Talk:New Jersey students protest proposed budget cuts

Review of revision 1007470 [Failed]

Revision 1007470 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Can't find the bit about $60 million. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1007470 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Can't find the bit about $60 million. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1007877 [Passed]

Revision 1007877 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Trying to rescue this article from {{stale}}ness. I had to remove a *lot* of stuff i couldn't find in the sources, and rephrased bits, but it still shouldn't be too involved to review. -Tempodivalse [talk] 14:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1007877 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Trying to rescue this article from {{stale}}ness. I had to remove a *lot* of stuff i couldn't find in the sources, and rephrased bits, but it still shouldn't be too involved to review. -Tempodivalse [talk] 14:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.