December 21
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Here Comes Honey Boo Boo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HorrorFan121 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails NFCC as image of living persons Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If it was a single person, definitely. As a cast ensemble, we are generally more lenient towards allowing those, considering how difficult it may be to recreate the cast in a single place. (Mind you, if I understand this show right, this is a family that livings within the same roof so technically it may be possible to get a group photo...) --MASEM (t) 17:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. These are just normal people in everyday attire; any photograph of them taken outside the TV context – be it as a group or individually – would do just as well. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:53, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scope of Government Diagram.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xerographica (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
A self-published piece of original research. As far as I can tell, nothing like this has ever been published in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 10:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep At least until it can be replaced with an illustration that more effectively helps readers understand the concept. --Xerographica (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:48, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scope of government. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this misrepresents classical liberalism it clearly mislabels progressivism as liberalism -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments. Original research is allowed, to some extent, in files; however, it could not be used in a Wikipedia article, so it wouldn't serve any purpose in Wikipedia. However, an accurate image (without arrows, and without implication that views of the scope of government can be restricted to even a 3-dimensional spectrum, not to mention the 1-dimensional spectrum here) could be useful. So, what I'm saying is: (1) This image serves no purpose on Wikipedia, and (2) An accurate image, summarizing a published source, on views on the scope of government could be used. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Beatlescoll2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Steelbeard1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
A photo montage of 14 album covers ,(all which are pictured elsewhere on WP) is completely inappropriate (eg counts as 13 non-free images (white album is uncopyrightable)) MASEM (t) 17:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I first uploaded the photo. I decided I do not want it on Wikipedia anymore. So feel free to delete the photo. Steelbeard1 (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete All it does is show that it contains the albums listed, so I don't see that it adds anything to the article. Mangoe (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Free energy.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sadeqsafarini (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Hit&run editor with WP:OR about a perpetual motion machine DMacks (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete It's unused and hopefully ever will be so. Mangoe (talk) 19:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:Original research -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BPM Promo Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Randumtasx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No proof that the author has released the license under a free license Werieth (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.