Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 July 4

James Bodenstedt – Speedy close - original "no consensus" relisted. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

The only sources that can be provided outside of WP:1E were all WP:ROUTINE coverage of a businessman purchasing and running a business. Oh and one case where an alumni donated. There was a "weak keep" there even stating that everything available is exactly that. Even the article creator admitted that they consider it being kept borderline. I see in order: Me with the nom, someone stating that beyond the 1E it's not notable, the creator mentioning the company multiple times before bringing up the 1E, a person saying that before the 1E it would have been a delete, someone saying there's not enough for a BLP, but maybe enough for the company, someone showing the routine coverage with another person stating that it fails to meet notability and go beyond trivial or routine coverage. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should have first contacted me on my talk page (which is the proper procedure). I closed it as no consensus due to lack of further participation (because there was a rather strong keep !vote with sources, but then there were some objections to those sources). If you want to re-open it then I have no problem with it (WP:NPASR). And DRV is not the place to re-argue the AfD, anyway. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.