</math> ranges over the positive real numbers, induces a topological vector space topology on <math>X.</math> When <math>X</math> has this topology, it is denoted by <math>X_U.</math> Since this topology is not necessarily Hausdorff nor complete, the completion of the Hausdorff space <math>X / p_U^{-1}(0)</math> is denoted by <math>\overline{X_U}</math> so that <math>\overline{X_U}</math> is a complete Hausdorff space and <math>p_U(x) := \inf_{x \in r U, r > 0} r</math> is a norm on this space making <math>\overline{X_U}</math> into a Banach space. The polar of <math>U,</math> <math>U^{\circ},</math> is a weakly compact bounded equicontinuous disk in <math>X^{\prime}</math> and so is infracomplete. |
|||
== Induced by a radial disk – quotient == |
|||
If <math>X</math> is a [[Metrizable topological vector space|metrizable]] [[Locally convex topological vector space|locally convex]] TVS then for every [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded]] subset <math>B</math> of <math>X,</math> there exists a bounded [[Absolutely convex set|disk]] <math>D</math> in <math>X</math> such that <math>B \subseteq X_D,</math> and both <math>X</math> and <math>X_D</math> induce the same [[subspace topology]] on <math>B.</math>{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} |
|||
Suppose that {{mvar|X}} is a topological vector space and {{mvar|V}} is a [[convex set|convex]] [[balanced set|balanced]] and [[radial set|radial]] set. |
|||
Then {{math|1={ {{sfrac|1|''n''}} ''V'' : ''n'' = 1, 2, ...}}} is a neighborhood basis at the origin for some locally convex topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''V''</sub>}} on {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
This TVS topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''V''</sub>}} is given by the [[Minkowski functional]] formed by {{mvar|V}}, {{math|''p''<sub>''V''</sub> : ''X'' → ℝ}}, which is a seminorm on {{mvar|X}} defined by {{math|1=''p''<sub>''V''</sub> := }}{{underset|{{math|''x''∈''rV'', ''r''>0}}|inf}} {{math|''r''}}. |
|||
The topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''V''</sub>}} is Hausdorff if and only if {{math|''p''<sub>''V''</sub>}} is a norm, or equivalently, if and only if {{math|1=''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) = { 0  }}} or equivalently, for which it suffices that {{mvar|V}} be [[von Neumann bounded|bounded]] in {{mvar|X}}. |
|||
The topology {{math|𝜏<sub>''V''</sub>}} need not be Hausdorff but {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} is Hausdorff. |
|||
A norm on {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} is given by {{math|1={{norm|''x'' + ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} := ''p''<sub>''V''</sub>(''x'')}}, where this value is in fact independent of the representative of the equivalence class {{math|''x'' + ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} chosen. |
|||
The normed space {{math|(''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0), {{norm|⋅}})}}> is denoted by {{math|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}} and its completion is denoted by {{math|{{overline|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}}}}. |
|||
==Induced by a radial disk – quotient== |
|||
If in addition {{mvar|V}} is bounded in {{mvar|X}} then the seminorm {{math|''p''<sub>''V''</sub> : ''X'' → ℝ}} is a norm so in particular, {{math|1=''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) = { 0  }}}. |
|||
In this case, we take {{math|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}} to be the vector space {{mvar|X}} instead of {{math|''X'' / { 0 }}} so that the notation {{math|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}} is unambiguous (whether {{math|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}} denotes the space induced by a radial disk or the space induced by a bounded disk).{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=97}} |
|||
Suppose that <math>X</math> is a topological vector space and <math>V</math> is a [[Convex set|convex]] [[Balanced set|balanced]] and [[Radial set|radial]] set. |
|||
The [[quotient topology]] {{math|𝜏<sub>''Q''</sub>}} on {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} (inherited from {{mvar|X}}'s original topology) is finer (in general, strictly finer) than the norm topology. |
|||
Then <math>\left\{\tfrac{1}{n} V : n = 1, 2, \ldots\right\}</math> is a neighborhood basis at the origin for some locally convex topology <math>\tau_V</math> on <math>X.</math> |
|||
This TVS topology <math>\tau_V</math> is given by the [[Minkowski functional]] formed by <math>V,</math> <math>p_V : X \to \R,</math> which is a seminorm on <math>X</math> defined by <math>p_V(x) := \inf_{x \in r V, r > 0} r.</math> |
|||
The topology <math>\tau_V</math> is Hausdorff if and only if <math>p_V</math> is a norm, or equivalently, if and only if <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0) = \{0\}</math> or equivalently, for which it suffices that <math>V</math> be [[von Neumann bounded|bounded]] in <math>X.</math> |
|||
The topology <math>\tau_V</math> need not be Hausdorff but <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0)</math> is Hausdorff. |
|||
A norm on <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0)</math> is given by <math>\left\|x + X / p_V^{-1}(0)\right\| := p_V(x),</math> where this value is in fact independent of the representative of the equivalence class <math>x + X / p_V^{-1}(0)</math> chosen. |
|||
The normed space <math>\left(X / p_V^{-1}(0), \| \cdot \|\right)</math> is denoted by <math>X_V</math> and its completion is denoted by <math>\overline{X_V}.</math> |
|||
If in addition <math>V</math> is bounded in <math>X</math> then the seminorm <math>p_V : X \to \R</math> is a norm so in particular, <math>p_V^{-1}(0) = \{0\}.</math> |
|||
=== Canonical maps === |
|||
In this case, we take <math>X_V</math> to be the vector space <math>X</math> instead of <math>X / \{0\}</math> so that the notation <math>X_V</math> is unambiguous (whether <math>X_V</math> denotes the space induced by a radial disk or the space induced by a bounded disk).{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
|||
The |
The [[quotient topology]] <math>\tau_Q</math> on <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0)</math> (inherited from <math>X</math>'s original topology) is finer (in general, strictly finer) than the norm topology. |
||
===Canonical maps=== |
|||
If {{mvar|U}} and {{mvar|V}} are radial disks such that {{math|''U'' ⊆ ''V''}} then {{math|''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0)}} ⊆ ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) so there is a continuous linear surjective '''canonical map''' {{math|''q''<sub>''V'',''U''</sub> : ''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0) → ''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) {{=}} ''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}} defined by sending {{math|''x'' + ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0) ∈ ''X''<sub>''U''</sub> {{=}} ''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0)}} to the equivalence class {{math|''x'' + ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}}, where one may verify that the definition does not depend on the representative of the equivalence class {{math|''x'' + ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''U''}}(0)}} that is chosen.{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=97}} |
|||
This canonical map has norm {{math|≤ 1}}{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=97}} and it has a unique continuous linear canonical extension to {{math|{{overline|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}}}} that is denoted by {{math|{{overline|''q''<sub>''V'',''U''</sub>}} : {{overline|''X''<sub>''U''</sub>}} → {{overline|''X''<sub>''V''</sub>}}}}. |
|||
The ''canonical map'' is the [[quotient map]] <math>q_V : X \to X_V = X / p_V^{-1}(0),</math> which is continuous when <math>X_V</math> has either the norm topology or the quotient topology.{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
|||
Suppose that in addition {{math|''B'' ≠ ∅}} and {{mvar|C}} are bounded disks in {{mvar|X}} with {{math|''B'' ⊆ ''C''}} so that {{math|''X''<sub>''B''</sub> ⊆ ''X''<sub>''C''</sub>}} and the natural inclusion {{math|In{{su|b=''B''|p=''C''}} : ''X''<sub>''B''</sub> → ''X''<sub>''C''</sub>}} is a continuous linear map. |
|||
Let {{math|In<sub>''B''</sub> : ''X''<sub>''B''</sub> → ''X''}}, {{math|In<sub>''C''</sub> : ''X''<sub>''C''</sub> → ''X''}}, and {{math|In{{su|b=''B''|p=''C''}} : ''X''<sub>''B''</sub> → ''X''<sub>''C''</sub>}} be the canonical maps. |
|||
Then {{math|1=In<sub>''C''</sub> = In{{su|b=''B''|p=''C''}} ∘ In<sub>''B''</sub>}} and {{math|1=''q''<sub>''V''</sub> = ''q''<sub>''V'',''U''</sub> ∘ ''q''<sub>''U''</sub>}}.{{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=97}} |
|||
If <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are radial disks such that <math>U \subseteq V</math>then <math>p_U^{-1}(0) \subseteq p_V^{-1}(0)</math> so there is a continuous linear surjective ''canonical map'' <math>q_{V,U} : X / p_U^{-1}(0) \to X / p_V^{-1}(0) = X_V</math> defined by sending |
|||
== Induced by a bounded radial disk == |
|||
<math>x + p_U^{-1}(0) \in X_U = X / p_U^{-1}(0)</math> to the equivalence class <math>x + p_V^{-1}(0),</math> where one may verify that the definition does not depend on the representative of the equivalence class <math>x + p_U^{-1}(0)</math> that is chosen.{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
|||
This canonical map has norm <math>\,\leq 1</math>{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} and it has a unique continuous linear canonical extension to <math>\overline{X_U}</math> that is denoted by <math>\overline{g_{V,U}} : \overline{X_U} \to \overline{X_V}.</math> |
|||
Suppose that in addition <math>B \neq \varnothing</math> and <math>C</math> are bounded disks in <math>X</math> with <math>B \subseteq C</math> so that <math>X_B \subseteq X_C</math> and the inclusion <math>\operatorname{In}_B^C : X_B \to X_C</math> is a continuous linear map. |
|||
Suppose that {{mvar|S}} is a bounded radial disk. |
|||
Let <math>\operatorname{In}_B : X_B \to X,</math> <math>\operatorname{In}_C : X_C \to X,</math> and <math>\operatorname{In}_B^C : X_B \to X_C</math> be the canonical maps. |
|||
Since {{mvar|S}} is a bounded disk, if we let {{math|1=''D'' := ''S''}} then we may create the auxiliary normed space {{math|1=''X''<sub>''D''</sub> = span ''D''}} with norm {{math|1=''p''<sub>''D''</sub> := }}{{underset|{{math|''x''∈''rD'', ''r''>0}}|inf}} {{math|''r''}}; since {{mvar|S}} is radial, {{math|1=''X''<sub>''S''</sub> = ''X''}}. |
|||
Then <math>\operatorname{In}_C = \operatorname{In}_B^C \circ \operatorname{In}_C : X_B \to X_C</math> and <math>q_V = q_{V,U} \circ q_U.</math>{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=97}} |
|||
Since {{mvar|S}} is a radial disk, if we let {{math|1=''V'' := ''S''}} then we may create the auxiliary seminormed space {{math|''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0)}} with the seminorm {{math|1=''p''<sub>''V''</sub> := }}{{underset|{{math|''x''∈''rV'', ''r''>0}}|inf}} {{math|''r''}}; because {{mvar|S}} is bounded, this seminorm is a norm and {{math|1=''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) = { 0  }}} so {{math|1=''X'' / ''p''{{su|p=-1|b=''V''}}(0) = ''X'' / { 0 } = ''X''}}. |
|||
==Induced by a bounded radial disk== |
|||
Suppose that <math>S</math> is a bounded radial disk. |
|||
Since <math>S</math> is a bounded disk, if <math>D := S</math> then we may create the auxiliary normed space <math>X_D = \operatorname{span} D</math> with norm <math>p_D(x) := \inf_{x \in r D, r > 0} r</math>; since <math>S</math> is radial, <math>X_S = X.</math> |
|||
Since <math>S</math> is a radial disk, if <math>V := S</math> then we may create the auxiliary seminormed space <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0)</math> with the seminorm <math>p_V(x) := \inf_{x \in r V, r > 0} r</math>; because <math>S</math> is bounded, this seminorm is a norm and <math>p_V^{-1}(0) = \{0\}</math> so <math>X / p_V^{-1}(0) = X / \{0\} = X.</math> |
|||
Thus, in this case the two auxiliary normed spaces produced by these two different methods result in the same normed space. |
Thus, in this case the two auxiliary normed spaces produced by these two different methods result in the same normed space. |
||
== |
==Duality== |
||
Suppose that |
Suppose that <math>H</math> is a weakly closed equicontinuous disk in <math>X^{\prime}</math> (this implies that <math>H</math> is weakly compact) and let |
||
<math display="block">U := H^{\circ} = \{x \in X : |h(x)| \leq 1 \text{ for all } h \in H\}</math> |
|||
Since {{math|1=''U''° = ''H''°° = ''H''}} by the [[bipolar theorem]], it follows that a continuous linear functional {{mvar|f}} belongs to {{math|1=''X''{{big|{{'}}}}<sub>''H''</sub> = span ''H''}} if and only if {{mvar|f}} belongs to the continuous dual space of {{math|(''X'', {{math|''p''<sub>''U''</sub>}})}}, where {{math|''p''<sub>''U''</sub>}} is the [[Minkowski functional]] of {{mvar|U}} defined by {{math|1=''p''<sub>''U''</sub> := }}{{underset|{{math|''x''∈''rU'', ''r''>0}}|inf}} {{math|''r''}}.{{sfn | Treves | 2006 | p=477}} |
|||
be the [[Polar set|polar]] of <math>H.</math> |
|||
Because <math>U^\circ = H^{\circ\circ} = H</math> by the [[bipolar theorem]], it follows that a continuous linear functional <math>f</math> belongs to <math>X^{\prime}_H = \operatorname{span} H</math> if and only if <math>f</math> belongs to the continuous dual space of <math>\left(X, p_U\right),</math> where <math>p_U</math> is the [[Minkowski functional]] of <math>U</math> defined by <math>p_U(x) := \inf_{x \in r U, r > 0} r.</math>{{sfn|Trèves|2006|p=477}} |
|||
== |
==Related concepts== |
||
A disk in a TVS is called ''[[infrabornivorous]]''{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} if it [[Absorbing set|absorbs]] all Banach disks. |
|||
}} |
|||
A linear map between two TVSs is called ''[[Infrabounded map|infrabounded]]''{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} if it maps Banach disks to bounded disks. |
|||
}} |
|||
=== |
===Fast convergence=== |
||
A sequence <math>x_\bull = \left(x_i\right)_{i=1}^\infty</math> in a TVS <math>X</math> is said to be ''fast convergent''{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} to a point <math>x \in X</math> if there exists a Banach disk <math>D</math> such that both <math>x</math> and the sequence is (eventually) contained in <math>\operatorname{span} D</math> and <math>x_\bull \to x</math> in <math>\left(X_D, p_D\right).</math> |
|||
}} |
|||
Every fast convergent sequence is [[Mackey convergent sequence|Mackey convergent]].{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=441-457}} |
|||
== |
==See also== |
||
* {{annotated link|Bornological space}} |
* {{annotated link|Bornological space}} |
||
Line 235: | Line 211: | ||
* {{annotated link|Tensor product of Hilbert spaces}} |
* {{annotated link|Tensor product of Hilbert spaces}} |
||
* {{annotated link|Topological tensor product}} |
* {{annotated link|Topological tensor product}} |
||
* {{annotated link|Topological vector space}} |
|||
* {{annotated link|Ultrabornological space}} |
* {{annotated link|Ultrabornological space}} |
||
== |
==Notes== |
||
{{reflist|group=note}} |
{{reflist|group=note}} |
||
== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
==Bibliography== |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Diestel | first=Joe | title=The metric theory of tensor products : Grothendieck's résumé revisited | publisher=American Mathematical Society | publication-place=Providence, R.I | year=2008 | isbn=0-8218-4440-7 | oclc=185095773 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Diestel | 2008 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Dubinsky | first=Ed | title=The structure of nuclear Fréchet spaces | publisher=Springer-Verlag | publication-place=Berlin New York | year=1979 | isbn=3-540-09504-7 | oclc=5126156 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Dubinsky | 1979 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Grothendieck | first=Grothendieck | title=Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires | publisher=American Mathematical Society | publication-place=Providence | year=1966 | isbn=0-8218-1216-5 | oclc=1315788 | language=fr | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Grothendieck | 1966 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Husain | first=Taqdir | title=Barrelledness in topological and ordered vector spaces | publisher=Springer-Verlag | publication-place=Berlin New York | year=1978 | isbn=3-540-09096-7 | oclc=4493665 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Husain | 1978 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{Khaleelulla Counterexamples in Topological Vector Spaces}} <!-- {{sfn | Khaleelulla | {{{year| 1982 }}} | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{Narici Beckenstein Topological Vector Spaces|edition=2}} <!-- {{sfn | Narici | Beckenstein | 2011 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Nlend | first=H | title=Bornologies and functional analysis : introductory course on the theory of duality topology-bornology and its use in functional analysis | publisher=North-Holland Pub. Co. Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier-North Holland | publication-place=Amsterdam New York New York | year=1977 | isbn=0-7204-0712-5 | oclc=2798822 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Nlend | 1977 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Nlend | first=H | title=Nuclear and conuclear spaces : introductory courses on nuclear and conuclear spaces in the light of the duality | publisher=North-Holland Pub. Co. Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier North-Holland | publication-place=Amsterdam New York New York, N.Y | year=1981 | isbn=0-444-86207-2 | oclc=7553061 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Nlend | 1981 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Pietsch | first=Albrecht | title=Nuclear locally convex spaces | publisher=Springer-Verlag | publication-place=Berlin,New York | year=1972 | isbn=0-387-05644-0 | oclc=539541 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Pietsch | 1972 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Robertson | first=A. P. | title=Topological vector spaces | publisher=University Press | publication-place=Cambridge England | year=1973 | isbn=0-521-29882-2 | oclc=589250 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Robertson | 1973 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Ryan | first=Raymond | title=Introduction to tensor products of Banach spaces | publisher=Springer | publication-place=London New York | year=2002 | isbn=1-85233-437-1 | oclc=48092184 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Ryan | 2002 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{Schaefer Wolff Topological Vector Spaces|edition=2}} <!-- {{sfn | Schaefer | 1999 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{Trèves François Topological vector spaces, distributions and kernels}} <!-- {{sfn | Treves | 2006 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite book | author=Wong | title=Schwartz spaces, nuclear spaces, and tensor products | publisher=Springer-Verlag | publication-place=Berlin New York | year=1979 | isbn=3-540-09513-6 | oclc=5126158 | ref=harv}} <!-- {{sfn | Wong | 1979 | p=}} --> |
|||
* {{cite journal|last1=Burzyk|first1=Józef|last2=Gilsdorf|first2=Thomas E.|title=Some remarks about Mackey convergence|journal=International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences|publisher=Hindawi Limited|volume=18|issue=4|year=1995|issn=0161-1712|doi=10.1155/s0161171295000846|url=https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijmms/1995/138625.pdf|pages=659–664 |doi-access=free }} <!--{{sfn|Burzyk|Gilsdorf|1995|pp=}}--> |
|||
== External links == |
|||
* {{Diestel The Metric Theory of Tensor Products Grothendieck's Résumé Revisited}} <!--{{sfn|Diestel|2008|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Dubinsky The Structure of Nuclear Fréchet Spaces}} <!--{{sfn|Dubinsky|1979|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Grothendieck Produits Tensoriels Topologiques et Espaces Nucléaires}} <!--{{sfn|Grothendieck|1955|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Hogbe-Nlend Bornologies and Functional Analysis}} <!--{{sfn|Hogbe-Nlend|1977|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Hogbe-Nlend Moscatelli Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces}} <!--{{sfn|Hogbe-Nlend|Moscatelli|1981|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Husain Khaleelulla Barrelledness in Topological and Ordered Vector Spaces}} <!--{{sfn|Husain|Khaleelulla|1978|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Khaleelulla Counterexamples in Topological Vector Spaces}} <!--{{sfn|Khaleelulla|1982|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Narici Beckenstein Topological Vector Spaces|edition=2}} <!--{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Pietsch Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces|edition=2}} <!--{{sfn|Pietsch|1979|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Robertson Topological Vector Spaces}} <!--{{sfn|Robertson|Robertson|1980|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Ryan Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces|edition=1}} <!--{{sfn|Ryan|2002|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Schaefer Wolff Topological Vector Spaces|edition=2}} <!--{{sfn|Schaefer|Wolff|1999|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Trèves François Topological vector spaces, distributions and kernels}} <!--{{sfn|Trèves|2006|p=}}--> |
|||
* {{Wong Schwartz Spaces, Nuclear Spaces, and Tensor Products}} <!--{{sfn|Wong|1979|p=}}--> |
|||
==External links== |
|||
* [https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/nuclear+space Nuclear space at ncatlab] |
* [https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/nuclear+space Nuclear space at ncatlab] |
||
Line 267: | Line 245: | ||
<!--- Categories ---> |
<!--- Categories ---> |
||
[[Category:Functional analysis]] |
[[Category:Functional analysis]] |
Revision as of 15:11, 8 May 2024
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (April 2020) |
In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, two methods of constructing normed spaces from disks were systematically employed by Alexander Grothendieck to define nuclear operators and nuclear spaces.[1] One method is used if the disk is bounded: in this case, the auxiliary normed space is with norm The other method is used if the disk is absorbing: in this case, the auxiliary normed space is the quotient space If the disk is both bounded and absorbing then the two auxiliary normed spaces are canonically isomorphic (as topological vector spaces and as normed spaces).
Induced by a bounded disk – Banach disks
Throughout this article, will be a real or complex vector space (not necessarily a TVS, yet) and will be a disk in
Seminormed space induced by a disk
Let will be a real or complex vector space. For any subset of the Minkowski functional of defined by:
- If then define to be the trivial map [2] and it will be assumed that [note 1]
- If and if is absorbing in then denote the Minkowski functional of in by where for all this is defined by
Let will be a real or complex vector space. For any subset of such that the Minkowski functional is a seminorm on let denote which is called the seminormed space induced by where if is a norm then it is called the normed space induced by
Assumption (Topology): is endowed with the seminorm topology induced by which will be denoted by or
Importantly, this topology stems entirely from the set the algebraic structure of and the usual topology on (since is defined using only the set and scalar multiplication). This justifies the study of Banach disks and is part of the reason why they play an important role in the theory of nuclear operators and nuclear spaces.
The inclusion map is called the canonical map.[1]
Suppose that is a disk. Then so that is absorbing in the linear span of The set of all positive scalar multiples of forms a basis of neighborhoods at the origin for a locally convex topological vector space topology on The Minkowski functional of the disk in guarantees that is well-defined and forms a seminorm on [3] The locally convex topology induced by this seminorm is the topology that was defined before.
Banach disk definition
A bounded disk in a topological vector space such that is a Banach space is called a Banach disk, infracomplete, or a bounded completant in
If its shown that is a Banach space then will be a Banach disk in any TVS that contains as a bounded subset.
This is because the Minkowski functional is defined in purely algebraic terms. Consequently, the question of whether or not forms a Banach space is dependent only on the disk and the Minkowski functional and not on any particular TVS topology that may carry. Thus the requirement that a Banach disk in a TVS be a bounded subset of is the only property that ties a Banach disk's topology to the topology of its containing TVS
Properties of disk induced seminormed spaces
Bounded disks
The following result explains why Banach disks are required to be bounded.
Theorem[4][5][1] — If is a disk in a topological vector space (TVS) then is bounded in if and only if the inclusion map is continuous.
If the disk is bounded in the TVS then for all neighborhoods of the origin in there exists some such that It follows that in this case the topology of is finer than the subspace topology that inherits from which implies that the inclusion map is continuous. Conversely, if has a TVS topology such that is continuous, then for every neighborhood of the origin in there exists some such that which shows that is bounded in
Hausdorffness
The space is Hausdorff if and only if is a norm, which happens if and only if does not contain any non-trivial vector subspace.[6] In particular, if there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology on such that is bounded in then is a norm. An example where is not Hausdorff is obtained by letting and letting be the -axis.
Convergence of nets
Suppose that is a disk in such that is Hausdorff and let be a net in Then in if and only if there exists a net of real numbers such that and for all ; moreover, in this case it will be assumed without loss of generality that for all
Relationship between disk-induced spaces
If then and on so define the following continuous[5] linear map:
If and are disks in with then call the inclusion map the canonical inclusion of into
In particular, the subspace topology that inherits from is weaker than 's seminorm topology.[5]
The disk as the closed unit ball
The disk is a closed subset of if and only if is the closed unit ball of the seminorm ; that is,
If is a disk in a vector space and if there exists a TVS topology on such that is a closed and bounded subset of then is the closed unit ball of (that is, ) (see footnote for proof).[note 2]
Sufficient conditions for a Banach disk
The following theorem may be used to establish that is a Banach space. Once this is established, will be a Banach disk in any TVS in which is bounded.
Theorem[7] — Let be a disk in a vector space If there exists a Hausdorff TVS topology on such that is a bounded sequentially complete subset of then is a Banach space.
Assume without loss of generality that and let be the Minkowski functional of Since is a bounded subset of a Hausdorff TVS, do not contain any non-trivial vector subspace, which implies that is a norm. Let denote the norm topology on induced by where since is a bounded subset of is finer than
Because is convex and balanced, for any
Let be a Cauchy sequence in By replacing with a subsequence, we may assume without loss of generality† that for all
This implies that for any so that in particular, by taking it follows that is contained in Since is finer than is a Cauchy sequence in For all is a Hausdorff sequentially complete subset of In particular, this is true for so there exists some such that in
Since for all by fixing and taking the limit (in ) as it follows that for each This implies that as which says exactly that in This shows that is complete.
†This assumption is allowed because is a Cauchy sequence in a metric space (so the limits of all subsequences are equal) and a sequence in a metric space converges if and only if every subsequence has a sub-subsequence that converges.
Note that even if is not a bounded and sequentially complete subset of any Hausdorff TVS, one might still be able to conclude that is a Banach space by applying this theorem to some disk satisfying because
The following are consequences of the above theorem:
- A sequentially complete bounded disk in a Hausdorff TVS is a Banach disk.[5]
- Any disk in a Hausdorff TVS that is complete and bounded (e.g. compact) is a Banach disk.[8]
- The closed unit ball in a Fréchet space is sequentially complete and thus a Banach disk.[5]
Suppose that is a bounded disk in a TVS
- If is a continuous linear map and is a Banach disk, then is a Banach disk and induces an isometric TVS-isomorphism
Properties of Banach disks
Let be a TVS and let be a bounded disk in
If is a bounded Banach disk in a Hausdorff locally convex space and if is a barrel in then absorbs (that is, there is a number such that [4]
If is a convex balanced closed neighborhood of the origin in then the collection of all neighborhoods where ranges over the positive real numbers, induces a topological vector space topology on When has this topology, it is denoted by Since this topology is not necessarily Hausdorff nor complete, the completion of the Hausdorff space is denoted by so that is a complete Hausdorff space and is a norm on this space making into a Banach space. The polar of is a weakly compact bounded equicontinuous disk in and so is infracomplete.
If is a metrizable locally convex TVS then for every bounded subset of there exists a bounded disk in such that and both and induce the same subspace topology on [5]
Induced by a radial disk – quotient
Suppose that is a topological vector space and is a convex balanced and radial set. Then is a neighborhood basis at the origin for some locally convex topology on This TVS topology is given by the Minkowski functional formed by which is a seminorm on defined by The topology is Hausdorff if and only if is a norm, or equivalently, if and only if or equivalently, for which it suffices that be bounded in The topology need not be Hausdorff but is Hausdorff. A norm on is given by where this value is in fact independent of the representative of the equivalence class chosen. The normed space is denoted by and its completion is denoted by
If in addition is bounded in then the seminorm is a norm so in particular, In this case, we take to be the vector space instead of so that the notation is unambiguous (whether denotes the space induced by a radial disk or the space induced by a bounded disk).[1]
The quotient topology on (inherited from 's original topology) is finer (in general, strictly finer) than the norm topology.
Canonical maps
The canonical map is the quotient map which is continuous when has either the norm topology or the quotient topology.[1]
If and are radial disks such that then so there is a continuous linear surjective canonical map defined by sending to the equivalence class where one may verify that the definition does not depend on the representative of the equivalence class that is chosen.[1] This canonical map has norm [1] and it has a unique continuous linear canonical extension to that is denoted by
Suppose that in addition and are bounded disks in with so that and the inclusion is a continuous linear map. Let and be the canonical maps. Then and [1]
Induced by a bounded radial disk
Suppose that is a bounded radial disk. Since is a bounded disk, if then we may create the auxiliary normed space with norm ; since is radial, Since is a radial disk, if then we may create the auxiliary seminormed space with the seminorm ; because is bounded, this seminorm is a norm and so Thus, in this case the two auxiliary normed spaces produced by these two different methods result in the same normed space.
Duality
Suppose that is a weakly closed equicontinuous disk in (this implies that is weakly compact) and let be the polar of Because by the bipolar theorem, it follows that a continuous linear functional belongs to if and only if belongs to the continuous dual space of where is the Minkowski functional of defined by [9]
Related concepts
A disk in a TVS is called infrabornivorous[5] if it absorbs all Banach disks.
A linear map between two TVSs is called infrabounded[5] if it maps Banach disks to bounded disks.
Fast convergence
A sequence in a TVS is said to be fast convergent[5] to a point if there exists a Banach disk such that both and the sequence is (eventually) contained in and in
Every fast convergent sequence is Mackey convergent.[5]
See also
- Bornological space – Space where bounded operators are continuous
- Injective tensor product
- Locally convex topological vector space – A vector space with a topology defined by convex open sets
- Nuclear operator – Linear operator related to topological vector spaces
- Nuclear space – A generalization of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces different from Hilbert spaces
- Initial topology – Coarsest topology making certain functions continuous
- Projective tensor product – tensor product defined on two topological vector spaces
- Schwartz topological vector space – topological vector space whose neighborhoods of the origin have a property similar to the definition of totally bounded subsets
- Tensor product of Hilbert spaces – Tensor product space endowed with a special inner product
- Topological tensor product – Tensor product constructions for topological vector spaces
- Ultrabornological space
Notes
- ^ This is the smallest vector space containing Alternatively, if then may instead be replaced with
- ^ Assume WLOG that Since is closed in it is also closed in and since the seminorm is the Minkowski functional of which is continuous on it follows Narici & Beckenstein (2011, pp. 119–120) that is the closed unit ball in
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 97.
- ^ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 169.
- ^ Trèves 2006, p. 370.
- ^ a b Trèves 2006, pp. 370–373.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 441–457.
- ^ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 115–154.
- ^ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 441–442.
- ^ Trèves 2006, pp. 370–371.
- ^ Trèves 2006, p. 477.
Bibliography
- Burzyk, Józef; Gilsdorf, Thomas E. (1995). "Some remarks about Mackey convergence" (PDF). International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. 18 (4). Hindawi Limited: 659–664. doi:10.1155/s0161171295000846. ISSN 0161-1712.
- Diestel, Joe (2008). The Metric Theory of Tensor Products: Grothendieck's Résumé Revisited. Vol. 16. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 9781470424831. OCLC 185095773.
- Dubinsky, Ed (1979). The Structure of Nuclear Fréchet Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 720. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09504-0. OCLC 5126156.
- Grothendieck, Alexander (1955). "Produits Tensoriels Topologiques et Espaces Nucléaires" [Topological Tensor Products and Nuclear Spaces]. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society Series (in French). 16. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-1216-7. MR 0075539. OCLC 1315788.
- Hogbe-Nlend, Henri (1977). Bornologies and Functional Analysis: Introductory Course on the Theory of Duality Topology-Bornology and its use in Functional Analysis. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol. 26. Amsterdam New York New York: North Holland. ISBN 978-0-08-087137-0. MR 0500064. OCLC 316549583.
- Hogbe-Nlend, Henri; Moscatelli, V. B. (1981). Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces: Introductory Course on Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces in the Light of the Duality "topology-bornology". North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol. 52. Amsterdam New York New York: North Holland. ISBN 978-0-08-087163-9. OCLC 316564345.
- Husain, Taqdir; Khaleelulla, S. M. (1978). Barrelledness in Topological and Ordered Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 692. Berlin, New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09096-0. OCLC 4493665.
- Khaleelulla, S. M. (1982). Counterexamples in Topological Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 936. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-11565-6. OCLC 8588370.
- Narici, Lawrence; Beckenstein, Edward (2011). Topological Vector Spaces. Pure and applied mathematics (Second ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1584888666. OCLC 144216834.
- Pietsch, Albrecht (1979). Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Vol. 66 (Second ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-05644-9. OCLC 539541.
- Robertson, Alex P.; Robertson, Wendy J. (1980). Topological Vector Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Vol. 53. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29882-7. OCLC 589250.
- Ryan, Raymond A. (2002). Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. London New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1-85233-437-6. OCLC 48092184.
- Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. Vol. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
- Trèves, François (2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.
- Wong, Yau-Chuen (1979). Schwartz Spaces, Nuclear Spaces, and Tensor Products. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 726. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09513-2. OCLC 5126158.